Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 3/2018

01-06-2018 | Original Research

Changes in transcranial motor evoked potentials during hemorrhage are associated with increased serum propofol concentrations

Authors: Jeremy A. Lieberman, John Feiner, Mark Rollins, Russ Lyon

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) monitor the integrity of the spinal cord during spine surgery. Propofol-based anesthesia is favored in order to enhance TcMEP quality. During intraoperative hemorrhage, TcMEP amplitudes may be reduced. The serum concentration of propofol may increase during hemorrhage. No study has determined whether changes in TcMEPs due to hemorrhage are related to changes in propofol blood levels. We monitored TcMEPs, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and cardiac output (CO) and hemoglobin in pigs (n = 6) undergoing controlled progressive hemorrhage during a standardized anesthetic with infusions of propofol, ketamine, and fentanyl. We recorded TcMEPs from the rectus femoris (RF) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles bilaterally. A pulmonary artery catheter was placed to measure CO. Progressive hemorrhage of 10% blood volume increments was done until TcMEP amplitude decreased by >60% from baseline. Serum propofol levels were also measured following removal of each 10% blood volume increment. TcMEP responses were elicited every 3 min using constant stimulation parameters. We removed between 20 and 50% of total blood volume in order to achieve the >60% reduction in TcMEP amplitude. MAP and CO decreased significantly from baseline. At maximum hemorrhage, TcMEP amplitude decreased in the RF and TA by an average of 73 and 62% respectively from baseline (P < 0.01). Serum propofol levels varied greatly among animals at baseline (range 410–1720 ng/mL) and increased in each animal during hemorrhage. The mean propofol concentration rose from 1190 ± 530 to 2483 ± 968 ng/mL (P < 0.01). The increased propofol concentration correlated with decreased CO. Multivariate analysis using hierarchical linear models indicated that the decline of TcMEP amplitude was primarily associated with rising propofol concentrations, but was also independently affected by reduced CO. We believe that the decrease in blood volume and CO during hemorrhage increased the serum concentration of propofol by reducing the volume of distribution and/or rate of hepatic metabolism of the drug. Despite wide acceptance of propofol as the preferred anesthetic when using TcMEPs, intravenous anesthetics are vulnerable to altered pharmacokinetics during conditions of hemorrhage and could contribute to false-positive TcMEP changes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Deletis V, Sala F. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord during spinal cord and spine surgery: a review focused on the corticospinal tracts. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119:248–64.CrossRefPubMed Deletis V, Sala F. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord during spinal cord and spine surgery: a review focused on the corticospinal tracts. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119:248–64.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Malhotra N, Shaffrey C. Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring in spine surgery. Spine. 2010;35:2167–79.CrossRefPubMed Malhotra N, Shaffrey C. Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring in spine surgery. Spine. 2010;35:2167–79.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Fehlings M, Brodke D, Norvell D, et al. The evidence for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: does it make a difference?. Spine 2010;35:S37–46.PubMed Fehlings M, Brodke D, Norvell D, et al. The evidence for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: does it make a difference?. Spine 2010;35:S37–46.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Sloan T. Anesthetic effects on electrophysiologic recordings. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;15:217–26.CrossRefPubMed Sloan T. Anesthetic effects on electrophysiologic recordings. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;15:217–26.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Balvin M, Song K, Slimp J. Effects of anesthetic regimens and other confounding factors affecting the interpretation of motor evoked potentials during pediatric spine surgery. Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol. 2010;50:219–44.PubMed Balvin M, Song K, Slimp J. Effects of anesthetic regimens and other confounding factors affecting the interpretation of motor evoked potentials during pediatric spine surgery. Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol. 2010;50:219–44.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Tamkus A, Rice K, Kim H. Differential rates of false-positive findings in transcranial electric motor evoked potential monitoring when using inhalational anesthesia versus total intravenous anesthesia during spine surgeries. Spine J. 2013;13:1484–8. Tamkus A, Rice K, Kim H. Differential rates of false-positive findings in transcranial electric motor evoked potential monitoring when using inhalational anesthesia versus total intravenous anesthesia during spine surgeries. Spine J. 2013;13:1484–8.
