Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 1/2014

01-06-2014

Safety of new oral anticoagulants for patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation

Authors: Gevorg Stepanyan, Nitish Badhwar, Randall J. Lee, Gregory M. Marcus, Byron K. Lee, Zian H. Tseng, Vasanth Vedantham, Jeffrey Olgin, Melvin Scheinman, Edward P. Gerstenfeld

Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The new oral anticoagulants (NOAC), dabigatran and rivaroxaban, have been demonstrated to be at least equivalent to warfarin for preventing cardiac thromboembolism (TE) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there is limited data regarding use around catheter ablation (CA) procedures.

Objective

We evaluated the risk of bleeding and TE complications associated with NOAC use during AF ablation.

Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation between January 2011 and 6 September 2013 were grouped based on peri-procedural anticoagulation regimen: (1) uninterrupted warfarin with therapeutic INR (WARF), n = 114, (2) dabigatran, n = 89, or (3) rivaroxaban, n = 98. NOACs were held for 24 h (dabigatran) or 36 h (rivaroxaban) prior to the procedure. Heparin infusion was initiated 6 h post-procedure for the NOAC groups; NOACs were resumed the morning after the procedure. Antral PVI was performed with activated clotting time (ACT) maintained >300 s. TE or bleeding complications during ablation and through 30 days were compared.

Results

Three hundred and one patients underwent ablation for paroxysmal (71 %) or persistent (29 %) AF. International Normalization Ratio (INR) for the WARF group was 2.0 ± 0.5. Baseline characteristics were similar among the groups. There were two TE events (asymptomatic cerebral emboli and TIA), and there were 17 bleeding events (large hematoma n = 4; pericardial effusion n = 6; persistent hematuria n = 1; pseudoaneurism/AV fistula n = 6). Of the six pericardial effusions, three required drainage. There was no significant difference in combined TE/bleeding risk among the groups (WARF vs. dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban; 6.2 % vs. 6.7 % vs. 6.0 %; p = 0.82)

