Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2/2023

Open Access 09-09-2022

Organisational Policies and Practices for the Inclusion of Vulnerable Workers: A Scoping Review of the Employer’s Perspective

Authors: A. Kersten, M. van Woerkom, G. A. Geuskens, R. W. B. Blonk

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 2/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose Current models of inclusive workplaces are primarily based on the perceptions of vulnerable workers, whereas attention for employer’s perceptions is lacking. This scoping review addresses this issue by mapping the literature that covers employer’s perceptions on the application and importance of organisational policies and practices aimed at the inclusion of vulnerable workers. Methods A literature search for qualitative and quantitative research articles was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, ProQuest, PsychInfo, Google Scholar and Web of Science. Studies were included when (a) they reported on practices aimed at the inclusion, participation, or rehabilitation of (b) workers with disabilities, a low education or migration background, or who were long-term unemployed, and (c) were based on samples of employers or their representatives. Results The search resulted in 3,134 articles. In total, 38 articles met the inclusion criteria of this study. We identified seven types of inclusive practices to stimulate the inclusion of vulnerable workers that employers applied and/or perceived as valuable: senior management commitment, recruitment and selection, performance management and development practices, job accommodations and redesign of work, supportive culture, external collaborations with other employers, and monitoring. Conclusions Our review identified seven categories of inclusive practices that pertain to all stages of the employee journey of vulnerable workers. These categories move beyond those reported in studies based on employee samples, for instance by highlighting the importance of monitoring and collaborations with other employers. Hence, our findings stress that insight into employers’ perceptions about effective measures is crucial to increase labour market participation of vulnerable groups.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Van Berkel R, Ingold J, McGurk P, Boselie P, Bredgaard T. Editorial introduction: an introduction to employer engagement in the field of HRM. Blending social policy and HRM research in promoting vulnerable groups’ labour market participation. Hum Resour Manag J. 2017;27(4):503–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12169.CrossRef Van Berkel R, Ingold J, McGurk P, Boselie P, Bredgaard T. Editorial introduction: an introduction to employer engagement in the field of HRM. Blending social policy and HRM research in promoting vulnerable groups’ labour market participation. Hum Resour Manag J. 2017;27(4):503–13. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​1748-8583.​12169.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Fangen K, Fossan K, Mohn FA, editors. Inclusion and exclusion of young adult migrants in Europe: barriers and bridges. London: Routledge; 2016. Fangen K, Fossan K, Mohn FA, editors. Inclusion and exclusion of young adult migrants in Europe: barriers and bridges. London: Routledge; 2016.
44.
go back to reference Chima FO. Disabilities misconceptions and employment: integrating advocacy perspective and rehabilitation. Free Inq Creativ Sociol. 2003;3(1):79–88. Chima FO. Disabilities misconceptions and employment: integrating advocacy perspective and rehabilitation. Free Inq Creativ Sociol. 2003;3(1):79–88.
47.
52.
go back to reference Weir R, Nielson WR. Interventions for disability management. Clin J Pain. 2001;17(4):128–32.CrossRef Weir R, Nielson WR. Interventions for disability management. Clin J Pain. 2001;17(4):128–32.CrossRef
70.
go back to reference Winter J, Issa MH, Quaigrain R, Dick K, Regehr JD. Evaluating disability management in the Manitoban construction industry for injured workers returning to the workplace with a disability. Can J Civ Eng. 2016;43(2):109–17.CrossRef Winter J, Issa MH, Quaigrain R, Dick K, Regehr JD. Evaluating disability management in the Manitoban construction industry for injured workers returning to the workplace with a disability. Can J Civ Eng. 2016;43(2):109–17.CrossRef
76.
go back to reference Heera S, Maini A, Chandan K. Disability Inclusion: an analysis of annual reports of nifty companies in India. IUP J Manag Res. 2017;16(3):30–45. Heera S, Maini A, Chandan K. Disability Inclusion: an analysis of annual reports of nifty companies in India. IUP J Manag Res. 2017;16(3):30–45.
77.
go back to reference Irvine A, Lupart J. Into the workforce: employers’ perspectives of inclusion. Dev Disabil Bull. 2018;36(1):225–50. Irvine A, Lupart J. Into the workforce: employers’ perspectives of inclusion. Dev Disabil Bull. 2018;36(1):225–50.
78.
81.
go back to reference Moore JR, Hanson WR, Maxey EC. Disability inclusion: catalyst to adaptive organizations. Organ Dev J. 2020;38(1):89–106. Moore JR, Hanson WR, Maxey EC. Disability inclusion: catalyst to adaptive organizations. Organ Dev J. 2020;38(1):89–106.
Metadata
Title
Organisational Policies and Practices for the Inclusion of Vulnerable Workers: A Scoping Review of the Employer’s Perspective
Authors
A. Kersten
M. van Woerkom
G. A. Geuskens
R. W. B. Blonk
Publication date
09-09-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 2/2023
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-022-10067-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2023

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2/2023 Go to the issue