Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 6/2018

01-12-2018 | Original Research

Performance of a second generation pulmonary capnotracking system for continuous monitoring of cardiac output

Authors: Philip J. Peyton, Monique Kozub

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Technologies for minimally-invasive cardiac output measurement in patients during surgery remain little used in routine practice. We tested a redeveloped system based on CO2 elimination (VCO2) by the lungs for use in ventilated patients, which can be seamlessly integrated into a modern anesthesia/monitoring platform, and provides automated, continuous breath-by-breath cardiac output monitoring. A prototype measurement system was constructed to measure VCO2 and end-tidal CO2 concentration with each breath. A baseline measurement of non-shunt cardiac output was made during a brief oscillating change in ventilator rate, according to the differential CO2 Fick approach and repeated at 5–10 min intervals. Continuous breath-by-breath monitoring of cardiac output was performed between these intervals from measurement of VCO2, using a derivation of the Fick equation applied to pulmonary CO2 elimination and cardiac output displayed in real time. Measurements were compared with simultaneous measurements by thermodilution in 50 patients undergoing cardiac surgery or liver transplantation. Overall mean bias [sd] for agreement in cardiac output measurement was − 0.3 [1.1] L/min, percentage error ± 38.7%, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.91. Concordance in measurement of changes of at least 15% in cardiac output was 81.4%, with a mean angular bias of − 1.7°, and radial limits of agreement of ± 76.2° on polar plot analysis. The accuracy and precision compared favourably to other clinical techniques. The method is relatively seamless and automated and has potential for continuous, cardiac output monitoring in ventilated patients during anesthesia and critical care.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Funk DJ, Moretti EW, Gan TJ. Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring in the perioperative setting. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:887–97.CrossRef Funk DJ, Moretti EW, Gan TJ. Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring in the perioperative setting. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:887–97.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Pearse RM, Harrison DA, MacDonald N, Gillies MA, Blunt M, Ackland G, Grocott MP, Ahern A, Griggs K, Scott R, Hinds C, Rowan K. OPTIMISE Study Group. Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA. 2014;311(21):2181–90.CrossRef Pearse RM, Harrison DA, MacDonald N, Gillies MA, Blunt M, Ackland G, Grocott MP, Ahern A, Griggs K, Scott R, Hinds C, Rowan K. OPTIMISE Study Group. Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA. 2014;311(21):2181–90.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Miller TE, Roche AM, Gan TJ. Poor adoption of hemodynamic optimization during major surgery: are we practicing substandard care? Anesth Analg. 2011;112(6):1274–6.CrossRef Miller TE, Roche AM, Gan TJ. Poor adoption of hemodynamic optimization during major surgery: are we practicing substandard care? Anesth Analg. 2011;112(6):1274–6.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Peyton P, Chong S. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology. 2010;113(5):1220–35.CrossRef Peyton P, Chong S. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology. 2010;113(5):1220–35.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput. 1999;15:85–91.CrossRef Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput. 1999;15:85–91.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Peyton P, Thompson D, Junor P. Non-invasive automated measurement of cardiac output during stable cardiac surgery using a fully integrated differential CO2 Fick method. J Clin Monit Comput. 2008;22(4):285 – 92.CrossRef Peyton P, Thompson D, Junor P. Non-invasive automated measurement of cardiac output during stable cardiac surgery using a fully integrated differential CO2 Fick method. J Clin Monit Comput. 2008;22(4):285 – 92.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Peyton P. Continuous minimally invasive peri-operative monitoring of cardiac output by pulmonary capnotracking: comparison with thermodilution and transesophageal echocardiography. J Clin Monit Comput. 2012;26(2):121 – 32.CrossRef Peyton P. Continuous minimally invasive peri-operative monitoring of cardiac output by pulmonary capnotracking: comparison with thermodilution and transesophageal echocardiography. J Clin Monit Comput. 2012;26(2):121 – 32.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gedeon A, Forslund L, Hedenstierna G, Romano E. A new method for noninvasive bedside determination of pulmonary blood flow. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1980;18:411–8.CrossRef Gedeon A, Forslund L, Hedenstierna G, Romano E. A new method for noninvasive bedside determination of pulmonary blood flow. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1980;18:411–8.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Peyton P, Robinson G, McCall P, Thompson B. Non-invasive measurement of intrapulmonary shunting. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004;18(1):47–52.CrossRef Peyton P, Robinson G, McCall P, Thompson B. Non-invasive measurement of intrapulmonary shunting. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004;18(1):47–52.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Peyton P, Venkatesan Y, Hood S, Junor P, May C. Non-invasive, automated and continuous cardiac output monitoring by pulmonary capnodynamics: breath by breath comparison with ultrasonic flow probe. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:72–80.CrossRef Peyton P, Venkatesan Y, Hood S, Junor P, May C. Non-invasive, automated and continuous cardiac output monitoring by pulmonary capnodynamics: breath by breath comparison with ultrasonic flow probe. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:72–80.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kelman GR. Digital computer subroutine for the conversion of oxygen tension into saturation. J Appl Physiol. 1966;21(4):1375–6.CrossRef Kelman GR. Digital computer subroutine for the conversion of oxygen tension into saturation. J Appl Physiol. 1966;21(4):1375–6.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kelman GR. Digital computer procedure for the conversion of PCO2 into blood CO2 content. Respir Physiol. 1967;3:111–5.CrossRef Kelman GR. Digital computer procedure for the conversion of PCO2 into blood CO2 content. Respir Physiol. 