Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urology and Nephrology 4/2014

01-04-2014 | Urology - Original Paper

The Prostate Health Index in predicting initial prostate biopsy outcomes in Asian men with prostate-specific antigen levels of 4–10 ng/mL

Authors: C. F. Ng, Peter K. F. Chiu, N. Y. Lam, H. C. Lam, Kim W. M. Lee, Simon S. M. Hou

Published in: International Urology and Nephrology | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the role of the Prostate Health Index (phi) in prostate cancer (PCa) detection in patients with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 4–10 ng/mL receiving their first prostatic biopsy in an Asian population.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of archived serum samples from patients enlisted in our tissue bank. Patients over 50 years old, with PSA level of 4–10 ng/mL, a negative digital rectal examination, and received their first prostatic biopsy between April 2008 and April 2013, were recruited. The serum sample collected before biopsy was retrieved for the measurement of various PSA derivatives and the phi value was calculated for each patient. The performance of these parameters in predicting the prostatic biopsy results was assessed.

Results

Two hundred and thirty consecutive patients, with 21 (9.13 %) diagnosed with PCa, were recruited for this study. Statistically significant differences between PCa patients and non-PCa patients were found for total PSA, PSA density, [-2]proPSA (p2PSA), free-to-total PSA ratio (%fPSA), p2PSA-to-free PSA ratio (%p2PSA), and phi. The areas under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve for total PSA, PSA density, %fPSA, %p2PSA, and phi were 0.547, 0.634, 0.654, 0.768, and 0.781, respectively. The phi was the best predictor of the prostatic biopsies results. At a sensitivity of 90 %, the use of the phi could have avoided unnecessary biopsies in 104 (45.2 %) patients.

