Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urology and Nephrology 8/2017

01-08-2017 | Urology - Original Paper

Diagnostic value of MRI-based PSA density in predicting transperineal sector-guided prostate biopsy outcomes

Authors: Findlay MacAskill, Su-Min Lee, David Eldred-Evans, Wahyu Wulaningsih, Rick Popert, Konrad Wolfe, Mieke Van Hemelrijck, Giles Rottenberg, Sidath H. Liyanage, Peter Acher

Published in: International Urology and Nephrology | Issue 8/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density (PSAD) has potential to increase the diagnostic utility of PSA, yet has had poor uptake in clinical practice. We aimed to determine the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging-derived PSAD (MR-PSAD) in predicting transperineal sector-guided prostate biopsy (TPSB) outcomes.

Materials and methods

Men presenting for primary TPSB from 2007 to 2014 were considered. Histological outcomes were assessed and defined as: presence of any cancer or significant cancer defined as presence of Gleason 4 and/or maximum tumour core length (MCCL) ≥ 4 mm (G4); or Gleason 4 and/or MCCL ≥ 6 mm (G6). Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were calculated, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were generated to compare MR-PSAD and PSA.

Results

Six hundred fifty-nine men were evaluated with mean age 62.5 ± 9 years, median PSA 6.7 ng/ml (range 0.5–40.0), prostate volume 40 cc (range 7–187) and MR-PSAD 0.15 ng/ml/cc (range 0.019–1.3). ROC area under the curve (95% CI) was significantly better for MR-PSAD than PSA for all cancer definitions (p < 0.001): 0.73 (0.70–0.76) versus 0.61 (0.57–0.64) for any cancer; 0.75 (0.71–0.78) versus 0.66 (0.62–0.69) for G4; and 0.77 (0.74–0.80) versus 0.68 (0.64–0.71) for G6. Sensitivities for MR-PSAD < 0.1 ng/ml/cc were 85.0, 89.9 and 91.9% for any, G4 and G6 cancer, respectively.

Conclusion

MR-PSAD may be better than total PSA in determining risk of positive biopsy outcome. Its use may improve risk stratification and reduce unnecessary biopsies.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Draisma G, Boer R, Otto SJ, van der Cruijsen IW, Damhuis RA, Schroder FH, de Koning HJ (2003) Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening: estimates from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:868–878CrossRefPubMed Draisma G, Boer R, Otto SJ, van der Cruijsen IW, Damhuis RA, Schroder FH, de Koning HJ (2003) Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening: estimates from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:868–878CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Loeb S, Vellekoop A, Ahmed HU, Catto J, Emberton M, Nam R, Rosario DJ, Scattoni V, Lotan Y (2013) Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 64:876–892CrossRefPubMed Loeb S, Vellekoop A, Ahmed HU, Catto J, Emberton M, Nam R, Rosario DJ, Scattoni V, Lotan Y (2013) Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 64:876–892CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Benson MC, Whang IS, Pantuck A, Ring K, Kaplan SA, Olsson CA, Cooner WH (1992) Prostate specific antigen density: a means of distinguishing benign prostatic hypertrophy and prostate cancer. J Urol 147:815–816CrossRefPubMed Benson MC, Whang IS, Pantuck A, Ring K, Kaplan SA, Olsson CA, Cooner WH (1992) Prostate specific antigen density: a means of distinguishing benign prostatic hypertrophy and prostate cancer. J Urol 147:815–816CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Nathan MS, Seenivasagam K, Mei Q, Wickham JE, Miller RA (1996) Transrectal ultrasonography: why are estimates of prostate volume and dimension so inaccurate? Br J Urol 77:401–407CrossRefPubMed Nathan MS, Seenivasagam K, Mei Q, Wickham JE, Miller RA (1996) Transrectal ultrasonography: why are estimates of prostate volume and dimension so inaccurate? Br J Urol 77:401–407CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Tong S, Cardinal HN, McLoughlin RF, Downey DB, Fenster A (1998) Intra- and inter-observer variability and reliability of prostate volume measurement via two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 24:673–681CrossRefPubMed Tong S, Cardinal HN, McLoughlin RF, Downey DB, Fenster A (1998) Intra- and inter-observer variability and reliability of prostate volume measurement via two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 24:673–681CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Pinsky PF, Kramer BS, Crawford ED, Grubb RL, Urban DA, Andriole GL, Chia D, Levin DL, Gohagan JK (2006) Prostate volume and prostate-specific antigen levels in men enrolled in a large screening trial. Urology 68:352–356CrossRefPubMed Pinsky PF, Kramer BS, Crawford ED, Grubb RL, Urban DA, Andriole GL, Chia D, Levin DL, Gohagan JK (2006) Prostate volume and prostate-specific antigen levels in men enrolled in a large screening trial. Urology 68:352–356CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Catalona WJ, Richie JP, deKernion JB, Ahmann FR, Ratliff TL, Dalkin BL, Kavoussi LR, MacFarlane MT, Southwick PC (1994) Comparison of prostate specific antigen concentration versus prostate specific antigen density in the early detection of prostate cancer: receiver operating characteristic curves. J Urol 152:2031–2036CrossRefPubMed Catalona WJ, Richie JP, deKernion JB, Ahmann FR, Ratliff TL, Dalkin BL, Kavoussi LR, MacFarlane MT, Southwick PC (1994) Comparison of prostate specific antigen concentration versus prostate specific antigen density in the early detection of prostate cancer: receiver operating characteristic curves. J Urol 152:2031–2036CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Elliott CS, Shinghal R, Presti JC Jr (2008) The performance of prostate specific antigen, prostate specific antigen density and transition zone density in the era of extended biopsy schemes. J Urol 179:1756–1761 (discussion 1761) CrossRefPubMed Elliott CS, Shinghal R, Presti JC Jr (2008) The performance of prostate specific antigen, prostate specific antigen density and transition zone density in the era of extended biopsy schemes. J Urol 179:1756–1761 (discussion 1761) CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Rais-Bahrami S, Siddiqui MM, Vourganti S, Turkbey B, Rastinehad AR, Stamatakis L, Truong H, Walton-Diaz A, Hoang AN, Nix JW, Merino MJ, Wood BJ, Simon RM, Choyke PL, Pinto PA (2015) Diagnostic value of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an adjunct to prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based