Conclusions

In this group of AF patients undergoing CA, use of peri-procedure dabigatran or rivaroxaban compared to uninterrupted warfarin did not lead to an increase in bleeding or TE complications.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kannel, W. B., Wolf, P. A., Benjamin, E. J., & Levy, D. (1998). Prevalence, incidence, prognosis, and predisposing conditions for atrial fibrillation: population-based estimates. The American Journal of Cardiology, 82, 2N–9N.PubMedCrossRef Kannel, W. B., Wolf, P. A., Benjamin, E. J., & Levy, D. (1998). Prevalence, incidence, prognosis, and predisposing conditions for atrial fibrillation: population-based estimates. The American Journal of Cardiology, 82, 2N–9N.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Wann, L., Curtis, A., January, C. T., Ellenbogen, K., Lowe, J., Estes, M., et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused update on the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (updating the 2006 guideline): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 57(2), 223–242.PubMedCrossRef Wann, L., Curtis, A., January, C. T., Ellenbogen, K., Lowe, J., Estes, M., et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused update on the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (updating the 2006 guideline): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 57(2), 223–242.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Coppens, M., Eikelboom, J., Hart, R., Yusuf, S., Lip, G., Dorian, P., et al. (2013). The CHA2DS2-VASc score identifies those patients with atrial fibrillation and a CHADS2 score of 1 who are unlikely to benefit from oral anticoagulant therapy. European Heart Journal, 34(3), 170–176.PubMedCrossRef Coppens, M., Eikelboom, J., Hart, R., Yusuf, S., Lip, G., Dorian, P., et al. (2013). The CHA2DS2-VASc score identifies those patients with atrial fibrillation and a CHADS2 score of 1 who are unlikely to benefit from oral anticoagulant therapy. European Heart Journal, 34(3), 170–176.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Connolly, S. J., Ezekowitz, M. D., Yusuf, S., Eikelboom, J., Oldgren, J., Parekh, A., et al. (2009). Dabigitran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. The New England Journal of Medicine, 361, 1139–1151.PubMedCrossRef Connolly, S. J., Ezekowitz, M. D., Yusuf, S., Eikelboom, J., Oldgren, J., Parekh, A., et al. (2009). Dabigitran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. The New England Journal of Medicine, 361, 1139–1151.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Patel, M. R., Mahaffey, K. W., Garg, J., the ROCKET AF Steering Committee, for the ROCKET AF Investigators, et al. (2011). Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The New England Journal of Medicine, 385(10), 883–891.CrossRef Patel, M. R., Mahaffey, K. W., Garg, J., the ROCKET AF Steering Committee, for the ROCKET AF Investigators, et al. (2011). Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The New England Journal of Medicine, 385(10), 883–891.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Calkins, H., Kuck, K., Cappato, R., Brugada, J., Camm, J., Chen, S., et al. (2012). 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 33, 171–257. Calkins, H., Kuck, K., Cappato, R., Brugada, J., Camm, J., Chen, S., et al. (2012). 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 33, 171–257.
7.
go back to reference Hussein, A. A., Martin, D. O., Saliba, W., Patel, D., Karim, S., Batal, O., et al. (2009 Oct). Radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation under therapeutic international normalized ratio: a safe and efficacious periprocedural anticoagulation strategy. Heart Rhythm, 6(10), 1425–1429. Hussein, A. A., Martin, D. O., Saliba, W., Patel, D., Karim, S., Batal, O., et al. (2009 Oct). Radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation under therapeutic international normalized ratio: a safe and efficacious periprocedural anticoagulation strategy. Heart Rhythm, 6(10), 1425–1429.
8.
go back to reference Fuster, V., Ryden, L., Cannom, D., Crijns, H., Curtis, A., Ellenbogen, K., et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused updates incorporated into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation, 123, e269–e36.PubMedCrossRef Fuster, V., Ryden, L., Cannom, D., Crijns, H., Curtis, A., Ellenbogen, K., et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused updates incorporated into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation, 123, e269–e36.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lakkireddy, D., Reddy, Y. M., Di Biase, L., et al. (2012). Feasibility and safety of dabigatran versus warfarin for peri-procedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: results from a multicenter prospective registry. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 59, 956–967.CrossRef Lakkireddy, D., Reddy, Y. M., Di Biase, L., et al. (2012). Feasibility and safety of dabigatran versus warfarin for peri-procedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: results from a multicenter prospective registry. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 59, 956–967.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Winkle, R. A., Mead, R. H., Engel, G., Kong, M. H., & Patrawala, R. A. (2012). The use of dabigatran immediately after atrial fibrillation ablation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 23, 264–268.PubMedCrossRef Winkle, R. A., Mead, R. H., Engel, G., Kong, M. H., & Patrawala, R. A. (2012). The use of dabigatran immediately after atrial fibrillation ablation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 23, 264–268.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Snipelisky, D., Kauffman, C., Prussak, K., Johns, G., Venkatachalam, K., & Kusumoto, F. (2012 Oct). A comparison of bleeding complications post-ablation between warfarin and dabigatran. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 35(1), 29–33. Snipelisky, D., Kauffman, C., Prussak, K., Johns, G., Venkatachalam, K., & Kusumoto, F. (2012 Oct). A comparison of bleeding complications post-ablation between warfarin and dabigatran. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 35(1), 29–33.
12.
go back to reference Kim, J. S., She, F., Jongnarangsin, K., Chugh, A., Latchamsetty, R., Ghanbari, H., et al. (2013). Dabigatran vs warfarin for radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm, 10(4), 483–489.PubMedCrossRef Kim, J. S., She, F., Jongnarangsin, K., Chugh, A., Latchamsetty, R., Ghanbari, H., et al. (2013). Dabigatran vs warfarin for radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm, 10(4), 483–489.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kaiser, D. W., Streur, M. M., Nagarakanti, R., Whalen, S. P., & Ellis, C. R. (2013). Continuous warfarin versus periprocedural dabigatran to reduce stroke and systemic embolism in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation or left atrial flutter. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 37(3), 241–247.PubMedCrossRef Kaiser, D. W., Streur, M. M., Nagarakanti, R., Whalen, S. P., & Ellis, C. R. (2013). Continuous warfarin versus periprocedural dabigatran to reduce stroke and systemic embolism in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation or left atrial flutter. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 37(3), 241–247.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Nin, T., Sairaku, A., Yoshida, Y., Kamiya, H., et al. (2013). A randomized controlled trail of dabigatran versus warfarin for periablation anticoagulation in patients undergoing ablation of atrial fibrillation. PACE, 36, 172–179.PubMedCrossRef Nin, T., Sairaku, A., Yoshida, Y., Kamiya, H., et al. (2013). A randomized controlled trail of dabigatran versus warfarin for periablation anticoagulation in patients undergoing ablation of atrial fibrillation. PACE, 36, 172–179.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Maddox, W., Kay, G. N., Yamada, T., et al. (2013). Dabigatran versus warfarin therapy for uninterrupted oral anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation ablation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 24, 861–865.PubMedCrossRef Maddox, W., Kay, G. N., Yamada, T., et al. (2013). Dabigatran versus warfarin therapy for uninterrupted oral anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation ablation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 24, 861–865.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bassiouny, M., Saliba, W., Rickard, J., et al. (2013). Use of dabigatran for periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 6, 460–466.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Bassiouny, M., Saliba, W., Rickard, J., et al. (2013). Use of dabigatran for periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 6, 460–466.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Eitel, C., Koch, J., Sommer, P., John, S., Kircher, S., Bollmann, A., Arya, A., Piorkowski, C., Hindricks, G., (2013).Novel oral anticoagulants in a real-world cohort of patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace May 22. (Epub ahead of print). Eitel, C., Koch, J., Sommer, P., John, S., Kircher, S., Bollmann, A., Arya, A., Piorkowski, C., Hindricks, G., (2013).Novel oral anticoagulants in a real-world cohort of patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace May 22. (Epub ahead of print).
18.
go back to reference Lakkireddy, D., Reddy, M., Swarup, V., Baqdunes, M., Mansour, M., Chaloub, F., Ruskin, J., DiBiase, L., Vallakatti, A., Janga, P., Umbarger, L., Sanchez, J., Burkhardt, D., Horton, R., Reddy, V. A, D’Avila, Atkins, D., Bommana, S., Natale, A., (2013) Uninterrupted rivaroxaban vs. warfarin for periprocedural anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation ablation: a multicenter experience. Heart Rhythm. May ;10(5)S240. (Abstract). Lakkireddy, D., Reddy, M., Swarup, V., Baqdunes, M., Mansour, M., Chaloub, F., Ruskin, J., DiBiase, L., Vallakatti, A., Janga, P., Umbarger, L., Sanchez, J., Burkhardt, D., Horton, R., Reddy, V. A, D’Avila, Atkins, D., Bommana, S., Natale, A., (2013) Uninterrupted rivaroxaban vs. warfarin for periprocedural anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation ablation: a multicenter experience. Heart Rhythm. May ;10(5)S240. (Abstract).
Metadata
Title
Safety of new oral anticoagulants for patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation
Authors
Gevorg Stepanyan
Nitish Badhwar
Randall J. Lee
Gregory M. Marcus
Byron K. Lee
Zian H. Tseng
Vasanth Vedantham
Jeffrey Olgin
Melvin Scheinman
Edward P. Gerstenfeld
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 1383-875X
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8595
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-014-9888-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 1/2014 Go to the issue