Top

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Published in:

01-09-2009 | Original Article

Impact of Hospital Case Volume on the Quality of Laparoscopic Colectomy in Japan

Authors: Kazuaki Kuwabara, Shinya Matsuda, Kiyohide Fushimi, Koichi B. Ishikawa, Hiromasa Horiguchi, Kenji Fujimori

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 9/2009

Abstract

Introduction

The increased use of laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer requires the evaluation of hospital case volume, quality care, and training systems, considering the difficulty of this surgery for various tumor locations.

Materials and methods

We assessed the quality of this procedure in Japan, based on hospital case volume and tumor location. A total of 3,765 patients were enrolled across 567 hospitals between July and December 2007. We analyzed patient characteristics, postoperative surgical complications, the administration of stapling devices or chemotherapy, hospital volume and teaching status, postoperative length of stay, total charges, and operating room time. Hospitals were classified into four case-volume categories: high (≥5 cases per month), intermediate to high (3–4), low to intermediate (1–2), and low (<1). Multivariate analysis was used to test the impact of hospital category and tumor location.

Results

Ten high-volume hospitals performed 401 cases, while 355 low-volume hospitals did 903. Hospital case volume, operating time, and complications affected postoperative stay and total costs. Longer procedural time was an independent predictor of complications. Tumor location, case volume, and teaching status explained the variations in procedural time individually but not complications. Training systems highlighting the applicability of techniques are important to promote the quality of laparoscopic colectomy.

Guller U, Jain N, Hervey S, Purves H, Pietrobon R. Laparoscopic vs. open colectomy. Outcomes comparison based on large nationwide databases. Arch Surg 2003;138:1179–1186.PubMedCrossRef

Law WL, Lee YM, Choi HK, Seto CL, Ho JW. Impact of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer on operative outcomes and survival. Ann Surg 2007;245:1–7.PubMedCrossRef

Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, Visa J. The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer. Ann Surg 2008;248:1–7.PubMedCrossRef

Hewett PJ, Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF, Frampton CM, Frizelle FA, Rieger NA, Smith JS, Solomon MJ, Stephens JH, Stevenson AR. Short-term outcomes of the Australasian Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Laparoscopic and Conventional Open Surgical Treatments for Colon Cancer. The ALCCaS Trial. Ann Surg 2008;248:728–738.PubMedCrossRef

Varela JE, Asolati M, Huerta S, Anthony T. Outcomes of laparoscopic and open colectomy at academic centers. Am J Surg 2008;196:403–406.PubMedCrossRef

Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Merkow RP, Nelson H, Wang E, Ko CY, Soper NJ. Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes from 121 hospitals. J Gastrointest Surg 2008;12:2001–2009.PubMedCrossRef

Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Nelson H, Stryker SJ, Stewart AK, Soper NJ, Russell TR, Ko CY. Use and outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for cancer in the United States. Arch Surg 2008;143:832–839.PubMedCrossRef

Kemp JA, Finlayson SRG. Nationwide trends in laparoscopic colectomy from 2000 to 2004. Surg Endosc 2008;22:1181–1187.PubMedCrossRef

Delaney CP, Chang E, Senagore AJ, Broder M. Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database. Ann Surg 2008;247:819–824.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Ministry of Health, Welfare and Labor. Survey of National Medical Care Insurance Services 2003 (Japanese). Tokyo, Japan: Health and Welfare Statistics Association. Available at http://wwwdbtk.mhlw.go.jp/IPPAN/ippan/sko_o_Dl [accessed April 16 2009].

11.

Ministry of Health, Welfare and Labor. Survey of National Medical Care Insurance Services 2007 (Japanese). Tokyo, Japan: Health and Welfare Statistics Association. Available at http://wwwdbtk.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/cgi/sse_kensaku [accessed April 16 2009].

12.

