Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 4/2006

01-12-2006 | Original Paper

Enhanced Provider Communication and Patient Education Regarding Return to Work in Cancer Survivors Following Curative Treatment: A Pilot Study

Authors: Karen Nieuwenhuijsen, Brigitte Bos-Ransdorp, Lon L. J. Uitterhoeve, Mirjam A. G. Sprangers, Jos H. A. M. Verbeek

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 4/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: For employed cancer survivors, returning to work and maintaining employment is an important aspect of their quality of life. We developed an intervention aimed at enhancing this by means of (a) providing the patient with an educational leaflet on return to work and (b) enhancing communication between attending and occupational physicians. The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility of this intervention and to examine the relation of patient adherence to the advice of the leaflet and return to work. Methods: A patient series of 35 employed cancer survivors was used to evaluate the intervention. Survivors completed a baseline questionnaire prior to their treatment. Survivors and occupational physicians were interviewed by telephone eight weeks following all curative treatment. Our measure of feasibility included satisfaction of survivors with the intervention, adherence to the advice, time to return to work, satisfaction of occupational physicians with the intervention, and perceived influence on their rehabilitation efforts. Results: Interviews of 26 survivors and 24 occupational physicians, revealed that those groups perceived the leaflet as useful (i.e., 7 on a 0–10 scale. Also seven out of ten suggestions in the leaflet was adhered to and half of the occupational physicians perceived the guidance they provided was helpful. However there was no effect of level of adherence on actual return to work. Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of the approach used. However level of adherence to eduactional leaflet was not associated with an improvement in return to work in cancer survivors.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sprangers MA. Quality-of-life assessment in oncology. Achievements and challenges. Acta Oncol 2002;41:229–37.CrossRefPubMed Sprangers MA. Quality-of-life assessment in oncology. Achievements and challenges. Acta Oncol 2002;41:229–37.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bowling A. What things are important in people's lives? A survey of the public's judgements to inform scales of health related quality of life. Soc Sci Med 1995;41:1447–62.CrossRefPubMed Bowling A. What things are important in people's lives? A survey of the public's judgements to inform scales of health related quality of life. Soc Sci Med 1995;41:1447–62.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ferrell BR, Grant MM, Funk B, Otis-Green S, Garcia N. Quality of life in breast cancer survivors as identified by focus groups. Psycho oncol 1997;6:13–23.CrossRef Ferrell BR, Grant MM, Funk B, Otis-Green S, Garcia N. Quality of life in breast cancer survivors as identified by focus groups. Psycho oncol 1997;6:13–23.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Meyer TJ, Mark MM. Effects of psychosocial interventions with adult cancer patients: a meta-analysis of randomized experiments. Health Psychol 1995;14:101–8.CrossRefPubMed Meyer TJ, Mark MM. Effects of psychosocial interventions with adult cancer patients: a meta-analysis of randomized experiments. Health Psychol 1995;14:101–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Petersson LM, Berglund G, Brodin O, Glimelius B, Sjoden PO. Group rehabilitation for cancer patients: satisfaction and perceived benefits. Patient Educ Couns 2000;40:219–29.CrossRefPubMed Petersson LM, Berglund G, Brodin O, Glimelius B, Sjoden PO. Group rehabilitation for cancer patients: satisfaction and perceived benefits. Patient Educ Couns 2000;40:219–29.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Berglund G, Bolund C, Gustavsson UL, Sjoden PO. Starting again–a comparison study of a group rehabilitation program for cancer patients. Acta Oncol 1993;32:15–21.PubMed Berglund G, Bolund C, Gustavsson UL, Sjoden PO. Starting again–a comparison study of a group rehabilitation program for cancer patients. Acta Oncol 1993;32:15–21.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Berglund G, Bolund C, Gustafsson UL, Sjoden PO. One-year follow-up of the ‘Starting Again’ group rehabilitation programme for cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 1994;30A:1744–51.CrossRefPubMed Berglund G, Bolund C, Gustafsson UL, Sjoden PO. One-year follow-up of the ‘Starting Again’ group rehabilitation programme for cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 1994;30A:1744–51.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cole RP, Scialla SJ, Bednarz L. Functional recovery in cancer rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:623–7.CrossRefPubMed Cole RP, Scialla SJ, Bednarz L. Functional recovery in cancer rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:623–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Verbeek J, Spelten E, Kammeijer M, Sprangers M. Return to work of cancer survivors: a prospective cohort study into the quality of rehabilitation by occupational physicians. Occup Environ Med 2003;60:352.CrossRefPubMed Verbeek J, Spelten E, Kammeijer M, Sprangers M. Return to work of cancer survivors: a prospective cohort study into the quality of rehabilitation by occupational physicians. Occup Environ Med 2003;60:352.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kremer AM, Wevers CWJ. Kanker in relatie tot werk [cancer in relation to work]. Tijdschrift voor bedrijfs- en verzekeringsgeneeskunde 2003;11:231–7 Kremer AM, Wevers CWJ. Kanker in relatie tot werk [cancer in relation to work]. Tijdschrift voor bedrijfs- en verzekeringsgeneeskunde 2003;11:231–7