1967;3:111–5.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Peyton P, Robinson G, Thompson B. The effect of ventilation-perfusion inhomogeneity and nitrous oxide on oxygenation in anesthesia: physiological modeling of gas exchange. J Appl Physiol. 2001;91:17–25.CrossRef Peyton P, Robinson G, Thompson B. The effect of ventilation-perfusion inhomogeneity and nitrous oxide on oxygenation in anesthesia: physiological modeling of gas exchange. J Appl Physiol. 2001;91:17–25.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;327:307–10.CrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;327:307–10.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG. Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat. 2007;17(4):571–82.CrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG. Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat. 2007;17(4):571–82.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. 2nd ed. Oxford Medical Publications. 1995. Ch 8, pp 104–26. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. 2nd ed. Oxford Medical Publications. 1995. Ch 8, pp 104–26.
17.
go back to reference Perrino AC Jr, Harris SN, Luther MA. Intraoperative determination of cardiac output using multiplane transesophageal echocardiography: a comparison to thermodilution. Anesthesiology. 1998;89:350–7.CrossRef Perrino AC Jr, Harris SN, Luther MA. Intraoperative determination of cardiac output using multiplane transesophageal echocardiography: a comparison to thermodilution. Anesthesiology. 1998;89:350–7.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM-H. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:1180–92.CrossRef Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM-H. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:1180–92.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Botero M, Kirby D, Lobato E, Staples E, Gravenstein N. Measurement of cardiac output before and after cardiopulmonary bypass: comparison among aortic transit-time ultrasound, thermodilution, and noninvasive partial CO2 rebreathing. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004;18(5):563 – 72.CrossRef Botero M, Kirby D, Lobato E, Staples E, Gravenstein N. Measurement of cardiac output before and after cardiopulmonary bypass: comparison among aortic transit-time ultrasound, thermodilution, and noninvasive partial CO2 rebreathing. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004;18(5):563 – 72.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bajorat J, Hofmockel R, Vagts DA, Janda M, Pohl B, Beck C, Noeldge-Schomburg G. Comparison of invasive and less-invasive techniques of cardiac output measurement under different haemodynamic conditions in a pig model. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006;23(1):23–30.CrossRef Bajorat J, Hofmockel R, Vagts DA, Janda M, Pohl B, Beck C, Noeldge-Schomburg G. Comparison of invasive and less-invasive techniques of cardiac output measurement under different haemodynamic conditions in a pig model. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006;23(1):23–30.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Critchley L. Bias and precision statistics: should we still adhere to the 30% benchmark for cardiac output monitor validation studies? Anesthesiology. 2011;114:1245–6.CrossRef Critchley L. Bias and precision statistics: should we still adhere to the 30% benchmark for cardiac output monitor validation studies? Anesthesiology. 2011;114:1245–6.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Capek JM, Roy RJ. Encyclopedia of medical devices and instrumentation. In: Webster JG, editor. New York: Wiley; 1988. pp. 1309–10. Capek JM, Roy RJ. Encyclopedia of medical devices and instrumentation. In: Webster JG, editor. New York: Wiley; 1988. pp. 1309–10.
23.
go back to reference Yem JS, Tang Y, Turner MJ, Baker AB. Sources of error in noninvasive pulmonary blood flow measurements by partial rebreathing: a computer model study. Anesthesiology. 2003 Apr;98(4):881–7.CrossRef Yem JS, Tang Y, Turner MJ, Baker AB. Sources of error in noninvasive pulmonary blood flow measurements by partial rebreathing: a computer model study. Anesthesiology. 2003 Apr;98(4):881–7.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hällsjö Sander C, Hallbäck M, Wallin M, Emtell P, Oldner A, Björne H. Novel continuous capnodynamic method for cardiac output assessment during mechanical ventilation. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112(5):824–31.CrossRef Hällsjö Sander C, Hallbäck M, Wallin M, Emtell P, Oldner A, Björne H. Novel continuous capnodynamic method for cardiac output assessment during mechanical ventilation. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112(5):824–31.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hällsjö Sander C, Lönnqvist PA, Hallbäck M, Sipmann FS, Wallin M, Oldner A, Björne H. Capnodynamic assessment of effective lung volume during cardiac output manipulations in a porcine model. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016;30(6):761–9.CrossRef Hällsjö Sander C, Lönnqvist PA, Hallbäck M, Sipmann FS, Wallin M, Oldner A, Björne H. Capnodynamic assessment of effective lung volume during cardiac output manipulations in a porcine model. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016;30(6):761–9.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hällsjö Sander C, Hallbäck M, Suarez Sipmann F, Wallin M, Oldner A, Björne H. A novel continuous capnodynamic method for cardiac output assessment in a porcine model of lung lavage. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015;59(8):1022–31.CrossRef Hällsjö Sander C, Hallbäck M, Suarez Sipmann F, Wallin M, Oldner A, Björne H. A novel continuous capnodynamic method for cardiac output assessment in a porcine model of lung lavage. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015;59(8):1022–31.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Peyton P. Editorial: minimally-invasive monitoring of cardiac output and lung gas exchange: taking it mainstream. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016;30(6):749–51.CrossRef Peyton P. Editorial: minimally-invasive monitoring of cardiac output and lung gas exchange: taking it mainstream. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016;30(6):749–51.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Performance of a second generation pulmonary capnotracking system for continuous monitoring of cardiac output
Authors
Philip J. Peyton
Monique Kozub
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-018-0110-y

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 6/2018 Go to the issue