detection of prostate cancer in men without prior biopsies. BJU Int 115:381–388CrossRefPubMed Rais-Bahrami S, Siddiqui MM, Vourganti S, Turkbey B, Rastinehad AR, Stamatakis L, Truong H, Walton-Diaz A, Hoang AN, Nix JW, Merino MJ, Wood BJ, Simon RM, Choyke PL, Pinto PA (2015) Diagnostic value of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an adjunct to prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based detection of prostate cancer in men without prior biopsies. BJU Int 115:381–388CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ayres BE, Montgomery BS, Barber NJ, Pereira N, Langley SE, Denham P, Bott SR (2012) The role of transperineal template prostate biopsies in restaging men with prostate cancer managed by active surveillance. BJU Int 109:1170–1176CrossRefPubMed Ayres BE, Montgomery BS, Barber NJ, Pereira N, Langley SE, Denham P, Bott SR (2012) The role of transperineal template prostate biopsies in restaging men with prostate cancer managed by active surveillance. BJU Int 109:1170–1176CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Vyas L, Acher P, Kinsella J, Challacombe B, Chang RT, Sturch P, Cahill D, Chandra A, Popert R (2014) Indications, results and safety profile of transperineal sector biopsies (TPSB) of the prostate: a single centre experience of 634 cases. BJU Int 114:32–37CrossRefPubMed Vyas L, Acher P, Kinsella J, Challacombe B, Chang RT, Sturch P, Cahill D, Chandra A, Popert R (2014) Indications, results and safety profile of transperineal sector biopsies (TPSB) of the prostate: a single centre experience of 634 cases. BJU Int 114:32–37CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Koppie TM, Bianco FJ Jr, Kuroiwa K, Reuter VE, Guillonneau B, Eastham JA, Scardino PT (2006) The clinical features of anterior prostate cancers. BJU Int 98:1167–1171CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Koppie TM, Bianco FJ Jr, Kuroiwa K, Reuter VE, Guillonneau B, Eastham JA, Scardino PT (2006) The clinical features of anterior prostate cancers. BJU Int 98:1167–1171CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Sazuka T, Imamoto T, Namekawa T, Utsumi T, Yanagisawa M, Kawamura K, Kamiya N, Suzuki H, Ueda T, Ota S, Nakatani Y, Ichikawa T (2013) Analysis of preoperative detection for apex prostate cancer by transrectal biopsy. Prostate Cancer 2013:705865CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sazuka T, Imamoto T, Namekawa T, Utsumi T, Yanagisawa M, Kawamura K, Kamiya N, Suzuki H, Ueda T, Ota S, Nakatani Y, Ichikawa T (2013) Analysis of preoperative detection for apex prostate cancer by transrectal biopsy. Prostate Cancer 2013:705865CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Mabjeesh NJ, Lidawi G, Chen J, German L, Matzkin H (2012) High detection rate of significant prostate tumours in anterior zones using transperineal ultrasound-guided template saturation biopsy. BJU Int 110:993–997CrossRefPubMed Mabjeesh NJ, Lidawi G, Chen J, German L, Matzkin H (2012) High detection rate of significant prostate tumours in anterior zones using transperineal ultrasound-guided template saturation biopsy. BJU Int 110:993–997CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Rouse P, Shaw G, Ahmed HU, Freeman A, Allen C, Emberton M (2011) Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging to rule-in and rule-out clinically important prostate cancer in men at risk: a cohort study. Urol Int 87:49–53CrossRefPubMed Rouse P, Shaw G, Ahmed HU, Freeman A, Allen C, Emberton M (2011) Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging to rule-in and rule-out clinically important prostate cancer in men at risk: a cohort study. Urol Int 87:49–53CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Grey AD, Chana MS, Popert R, Wolfe K, Liyanage SH, Acher PL (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) scoring in a transperineal prostate biopsy setting. BJU Int 115:728–735CrossRefPubMed Grey AD, Chana MS, Popert R, Wolfe K, Liyanage SH, Acher PL (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) scoring in a transperineal prostate biopsy setting. BJU Int 115:728–735CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference London Cancer Alliance (2015) LCA best practice prostate pathway. London Cancer Alliance NHS, London London Cancer Alliance (2015) LCA best practice prostate pathway. London Cancer Alliance NHS, London
18.
