Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ASCO Annual Meeting 2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Keep up to date with all the top stories and latest evidence with our hub page, including official congress videos and expert takeaways.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 3/2013

Open Access 01-09-2013

Returning to Work After Stroke: Perspectives of Employer Stakeholders, a Qualitative Study

Authors: Carol Coole, Kathryn Radford, Mary Grant, Jane Terry

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose More than 40 % of working age adults with stroke fail to return to work. The work context is a key factor in return to work, but little is known about the experiences of employers in supporting employees with stroke. The aim of this study was to explore return to work after stroke from the employer perspective, to identify key features associated with success and to seek participants’ views regarding the role of healthcare in return to work. Methods Data was gathered through 18 semi-structured interviews with employer stakeholders and included small business owners, line managers, human resources and occupational health staff. Data was analysed thematically. Results The main themes identified were: the impact of stroke on the employer, characteristics of the employee, communication, knowledge and information, experience of other stakeholders, integrating healthcare in return to work. Conclusion Employers face complex emotional and practical issues when helping an employee return to work after stroke, for which many lack knowledge and experience. The range and quality of support networks that they access is variable and advice and support from clinicians is welcomed. Further research is necessary to investigate how such support could be funded and integrated within existing service provision.
Literature
1.
Daniel K, Wolfe CD, Busch MA, McKevitt C. What are the social consequences of stroke for working-aged adults? A Systematic Review. Stroke. 2009;40(6):e431–40.PubMedCrossRef
2.
3.
Treger I, Shames J, Giaquinto S, Ring H. Return to work in stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(17):1397–403.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Saeki S, Toyonaga T. Determinants of early return to work after first stroke in Japan. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42:254–8.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Lindstrom B, Roding J, Sundelin G. Positive attitudes and preserved high level of motor performance are important factors for return to work in younger persons after stroke: a national survey. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:714–8.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Vestling M, Tufvesson B, Iwarsson S. Indicators for return to work after stroke and the importance of work for subjective well-being and life satisfaction. J Rehabil Med. 2003;35:127–31.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Waddell G, Burton AK, Kendall N. Vocational rehabilitation: what works for whom and when? London: TSO; 2008.
8.
Frank AO, Thurgood J. Vocational rehabilitation in the UK: opportunities for health-care professionals. Int J Therapy Rehabil. 2006;13(3):126–34.
9.
Playford ED, Radford K, Burton C, Gibson A, Jellie B, Sweetland J, Watkins C. Mapping Vocational Rehabilitation Services for people with Long term neurological conditions: Summary report. Department of Health. March 2011. Available from: http://​www.​ltnc.​org.​uk Accessed 9 July 2012.
10.
Tyerman A, Meehan MJ, editors. Vocational assessment and rehabilitation after acquired brain injury: inter-agency guidelines. London: British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine/Royal College of Physicians; 2004.
11.
National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke. 3rd ed. Intercollegiate stroke working party. London: Royal College of Physicians of London; 2008.
12.
Department of Health. National stroke strategy. London: UK; 2007.
13.
14.
Department of Health. The NHS outcomes framework 2011/12, London; 2010.
15.
Deshpande P, Turner-Stokes L. Survey of vocational rehabilitation services available to people with acquired brain injury in the UK. In: Tyerman A, Meehan MJ, editors. Vocational assessment and rehabilitation after acquired brain injury: Inter-agency guidelines. 2004.
16.
17.
Radford KA, Grant MI, Terry J, Marr L, Brain N. Developing stroke specific vocational rehabilitation: mapping current service provision. Int J Stroke. 2011;6(Suppl 2):49.
18.
Black C, Frost D. Health at work: an independent review of sickness absence. London: TSO; 2011.
19.
Department for Work and Pensions. Building capacity for work, A UK framework for vocational rehabilitation, London UK; 2004.
20.
Glozier N, Hackett ML, Parag V, Anderson CS. The influence of psychiatric morbidity on return to paid work after stroke in younger adults: the Auckland Regional Community Stroke (ARCOS) Study, 2002 to 2003. Stroke. 2008;39:1526–32.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Lock S, Jordan L, Bryan K, Maxim J. Work after stroke: focusing on barriers and enablers. Disabil Soc. 2005;20(1):33–47.CrossRef
22.
Alaszewski A, Alaszewski H, Potter J, Penhale B. Working after a stroke: survivors’ experiences and perceptions of barriers to and facilitators of the return to paid employment. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(24):1858–69.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Holmgren K, Ivanoff SD. Supervisors’ views on employer responsibility in the return to work process. A focus group study. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:93–106.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Munir F, Yarker J, Hicks B, Donaldson-Fielder E. Returning employees back to work: developing a measure for supervisors to support return to work. J Occup Rehab. 2012;22:196–208.CrossRef
25.
Culler KH, Wang Y-C, Byers K, Trierweiler R. Barriers and facilitators of return to work for individuals with strokes: perspectives of the stroke survivor, vocational specialist, and employer. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(4):325–40.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRef
27.
Fylan B, Fylan F, Caveney L. An evaluation of the Statement of Fitness for Work: qualitative work with GPs. Department for Work and Pensions Research Report 780; 2011.
28.
29.
de Vries G, Koeter MWJ, Nabitz U, Hees HL, Schene AH. Return to work after sick leave due to depression; a conceptual analysis based on perspectives of patients, supervisors and occupational physicians. J Affect Disord. 2011;136(3):1017–26.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Lemieux P, Durand M-J, Hong QN. Supervisors’ perception of the factors influencing the return to work of workers with common mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21:293–303.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Haafkens JA, Kopnina H, Meerman MGM, van Dijk FJH. Facilitating job retention for chronically ill employees: perspectives of line managers and human resource managers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:104.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Cunningham I, James P, Dibben P. Bridging the gap between rhetoric and reality: line managers and the protection of job security for ill workers in the modern workplace. Br J Manage. 2004;15:273–90.CrossRef
33.
Amir Z, Wynn P, Chan F, Strauser D, Whitaker S, Luker K. Return to work after cancer in the UK: attitudes and experiences of line managers. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20:435–42.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Cohen CA, Colantonio A, Vernich L. Positive aspects of caregiving: rounding out the caregiver experience. Int J Geriat Psychiatr. 2002;17(2):184–8.CrossRef
35.
Park CH, Shin DW, Choi JY, Kang J, Baek YJ, Mo HN, Lee MS, Park SJ, Park SM, Park S. Determinants of the burden and positivity of family caregivers of terminally ill cancer patients in Korea. Psychooncology. 2012;21(3):282–90.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Department for Work and Pensions, Department of Health, Health & Safety Executive. Health work and well-being strategy, London UK; 2008.
37.
Carbonneau H, Caron C, Desrosiers J. Development of a conceptual framework of positive aspects of caregiving in dementia. Dementia. 2010;9(3):327–353.CrossRef
38.
Improving Work & Health, Changing Lives. The government’s response to Dame Carol Black’s review of the health of Britain’s working age population. London: TSO; 2008.
39.
Gard G, Larsson A. How can cooperation between rehabilitation professionals in rehabilitation planning be improved? A qualitative study from the employer’s perspective. Work. 2006;26(2):191–6.PubMed
40.
Sawney P, Challenor J. Poor communication between health professionals is a barrier to rehabilitation. Occup Med. 2003;53:246–8.CrossRef
41.
Doucet T, Muller F, Verdun-Esquer C, Debelleix X, Brochard P. Returning to work after a stroke: a retrospective study at the physical and rehabilitation medicine centre “La Tour de Gassies”. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2012;55(12):112–27.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Hussey L, Turner S, Thorley K, McNamee R, Agius R. Comparison of work-related ill health reporting by occupational physicians and general practitioners. Occup Med. 2010;60:294–300.CrossRef
43.
Sinclair A, Martin R, Tyers C. Occupational Health advice lines: final evaluation. Research Report 793. Department for Work and Pensions; 2012.
44.
Lambeek LC, van Mechelen W, Knol DL, Loisel P, Anema JR. Randomised controlled trial of integrated care to reduce disability from chronic low back pain in working and private life. BMJ. 2010;340:c1035.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Will MC. Let us pause and reflect: but not too long. Except Child. 1984;51(1):11–6.PubMed
46.
Bond GR, Drake RE, Becker DR. An update on randomized controlled trials of evidence-based supported employment. Psych Rehab J. 2008;31(4):280–90.CrossRef
47.
Wehman P, Kregel J, Keyser-Marcus L, Sherron-Targett P, Campbell L, West M, Cifu DX. Supported employment for persons with traumatic brain injury: a preliminary investigation of long-term follow-up costs and program efficiency. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(2):192–6.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Fadyl JK, McPherson KM. Approaches to vocational rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: a review of the evidence. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009;24(3):195–212.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Hart T, Dijkers M, Fraser R, Cicerone K, Bogner JA, Whyte J, Malec J, Waldron B. Vocational services for traumatic brain injury: treatment definition and diversity within model systems of care. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006;21(6):467–82.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Soklaridis S, Ammendolia C, Cassidy D. Looking upstream to understand low back pain and return to work: psychosocial factors as the product of system issues. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(9):1557–66.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Returning to Work After Stroke: Perspectives of Employer Stakeholders, a Qualitative Study
Authors
Carol Coole
Kathryn Radford
Mary Grant
Jane Terry
Publication date
01-09-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-012-9401-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 3/2013 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Leadership Effectiveness: A Supervisor’s Approach to Manage Return to Work

OriginalPaper

The Predictive Validity of OMPQ on the Rehabilitation Outcomes for Patients with Acute and Subacute Non-Specific LBP in a Chinese Population

OriginalPaper

The Associations Between Personality Characteristics and Absenteeism: A Cross-Sectional Study in Workers With and Without Depressive and Anxiety Disorders

OriginalPaper

Exploring the Distribution and Determinants of a Change in Recovery Expectations Following Traumatic Injury to Victorian Workers

OriginalPaper

Spine Kinematics Predict Symptom and Lost Time Recurrence: How Much Recovery is Enough?

OriginalPaper

Methods in Measuring Return to Work: A Comparison of Measures of Return to Work Following Treatment of Coronary Heart Disease