7.
go back to reference Lyon R, Lieberman J, Grabovac M, et al. Strategies for managing decreased Motor Evoked Potential signals while distracting the spine during correction of scoliosis. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2004;16:167–70.CrossRefPubMed Lyon R, Lieberman J, Grabovac M, et al. Strategies for managing decreased Motor Evoked Potential signals while distracting the spine during correction of scoliosis. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2004;16:167–70.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lieberman J, Lyon R, Feiner J, et al. The efficacy of motor evoked potentials in fixed sagittal imbalance deformity correction surgery. Spine. 2008;33:E414–E24.CrossRefPubMed Lieberman J, Lyon R, Feiner J, et al. The efficacy of motor evoked potentials in fixed sagittal imbalance deformity correction surgery. Spine. 2008;33:E414–E24.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Schwartz D, Auerbach J, Dormans J, et al. Neurophysiological detection of impending spinal cord injury during scoliosis surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2440–9.PubMed Schwartz D, Auerbach J, Dormans J, et al. Neurophysiological detection of impending spinal cord injury during scoliosis surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2440–9.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Noonan K, Walker T, Feinberg J, et al. Factors related to false- versus true-positive neuromonitoring changes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Spine. 2002;27:825–30.CrossRefPubMed Noonan K, Walker T, Feinberg J, et al. Factors related to false- versus true-positive neuromonitoring changes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Spine. 2002;27:825–30.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Cheh G, Lenke L, Padberg A, et al. Loss of spinal cord monitoring signals in children during thoracic kyphosis correction with spinal osteotomy: why does it occur and what should you do? Spine. 2008;33:1093–9.CrossRefPubMed Cheh G, Lenke L, Padberg A, et al. Loss of spinal cord monitoring signals in children during thoracic kyphosis correction with spinal osteotomy: why does it occur and what should you do? Spine. 2008;33:1093–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Othman Z, Lenke LG, Bolon S, et al. Hypotension-induced loss of intraoperative monitoring data during surgical correction of scheuermann kyphosis: a case report. Spine. 2004;29:E258-65.CrossRefPubMed Othman Z, Lenke LG, Bolon S, et al. Hypotension-induced loss of intraoperative monitoring data during surgical correction of scheuermann kyphosis: a case report. Spine. 2004;29:E258-65.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lieberman J, Feiner J, Lyon R, et al. Effect of hemorrhage and hypotension on transcranial motor-evoked potentials in swine. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:1109–19.CrossRefPubMed Lieberman J, Feiner J, Lyon R, et al. Effect of hemorrhage and hypotension on transcranial motor-evoked potentials in swine. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:1109–19.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference De Paepe P, Belpaire F, Rosseel M, et al. Influence of hypovolemia on the pharmacokinetics and the electroencephalographic effect of propofol in the rat. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:1482–90.CrossRefPubMed De Paepe P, Belpaire F, Rosseel M, et al. Influence of hypovolemia on the pharmacokinetics and the electroencephalographic effect of propofol in the rat. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:1482–90.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Johnson K, Egan T, Kern S, et al. The influence of hemorrhagic shock on propofol: a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:409–20.CrossRefPubMed Johnson K, Egan T, Kern S, et al. The influence of hemorrhagic shock on propofol: a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:409–20.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kazama T, Kurita T, Morita K, et al. Influence of hemorrhage on propofol pseudo-steady state concentration. Anesthesiology. 2002;97:1156–61.CrossRefPubMed Kazama T, Kurita T, Morita K, et al. Influence of hemorrhage on propofol pseudo-steady state concentration. Anesthesiology. 2002;97:1156–61.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kurita T, Morita K, Kazama T, et al. Influence of cardiac output on plasma propofol concentrations during constant infusion in swine. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:1498–503.CrossRefPubMed Kurita T, Morita K, Kazama T, et al. Influence of cardiac output on plasma propofol concentrations during constant infusion in swine. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:1498–503.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Mok J, Lyon R, Lieberman J, et al. Monitoring of nerve root injury using transcranial motor-evoked potentials in a pig model. Spine. 2008;33:E465–73.CrossRefPubMed Mok J, Lyon R, Lieberman J, et al. Monitoring of nerve root injury using transcranial motor-evoked potentials in a pig model. Spine. 2008;33:E465–73.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lyon R, Burch S, Lieberman J. Mixed-muscle electrode placement (“jumping” muscles) may produce false-negative results when using transcranial motor evoked potentials to detect an isolated nerve root injury in a porcine model. J Clin Monit Comput. 2009;23:403–8.CrossRefPubMed Lyon R, Burch S, Lieberman J. Mixed-muscle electrode placement (“jumping” muscles) may produce false-negative results when using transcranial motor evoked potentials to detect an isolated nerve root injury in a porcine model. J Clin Monit Comput. 2009;23:403–8.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Lyon R, Gibson A, Burch S, et al. Increases in voltage may produce false-negatives when using transcranial motor evoked potentials to detect an isolated nerve root injury. J Clin Monit Comput. 2010;24:441–8.CrossRefPubMed Lyon R, Gibson A, Burch S, et al. Increases in voltage may produce false-negatives when using transcranial motor evoked potentials to detect an isolated nerve root injury. J Clin Monit Comput. 2010;24:441–8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Raudenbush S, Bryk A. Hierarchical linear models—applications and data analysis methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2002. Raudenbush S, Bryk A. Hierarchical linear models—applications and data analysis methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2002.
