Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 6/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Original Research

Genetics and Personal Insurance: the Perspectives of Canadian Cancer Genetic Counselors

Authors: Michelle Lane, Ida Ngueng Feze, Yann Joly

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Genetic discrimination in the context of genetic testing has been identified as a concern for symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals for more than three decades. Genetic counselors are often the health care professionals who discuss risks and benefits of genetic testing with patients, thereby making them most appropriate to address patient concerns about genetics and personal insurance (i.e., life, life as related to mortgage or group insurance, disability, critical illness and travel). A pilot study was conducted to ascertain the current practices of Canadian cancer genetic counselors in regard to their discussions with patients about genetic testing and access to personal insurance. Among the 36 counselors surveyed, 100 % reported discussing the issue of genetic testing and personal insurance with their patients. Several factors influenced the content, depth and length of these discussions including age, cancer status, family members, and patients’ current and future insurance needs. Counselors reported discussing with patients the possible impact of genetic test results on access to personal insurance, possible access and use of patient genetic information by insurance companies, and whom patients should contact if they have additional questions. The most commonly reported inquiries from patients included questions about the possible impact of genetic testing on their ability to obtain insurance, and the insurability of family members. While 28 % of counselors reported having been contacted by an insurer requesting access to patient information, only one counselor was aware of or could recall the outcome of such a request. This pilot study revealed that issues concerning genetics and personal insurance are commonly discussed in Canadian cancer genetic counseling sessions. Counselors furthermore expressed a need for additional educational resources on the topic of genetics and personal insurance for themselves and their patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
Armstrong, K., Weber, B., FitzGerald, G., Hershey, J., Pauly, M., Lemaire, J., . . . Asch, D. (2003). Life insurance and breast cancer risk assessment: adverse selection, genetic testing decisions, and discrimination. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 120A, 359–364.
Audet v. Industrielle-Alliance (Quebec) (1990) R.R.A. 500 (C.S.).
Barlow-Stewart, K., Taylor, S. A., Stranger, M., & Otlowski, M. (2009). Verification of consumer’s experiences and perceptions of genetic discrimination and its impact on utilization of genetic testing. Genetics in Medicine, 11(3), 193–201.CrossRefPubMed
Bernhardt, B. A., Biesecker, B. B., & Mastromarino, C. L. (2000). Goals, benefits, and outcomes of genetic counseling: client and genetic counselor assessment. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 94, 189–197.CrossRefPubMed
Bill 127 (2013). An act to amend the human rights code with respect to genetic characteristics, 2nd Sess, 40th Legislature of Ontario (1st reading as of 13 November 2013).
Bill S-201 (2013). An act to prohibit and prevent genetic discrimination, 1st Sess, 41st Parliament, 2nd Sess, 2nd Reading in Senate, Report of the Standing Senate Committee on Human Rights issued on February 9, 2015. Version as of April 2nd 2015.
Billings, P. R., Kohn, M. A., De Cuevas, M., Beckwith, J., Alper, J. S., & Natowicz, M. R. (1992). Discrimination as a consequence of genetic testing. American Journal of Human Genetics, 50(3), 476–482.PubMedCentralPubMed
Bombard, Y., Penziner, E., Suchowersky, O., Guttman, M., Paulsen, J. S., Bottorff, J. L., & Hayden, M. R. (2007). Engagement with genetic discrimination: concerns and experiences in the context of Huntington disease. European Journal of Human Genetics, 16(3), 279–289.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Bombard, Y., Veenstra, G., Friedman, J. M., Creighton, S., Currie, L., Paulsen, J. S., . . . Group, T. C. R.-H. C. R. (2009). Perceptions of genetic discrimination among people at risk for Huntington’s disease: a cross sectional survey. British Medical Journal, 338, b2175.
Bombard, Y., Palin, J., Friedman, J. M., Veenstra, G., Creighton, S., Bottorff, J. L., & Hayden, M. R. (2012). Beyond the patient: the broader impact of genetic discrimination among individuals at risk of Huntington disease. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 159(2), 217–226.CrossRef
Bombard, Y., Bach, P., & Offit, K. (2013). Translating genomics in cancer care. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network: JNCCN, 11, 1343–1353.PubMed
Bower, M. A., McCarthy Veach, P., Bartels, D. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2002). A survey of genetic counselors’ strategies for addressing ethical and professional challenges in practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11(3), 77–101.CrossRef
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.CrossRef
Canadian Institute of Actuaries (2014). Statement on genetic testing and insurance. Online: www.​cia-ica.​ca: Canadian Institute of Actuaries.
Canadian Life and Health Insurance Association Inc (2014). Industry code: genetic testing information for insurance underwriting. Online: www.​clhia.​ca: Canadian Life and Health Insurance Association.
Geer, K. P., Ropka, M. E., Cohn, W. F., Jones, S. M., & Miesfeldt, S. (2001). Factors influencing patient’s decisions to decline cancer genetic counseling services. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 10(1), 25–40.CrossRefPubMed
Godard, B., Pratte, A., Dumont, M., Simard-Lebrun, A., & Simard, J. (2007). Factors associated with an individual’s decision to withdraw from genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: implications for counseling. Genetic Testing, 11(1), 45–54.CrossRefPubMed
