Skip to main content
Top
Published in: HSS Journal ® 3/2016

01-10-2016 | Original Article

Higher Acetabular Anteversion in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

Authors: Antonia F. Chen, MD, MBA, Chi-Lung Chen, MD, Sara Low, MD, Wei-Ming Lin, MD, Karthikeyan Chinnakkannu, MBBS, MS, Fabio R. Orozco, MD, Alvin C. Ong, MD, Zachary D. Post, MD

Published in: HSS Journal ® | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Surgical approach is known as a risk factor that influences cup malposition while performing total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, no study has been conducted comparing cup positioning between the supine direct anterior (DA) and supine direct lateral (DL) THA approaches.

Questions/Purposes

(1) Is there a difference in acetabular cup positioning between supine DA and supine DL THA approaches?
(2) Are there differences in complications based on acetabular cup positioning between the two approaches?

Methods

From 2012 to 2014, 186 patients who underwent primary THAs using DA approach were matched with 186 patients using DL approach by body mass index, age, and gender. Cup anteversion and abduction angles were measured from standing anteroposterior pelvis radiographs by two blinded observers. The Lewinnek safe zone was used as the standard for cup positioning. Cup anteversion, abduction angles, and complications were recorded and compared.

Results

Cup anteversion was on average 3° higher in the DA approach compared to the DL approach. The abduction angle for the DA approach was equivalent to the DL approach both averaging 46° to 47°. There were more DA hips outside of the safe zone (10%) for anteversion than DL (3%) hips. There were no differences in complications between DA and DL approaches.