go back to reference Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Emberton M (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 389:815–822CrossRefPubMed Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Emberton M (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 389:815–822CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Choi YJ, Kim JK, Kim HJ, Cho KS (2009) Interobserver variability of transrectal ultrasound for prostate volume measurement according to volume and observer experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:444–449CrossRefPubMed Choi YJ, Kim JK, Kim HJ, Cho KS (2009) Interobserver variability of transrectal ultrasound for prostate volume measurement according to volume and observer experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:444–449CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Lee JS, Chung BH (2007) Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of prostate volume as compared with radical prostatectomy specimens. Urol Int 78:323–327CrossRefPubMed Lee JS, Chung BH (2007) Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of prostate volume as compared with radical prostatectomy specimens. Urol Int 78:323–327CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Abd-Alazeez M, Ahmed HU, Arya M, Charman SC, Anastasiadis E, Freeman A, Emberton M, Kirkham A (2014) The accuracy of multiparametric MRI in men with negative biopsy and elevated PSA level—can it rule out clinically significant prostate cancer? Urol Oncol 32(45):e17–e22 Abd-Alazeez M, Ahmed HU, Arya M, Charman SC, Anastasiadis E, Freeman A, Emberton M, Kirkham A (2014) The accuracy of multiparametric MRI in men with negative biopsy and elevated PSA level—can it rule out clinically significant prostate cancer? Urol Oncol 32(45):e17–e22
22.
go back to reference Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC, Kressel HY, Rifai N, Golub RM, Altman DG, Hooft L, Korevaar DA, Cohen JF (2015) STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ 351:h5527CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC, Kressel HY, Rifai N, Golub RM, Altman DG, Hooft L, Korevaar DA, Cohen JF (2015) STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ 351:h5527CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Littrup PJ, Williams CR, Egglin TK, Kane RA (1991) Determination of prostate volume with transrectal US for cancer screening. Part II. Accuracy of in vitro and in vivo techniques. Radiology 179:49–53CrossRefPubMed Littrup PJ, Williams CR, Egglin TK, Kane RA (1991) Determination of prostate volume with transrectal US for cancer screening. Part II. Accuracy of in vitro and in vivo techniques. Radiology 179:49–53CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Ahmed HU, Hu Y, Carter T, Arumainayagam N, Lecornet E, Freeman A, Hawkes D, Barratt DC, Emberton M (2011) Characterizing clinically significant prostate cancer using template prostate mapping biopsy. J Urol 186:458–464CrossRefPubMed Ahmed HU, Hu Y, Carter T, Arumainayagam N, Lecornet E, Freeman A, Hawkes D, Barratt DC, Emberton M (2011) Characterizing clinically significant prostate cancer using template prostate mapping biopsy. J Urol 186:458–464CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Stephan C, Stroebel G, Heinau M, Lenz A, Roemer A, Lein M, Schnorr D, Loening SA, Jung K (2005) The ratio of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to prostate volume (PSA density) as a parameter to improve the detection of prostate carcinoma in PSA values in the range of <4 ng/mL. Cancer 104:993–1003CrossRefPubMed Stephan C, Stroebel G, Heinau M, Lenz A, Roemer A, Lein M, Schnorr D, Loening SA, Jung K (2005) The ratio of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to prostate volume (PSA density) as a parameter to improve the detection of prostate carcinoma in PSA values in the range of <4 ng/mL. Cancer 104:993–1003CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Hoshii T, Nishiyama T, Toyabe S, Akazawa K, Komatsu S, Kaneko M, Hara N, Takahashi K (2007) Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-based prostate-specific antigen density of the prostate in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Int J Urol 14:305–310CrossRefPubMed Hoshii T, Nishiyama T, Toyabe S, Akazawa K, Komatsu S, Kaneko M, Hara N, Takahashi K (2007) Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-based prostate-specific antigen density of the prostate in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Int J Urol 14:305–310CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Kubota Y, Kamei S, Nakano M, Ehara H, Deguchi T, Tanaka O (2008) The potential role of prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate-specific antigen density in the detection of prostate cancer. Int J Urol 15:322–326 (discussion 