Gregoire, G., Alemdjrodo, R., & Chagnon, A. (2009). La discrimination génétique et l’assurance-vie: les mesures de protection actuelles suffisent-elles? Lex Electronica, 14(1).
Hadley, D., Jenkins, J., Dimond, E., Nakahara, K., Grogan, L., Liewehr, D., . . . Kirsch, I. (2003). Genetic testing in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Archives of Internal Medicine, 163(5), 573–582.
Hall, M. A., & Rich, S. S. (2000). Genetic privacy laws and patients’ fear of discrimiantion by health insurers: the view from genetic counselors. American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 28, 245–257.CrossRef
Hudson, K., Javitt, G., Burke, W., Byers, P., & ASHG Social Issues Committee. (2007). ASHG statement on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the United States. American Journal of Human Genetics, 81(3), 635–637.PubMedCentralCrossRef
Huizenga, C. R., Lowstuter, K., Banks, K. C., Lagos, V. I., Vandergon, V. O., & Weitzel, J. N. (2010). Evolving perspectives on genetic discrimination in health insurance among health care providers. Familial Cancer, 9(2), 253–260.CrossRefPubMed
Joly, Y., Braker, M., & Le Huynh, M. (2010). Genetic discrimination in private insurance: global perspectives. New Genetics and Society, 29(4), 351–368.CrossRef
Keogh, L. A., van Vliet, C. M., Studdert, D. M., Maskiell, J. A., Macrae, F. A., St John, D. J., . . . Jenkins, M. A. (2009). Is uptake of genetic testing for colorectal cancer influenced by knowledge of insurance implications? Medical Journal of Australia, 191(5), 255–258.
Kirkland, S. A., Raina, P. S., Wolfson, C., Strople, G., Kits, O., Dukeshire, S., . . . Pelletier, A. (2009). Exploring the acceptability and feasibility of conducting a large longitudinal population-based study in Canada. Canadian Journal on Aging, 28(3), 231–242.
Lemmens, T. (2004). Can insurance law accommodate the uncertainty associated with preliminary genetic information? Canadian Bar Review, 83, 357–410.
Ngueng Feze, I., & Joly, Y. (2014). Can’t always get what you want? Try an indirect route you just might get what you need: a study on access to genetic data by Canadian life insurers. Current Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, 12, 56–64.CrossRef
Otlowski, M., Taylor, S., & Bombard, Y. (2012). Genetic discrimination: international perspectives. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 13(6), 433–454.CrossRefPubMed
Parascola, M., Hawkins, J. S., & danis, M. (2002). Patient autonomy and the challenge of clinical uncertainty. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 12(3), 245–264.CrossRef
Pfeffer, N. L., McCarthy Veach, P., & LeRoy, B. S. (2003). An investigation of genetic counselors’ discussions of genetic discrimination with cancer risk patients. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 12(5), 419–438.CrossRefPubMed
Phoenix Strategic Perspective Inc. (2013). Survey of Canadians on privacy-related issues. Ottawa: Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada.
Ragoussis, V., Ngueng Feze, I., & Joly, Y. (2014). Sharing genetic information online: an exploration of GINA’s 2.0 frontier. The American Journal of Bioethics, 14(11), 53–55.CrossRefPubMed
Riley, B., Culver, J., Skrzynia, C., Senter, L., Peters, J., Costalas, J., . . . Trepanier, A. (2012). Essential elements of genetic cancer risk assessment, counseling, and testing: updated recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21(2), 151–161.
Rothstein, M. A. (2009). GINA’s beauty is only skin deep. Gene Watch, 22(2), 9–12.
Rothstein, M. A., & Joly, Y. (2009). Genetic information and insurance underwriting: Contemporary issues and approaches in the global economy insurance. In P. Atkinson, P. Glasner, & M. Lock (Eds.), Handbook of genetics and society: Mapping the new genomic era. London: Routledge.
Stone, M. J., & Petrick, J. F. (2013). The educational benefits of travel experiences: a literature review. Journal of Travel Research, 52(6), 731–744.CrossRef
Taylor, S., Treloar, S., Barlow-Stewart, K., Stranger, M., & Otlowski, M. (2008). Investigating genetic discrimination in Australia: a large-scale survey of clinical genetics clients. Clinical Genetics, 74(1), 20–30.CrossRefPubMed
Trepanier, A., Ahrens, M., McKinnon, W., Peters, J., Stopfer, J., Grumet, S. C., . . . Vockley, C. W. (2004). Genetic cancer risk assessment and counseling: recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 13(2), 83–114.
Wertz, D. C. (1998–1999). “Genetic discrimination”: results of a survey of genetics professionals, primary care, physicians, patients and public. Health Law Review, 7(3), 7–8.
Wham, D., Vu, T., Chan-Smutko, G., Kobelka, C., Urbauer, D., & Heald, B. (2010). Assessment of clinical practices among cancer genetic counselors. Familial Cancer, 9, 459–468.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Genetics and Personal Insurance: the Perspectives of Canadian Cancer Genetic Counselors
Authors
Michelle Lane
Ida Ngueng Feze
Yann Joly
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9841-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

Journal of Genetic Counseling 6/2015 Go to the issue

Original Research

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Regarding Genetic Testing and Genetic Counselors in Jordan: A Population-Based Survey

Original Research

The Impact of Neurofibromatosis Type 1 on the Health and Wellbeing of Australian Adults

Original Research

Support Desired by Women Following Termination of Pregnancy for a Fetal Anomaly

Abstract

Presented Abstracts from the Thirty Fourth Annual Education Conference of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (Pittsburgh, PA, October 2015)

Original Research

Uptake of Genetic Counseling, Knowledge of Bleeding risks and Psychosocial Impact in a South African Cohort of Female Relatives of People with Hemophilia

Original Research

Facilitators and Challenges in Psychosocial Adaptation to Being at Increased Familial Risk of Breast Cancer