Conclusion

There is a tendency to antevert the acetabular cup when performing THAs using the DA approach, and one must be mindful of this when implanting the acetabular component.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Barrack RL. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003; 11: 89-99.CrossRefPubMed Barrack RL. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003; 11: 89-99.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Barrack RL, Krempec JA, Clohisy JC, et al. Accuracy of acetabular component position in hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2013; 95: 1760-1768.CrossRef Barrack RL, Krempec JA, Clohisy JC, et al. Accuracy of acetabular component position in hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2013; 95: 1760-1768.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Barrett WP, Turner SE, Leopold JP. Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2013; 28: 1634-1638.CrossRef Barrett WP, Turner SE, Leopold JP. Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2013; 28: 1634-1638.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Biedermann R, Tonin A, Krismer M, et al. Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 2005; 87: 762-769.CrossRef Biedermann R, Tonin A, Krismer M, et al. Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 2005; 87: 762-769.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Callanan MC, Jarrett B, Bragdon CR, et al. The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469: 319-329.CrossRefPubMed Callanan MC, Jarrett B, Bragdon CR, et al. The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469: 319-329.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Coventry MB, Beckenbaugh RD, Nolan DR, et al. 2,012 total hip arthroplasties. A study of postoperative course and early complications. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 1974; 56: 273-284. Coventry MB, Beckenbaugh RD, Nolan DR, et al. 2,012 total hip arthroplasties. A study of postoperative course and early complications. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 1974; 56: 273-284.
7.
go back to reference D’Lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, et al. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2000; 82: 315-321. D’Lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, et al. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2000; 82: 315-321.
8.
go back to reference Elson L, Dounchis J, Illgen R, et al. Precision of acetabular cup placement in robotic integrated total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int: J Clin Exp Res Hip Pathol Ther. 2015. Elson L, Dounchis J, Illgen R, et al. Precision of acetabular cup placement in robotic integrated total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int: J Clin Exp Res Hip Pathol Ther. 2015.
9.
go back to reference Jain S, Aderinto J, Bobak P. The role of the transverse acetabular ligament in total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2013; 79: 135-140.PubMed Jain S, Aderinto J, Bobak P. The role of the transverse acetabular ligament in total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2013; 79: 135-140.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF. Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J Arthroplast. 2002; 17: 282-288.CrossRef Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF. Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J Arthroplast. 2002; 17: 282-288.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kennedy JG, Rogers WB, Soffe KE, et al. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. J Arthroplast. 1998; 13: 530-534.CrossRef Kennedy JG, Rogers WB, Soffe KE, et al. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. J Arthroplast. 1998; 13: 530-534.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, et al. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 1978; 60: 217-220. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, et al. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 1978; 60: 217-220.
13.
go back to reference Malviya A, Lingard EA, Malik A, et al. Hip flexion after Birmingham hip resurfacing: role of cup anteversion, anterior femoral head-neck offset, and head-neck ratio. J Arthroplast. 2010; 25: 387-391.CrossRef Malviya A, Lingard EA, Malik A, et al. Hip flexion after Birmingham hip resurfacing: role of cup anteversion, anterior femoral head-neck offset, and head-neck ratio. J Arthroplast. 2010; 25: 387-391.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 441: 115-124.CrossRefPubMed Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 441: 115-124.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference McCollum DE, Gray WJ. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990:159–170. McCollum DE, Gray WJ. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990:159–170.
16.
go back to reference Moskal JT, Capps SG. Acetabular component positioning in total hip arthroplasty: an evidence-based analysis. J Arthroplast. 2011; 26: 1432-1437.CrossRef Moskal JT, Capps SG. Acetabular component positioning in total hip arthroplasty: an evidence-based analysis. J Arthroplast. 2011; 26: 1432-1437.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mouilhade F, Matsoukis J, Oger P, et al. Component positioning in primary total hip replacement: a prospective comparative study of two anterolateral approaches, minimally invasive versus gluteus medius hemimyotomy. Orthop Traumatol, Surg Res: OTSR. 2011; 97: 14-21.CrossRefPubMed Mouilhade F, Matsoukis J, Oger P, et al. Component positioning in primary total hip replacement: a prospective comparative study of two anterolateral approaches, minimally invasive versus gluteus medius hemimyotomy. Orthop Traumatol, Surg Res: OTSR. 2011; 97: 14-21.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Nakata K, Nishikawa M, Yamamoto K, et al. A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach: two consecutive series. J Arthroplast. 2009; 24: 698-704.CrossRef Nakata K, Nishikawa M, Yamamoto K, et al. A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach: two consecutive series. J Arthroplast. 2009; 24: 698-704.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference O’Brien DA, Rorabeck CH. The mini-incision direct lateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 441: 99-103.CrossRefPubMed O’Brien DA, Rorabeck CH. The mini-incision direct lateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 441: 99-103.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Odri GA, Padiolleau GB, Gouin FT. Oversized cups as a major risk factor of postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2014; 29: 753-756.CrossRef Odri GA, Padiolleau GB, Gouin FT. Oversized cups as a major risk factor of postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2014; 29: 753-756.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Parratte S, Argenson JN, Flecher X, et al. Computer-assisted surgery for acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty: comparative prospective randomized study. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007; 93: 238-246.CrossRefPubMed Parratte S, Argenson JN, Flecher X, et al. Computer-assisted surgery for acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty: comparative prospective randomized study. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007; 93: 238-246.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Parvizi J, Gehrke T. International consensus group on periprosthetic joint I. Definition of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplast. 2014; 29: 1331.CrossRef Parvizi J, Gehrke T. International consensus group on periprosthetic joint I. Definition of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplast. 2014; 29: 1331.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, Bissett GA, et al. Surgical treatment of limb-length discrepancy following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2003; 85-A: 2310-2317. Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, Bissett GA, et al. Surgical treatment of limb-length discrepancy following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2003; 85-A: 2310-2317.
24.
go back to reference Rathod PA, Bhalla S, Deshmukh AJ, et al. Does fluoroscopy with anterior hip arthroplasty decrease acetabular cup variability compared with a nonguided posterior approach? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472: 1877-1885.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rathod PA, Bhalla S, Deshmukh AJ, et al. Does fluoroscopy with anterior hip arthroplasty decrease acetabular cup variability compared with a nonguided posterior approach? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472: 1877-1885.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Saxler G, Marx A, Vandevelde D, et al. The accuracy of free-hand cup positioning--a CT based measurement of cup placement in 105 total hip arthroplasties. Int Orthop. 2004; 28: 198-201.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Saxler G, Marx A, Vandevelde D, et al. The accuracy of free-hand cup positioning--a CT based measurement of cup placement in 105 total hip arthroplasties. Int Orthop. 2004; 28: 198-201.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Sendtner E, Schuster T, Worner M, et al. Accuracy of acetabular cup placement in computer-assisted, minimally-invasive THR in a lateral decubitus position. Int Orthop. 2011; 35: 809-815.CrossRefPubMed Sendtner E, Schuster T, Worner M, et al. Accuracy of acetabular cup placement in computer-assisted, minimally-invasive THR in a lateral decubitus position. Int Orthop. 2011; 35: 809-815.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Soong M, Rubash HE, Macaulay W. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004; 12: 314-321.CrossRefPubMed Soong M, Rubash HE, Macaulay W. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004; 12: 314-321.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Takazawa M, Iida S, Suzuki C. Does surgical approach influence the position of acetabular and femoral component in total hip arthroplasty? Comparison between direct anterior and lateral approach. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 2012; 94-B: 187. Takazawa M, Iida S, Suzuki C. Does surgical approach influence the position of acetabular and femoral component in total hip arthroplasty? Comparison between direct anterior and lateral approach. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 2012; 94-B: 187.
29.
go back to reference Teet JS, Skinner HB, Khoury L. The effect of the “mini” incision in total hip arthroplasty on component position. J Arthroplast. 2006; 21: 503-507.CrossRef Teet JS, Skinner HB, Khoury L. The effect of the “mini” incision in total hip arthroplasty on component position. J Arthroplast. 2006; 21: 503-507.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Widmer K-H. Is there really a “safe zone” for the placement of total hip components? Bioceram Altern Bearings Joint Arthroplasty Ceram Orthop. 2006; 249–252. Widmer K-H. Is there really a “safe zone” for the placement of total hip components? Bioceram Altern Bearings Joint Arthroplasty Ceram Orthop. 2006; 249–252.
31.
go back to reference Williams S, Leslie I, Isaac G, et al. Tribology and wear of metal-on-metal hip prostheses: influence of cup angle and head position. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2008; 90(Suppl 3): 111-117.CrossRef Williams S, Leslie I, Isaac G, et al. Tribology and wear of metal-on-metal hip prostheses: influence of cup angle and head position. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2008; 90(Suppl 3): 111-117.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Zhan C, Kaczmarek R, Loyo-Berrios N, et al. Incidence and short-term outcomes of primary and revision hip replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2007; 89: 526-533.CrossRef Zhan C, Kaczmarek R, Loyo-Berrios N, et al. Incidence and short-term outcomes of primary and revision hip replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2007; 89: 526-533.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Higher Acetabular Anteversion in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case-Control Study
Authors
Antonia F. Chen, MD, MBA
Chi-Lung Chen, MD
Sara Low, MD
Wei-Ming Lin, MD
Karthikeyan Chinnakkannu, MBBS, MS
Fabio R. Orozco, MD
Alvin C. Ong, MD
Zachary D. Post, MD
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
HSS Journal ® / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1556-3316
Electronic ISSN: 1556-3324
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-016-9488-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

HSS Journal ® 3/2016 Go to the issue