Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 3/2020

01-03-2020 | Preimplantation Genetic Diagnostics | Genetics

Live births following preimplantation genetic testing for dynamic mutation diseases by karyomapping: a report of three cases

Authors: Dayuan Shi, Jiawei Xu, Wenbin Niu, Yidong Liu, Hao Shi, Guidong Yao, Senlin Shi, Gang Li, Wenyan Song, Haixia Jin, Yingpu Sun

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic defects (PGT-M) is a beneficial strategy for the patients suffering from a Mendelian disease, which could protect their offspring from inheriting the disease. The purpose of this study is to report the effectiveness of PGT-M based on karyomapping for three cases of dynamic mutation diseases with trinucleotide repeat expansion.

Methods

PGT-M was carried out on three couples, whose family members were diagnosed with Huntington’s disease or spinocerebellar ataxias 2 or 12. The whole genome amplification was obtained using the multiple displacement amplification (MDA) method. Then, karyomapping was performed to detect the allele that is carrying the trinucleotide repeat expansion using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) linkage analyses, and the copy number variations (CNVs) of the embryos were also identified. Prenatal diagnosis was performed to validate the accuracy of PGT-M.

Results

PGT-M was successfully performed on the three couples, and they accepted the transfers of euploid blastocysts without the relevant pathogenic allele. The clinical pregnancies were acquired and the prenatal diagnosis of the three families confirmed the effectiveness of karyomapping. The three born babies were healthy and free of the pathogenic alleles HTT, ATXN2, or PPP2R2B corresponding to Huntington’s disease, spinocerebellar ataxias 2 or 12, respectively.