327) CrossRefPubMed Kubota Y, Kamei S, Nakano M, Ehara H, Deguchi T, Tanaka O (2008) The potential role of prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate-specific antigen density in the detection of prostate cancer. Int J Urol 15:322–326 (discussion 327) CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Mueller-Lisse UG, Mueller-Lisse UL, Haller S, Schneede P, Scheidler JE, Schmeller N, Hofstetter AG, Reiser MF (2002) Likelihood of prostate cancer based on prostate-specific antigen density by MRI: retrospective analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:432–437CrossRefPubMed Mueller-Lisse UG, Mueller-Lisse UL, Haller S, Schneede P, Scheidler JE, Schmeller N, Hofstetter AG, Reiser MF (2002) Likelihood of prostate cancer based on prostate-specific antigen density by MRI: retrospective analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:432–437CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Peng Y, Shen D, Liao S, Turkbey B, Rais-Bahrami S, Wood B, Karademir I, Antic T, Yousef A, Jiang Y, Pinto PA, Choyke PL, Oto A (2015) MRI-based prostate volume-adjusted prostate-specific antigen in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 42:1733–1739CrossRefPubMed Peng Y, Shen D, Liao S, Turkbey B, Rais-Bahrami S, Wood B, Karademir I, Antic T, Yousef A, Jiang Y, Pinto PA, Choyke PL, Oto A (2015) MRI-based prostate volume-adjusted prostate-specific antigen in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 42:1733–1739CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Washino S, Okochi T, Saito K, Konishi T, Hirai M, Kobayashi Y, Miyagawa T (2016) Combination of PI-RADS score and PSA density predicts biopsy outcome in biopsy naive patients. BJU Int 119:225–233CrossRefPubMed Washino S, Okochi T, Saito K, Konishi T, Hirai M, Kobayashi Y, Miyagawa T (2016) Combination of PI-RADS score and PSA density predicts biopsy outcome in biopsy naive patients. BJU Int 119:225–233CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, Choyke P, Verma S, Villeirs G, Rouviere O, Logager V, Futterer JJ (2012) ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 22:746–757CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, Choyke P, Verma S, Villeirs G, Rouviere O, Logager V, Futterer JJ (2012) ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 22:746–757CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Futterer JJ, Briganti A, De Visschere P, Emberton M, Giannarini G, Kirkham A, Taneja SS, Thoeny H, Villeirs G, Villers A (2015) Can clinically significant prostate cancer be detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? A systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 68:1045–1053CrossRefPubMed Futterer JJ, Briganti A, De Visschere P, Emberton M, Giannarini G, Kirkham A, Taneja SS, Thoeny H, Villeirs G, Villers A (2015) Can clinically significant prostate cancer be detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? A systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 68:1045–1053CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Busch J, Hamborg K, Meyer HA, Buckendahl J, Magheli A, Lein M, Jung K, Miller K, Stephan C (2012) Value of prostate specific antigen density and percent free prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer prognosis. J Urol 188:2165–2170CrossRefPubMed Busch J, Hamborg K, Meyer HA, Buckendahl J, Magheli A, Lein M, Jung K, Miller K, Stephan C (2012) Value of prostate specific antigen density and percent free prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer prognosis. J Urol 188:2165–2170CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Koie T, Mitsuzuka K, Yoneyama T, Narita S, Kawamura S, Kaiho Y, Tsuchiya N, Tochigi T, Habuchi T, Arai Y, Ohyama C, Tobisawa Y (2015) Prostate-specific antigen density predicts extracapsular extension and increased risk of biochemical recurrence in patients with high-risk prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy. Int J Clin Oncol 20:176–181CrossRefPubMed Koie T, Mitsuzuka K, Yoneyama T, Narita S, Kawamura S, Kaiho Y, Tsuchiya N, Tochigi T, Habuchi T, Arai Y, Ohyama C, Tobisawa Y (2015) Prostate-specific antigen density predicts extracapsular extension and increased risk of biochemical recurrence in patients with high-risk prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy. Int J Clin Oncol 20:176–181CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Hansen NL, Barrett T, Koo B, Doble A, Gnanapragasam V, Warren A, Kastner C, Bratt O (2016) The influence of prostate-specific antigen density on positive and negative predictive values