Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urology and Nephrology 8/2015

01-08-2015 | Urology - Original Paper

Predicting length of stay after robotic partial nephrectomy

Authors: Wassim M. Bazzi, Daniel D. Sjoberg, Angelica A. C. Grasso, Melanie Bernstein, Raul Parra, Jonathan A. Coleman

Published in: International Urology and Nephrology | Issue 8/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

To investigate factors predictive of length of stay (LOS) after robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) in an effort to identify patients suitable for RPN with overnight stay at outpatient surgical facilities.

Materials and methods

Retrospective chart review of patients who underwent RPN at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from January 2007 to July 2012 was conducted. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the main predictors of LOS. The discrimination of the multivariate model was measured using the area under the curve (AUC); tenfold cross-validation was performed to correct for over-fit.

Results

One hundred and eighty-six patients were included in the analysis; 84 (45 %) had LOS of ≤1 day (median LOS 2 day; interquartile range 1–2). On univariate analysis, preoperative variables associated with LOS > 1 included larger tumors (P < 0.0001), lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.003), older age (P = 0.006), female gender (P = 0.035), and higher comorbidity score (P = 0.015); operative variables associated with LOS > 1 day included greater estimated blood loss (P < 0.0001) and longer operative (P < 0.0001) and ischemia (P < 0.0001) times. The AUC of the preoperative model was 0.61 (95 % CI 0.52–0.69) after tenfold cross-validation.