11.
go back to reference Maunsell E, Brisson C, Dubois L, Lauzier S, Fraser A. Work problems after breast cancer: an exploratory qualitative study. Psychooncology 1999;8:467–73.CrossRefPubMed Maunsell E, Brisson C, Dubois L, Lauzier S, Fraser A. Work problems after breast cancer: an exploratory qualitative study. Psychooncology 1999;8:467–73.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Siegert RJ, Taylor WJ. Theoretical aspects of goal-setting and motivation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:1–8.CrossRefPubMed Siegert RJ, Taylor WJ. Theoretical aspects of goal-setting and motivation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:1–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Barnes MP, Ward AB. Textbook of rehabilitation medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2000. Barnes MP, Ward AB. Textbook of rehabilitation medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2000.
14.
go back to reference McLellan DL. Introduction to rehabilitation. In Wilson BA, McLellan DL, editors. Rehabilitation studies handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University press 1997. pp. 1–19. McLellan DL. Introduction to rehabilitation. In Wilson BA, McLellan DL, editors. Rehabilitation studies handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University press 1997. pp. 1–19.
15.
go back to reference Gard G, Larsson A. Focus on motivation in the work rehabilitation planning process: a qualitative study from the employer's perspective. J.Occup Rehabil 2003;13:159–67.CrossRefPubMed Gard G, Larsson A. Focus on motivation in the work rehabilitation planning process: a qualitative study from the employer's perspective. J.Occup Rehabil 2003;13:159–67.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ostelo RW, de Vet HC, Berfelo MW, Kerckhoffs MR, Vlaeyen JW, Wolters PM, Van Den Brandt PA. Effectiveness of behavioral graded activity after first-time lumbar disc surgery: short term results of a randomized controlled trial. Eur Spine J 2003;12:637–44.CrossRefPubMed Ostelo RW, de Vet HC, Berfelo MW, Kerckhoffs MR, Vlaeyen JW, Wolters PM, Van Den Brandt PA. Effectiveness of behavioral graded activity after first-time lumbar disc surgery: short term results of a randomized controlled trial. Eur Spine J 2003;12:637–44.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Van Der Klink JJ, van Dijk FJ. Dutch practice guidelines for managing adjustment disorders in occupational and primary health care. Scand J Work Environ Health 2003;29:478--87.PubMed Van Der Klink JJ, van Dijk FJ. Dutch practice guidelines for managing adjustment disorders in occupational and primary health care. Scand J Work Environ Health 2003;29:478--87.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Spelten ER, et al. Cancer, fatigue and the return of patients to work-a prospective cohort study. Eur J Cancer 2003;39:1562–67.CrossRefPubMed Spelten ER, et al. Cancer, fatigue and the return of patients to work-a prospective cohort study. Eur J Cancer 2003;39:1562–67.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Nieuwenhuijsen K, et al. Validation of performance indicators for rehabilitation of workers with mental health problems. Med Care 2005;43:1034--42.CrossRefPubMed Nieuwenhuijsen K, et al. Validation of performance indicators for rehabilitation of workers with mental health problems. Med Care 2005;43:1034--42.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Verbeek JH. How can doctors help their patients to return to work? PLOS Medicine 2006. In press. Verbeek JH. How can doctors help their patients to return to work? PLOS Medicine 2006. In press.
21.
go back to reference Nieuwenhuijsen K, et al. Predicting the duration of sickness absence for patients with common mental disorders in occupational health care. SJWEH 2006. In press. Nieuwenhuijsen K, et al. Predicting the duration of sickness absence for patients with common mental disorders in occupational health care. SJWEH 2006. In press.
22.
go back to reference Steenstra IA, et al. Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave due to low-back pain in dutch health care professionals. J Occup Rehab 2005;15:591–605.CrossRef Steenstra IA, et al. Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave due to low-back pain in dutch health care professionals. J Occup Rehab 2005;15:591–605.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Enhanced Provider Communication and Patient Education Regarding Return to Work in Cancer Survivors Following Curative Treatment: A Pilot Study
Authors
Karen Nieuwenhuijsen
Brigitte Bos-Ransdorp
Lon L. J. Uitterhoeve
Mirjam A. G. Sprangers
Jos H. A. M. Verbeek
Publication date
01-12-2006
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 4/2006
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-006-9057-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2006

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 4/2006 Go to the issue