Conclusions

Use of the phi could improve the accuracy of PCa detection in patients with an elevated PSA level and thus avoid unnecessary prostatic biopsies.
Literature
1.
3.
go back to reference Zaytoun OM, Anil T, Moussa AS, Jianbo L, Fareed K, Jones JS (2011) Morbidity of prostate biopsy after simplified versus complex preparation protocols: assessment of risk factors. Urology 77:910–914PubMedCrossRef Zaytoun OM, Anil T, Moussa AS, Jianbo L, Fareed K, Jones JS (2011) Morbidity of prostate biopsy after simplified versus complex preparation protocols: assessment of risk factors. Urology 77:910–914PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wagenlehner FM, van Oostrum E, Tenke P, Tandogdu Z, Cek M, Grabe M, Wullt B, Pickard R, Naber KG, Pilatz A, Weidner W, Bjerklund-Johansen TE, On behalf of the GPIU investigators (2013) Infective complications after prostate biopsy: outcome of the Global Prevalence Study of Infections in Urology (GPIU) 2010 and 2011, a prospective multinational multicentre prostate biopsy study. Eur Urol 63:521–527PubMedCrossRef Wagenlehner FM, van Oostrum E, Tenke P, Tandogdu Z, Cek M, Grabe M, Wullt B, Pickard R, Naber KG, Pilatz A, Weidner W, Bjerklund-Johansen TE, On behalf of the GPIU investigators (2013) Infective complications after prostate biopsy: outcome of the Global Prevalence Study of Infections in Urology (GPIU) 2010 and 2011, a prospective multinational multicentre prostate biopsy study. Eur Urol 63:521–527PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tosoian J, Loeb S (2010) PSA and beyond: the past, present, and future of investigative biomarkers for prostate cancer. Sci World J 10:1919–1931CrossRef Tosoian J, Loeb S (2010) PSA and beyond: the past, present, and future of investigative biomarkers for prostate cancer. Sci World J 10:1919–1931CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jansen FH, van Schaik RH, Kurstjens J, Horninger W, Klocker H, Bektic J, Wildhagen MF, Roobol MJ, Bangma CH, Bartsch G (2010) Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoform p2PSA in combination with total PSA and free PSA improves diagnostic accuracy in prostate cancer detection. Eur Urol 57:921–927PubMedCrossRef Jansen FH, van Schaik RH, Kurstjens J, Horninger W, Klocker H, Bektic J, Wildhagen MF, Roobol MJ, Bangma CH, Bartsch G (2010) Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoform p2PSA in combination with total PSA and free PSA improves diagnostic accuracy in prostate cancer detection. Eur Urol 57:921–927PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Guazzoni G, Nava L, Lazzeri M, Scattoni V, Lughezzani G, Maccagnano C, Dorigatti F, Ceriotti F, Pontillo M, Bini V, Freschi M, Montorsi F, Rigatti P (2011) Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoform p2PSA significantly improves the prediction of prostate cancer at initial extended prostate biopsies in patients with total PSA between 2.0 and 10.0 ng/ml: results of a prospective study in a clinical setting. Eur Urol 60:214–222PubMedCrossRef Guazzoni G, Nava L, Lazzeri M, Scattoni V, Lughezzani G, Maccagnano C, Dorigatti F, Ceriotti F, Pontillo M, Bini V, Freschi M, Montorsi F, Rigatti P (2011) Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoform p2PSA significantly improves the prediction of prostate cancer at initial extended prostate biopsies in patients with total PSA between 2.0 and 10.0 ng/ml: results of a prospective study in a clinical setting. Eur Urol 60:214–222PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Catalona WJ, Partin AW, Sanda MG, Wei JT, Klee GG, Bangma CH, Slawin KM, Marks LS, Loeb S, Broyles DL, Shin SS, Cruz AB, Chan DW, Sokoll LJ, Roberts WL, van Schaik RH, Mizrahi IA (2011) A multicenter study of [-2]pro-prostate specific antigen combined with prostate specific antigen and free prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer detection in the 2.0 to 10.0 ng/ml prostate specific antigen range. J Urol 185:1650–1655PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Catalona WJ, Partin AW, Sanda MG, Wei JT, Klee GG, Bangma CH, Slawin KM, Marks LS, Loeb S, Broyles DL, Shin SS, Cruz AB, Chan DW, Sokoll LJ, Roberts WL, van Schaik RH, Mizrahi IA (2011) A multicenter study of [-2]pro-prostate specific antigen combined with prostate specific antigen and free prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer detection in the 2.0 to 10.0 ng/ml prostate specific antigen range. J Urol 185:1650–1655PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Filella X, Giménez N (2013) Evaluation of [-2] proPSA and Prostate Health Index (phi) for the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med 51:729–739PubMed Filella X, Giménez N (2013) Evaluation of [-2] proPSA and Prostate Health Index (phi) for the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med 51:729–739PubMed
10.
go back to reference Chun FK, Epstein JI, Ficarra V, Freedland SJ, Montironi R, Montorsi F, Shariat SF, Schröder FH, Scattoni V (2010) Optimizing performance and interpretation of prostate biopsy: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 58:851–864PubMedCrossRef Chun FK, Epstein JI, Ficarra V, Freedland SJ, Montironi R, Montorsi F, Shariat SF, Schröder FH, Scattoni V (2010) Optimizing performance and interpretation of prostate biopsy: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 58:851–864PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bjurlin MA, Carter HB, Schellhammer P, Cookson MS, Gomella LG, Troyer D, Wheeler TM, Schlossberg S, Penson DF, Taneja SS (2013) Optimization of initial prostate biopsy in clinical practice: sampling, labeling and specimen processing. J Urol 189:2039–2046PubMedCrossRef Bjurlin MA, Carter HB, Schellhammer P, Cookson MS, Gomella LG, Troyer D, Wheeler TM, Schlossberg S, Penson DF, Taneja SS (2013) Optimization of initial prostate biopsy in clinical practice: sampling, labeling and specimen processing. J Urol 189:2039–2046PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Rodrigues G, Warde P, Pickles T, Crook J, Brundage M, Souhami L, Lukka H, Genitourinary Radiation Oncologists of Canada (2012) Pre-treatment risk stratification of prostate cancer patients: a critical review. Can Urol Assoc J 6:121–127PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Rodrigues G, Warde P, Pickles T, Crook J, Brundage M, Souhami L, Lukka H, Genitourinary Radiation Oncologists of Canada (2012) Pre-treatment risk stratification of prostate cancer patients: a critical review. Can Urol Assoc J 6:121–127PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ito K, Miyakubo M, Sekine Y, Koike H, Matsui H, Shibata Y, Suzuki K (2013) Diagnostic significance of [-2]pro-PSA and prostate dimension-adjusted PSA-related indices in men with total PSA in the 2.0–10.0 ng/mL range. World J Urol 31:305–311PubMedCrossRef Ito K, Miyakubo M, Sekine Y, Koike H, Matsui H, Shibata Y, Suzuki K (2013) Diagnostic significance of [-2]pro-PSA and prostate dimension-adjusted PSA-related indices in men with total PSA in the 2.0–10.0 ng/mL range. World J Urol 31:305–311PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Stephan C, Vincendeau S, Houlgatte A, Cammann H, Jung K, Semjonow A (2013) Multicenter evaluation of [-2]proprostate-specific antigen and the prostate health index for detecting prostate cancer. Clin Chem 59:306–314PubMedCrossRef Stephan C, Vincendeau S, Houlgatte A, Cammann H, Jung K, Semjonow A (2013) Multicenter evaluation of [-2]proprostate-specific antigen and the prostate health index for detecting prostate cancer. Clin Chem 59:306–314PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Nichol MB, Wu J, Huang J, Denham D, Frencher SK, Jacobsen SJ (2011) Cost-effectiveness of Prostate Health Index for prostate cancer detection. BJU Int 110:353–362PubMedCrossRef Nichol MB, Wu J, Huang J, Denham D, Frencher SK, Jacobsen SJ (2011) Cost-effectiveness of Prostate Health Index for prostate cancer detection. BJU Int 110:353–362PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sokoll LJ, Ellis W, Lange P, Noteboom J, Elliott DJ, Deras IL, Blase A, Koo S, Sarno M, Rittenhouse H, Groskopf J, Vessella RL (2008) A multicenter evaluation of the PCA3 molecular urine test: pre-analytical effects, analytical performance, and diagnostic accuracy. Clin Chim Acta 389:1–6PubMedCrossRef Sokoll LJ, Ellis W, Lange P, Noteboom J, Elliott DJ, Deras IL, Blase A, Koo S, Sarno M, Rittenhouse H, Groskopf J, Vessella RL (2008) A multicenter evaluation of the PCA3 molecular urine test: pre-analytical effects, analytical performance, and diagnostic accuracy. Clin Chim Acta 389:1–6PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Roobol MJ, Schröder FH, van Leeuwen P, Hessels D, van den Bergh RC, Wolters T, van Leeuwen PJ (2010) Performance of the prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) gene and prostate-specific antigen in prescreened men: exploring the value of PCA3 for a first-line diagnostic test. Eur Urol 58:893–899PubMedCrossRef Roobol MJ, Schröder FH, van Leeuwen P, Hessels D, van den Bergh RC, Wolters T, van Leeuwen PJ (2010) Performance of the prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) gene and prostate-specific antigen in prescreened men: exploring the value of PCA3 for a first-line diagnostic test. Eur Urol 58:893–899PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Semjonow A, Köpke T, Eltze E, Pepping-Schefers B, Burgel H, Darte C (2010) Pre-analytical in vitro stability of [-2]proPSA in blood and serum. Clin Chem 43:926–928 Semjonow A, Köpke T, Eltze E, Pepping-Schefers B, Burgel H, Darte C (2010) Pre-analytical in vitro stability of [-2]proPSA in blood and serum. Clin Chem 43:926–928
19.
go back to reference Fillée C, Tombal B, Philippe M (2010) Prostate cancer screening: clinical impact of WHO calibration of Beckman Coulter Access® prostate-specific antigen assays. Clin Chem Lab Med 48:285–288PubMedCrossRef Fillée C, Tombal B, Philippe M (2010) Prostate cancer screening: clinical impact of WHO calibration of Beckman Coulter Access® prostate-specific antigen assays. Clin Chem Lab Med 48:285–288PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Prostate Health Index in predicting initial prostate biopsy outcomes in Asian men with prostate-specific antigen levels of 4–10 ng/mL
Authors
C. F. Ng
Peter K. F. Chiu
N. Y. Lam
H. C. Lam
Kim W. M. Lee
Simon S. M. Hou
Publication date
01-04-2014
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Urology and Nephrology / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0301-1623
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-013-0582-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

International Urology and Nephrology 4/2014 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.