Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 3/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011

Initial experience with magnetic resonance imaging-safe pacemakers

A review

Authors: Werner Jung, Vlada Zvereva, Bajram Hajredini, Sebastian Jäckle

Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Due of its superior soft tissue imaging capabilities, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become the imaging modality of choice in many clinical situations, as illustrated by the tremendous growth in the number of MRIs performed over the past 2 decades. In parallel, the number of patients who require pacemakers or implantable cardiac defibrillators is increasing as indications for these devices broaden and the population ages. Taken together, these phenomena present an important clinical issue, as MR scans are generally contraindicated—except in urgent situations—in patients who have implanted cardiovascular devices. Potentially deleterious interactions between the magnetic fields and radio frequency (RF) energy produced by MR equipment and implantable devices have been identified, including inhibition of pacing, asynchronous/high-rate pacing, lead tip heating, and loss of capture. New devices that incorporate technologies to improve MR safety in patients with pacemakers have recently received approval in Europe and are under evaluation in the United States. Initial data from these devices suggest that these devices are safe in the MRI environment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kalin, R., & Stanton, M. S. (2005). Current clinical issues for MRI scanning of pacemaker and defibrillator patients. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 28(4), 326–328.PubMedCrossRef Kalin, R., & Stanton, M. S. (2005). Current clinical issues for MRI scanning of pacemaker and defibrillator patients. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 28(4), 326–328.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sutton, R., Kanal, E., Wilkoff, B. L., Bello, D., Luechinger, R., Jenniskens, I., et al. (2008). Safety of magnetic resonance imaging of patients with a new Medtronic EnRhythm MRI SureScan pacing system: clinical study design. Trials, 9, 68.PubMed Sutton, R., Kanal, E., Wilkoff, B. L., Bello, D., Luechinger, R., Jenniskens, I., et al. (2008). Safety of magnetic resonance imaging of patients with a new Medtronic EnRhythm MRI SureScan pacing system: clinical study design. Trials, 9, 68.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Sakakibara, Y., & Mitsui, T. (1999). Concerns about sources of electromagnetic interference in patients with pacemakers. Japanese Heart Journal, 40(6), 737–743.PubMedCrossRef Sakakibara, Y., & Mitsui, T. (1999). Concerns about sources of electromagnetic interference in patients with pacemakers. Japanese Heart Journal, 40(6), 737–743.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Levine, G. N., Gomes, A. S., Arai, A. E., Bluemke, D. A., Flamm, S. D., Kanal, E., et al. (2007). Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiovascular devices: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation, 116(24), 2878–2891.PubMedCrossRef Levine, G. N., Gomes, A. S., Arai, A. E., Bluemke, D. A., Flamm, S. D., Kanal, E., et al. (2007). Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiovascular devices: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation, 116(24), 2878–2891.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Pohost, G. M., Blackwell, G. G., & Shellock, F. G. (1992). Safety of patients with medical devices during application of magnetic resonance methods. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 649, 302–312.PubMedCrossRef Pohost, G. M., Blackwell, G. G., & Shellock, F. G. (1992). Safety of patients with medical devices during application of magnetic resonance methods. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 649, 302–312.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gimbel, J. R., & Kanal, E. (2004). Can patients with implantable pacemakers safely undergo magnetic resonance imaging? Journal of the American College of Cardiologists, 43(7), 1325–1327.CrossRef Gimbel, J. R., & Kanal, E. (2004). Can patients with implantable pacemakers safely undergo magnetic resonance imaging? Journal of the American College of Cardiologists, 43(7), 1325–1327.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Shellock, F. G., & Crues, J. V. I. I. I. (2002). MR Safety and the American College of Radiology White Paper. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, 178(6), 1349–1352.PubMed Shellock, F. G., & Crues, J. V. I. I. I. (2002). MR Safety and the American College of Radiology White Paper. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, 178(6), 1349–1352.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Kanal, E., Borgstede, J. P., Barkovich, A. J., Bell, C., Bradley, W. G., Etheridge, S., et al. (2004). American College of Radiology White Paper on MR Safety: 2004 update and revisions. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, 182(5), 1111–1114.PubMed Kanal, E., Borgstede, J. P., Barkovich, A. J., Bell, C., Bradley, W. G., Etheridge, S., et al. (2004). American College of Radiology White Paper on MR Safety: 2004 update and revisions. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, 182(5), 1111–1114.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Roguin, A., Schwitter, J., Vahlhaus, C., Lombardi, M., Brugada, J., Vardas, P., et al. (2008). Magnetic resonance imaging in individuals with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Europace, 10(3), 336–346.PubMedCrossRef Roguin, A., Schwitter, J., Vahlhaus, C., Lombardi, M., Brugada, J., Vardas, P., et al. (2008). Magnetic resonance imaging in individuals with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Europace, 10(3), 336–346.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lauck, G., von Smekal, A., Wolke, S., et al. (1995). Effects of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging on cardiac pacemakers. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 18(8), 1549–1555.PubMedCrossRef Lauck, G., von Smekal, A., Wolke, S., et al. (1995). Effects of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging on cardiac pacemakers. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 18(8), 1549–1555.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Vahlhaus, C., Sommer, T., Lewalter, T., et al. (2001). Interference with cardiac pacemakers by magnetic resonance imaging: are there irreversible changes at 0.5 Tesla? Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 24(4 Pt 1), 489–495.PubMedCrossRef Vahlhaus, C., Sommer, T., Lewalter, T., et al. (2001). Interference with cardiac pacemakers by magnetic resonance imaging: are there irreversible changes at 0.5 Tesla? Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 24(4 Pt 1), 489–495.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mollerus, M., Albin, G., Lipinski, M., & Lucca, J. (2009). Ectopy in patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable cardioverter–defibrillators undergoing an MRI scan. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 32(3), 772–778.PubMedCrossRef Mollerus, M., Albin, G., Lipinski, M., & Lucca, J. (2009). Ectopy in patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable cardioverter–defibrillators undergoing an MRI scan. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 32(3), 772–778.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Martin, E. T., Coman, J. A., Shellock, F. G., Pulling, C. C., Fair, R., & Jenkins, K. (2004). Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-Tesla. Journal of the American College of Cardiologists, 43(7), 1315–1324.CrossRef Martin, E. T., Coman, J. A., Shellock, F. G., Pulling, C. C., Fair, R., & Jenkins, K. (2004). Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-Tesla. Journal of the American College of Cardiologists, 43(7), 1315–1324.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sommer, T., Naehle, C. P., Yang, A., Zeijlemaker, V., Hackenbroch, M., Schmiedel, A., et al. (2006). Strategy for safe performance of extrathoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 tesla in the presence of cardiac pacemakers in non-pacemaker-dependent patients: a prospective study with 115 examinations. Circulation, 114(12), 1285–1292.PubMedCrossRef Sommer, T., Naehle, C. P., Yang, A., Zeijlemaker, V., Hackenbroch, M., Schmiedel, A., et al. (2006). Strategy for safe performance of extrathoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 tesla in the presence of cardiac pacemakers in non-pacemaker-dependent patients: a prospective study with 115 examinations. Circulation, 114(12), 1285–1292.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Luechinger, R., Duru, F., Zeijlemaker, V. A., Scheidegger, M. B., Boesiger, P., & Candinas, R. (2002). Pacemaker reed switch behavior in 0.5, 1.5, and 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging units: are reed switches always closed in strong magnetic fields? Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 25(10), 1419–1423.PubMedCrossRef Luechinger, R., Duru, F., Zeijlemaker, V. A., Scheidegger, M. B., Boesiger, P., & Candinas, R. (2002). Pacemaker reed switch behavior in 0.5, 1.5, and 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging units: are reed switches always closed in strong magnetic fields? Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 25(10), 1419–1423.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sommer, T., Vahlhaus, C., Lauck, G., von Smekal, A., Reinke, M., Hofer, U., et al. (2000). MR imaging and cardiac pacemakers: in-vitro evaluation and in-vivo studies in 51 patients at 0.5 T. Radiology, 215(3), 869–879.PubMed Sommer, T., Vahlhaus, C., Lauck, G., von Smekal, A., Reinke, M., Hofer, U., et al. (2000). MR imaging and cardiac pacemakers: in-vitro evaluation and in-vivo studies in 51 patients at 0.5 T. Radiology, 215(3), 869–879.