Winter DC. The cost of laparoscopic surgery is the price of progress. Br J Surg 2009;96:327–328.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Glomsaker TB, Søreide K. Surgical training and working time restriction. Br J Surg 2009;96:329–330.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Kuhry E, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Hop WC, Veldkamp R, Cuesta MA, Jeekel J, Påhlman L, Morino M, Lacy A, Delgado S, COLOR Study Group. Impact of hospital case volume on short-term outcome after laparoscopic operation for colonic cancer. Surg Endosc 2005;19:687–692.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Lee YS, Lee IK, Kang WK, Cho HM, Park JK, Oh ST, Kim JG, Kim YH. Surgical and pathological outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for transverse colon cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008;23:669–673.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Sailhamer EA, Sokal SM, Chang Y, Rattner DW, Berger DL. Environmental impact of accelerated clinical care in a high-volume center. Surgery 2007;142:343–349.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Larson DW, Marcello PW, Larach SW, Wexner SD, Park A, Marks J, Senagore AJ, Thorson AG, Young-Fadok TM, Green E, Sargent DJ, Nelson H. Surgeon volume does not predict outcomes in the setting of technical credentialing. Results from a randomized trial in colon cancer. Ann Surg 2008;248:746–750.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Nguyen N, Yegiyants S, Kaloostian C, Abbas MA, Difronzo LA. The Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) initiative to reduce infection in elective colorectal surgery: which performance measures affect outcome? Am Surg 2008;74:1012–1016.PubMed

19.

Sundararajan V, Henderson T, Perry C, Muggivan A, Quan H, Ghali WA. New ICD-10 version of the Charlson Comorbidity Index predicted in-hospital mortality. J Clin Epidemiol 2004;57:1288–1294.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Zhan C, Miller MR. Administrative data based patient safety research: a critical review. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:58–63.CrossRef

21.

Hirose M, Imanaka Y, Ishizaki T, Sekimoto M, Harada Y, Kuwabara K, Hayashida K, Oh EH, Evans SE. Profiling hospital performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on the administrative data of four teaching hospitals in Japan. World J Surg 2005;29:429–435.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Austin MT, Feurer ID, Holzman MD, Richards WO, Pinson CW, Herline AJ. The impact of a laparoscopic colorectal surgeon on the laparoscopic colectomy experience of a single academic center. Surg Endosc 2005;19:311–315.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Chen W, Sailhamer E, Berger DL, Rattner DW. Operative time is a poor surrogate for the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 2007;21:238–243.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Dowdall JF, McAnena OJ. Linear stapling of the short gastric vessels reduces blood loss and splenectomy at oesophageal and gastric surgery. Surg Endosc 2006;20:770–772.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Scott DJ, Dunnington GL. The New ACS/APDS skills curriculum: moving the learning curve out of the operating room. J Gastrointest Surg 2008;12:213–221.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Tokunaga M, Hiki N, Fukunaga T, Miki A, Nunobe S, Ohyama S, Seto Y, Yamaguchi T. Quality control and educational value of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy in a high-volume center. Surg Endosc 2009;23:289–295.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Jamali FR, Soweid AM, Dimassi H, Bailey C, Leroy J, Marescaux J. Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 2008;143:762–767.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Dimick JB, Finlayson SR. Rural hospitals and volume standards in surgery. Surgery 2006;140:367–371.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Schilling PL, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer JD. Prioritizing quality improvement in general surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2008;207:698–704.PubMedCrossRef

30.

OECD Health Data 2008—Frequently requested data. Available from http://www.oecd.org/document/16/0,3343,en_2649_34631_2085200_1_1_1_1,00.html [accessed 4 November 2008].

31.

Ishizaki T, Imanaka Y, Hirose M, Kuwabara K, Ogawa T, Harada Y. A first look at variations in use of breast conserving surgery at five teaching hospitals in Japan. Int J Qual Health Care 2002;5:411–418.CrossRef

Title: Impact of Hospital Case Volume on the Quality of Laparoscopic Colectomy in Japan
Authors: Kazuaki Kuwabara
Shinya Matsuda
Kiyohide Fushimi
Koichi B. Ishikawa
Hiromasa Horiguchi
Kenji Fujimori
Publication date: 01-09-2009
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 9/2009
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-0956-x

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Impact of Hospital Case Volume on the Quality of Laparoscopic Colectomy in Japan

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Results

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Results

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 9/2009

Rapid Reversal of Parenteral-Nutrition-Associated Cirrhosis Following Isolated Intestinal Transplantation

Negative Impact of Blood Transfusion on Recurrence and Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Hepatic Resection

Management of Leak in the Bariatric Gastric Bypass Patient: Reoperate, Drain and Feed Distally

Treatment of Leaks and Other Bariatric Complications with Endoluminal Stents

A Comprehensive Review of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) and Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) Techniques for Cholecystectomy

Immunohistochemical Expression of Osteopontin in Gastric Cancer