Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Familial Cancer 4/2009

Open Access 01-12-2009

Attitude towards pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary cancer

Authors: Chantal Lammens, Eveline Bleiker, Neil Aaronson, Annette Vriends, Margreet Ausems, Maaike Jansweijer, Anja Wagner, Rolf Sijmons, Ans van den Ouweland, Rob van der Luijt, Liesbeth Spruijt, Encarna Gómez García, Mariëlle Ruijs, Senno Verhoef

Published in: Familial Cancer | Issue 4/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

The use of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for hereditary cancer is subject to on-going debate, particularly among professionals. This study evaluates the attitude towards PGD and attitude-associated characteristics of those concerned: family members with a hereditary cancer predisposition. Forty-eight Von Hippel-Lindau and 18 Li–Fraumeni Syndrome families were identified via the 9 family cancer clinics in the Netherlands. In total, 216 high risk family members and partners were approached, of whom 179 (83%) completed a self-report questionnaire. Of the high risk family members, 35% expressed a positive attitude towards PGD. Those with a current desire to have children were significantly more likely to have a positive attitude: 48% would consider the use of PGD. No other sociodemographic, medical or psychosocial variables were associated significantly with a positive attitude. The most frequently reported advantage of PGD is the avoidance of a possible pregnancy termination. Uncertainty about late effects was the most frequently reported disadvantage. These results indicate that approximately half of those contemplating a future pregnancy would consider the use of PGD. The actual uptake, however, is expected to be lower. There is no indication that psychosocial factors affect interest in PGD.
Literature
2.
8.
go back to reference Niermeijer MF, Die-Smulders CE, Page-Christiaens GC et al (2008) [Genetic cancer syndromes and reproductive choice: dialogue between parents and politicians on preimplantation genetic diagnosis] Erfelijke kankersyndromen en kinderwens: ouders en politiek in dialoog over pre-implantatiegenetische diagnostiek. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 152:1503–1506PubMed Niermeijer MF, Die-Smulders CE, Page-Christiaens GC et al (2008) [Genetic cancer syndromes and reproductive choice: dialogue between parents and politicians on preimplantation genetic diagnosis] Erfelijke kankersyndromen en kinderwens: ouders en politiek in dialoog over pre-implantatiegenetische diagnostiek. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 152:1503–1506PubMed
12.
go back to reference Menon U, Harper J, Sharma A et al (2007) Views of BRCA gene mutation carriers on preimplantation genetic diagnosis as a reproductive option for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Hum Reprod 22:1573–1577. doi:10.1093/humrep/dem055 CrossRefPubMed Menon U, Harper J, Sharma A et al (2007) Views of BRCA gene mutation carriers on preimplantation genetic diagnosis as a reproductive option for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Hum Reprod 22:1573–1577. doi:10.​1093/​humrep/​dem055 CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Quinn G, Vadaparampil S, Wilson C et al (2008) Attitudes of high-risk women toward preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril 91:2361–2368 Quinn G, Vadaparampil S, Wilson C et al (2008) Attitudes of high-risk women toward preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril 91:2361–2368
18.
go back to reference Kleihues P, Schauble B, zur Hausen A et al (1997) Tumors associated with p53 germline mutations: a synopsis of 91 families. Am J Pathol 150:1–13PubMed Kleihues P, Schauble B, zur Hausen A et al (1997) Tumors associated with p53 germline mutations: a synopsis of 91 families. Am J Pathol 150:1–13PubMed
19.
go back to reference Nichols KE, Malkin D, Garber JE et al (2001) Germ-line p53 mutations predispose to a wide spectrum of early-onset cancers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10:83–87PubMed Nichols KE, Malkin D, Garber JE et al (2001) Germ-line p53 mutations predispose to a wide spectrum of early-onset cancers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10:83–87PubMed
21.
go back to reference Maher ER, Yates JR, Harries R et al (1990) Clinical features and natural history of von Hippel-Lindau disease. Q J Med 77:1151–1163PubMed Maher ER, Yates JR, Harries R et al (1990) Clinical features and natural history of von Hippel-Lindau disease. Q J Med 77:1151–1163PubMed
24.
go back to reference Farhi D, Bastuji-Garin S, Khosrotehrani K et al (2008) Neurofibromatosis 1: analysis of the demand for prenatal diagnosis in a French cohort of 361 patients. Am J Med Genet A 146:159–165. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.32066 Farhi D, Bastuji-Garin S, Khosrotehrani K et al (2008) Neurofibromatosis 1: analysis of the demand for prenatal diagnosis in a French cohort of 361 patients. Am J Med Genet A 146:159–165. doi:10.​1002/​ajmg.​a.​32066
25.
go back to reference Die-Smulders CE, Land JA, Dreesen JC et al (2004) Results from 10 years of preimplantation-genetic diagnostics in The Netherlands. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 148:2491–2496PubMed Die-Smulders CE, Land JA, Dreesen JC et al (2004) Results from 10 years of preimplantation-genetic diagnostics in The Netherlands. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 148:2491–2496PubMed
26.
go back to reference Musters AM, Oosterwijk C, Repping S et al (2008) Doelgroep is onwetend: onbekendheid met pre-implantatie genetische diagnostiek is groot. Med Contact (Bussum) 63:980–983 Musters AM, Oosterwijk C, Repping S et al (2008) Doelgroep is onwetend: onbekendheid met pre-implantatie genetische diagnostiek is groot. Med Contact (Bussum) 63:980–983
28.
go back to reference Kääriäinen H (2006) The need for interaction between assisted reproduction technology and genetics. Recommendations of the European societies of human genetics and human reproduction and embryology. Eur J Hum Genet 14:509–511. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201600 Kääriäinen H (2006) The need for interaction between assisted reproduction technology and genetics. Recommendations of the European societies of human genetics and human reproduction and embryology. Eur J Hum Genet 14:509–511. doi:10.​1038/​sj.​ejhg.​5201600
29.
go back to reference Lerman C, Kash K, Stefanek M (1994) Younger women at increased risk for breast cancer: perceived risk, psychological well-being, and surveillance behavior. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 16:171–176PubMed Lerman C, Kash K, Stefanek M (1994) Younger women at increased risk for breast cancer: perceived risk, psychological well-being, and surveillance behavior. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 16:171–176PubMed
32.
go back to reference Horowitz MJ (1982) Stress response syndromes and their treatment. In: Goldberger L, Breznitz S (eds) Handbook of stress: theoretical and clinical aspects. Collier Macmillan Publishers, London, pp 711–732 Horowitz MJ (1982) Stress response syndromes and their treatment. In: Goldberger L, Breznitz S (eds) Handbook of stress: theoretical and clinical aspects. Collier Macmillan Publishers, London, pp 711–732
33.
go back to reference Brom D, Kleber RJ (1985) De schok verwerkingslijst. Ned Tijdschr Psychol 40:164–168. Impact of event scale Brom D, Kleber RJ (1985) De schok verwerkingslijst. Ned Tijdschr Psychol 40:164–168. Impact of event scale
Metadata
Title
Attitude towards pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary cancer
Authors
Chantal Lammens
Eveline Bleiker
Neil Aaronson
Annette Vriends
Margreet Ausems
Maaike Jansweijer
Anja Wagner
Rolf Sijmons
Ans van den Ouweland
Rob van der Luijt
Liesbeth Spruijt
Encarna Gómez García
Mariëlle Ruijs
Senno Verhoef
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Familial Cancer / Issue 4/2009
Print ISSN: 1389-9600
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7292
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-009-9265-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2009

Familial Cancer 4/2009 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine