Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 3/2010

01-09-2010

Exploring Workplace Actors Experiences of the Social Organization of Return-to-Work

Authors: Åsa Tjulin, Ellen MacEachen, Kerstin Ekberg

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 3/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction There is a limited body of research on how the actual social exchange among workplace actors influences the practice of return-to-work. The objective of this study was to explore how workplace actors experience social relations at the workplace and how organizational dynamics in workplace-based return-to-work extends before and beyond the initial return of the sick listed worker to the workplace. Method An exploratory qualitative method approach was used, consisting of individual open-ended interviews with 33 workplace actors at seven worksites that had re-entering workers. The workplace actors represented in these interviews include: re-entering workers, supervisors, co-workers, and human resource managers. Results The analysis identified three distinct phases in the return to work process: while the worker is off work, when the worker returns back to work, and once back at work during the phase of sustainability of work ability. The two prominent themes that emerged across these phases include the theme of invisibility in relation to return-to-work effort and uncertainty, particularly, about how and when to enact return-to-work. Conclusion The findings strengthen the notion that workplace-based return-to-work interventions need to take social relations amongst workplace actors into account. They also highlight the importance and relevance of the varied roles of different workplace actors during two relatively unseen or grey areas, of return-to-work: the pre-return and the post-return sustainability phase. Attention to the invisibility of return-to-work efforts of some actors and uncertainty about how and when to enact return-to-work between workplace actors can promote successful and sustainable work ability for the re-entering worker.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):607–31.CrossRefPubMed Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):607–31.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Elders LA, van der Beek AJ, Burdorf A. Return to work after sickness absence due to back disorders—a systematic review on intervention strategies. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2000;73(5):339–48.CrossRefPubMed Elders LA, van der Beek AJ, Burdorf A. Return to work after sickness absence due to back disorders—a systematic review on intervention strategies. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2000;73(5):339–48.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference MacEachen E, Ferrier S, Kosny A, Chambers L. A deliberation on ‘hurt versus harm’ logic in early-return-to-work policy. Policy Prac Health Saf. 2007;5(2):75–96. MacEachen E, Ferrier S, Kosny A, Chambers L. A deliberation on ‘hurt versus harm’ logic in early-return-to-work policy. Policy Prac Health Saf. 2007;5(2):75–96.
4.
go back to reference MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche RL, Irvin E. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32(4):257–69.PubMed MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche RL, Irvin E. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32(4):257–69.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Young AE, Roessler RT, Wasiak R, McPherson KM, van Poppel MN, Anema JR. A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):557–68.CrossRefPubMed Young AE, Roessler RT, Wasiak R, McPherson KM, van Poppel MN, Anema JR. A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):557–68.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Baril R, Clarke J, Friesen M, Stock S, Cole D. Management of return-to-work programs for workers with musculoskeletal disorders: a qualitative study in three Canadian provinces. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(11):2101–14.CrossRefPubMed Baril R, Clarke J, Friesen M, Stock S, Cole D. Management of return-to-work programs for workers with musculoskeletal disorders: a qualitative study in three Canadian provinces. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(11):2101–14.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Eakin JM, MacEachen E, Clarke J. Playing it smart’ with return-to-work: small workplace experience under Ontario’s policy of self-reliance and early return. Policy Prac Health Saf. 2003;1(2):19–42. Eakin JM, MacEachen E, Clarke J. Playing it smart’ with return-to-work: small workplace experience under Ontario’s policy of self-reliance and early return. Policy Prac Health Saf. 2003;1(2):19–42.
8.
go back to reference Larsson A, Gard G. How can the rehabilitation planning process at the workplace be improved? A qualitative study from employers’ perspective. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(3):169–81.CrossRefPubMed Larsson A, Gard G. How can the rehabilitation planning process at the workplace be improved? A qualitative study from employers’ perspective. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(3):169–81.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Bellaby P. What is genuine sickness? The relation between work-discipline and the sick role in a pottery factory. Sociol Health Illn. 1990;12(1):47–68.CrossRef Bellaby P. What is genuine sickness? The relation between work-discipline and the sick role in a pottery factory. Sociol Health Illn. 1990;12(1):47–68.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gates L. Workplace accommodation as a social process. J Occup Rehabil. 2000;10(1):85–98.CrossRef Gates L. Workplace accommodation as a social process. J Occup Rehabil. 2000;10(1):85–98.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Eakin JM, MacEachen E. Health and social relations of work: a study of health-related experiences of employees in small workplaces. Sociol Health Illn. 1998;20(6):896–914.CrossRef Eakin JM, MacEachen E. Health and social relations of work: a study of health-related experiences of employees in small workplaces. Sociol Health Illn. 1998;20(6):896–914.