of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect Gleason score 7–10 prostate cancer in a repeat biopsy setting. BJU Int 119:724–730CrossRefPubMed Hansen NL, Barrett T, Koo B, Doble A, Gnanapragasam V, Warren A, Kastner C, Bratt O (2016) The influence of prostate-specific antigen density on positive and negative predictive values of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect Gleason score 7–10 prostate cancer in a repeat biopsy setting. BJU Int 119:724–730CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Klemann N, Roder MA, Helgstrand JT, Brasso K, Toft BG, Vainer B, Iversen P (2017) Risk of prostate cancer diagnosis and mortality in men with a benign initial transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy set: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 18:221–229CrossRefPubMed Klemann N, Roder MA, Helgstrand JT, Brasso K, Toft BG, Vainer B, Iversen P (2017) Risk of prostate cancer diagnosis and mortality in men with a benign initial transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy set: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 18:221–229CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference McConnell JD, Bruskewitz R, Walsh P, Andriole G, Lieber M, Holtgrewe HL, Albertsen P, Roehrborn CG, Nickel JC, Wang DZ, Taylor AM, Waldstreicher J (1998) The effect of finasteride on the risk of acute urinary retention and the need for surgical treatment among men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Finasteride Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Study Group. N Engl J Med 338:557–563CrossRefPubMed McConnell JD, Bruskewitz R, Walsh P, Andriole G, Lieber M, Holtgrewe HL, Albertsen P, Roehrborn CG, Nickel JC, Wang DZ, Taylor AM, Waldstreicher J (1998) The effect of finasteride on the risk of acute urinary retention and the need for surgical treatment among men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Finasteride Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Study Group. N Engl J Med 338:557–563CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Kim JH, Doo SW, Yang WJ, Lee KW, Lee CH, Song YS, Jeon YS, Kim ME, Kwon SS (2014) Impact of obesity on the predictive accuracy of prostate-specific antigen density and prostate-specific antigen in native Korean men undergoing prostate biopsy. Int J Urol 21:987–990CrossRefPubMed Kim JH, Doo SW, Yang WJ, Lee KW, Lee CH, Song YS, Jeon YS, Kim ME, Kwon SS (2014) Impact of obesity on the predictive accuracy of prostate-specific antigen density and prostate-specific antigen in native Korean men undergoing prostate biopsy. Int J Urol 21:987–990CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Turkbey B, Fotin SV, Huang RJ, Yin Y, Daar D, Aras O, Bernardo M, Garvey BE, Weaver J, Haldankar H, Muradyan N, Merino MJ, Pinto PA, Periaswamy S, Choyke PL (2013) Fully automated prostate segmentation on MRI: comparison with manual segmentation methods and specimen volumes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:W720–W729CrossRefPubMed Turkbey B, Fotin SV, Huang RJ, Yin Y, Daar D, Aras O, Bernardo M, Garvey BE, Weaver J, Haldankar H, Muradyan N, Merino MJ, Pinto PA, Periaswamy S, Choyke PL (2013) Fully automated prostate segmentation on MRI: comparison with manual segmentation methods and specimen volumes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:W720–W729CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Dall’Era MA, Cooperberg MR, Chan JM, Davies BJ, Albertsen PC, Klotz LH, Warlick CA, Holmberg L, Bailey DE Jr, Wallace ME, Kantoff PW, Carroll PR (2008) Active surveillance for early-stage prostate cancer: review of the current literature. Cancer 112:1650–1659CrossRefPubMed Dall’Era MA, Cooperberg MR, Chan JM, Davies BJ, Albertsen PC, Klotz LH, Warlick CA, Holmberg L, Bailey DE Jr, Wallace ME, Kantoff PW, Carroll PR (2008) Active surveillance for early-stage prostate cancer: review of the current literature. Cancer 112:1650–1659CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Diagnostic value of MRI-based PSA density in predicting transperineal sector-guided prostate biopsy outcomes
Authors
Findlay MacAskill
Su-Min Lee
David Eldred-Evans
Wahyu Wulaningsih
Rick Popert
Konrad Wolfe
Mieke Van Hemelrijck
Giles Rottenberg
Sidath H. Liyanage
Peter Acher
Publication date
01-08-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Urology and Nephrology / Issue 8/2017
Print ISSN: 0301-1623
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-017-1609-8

Other articles of this Issue 8/2017

International Urology and Nephrology 8/2017 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.