Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology 3/2012

01-07-2012 | Clinical Study

Assessment of intra-observer variability in measurement of high-grade brain tumors

Authors: James M. Provenzale, Michael C. Mancini

Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

A 25% increase in bidimensional products (BPs) of tumor diameter has been used as a criterion for brain tumor progression. We studied intra-observer variability in measurements of BPs. Ten patients with contrast-enhancing glioblastoma multiforme underwent baseline and follow-up MR imaging. Seven observers measured BPs in various planes. Differences in BPs between scans were expressed as a percentage of baseline. This calculation was performed for both readings of the baseline and follow-up scans. Differences between change from baseline to follow-up on each reading (termed D values) were calculated for each reader (total of 196 D values). Median D value in each plane was calculated for each reader. Range of D values was 12.36–33.64% in axial plane (average 10.63%), 12.18–38.62% in coronal plane (average 26.84%) and 15.12–35.48% in sagittal plane (average 26.11%). Across all planes, 88 (45%) D values were >25%. When all imaging planes for any single observation were combined, in 76% of cases, at least one D value of >25% was seen. Based on the high degree of intra-observer variability, tumor measurements producing an increase in BP of >25% can routinely be obtained solely by chance.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Macdonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC Jr, Cairncross JG (1990) Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 8:1277–1280PubMed Macdonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC Jr, Cairncross JG (1990) Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 8:1277–1280PubMed
2.
go back to reference Wen PY, Norden AD, Drappatz J, Quant E (2010) Response assessment challenges in clinical trials of gliomas. Curr Oncol Rep 12:68–75PubMedCrossRef Wen PY, Norden AD, Drappatz J, Quant E (2010) Response assessment challenges in clinical trials of gliomas. Curr Oncol Rep 12:68–75PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Reardon DA, Galanis E, DeGroot JF et al (2011) Clinical trial end points for high-grade glioma: the evolving landscape. Neuro Oncol 13:353–361PubMedCrossRef Reardon DA, Galanis E, DeGroot JF et al (2011) Clinical trial end points for high-grade glioma: the evolving landscape. Neuro Oncol 13:353–361PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28:1963–1972PubMedCrossRef Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28:1963–1972PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hayward RM, Patronas N, Baker EH, Vézina G, Albert PS, Warren KE (2008) Inter-observer variability in the measurement of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas. J Neuro Oncol 90:57–61CrossRef Hayward RM, Patronas N, Baker EH, Vézina G, Albert PS, Warren KE (2008) Inter-observer variability in the measurement of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas. J Neuro Oncol 90:57–61CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Provenzale JM, Ison C, Delong D (2009) Bi-dimensional measurements in brain tumors: assessment of inter-observer variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:W515–W522PubMedCrossRef Provenzale JM, Ison C, Delong D (2009) Bi-dimensional measurements in brain tumors: assessment of inter-observer variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:W515–W522PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bauknecht HC, Romano VC, Rogalla P et al (2010) Intra- and interobserver variability of linear and volumetric measurements of brain metastases using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 45:49–56PubMedCrossRef Bauknecht HC, Romano VC, Rogalla P et al (2010) Intra- and interobserver variability of linear and volumetric measurements of brain metastases using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 45:49–56PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Shah GD, Kesari S, Xu R et al (2006) Comparison of linear and volumetric criteria in assessing tumor response in adult high-grade gliomas. Neuro Oncol 8:38–46PubMedCrossRef Shah GD, Kesari S, Xu R et al (2006) Comparison of linear and volumetric criteria in assessing tumor response in adult high-grade gliomas. Neuro Oncol 8:38–46PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sorensen AG, Patel S, Harmat Ch et al (2001) Comparison of diameter and perimeter methods for tumor volume calculation. J Clin Oncol 19:551–557PubMed Sorensen AG, Patel S, Harmat Ch et al (2001) Comparison of diameter and perimeter methods for tumor volume calculation. J Clin Oncol 19:551–557PubMed
10.
go back to reference Weltens C, Menten J, Feron M et al (2001) Interobserver variations in gross tumor volume delineation of brain tumors on computed tomography and impact of magnetic resonance imaging. Radiother Oncol 60:49–59PubMedCrossRef Weltens C, Menten J, Feron M et al (2001) Interobserver variations in gross tumor volume delineation of brain tumors on computed tomography and impact of magnetic resonance imaging. Radiother Oncol 60:49–59PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Leunens G, Menten J, Weltens C, Verstraete J, van der Schueren E (1993) Quality assessment in medical decision making in radiation oncology: variability in target volume delineation for brain tumours. Radiother Oncol 29:169–175PubMedCrossRef Leunens G, Menten J, Weltens C, Verstraete J, van der Schueren E (1993) Quality assessment in medical decision making in radiation oncology: variability in target volume delineation for brain tumours. Radiother Oncol 29:169–175PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Vos MJ, Uitdehaag BMJ, Barkhof F et al (2003) Interobserver variability in the radiological assessment of response to chemotherapy in glioma. Neurology 60:826–830PubMedCrossRef Vos MJ, Uitdehaag BMJ, Barkhof F et al (2003) Interobserver variability in the radiological assessment of response to chemotherapy in glioma. Neurology 60:826–830PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Assessment of intra-observer variability in measurement of high-grade brain tumors
Authors
James M. Provenzale
Michael C. Mancini
Publication date
01-07-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0167-594X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7373
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-012-0843-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Journal of Neuro-Oncology 3/2012 Go to the issue