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wasiak R, Verma S, Pransky G, Webster B. Risk factors for recurrent episodes of care and work disability: case of low back pain. J Occup Environ Med. 2004;46(1):68–76.CrossRefPubMed Wasiak R, Verma S, Pransky G, Webster B. Risk factors for recurrent episodes of care and work disability: case of low back pain. J Occup Environ Med. 2004;46(1):68–76.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Holmgren K, Dahlin Ivanoff S. Women on sickness absence—views of possibilities and obstacles for returning to work. A focus group study. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(4):213–22.CrossRefPubMed Holmgren K, Dahlin Ivanoff S. Women on sickness absence—views of possibilities and obstacles for returning to work. A focus group study. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(4):213–22.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Roberts-Yates C. The concerns and issues of injured workers in relation to claims/injury management and rehabilitation: the need for new operational frameworks. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(16):898–907.CrossRefPubMed Roberts-Yates C. The concerns and issues of injured workers in relation to claims/injury management and rehabilitation: the need for new operational frameworks. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(16):898–907.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Holmgren K, Ivanoff SD. Supervisors’ views on employer responsibility in the return to work process. A focus group study. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(1):93–106.CrossRefPubMed Holmgren K, Ivanoff SD. Supervisors’ views on employer responsibility in the return to work process. A focus group study. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(1):93–106.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Shaw WS, Robertson MM, Pransky G, McLellan RK. Employee perspectives on the role of supervisors to prevent workplace disability after injuries. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(3):129–42.CrossRefPubMed Shaw WS, Robertson MM, Pransky G, McLellan RK. Employee perspectives on the role of supervisors to prevent workplace disability after injuries. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(3):129–42.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, Keller R, Scheel I, van Tulder M, et al. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):507–24.CrossRefPubMed Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, Keller R, Scheel I, van Tulder M, et al. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):507–24.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Strauss S, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. 2nd ed. London: SAGE; 1998. Strauss S, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. 2nd ed. London: SAGE; 1998.
19.
go back to reference Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. London: SAGE; 2002. Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. London: SAGE; 2002.
20.
go back to reference 1962:381 A. Lagen om allmänn försäkring. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet; 1962. 1962:381 A. Lagen om allmänn försäkring. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet; 1962.
21.
go back to reference Hogan B, Carrasco JA, Wellman B. Visualizing personal networks: working with participant-aided sociograms. Field Methods. 2007;19(2):116–44.CrossRef Hogan B, Carrasco JA, Wellman B. Visualizing personal networks: working with participant-aided sociograms. Field Methods. 2007;19(2):116–44.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Grant D, editor. The SAGE handbook of organizational discourse. London: SAGE; 2004. Grant D, editor. The SAGE handbook of organizational discourse. London: SAGE; 2004.
23.
go back to reference Clegg S. The bounds of rationality: power/history/imagination. Crit Perspect Account. 2006;17:847–63.CrossRef Clegg S. The bounds of rationality: power/history/imagination. Crit Perspect Account. 2006;17:847–63.CrossRef
24.
25.
go back to reference Friesen MN, Yassi A, Cooper J. Return-to-work: the importance of human interactions and organizational structures. Work. 2001;17(1):11–22.PubMed Friesen MN, Yassi A, Cooper J. Return-to-work: the importance of human interactions and organizational structures. Work. 2001;17(1):11–22.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Schultz IZ, Stowell AW, Feuerstein M, Gatchel RJ. Models of return to work for musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(2):327–52.CrossRefPubMed Schultz IZ, Stowell AW, Feuerstein M, Gatchel RJ. Models of return to work for musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(2):327–52.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Linton SJ, Gross D, Schultz IZ, Main C, Cote P, Pransky G, et al. Prognosis and the identification of workers risking disability: research issues and directions for future research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):459–74.CrossRefPubMed Linton SJ, Gross D, Schultz IZ, Main C, Cote P, Pransky G, et al. Prognosis and the identification of workers risking disability: research issues and directions for future research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):459–74.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Walters V, Haines T. Workers’ use and knowledge of the ‘internal responsibility system’: limits to participation in occupational health and safety. Can Public Policy. 1988;14(4):411–23.CrossRef Walters V, Haines T. Workers’ use and knowledge of the ‘internal responsibility system’: limits to participation in occupational health and safety. Can Public Policy. 1988;14(4):411–23.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Exploring Workplace Actors Experiences of the Social Organization of Return-to-Work
Authors
Åsa Tjulin
Ellen MacEachen
Kerstin Ekberg
Publication date
01-09-2010
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 3/2010
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-009-9209-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2010

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 3/2010 Go to the issue