Conclusion

This study shows that karyomapping is a highly powerful and efficient approach for dynamic mutation detection in preimplantation embryos. In this work, we first report the birth of healthy babies that are free of the pathogenic gene for dynamic mutation diseases in patients receiving PGT-M by karyomapping.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kay C, Hayden MR, Leavitt BR. Epidemiology of Huntington disease. Handb Clin Neurol. 2017;144:31–46.CrossRef Kay C, Hayden MR, Leavitt BR. Epidemiology of Huntington disease. Handb Clin Neurol. 2017;144:31–46.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ghosh R, Tabrizi SJ. Clinical features of Huntington’s disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1049:1–28.CrossRef Ghosh R, Tabrizi SJ. Clinical features of Huntington’s disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1049:1–28.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Group THsDCR. A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington’s disease chromosomes. Cell. 1993;72:971–83.CrossRef Group THsDCR. A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington’s disease chromosomes. Cell. 1993;72:971–83.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ziihlke C, Rless O, Bockel B, Lange H, Thies U. Mitotic stability and meiotic variability of the (CAG)n repeat in the Huntington disease gene. Hum Mol Genet. 1993;2:2063–7.CrossRef Ziihlke C, Rless O, Bockel B, Lange H, Thies U. Mitotic stability and meiotic variability of the (CAG)n repeat in the Huntington disease gene. Hum Mol Genet. 1993;2:2063–7.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Soong BW, Morrison PJ. Spinocerebellar ataxias. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;155:143–74.CrossRef Soong BW, Morrison PJ. Spinocerebellar ataxias. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;155:143–74.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ruano L, Melo C, Silva MC, Coutinho P. The global epidemiology of hereditary ataxia and spastic paraplegia a systematic review of prevalence studies. Neuroepidemiology. 2014;42:174–83.CrossRef Ruano L, Melo C, Silva MC, Coutinho P. The global epidemiology of hereditary ataxia and spastic paraplegia a systematic review of prevalence studies. Neuroepidemiology. 2014;42:174–83.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sermon K, Goossens V, Seneca S, Lissens W, Vos AD, Vandervorst M, et al. Preimplantation diagnosis for Huntington’s disease (HD) clinical application and analysis of the HD expansion in affected embryos. Prenat Diagn. 1998;18:1427–36.CrossRef Sermon K, Goossens V, Seneca S, Lissens W, Vos AD, Vandervorst M, et al. Preimplantation diagnosis for Huntington’s disease (HD) clinical application and analysis of the HD expansion in affected embryos. Prenat Diagn. 1998;18:1427–36.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sermon K, Seneca S, Vanderfaeillie A, Lissens W. Preimplantation diagnosis for fragile X syndrome based on the detection of the non-expanded paternal and maternal CGG. Prenat Diagn. 1999;19:1223–30.CrossRef Sermon K, Seneca S, Vanderfaeillie A, Lissens W. Preimplantation diagnosis for fragile X syndrome based on the detection of the non-expanded paternal and maternal CGG. Prenat Diagn. 1999;19:1223–30.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sermon K, Seneca S, Rycke MD, Goossens V. PGD in the lab for triplet repeat diseases-myotonic dystrophy, Huntington’s disease and fragile-X syndrome. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001;183:S77–85.CrossRef Sermon K, Seneca S, Rycke MD, Goossens V. PGD in the lab for triplet repeat diseases-myotonic dystrophy, Huntington’s disease and fragile-X syndrome. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001;183:S77–85.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Moutou C, Gardes N, Viville S. New tools for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of Huntington’s disease and their clinical applications. Eur J Hum Genet. 2004;12:1007–14.CrossRef Moutou C, Gardes N, Viville S. New tools for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of Huntington’s disease and their clinical applications. Eur J Hum Genet. 2004;12:1007–14.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Van Rij MC, De Rademaeker M, Moutou C, Dreesen JC, De Rycke M, Liebaers I, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for Huntington’s disease: the experience of three European centres. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20:368–75.CrossRef Van Rij MC, De Rademaeker M, Moutou C, Dreesen JC, De Rycke M, Liebaers I, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for Huntington’s disease: the experience of three European centres. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20:368–75.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Pecina A, Lozano Arana MD, Garcia-Lozano JC, Borrego S, Antinolo G. One-step multiplex polymerase chain reaction for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of Huntington disease. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:2411–2.CrossRef Pecina A, Lozano Arana MD, Garcia-Lozano JC, Borrego S, Antinolo G. One-step multiplex polymerase chain reaction for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of Huntington disease. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:2411–2.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kieffer E, Nicod JC, Gardes N, Kastner C, Becker N, Celebi C, et al. Improving preimplantation genetic diagnosis for fragile X syndrome: two new powerful single-round multiplex indirect and direct tests. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24:221–7.CrossRef Kieffer E, Nicod JC, Gardes N, Kastner C, Becker N, Celebi C, et al. Improving preimplantation genetic diagnosis for fragile X syndrome: two new powerful single-round multiplex indirect and direct tests. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24:221–7.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Moutou C, Nicod JC, Gardes N, Viville S. Birth after pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of spinocerebellar ataxia 2 (Sca2). Prenat Diagn. 2008;28:126–30.CrossRef Moutou C, Nicod JC, Gardes N, Viville S. Birth after pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of spinocerebellar ataxia 2 (Sca2). Prenat Diagn. 2008;28:126–30.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lasken RS. Genomic DNA amplification by the multiple displacement amplification (MDA) method. Biochem Soc Trans. 