22.
go back to reference Padberg AM, Wilson-Holden TJ, Lenke LG, et al. Somatosensory- and motor-evoked potential monitoring without a wake-up test during idiopathic scoliosis surgery. An accepted standard of care. Spine. 1998;23:1392–400.CrossRefPubMed Padberg AM, Wilson-Holden TJ, Lenke LG, et al. Somatosensory- and motor-evoked potential monitoring without a wake-up test during idiopathic scoliosis surgery. An accepted standard of care. Spine. 1998;23:1392–400.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Pelosi L, Lamb J, Grevitt M, et al. Combined monitoring of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in orthopaedic spinal surgery. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113:1082–91.CrossRefPubMed Pelosi L, Lamb J, Grevitt M, et al. Combined monitoring of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in orthopaedic spinal surgery. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113:1082–91.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference MacDonald D, Al Zayed Z, Khoudeir I, et al. Monitoring scoliosis surgery with combined multiple pulse transcranial electric motor and cortical somatosensory-evoked potentials from the lower and upper extremities. Spine. 2006;28:194–203.CrossRef MacDonald D, Al Zayed Z, Khoudeir I, et al. Monitoring scoliosis surgery with combined multiple pulse transcranial electric motor and cortical somatosensory-evoked potentials from the lower and upper extremities. Spine. 2006;28:194–203.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kelleher M, Tan G, Sarjeant R, et al. Predictive value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during cervical spine surgery: a prospective analysis of 1055 consecutive patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;8:215–21.CrossRefPubMed Kelleher M, Tan G, Sarjeant R, et al. Predictive value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during cervical spine surgery: a prospective analysis of 1055 consecutive patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;8:215–21.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Chen B, Chen Y, Yang J, et al. Comparison of the wake-up test and combined TES-MEP and CSEP monitoring in spinal surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28:335–40.CrossRefPubMed Chen B, Chen Y, Yang J, et al. Comparison of the wake-up test and combined TES-MEP and CSEP monitoring in spinal surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28:335–40.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Ben-David B, Haller G, Taylor P. Anterior spinal fusion complicated by paraplegia. A case report of a false-negative somatosensory-evoked potential. Spine. 1987;12:536–9.CrossRefPubMed Ben-David B, Haller G, Taylor P. Anterior spinal fusion complicated by paraplegia. A case report of a false-negative somatosensory-evoked potential. Spine. 1987;12:536–9.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Minahan RE, Sepkuty JP, Lesser RP, et al. Anterior spinal cord injury with preserved neurogenic ‘motor’ evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112:1442–50.CrossRefPubMed Minahan RE, Sepkuty JP, Lesser RP, et al. Anterior spinal cord injury with preserved neurogenic ‘motor’ evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112:1442–50.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Zhou HH, Zhu C. Comparison of isoflurane effects on motor evoked potential and F wave. Anesthesiology 2000; 93:32–8.CrossRefPubMed Zhou HH, Zhu C. Comparison of isoflurane effects on motor evoked potential and F wave. Anesthesiology 2000; 93:32–8.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Pechstein U, Nadstawek J, Zentner J, et al. Isoflurane plus nitrous oxide versus propofol for recording of motor evoked potentials after high frequency repetitive electrical stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;108:175–81.CrossRefPubMed Pechstein U, Nadstawek J, Zentner J, et al. Isoflurane plus nitrous oxide versus propofol for recording of motor evoked potentials after high frequency repetitive electrical stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;108:175–81.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference van Dongen E, ter Beek H, Aarts L, et al. The effect of two low-dose propofol infusions on the relationship between six-pulse transcranial electrical stimulation and the evoked lower extremity muscle response. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000;44:799–803.CrossRefPubMed van Dongen E, ter Beek H, Aarts L, et al. The effect of two low-dose propofol infusions on the relationship between six-pulse transcranial electrical stimulation and the evoked lower extremity muscle response. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000;44:799–803.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Pelosi L, Stevenson M, Hobbs G, et al. Intraoperative motor evoked potentials to transcranial electrical stimulation during two anaesthetic regimens. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112:1076–87.CrossRefPubMed Pelosi L, Stevenson M, Hobbs G, et al. Intraoperative motor evoked potentials to transcranial electrical stimulation during two anaesthetic regimens. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112:1076–87.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Nathan N, Tabaraud F, Lacroix F, et al. Influence of propofol concentrations on multipulse transcranial motor evoked potentials. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91:493–7.CrossRefPubMed Nathan N, Tabaraud F, Lacroix F, et al. Influence of propofol concentrations on multipulse transcranial motor evoked potentials. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91:493–7.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Woodforth I, Hicks R, Crawford M, et al. Depression of I waves in corticospinal volleys by sevoflurane, thiopental, and propofol. Anesth Analg. 1999;89:1182–7.CrossRefPubMed Woodforth I, Hicks R, Crawford M, et al. Depression of I waves in corticospinal volleys by sevoflurane, thiopental, and propofol. Anesth Analg. 1999;89:1182–7.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Kakinohana M, Fuchigami T, Nakamura S, et al. Propofol reduces spinal motor neuron excitability in humans. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:1586–8.PubMed Kakinohana M, Fuchigami T, Nakamura S, et al. Propofol reduces spinal motor neuron excitability in humans. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:1586–8.PubMed
36.
go back to reference Baars J, Dangel C, Herold K, et al. Suppression of the human spinal H-reflex by propofol: a quantitative analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006;50:193–200.CrossRefPubMed Baars J, Dangel C, Herold K, et al. Suppression of the human spinal H-reflex by propofol: a quantitative analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006;50:193–200.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference DiPiro J, Hooker K, Sherman J, et al. Effect of experimental hemorrhagic shock on hepatic drug elimination. Crit Care Med. 1992;20:810–5.CrossRefPubMed DiPiro J, Hooker K, Sherman J, et al. Effect of experimental hemorrhagic shock on hepatic drug elimination. Crit Care Med. 1992;20:810–5.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Takizawa D, Takizawa E, Miyoshi S, et al. The increase in total and unbound propofol concentrations during accidental hemorrhagic shock in patients undergoing liver transplantation. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:1339–40.CrossRefPubMed Takizawa D, Takizawa E, Miyoshi S, et al. The increase in total and unbound propofol concentrations during accidental hemorrhagic shock in patients undergoing liver transplantation. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:1339–40.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Hoymark S, Raeder J, Grimsmo B, et al. Bispectral index, serum drug concentrations and emergence associated with individually adjusted target-controlled infusions of remifentanil and propofol for laparoscopic surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91:773–80.CrossRef Hoymark S, Raeder J, Grimsmo B, et al. Bispectral index, serum drug concentrations and emergence associated with individually adjusted target-controlled infusions of remifentanil and propofol for laparoscopic surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91:773–80.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference McGaughran L, Voss LJ, Oliver R, et al. Rapid measurement of blood propofol levels: a proof of concept study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2006;20:109–15.CrossRefPubMed McGaughran L, Voss LJ, Oliver R, et al. Rapid measurement of blood propofol levels: a proof of concept study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2006;20:109–15.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Takita A, Masui K, Kazama T. On-line monitoring of end-tidal propofol concentration in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology. 2007;106:659–64.CrossRefPubMed Takita A, Masui K, Kazama T. On-line monitoring of end-tidal propofol concentration in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology. 2007;106:659–64.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Kamysek S, Fuchs P, Schwoebel H, et al. Drug detection in breath: effects of pulmonary blood flow and cardiac output on propofol exhalation. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011;401:2093–102.CrossRefPubMed Kamysek S, Fuchs P, Schwoebel H, et al. Drug detection in breath: effects of pulmonary blood flow and cardiac output on propofol exhalation. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011;401:2093–102.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Changes in transcranial motor evoked potentials during hemorrhage are associated with increased serum propofol concentrations
Authors
Jeremy A. Lieberman
John Feiner
Mark Rollins
Russ Lyon
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-017-0057-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 3/2018 Go to the issue