Conclusions

LOS after RPN is influenced by age, gender, medical comorbidities, and tumor size. However, when analyzed retrospectively, these factors had limited ability to predict LOS after RPN with sufficient accuracy to develop a prediction tool.
Literature
1.
3.
go back to reference Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D et al (2004) Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med 351(13):1296–1305PubMedCrossRef Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D et al (2004) Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med 351(13):1296–1305PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK et al (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology 64(5):914–918PubMedCrossRef Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK et al (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology 64(5):914–918PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG et al (2010) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: an international experience. Eur Urol 57(5):815–820PubMedCrossRef Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG et al (2010) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: an international experience. Eur Urol 57(5):815–820PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Simhan J, Smaldone MC, Tsai KJ et al (2012) Perioperative outcomes of robotic and open partial nephrectomy for moderately and highly complex renal lesions. J Urol 187(6):2000–2004PubMedCrossRef Simhan J, Smaldone MC, Tsai KJ et al (2012) Perioperative outcomes of robotic and open partial nephrectomy for moderately and highly complex renal lesions. J Urol 187(6):2000–2004PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sprenkle PC, Power N, Ghoneim T et al (2012) Comparison of open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for renal tumors 4–7 centimeters. Eur Urol 61(3):593–599PubMedCrossRef Sprenkle PC, Power N, Ghoneim T et al (2012) Comparison of open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for renal tumors 4–7 centimeters. Eur Urol 61(3):593–599PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kaouk JH, Khalifeh A, Hillyer S et al (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: step-by-step contemporary technique and surgical outcomes at a single high-volume institution. Eur Urol 62(3):553–561PubMedCrossRef Kaouk JH, Khalifeh A, Hillyer S et al (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: step-by-step contemporary technique and surgical outcomes at a single high-volume institution. Eur Urol 62(3):553–561PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Baum N (2010) From the operating room to the office: paradigm shift in the economics of surgical practice. J Med Pract Manag 27(4):192–198 Baum N (2010) From the operating room to the office: paradigm shift in the economics of surgical practice. J Med Pract Manag 27(4):192–198
10.
go back to reference Hollingsworth JM, Saigal CS, Lai JC et al (2012) Surgical quality among medicare beneficiaries undergoing outpatient urological surgery. J Urol 188(4):1274–1278PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hollingsworth JM, Saigal CS, Lai JC et al (2012) Surgical quality among medicare beneficiaries undergoing outpatient urological surgery. J Urol 188(4):1274–1278PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cullen KA, Hall MJ, Golosinskiy A (2009) Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006. Natl Health Stat Rep 11:1–25 Cullen KA, Hall MJ, Golosinskiy A (2009) Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006. Natl Health Stat Rep 11:1–25
12.
go back to reference Rotter T, Kinsman L, James E et al (2010) Clinical pathways: effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD006632 Rotter T, Kinsman L, James E et al (2010) Clinical pathways: effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD006632
15.
go back to reference Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C (1982) Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 6(7):655–663PubMedCrossRef Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C (1982) Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 6(7):655–663PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID et al (2002) AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Springer, New York, NYCrossRef Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID et al (2002) AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Springer, New York, NYCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kutikov A, Uzzo RG (2009) The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 182(3):844–853PubMedCrossRef Kutikov A, Uzzo RG (2009) The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 182(3):844–853PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kolla SB, Spiess PE, Sexton WJ (2011) Interobserver reliability of the RENAL nephrometry scoring system. Urology 78(3):592–594PubMedCrossRef Kolla SB, Spiess PE, Sexton WJ (2011) Interobserver reliability of the RENAL nephrometry scoring system. Urology 78(3):592–594PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Long J-A, Arnoux V, Fiard G et al (2013) External validation of the RENAL nephrometry score in renal tumours treated by partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 111(2):233–239PubMedCrossRef Long J-A, Arnoux V, Fiard G et al (2013) External validation of the RENAL nephrometry score in renal tumours treated by partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 111(2):233–239PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Stroup SP, Palazzi K, Kopp RP et al (2012) RENAL nephrometry score is associated with operative approach for partial nephrectomy and urine leak. Urology 80(1):151–156PubMedCrossRef Stroup SP, Palazzi K, Kopp RP et al (2012) RENAL nephrometry score is associated with operative approach for partial nephrectomy and urine leak. Urology 80(1):151–156PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Nogueira L, Katz D, Pinochet R et al (2008) Comparison of gelatine matrix-thrombin sealants used during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 102(11):1670–1674PubMedCrossRef Nogueira L, Katz D, Pinochet R et al (2008) Comparison of gelatine matrix-thrombin sealants used during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 102(11):1670–1674PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Godoy G, Katz DJ, Adamy A et al (2011) Routine drain placement after partial nephrectomy is not always necessary. J Urol 186(2):411–415PubMedCrossRef Godoy G, Katz DJ, Adamy A et al (2011) Routine drain placement after partial nephrectomy is not always necessary. J Urol 186(2):411–415PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Nelson B, Kaufman M, Broughton G et al (2007) Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Urol 177(3):929–931PubMedCrossRef Nelson B, Kaufman M, Broughton G et al (2007) Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Urol 177(3):929–931PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Oyetunji TA, Turner PL, Onguti SK et al (2013) Predictors of post discharge complications: role of in-hospital length of stay. Am J Surg 205(1):71–76PubMedCrossRef Oyetunji TA, Turner PL, Onguti SK et al (2013) Predictors of post discharge complications: role of in-hospital length of stay. Am J Surg 205(1):71–76PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Chughtai B, Abraham C, Finn D, Rosenberg S, Yarlagadda B, Perrotti M (2008) Fast track open partial nephrectomy: reduced postoperative length of stay with a goal-directed pathway does not compromise outcome. Adv Urol 2008:507543 Chughtai B, Abraham C, Finn D, Rosenberg S, Yarlagadda B, Perrotti M (2008) Fast track open partial nephrectomy: reduced postoperative length of stay with a goal-directed pathway does not compromise outcome. Adv Urol 2008:507543
26.
go back to reference Abaza R, Shah K (2013) A single overnight stay is possible for most patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy. Urology 81(2):301–306PubMedCrossRef Abaza R, Shah K (2013) A single overnight stay is possible for most patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy. Urology 81(2):301–306PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Faiz O, Haji A, Burns E et al (2011) Hospital stay amongst patients undergoing major elective colorectal surgery: predicting prolonged stay and readmissions in NHS hospitals. Colorectal Dis 13(7):816–822PubMedCrossRef Faiz O, Haji A, Burns E et al (2011) Hospital stay amongst patients undergoing major elective colorectal surgery: predicting prolonged stay and readmissions in NHS hospitals. Colorectal Dis 13(7):816–822PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Kelly M, Sharp L, Dwane F et al (2012) Factors predicting hospital length-of-stay and readmission after colorectal resection: a population-based study of elective and emergency admissions. BMC Health Serv Res 12(1):77PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kelly M, Sharp L, Dwane F et al (2012) Factors predicting hospital length-of-stay and readmission after colorectal resection: a population-based study of elective and emergency admissions. BMC Health Serv Res 12(1):77PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Hennus PML, Kroeze SGC, Bosch JLHR et al (2012) Impact of comorbidity on complications after nephrectomy: use of the Clavien classification of surgical complications. BJU Int 110(5):682–687PubMedCrossRef Hennus PML, Kroeze SGC, Bosch JLHR et al (2012) Impact of comorbidity on complications after nephrectomy: use of the Clavien classification of surgical complications. BJU Int 110(5):682–687PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Sammon J, Trinh Q-D, Sun M et al (2012) The effect of gender on nephrectomy perioperative outcomes: a national survey. Can J Urol 19(4):6337–6344PubMed Sammon J, Trinh Q-D, Sun M et al (2012) The effect of gender on nephrectomy perioperative outcomes: a national survey. Can J Urol 19(4):6337–6344PubMed
Metadata
Title
Predicting length of stay after robotic partial nephrectomy
Authors
Wassim M. Bazzi
Daniel D. Sjoberg
Angelica A. C. Grasso
Melanie Bernstein
Raul Parra
Jonathan A. Coleman
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Urology and Nephrology / Issue 8/2015
Print ISSN: 0301-1623
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-015-1044-7

Other articles of this Issue 8/2015

International Urology and Nephrology 8/2015 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.