2009;37:450–3.CrossRef Lasken RS. Genomic DNA amplification by the multiple displacement amplification (MDA) method. Biochem Soc Trans. 2009;37:450–3.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Buijsen RAM, Toonen LJA, Gardiner SL, van Roon-Mom WMC. Genetics, mechanisms, and therapeutic progress in polyglutamine spinocerebellar ataxias. Neurotherapeutics. 2019;16:263–86.CrossRef Buijsen RAM, Toonen LJA, Gardiner SL, van Roon-Mom WMC. Genetics, mechanisms, and therapeutic progress in polyglutamine spinocerebellar ataxias. Neurotherapeutics. 2019;16:263–86.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Handyside AH, Harton GL, Mariani B, Thornhill AR, Affara N, Shaw MA, et al. Karyomapping: a universal method for genome wide analysis of genetic disease based on mapping crossovers between parental haplotypes. J Med Genet. 2010;47:651–8.CrossRef Handyside AH, Harton GL, Mariani B, Thornhill AR, Affara N, Shaw MA, et al. Karyomapping: a universal method for genome wide analysis of genetic disease based on mapping crossovers between parental haplotypes. J Med Genet. 2010;47:651–8.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Vanneste E, Voet T, Le Caignec C, Ampe M, Konings P, Melotte C, et al. Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos. Nat Med. 2009;15:577–83.CrossRef Vanneste E, Voet T, Le Caignec C, Ampe M, Konings P, Melotte C, et al. Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos. Nat Med. 2009;15:577–83.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Spath K, Jaroudi S, Sarasa J, Enciso M, et al. The origin and impact of embryonic aneuploidy. Hum Genet. 2013;132:1001–13.CrossRef Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Spath K, Jaroudi S, Sarasa J, Enciso M, et al. The origin and impact of embryonic aneuploidy. Hum Genet. 2013;132:1001–13.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Huang L, Ma F, Chapman A, Lu S, Xie XS. Single-cell whole-genome amplification and sequencing: methodology and applications. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2015;16:79–102.CrossRef Huang L, Ma F, Chapman A, Lu S, Xie XS. Single-cell whole-genome amplification and sequencing: methodology and applications. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2015;16:79–102.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Yan L, Huang L, Xu L, Huang J, Ma F, Zhu X, et al. Live births after simultaneous avoidance of monogenic diseases and chromosome abnormality by next-generation sequencing with linkage analyses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:15964–49.CrossRef Yan L, Huang L, Xu L, Huang J, Ma F, Zhu X, et al. Live births after simultaneous avoidance of monogenic diseases and chromosome abnormality by next-generation sequencing with linkage analyses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:15964–49.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Natesan SA, Bladon AJ, Coskun S, Qubbaj W, Prates R, Munne S, et al. Genome-wide karyomapping accurately identifies the inheritance of single-gene defects in human preimplantation embryos in vitro. Genet Med. 2014;16:838–45.CrossRef Natesan SA, Bladon AJ, Coskun S, Qubbaj W, Prates R, Munne S, et al. Genome-wide karyomapping accurately identifies the inheritance of single-gene defects in human preimplantation embryos in vitro. Genet Med. 2014;16:838–45.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Konstantinidis M, Prates R, Goodall NN, Fischer J, Tecson V, Lemma T, et al. Live births following karyomapping of human blastocysts: experience from clinical application of the method. Reprod BioMed Online. 2015;31:394–403.CrossRef Konstantinidis M, Prates R, Goodall NN, Fischer J, Tecson V, Lemma T, et al. Live births following karyomapping of human blastocysts: experience from clinical application of the method. Reprod BioMed Online. 2015;31:394–403.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Natesan SA, Handyside AH, Thornhill AR, Ottolini CS, Sage K, Summers MC, et al. Live birth after PGD with confirmation by a comprehensive approach (karyomapping) for simultaneous detection of monogenic and chromosomal disorders. Reprod BioMed Online. 2014;29:600–5.CrossRef Natesan SA, Handyside AH, Thornhill AR, Ottolini CS, Sage K, Summers MC, et al. Live birth after PGD with confirmation by a comprehensive approach (karyomapping) for simultaneous detection of monogenic and chromosomal disorders. Reprod BioMed Online. 2014;29:600–5.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ben-Nagi J, Wells D, Doye K, Loutradi K, Exeter H, Drew E, et al. Karyomapping: a single centre’s experience from application of methodology to ongoing pregnancy and live-birth rates. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;35:264–71.CrossRef Ben-Nagi J, Wells D, Doye K, Loutradi K, Exeter H, Drew E, et al. Karyomapping: a single centre’s experience from application of methodology to ongoing pregnancy and live-birth rates. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;35:264–71.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Sermon K. Novel technologies emerging for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2017;17:71–82.CrossRef Sermon K. Novel technologies emerging for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2017;17:71–82.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Treff NR, Fedick A, Tao X, Devkota B, Taylor D, Scott RT Jr. Evaluation of targeted next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis of monogenic disease. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1377–84.CrossRef Treff NR, Fedick A, Tao X, Devkota B, Taylor D, Scott RT Jr. Evaluation of targeted next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis of monogenic disease. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1377–84.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Van Dijk EL, Jaszczyszyn Y, Naquin D, Thermes C. The third revolution in sequencing technology. Trends Genet. 2018;34:666–81.CrossRef Van Dijk EL, Jaszczyszyn Y, Naquin D, Thermes C. The third revolution in sequencing technology. Trends Genet. 2018;34:666–81.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Live births following preimplantation genetic testing for dynamic mutation diseases by karyomapping: a report of three cases
Authors
Dayuan Shi
Jiawei Xu
Wenbin Niu
Yidong Liu
Hao Shi
Guidong Yao
Senlin Shi
Gang Li
Wenyan Song
Haixia Jin
Yingpu Sun
Publication date
01-03-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01718-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 3/2020 Go to the issue