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Achenbach, S., Moshage, W., Diem, B., Bieberle, T., Schibgilla, V., & Bachmann, K. (1997). Effects of magnetic resonance imaging on cardiac pacemakers and electrodes. American Heart Journal, 134(3), 467–473.PubMedCrossRef Achenbach, S., Moshage, W., Diem, B., Bieberle, T., Schibgilla, V., & Bachmann, K. (1997). Effects of magnetic resonance imaging on cardiac pacemakers and electrodes. American Heart Journal, 134(3), 467–473.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Luechinger, R., Zeijlemaker, V. A., Pedersen, E. M., Mortensen, P., Falk, E., Duru, F., et al. (2005). In vivo heating of pacemaker leads during magnetic resonance imaging. European Heart Journal, 26(4), 376–383. discussion 325–377.PubMedCrossRef Luechinger, R., Zeijlemaker, V. A., Pedersen, E. M., Mortensen, P., Falk, E., Duru, F., et al. (2005). In vivo heating of pacemaker leads during magnetic resonance imaging. European Heart Journal, 26(4), 376–383. discussion 325–377.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Roguin, A., Zviman, M. M., Meininger, G. R., Rodrigues, E. R., Dickfeld, T. M., Bluemke, D. A., et al. (2004). Modern pacemaker and implantable cardioverter/defibrillator systems can be magnetic resonance imaging safe: in vitro and in vivo assessment of safety and function at 1.5 T. Circulation, 110(5), 475–482.PubMedCrossRef Roguin, A., Zviman, M. M., Meininger, G. R., Rodrigues, E. R., Dickfeld, T. M., Bluemke, D. A., et al. (2004). Modern pacemaker and implantable cardioverter/defibrillator systems can be magnetic resonance imaging safe: in vitro and in vivo assessment of safety and function at 1.5 T. Circulation, 110(5), 475–482.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Mollerus, M., Albin, G., Lipinski, M., & Lucca, J. (2008). Cardiac biomarkers in patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable cardioverter–defibrillators undergoing an MRI scan. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 31(10), 1241–1245.PubMedCrossRef Mollerus, M., Albin, G., Lipinski, M., & Lucca, J. (2008). Cardiac biomarkers in patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable cardioverter–defibrillators undergoing an MRI scan. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 31(10), 1241–1245.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Wilkoff, B. L., Bello, D., Taborsky, M., Vymazal, J., Kanal, E., Heuer, H., et al. (2010). Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with a pacemaker system designed for the magnetic resonance environment. Hear Rhythm, 8(1), 65–73.CrossRef Wilkoff, B. L., Bello, D., Taborsky, M., Vymazal, J., Kanal, E., Heuer, H., et al. (2010). Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with a pacemaker system designed for the magnetic resonance environment. Hear Rhythm, 8(1), 65–73.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Forleo, G. B., Santini, L., Della Rocca, D. G., Romano, V., Papavasileiou, L. P., Magliano, G., et al. (2010). Safety and efficacy of a new magnetic resonance imaging-compatible pacing system: early results of a prospective comparison with conventional dual-chamber implant outcomes. Hear Rhythm, 7(6), 750–754.CrossRef Forleo, G. B., Santini, L., Della Rocca, D. G., Romano, V., Papavasileiou, L. P., Magliano, G., et al. (2010). Safety and efficacy of a new magnetic resonance imaging-compatible pacing system: early results of a prospective comparison with conventional dual-chamber implant outcomes. Hear Rhythm, 7(6), 750–754.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Gimbel, J. R. (2010). The safety of MRI scanning of pacemakers and ICDs: what are the critical elements of safe scanning? Ask me again at 10,000. Europace, 12(7), 915–917.PubMedCrossRef Gimbel, J. R. (2010). The safety of MRI scanning of pacemakers and ICDs: what are the critical elements of safe scanning? Ask me again at 10,000. Europace, 12(7), 915–917.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Faris, O. P., & Shein, M. J. (2005). Government viewpoint: U.S. Food & Drug Administration: pacemakers, ICDs and MRI. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 28(4), 268–269.PubMedCrossRef Faris, O. P., & Shein, M. J. (2005). Government viewpoint: U.S. Food & Drug Administration: pacemakers, ICDs and MRI. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 28(4), 268–269.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Gimbel, J. R. (2009). Unexpected asystole during 3 T magnetic resonance imaging of a pacemaker-dependent patient with a ‘modern’ pacemaker. Europace, 11, 1241–1242.PubMedCrossRef Gimbel, J. R. (2009). Unexpected asystole during 3 T magnetic resonance imaging of a pacemaker-dependent patient with a ‘modern’ pacemaker. Europace, 11, 1241–1242.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Initial experience with magnetic resonance imaging-safe pacemakers
A review
Authors
Werner Jung
Vlada Zvereva
Bajram Hajredini
Sebastian Jäckle
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 1383-875X
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8595
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-011-9610-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 3/2011 Go to the issue