Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Familial Cancer 4/2009

01-12-2009

The relationship between knowledge of family history and cancer characteristics at diagnosis in women newly-diagnosed with invasive breast cancer

Authors: Marijana Lijovic, Susan R. Davis, Pam Fradkin, Jo Bradbury, Maria La China, Max Schwarz, Rory Wolfe, Helen Farrugia, Robin J. Bell

Published in: Familial Cancer | Issue 4/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Aim To document the prevalence of family history of breast cancer (BC) amongst women newly-diagnosed with invasive BC and to explore the relationship between family history and cancer size and stage. Methods A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on baseline questionnaire data from a cohort study of 1,684 women diagnosed with invasive BC within the previous 12 months and recruited between 2004 and 2006 in Victoria, Australia. Results Women with affected first degree relative(s) were more likely to have a smaller BC (odds ratio for ≤10 mm 1.74, 95% CI: 1.32–2.29) and stage I BC (odds ratio 1.31, 95% CI: 1.01–1.70) at diagnosis than women with no affected relatives. There was no significant difference in BC size and stage between women with only affected second degree relatives and women with no affected relatives. Conclusions Women with a first degree relative with BC had smaller, earlier stage cancers at diagnosis, possibly reflecting more diligent use of breast screening amongst women who considered themselves at increased risk of developing the disease.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), Australasian Association of Cancer Registries (AACR) (2007) Cancer in Australia: an overview, 2006. AIHW, Canberra, Cancer series no. 37. Cat. no. CAN 32 Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), Australasian Association of Cancer Registries (AACR) (2007) Cancer in Australia: an overview, 2006. AIHW, Canberra, Cancer series no. 37. Cat. no. CAN 32
2.
go back to reference Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), Australasian Association of Cancer Registries (AACR), NHMRC National Breast Cancer Centre (1998) Breast cancer survival in Australian women 1982–94. AIHW, Canberra Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), Australasian Association of Cancer Registries (AACR), NHMRC National Breast Cancer Centre (1998) Breast cancer survival in Australian women 1982–94. AIHW, Canberra
3.
go back to reference Pharoah PD, Stratton JF, Mackay J (1998) Screening for breast and ovarian cancer: the relevance of family history. Br Med Bull 54:823–838PubMed Pharoah PD, Stratton JF, Mackay J (1998) Screening for breast and ovarian cancer: the relevance of family history. Br Med Bull 54:823–838PubMed
4.
go back to reference Welsh ML, Buist DS, Aiello Bowles EJ et al. (2008) Population-based estimates of the relation between breast cancer risk, tumor subtype, and family history. Breast Cancer Res Treat (in press). DOI 10.1007/s10549-10008-10026-10541 Welsh ML, Buist DS, Aiello Bowles EJ et al. (2008) Population-based estimates of the relation between breast cancer risk, tumor subtype, and family history. Breast Cancer Res Treat (in press). DOI 10.​1007/​s10549-10008-10026-10541
6.
go back to reference Dite GS, Jenkins MA, Southey MC et al (2003) Familial risks, early-onset breast cancer, and BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:448–457PubMedCrossRef Dite GS, Jenkins MA, Southey MC et al (2003) Familial risks, early-onset breast cancer, and BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:448–457PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (2001) Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58,209 women with breast cancer and 101,986 women without the disease. Lancet 358:1389–1399CrossRef Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (2001) Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58,209 women with breast cancer and 101,986 women without the disease. Lancet 358:1389–1399CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Pharoah PD, Day NE, Duffy S et al (1997) Family history and the risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 71:800–809CrossRefPubMed Pharoah PD, Day NE, Duffy S et al (1997) Family history and the risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 71:800–809CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference National Breast Cancer Centre (NBCC) (2005) The National Breast Cancer Centre Breast Health Survey Technical Report. NBCC, Camperdown National Breast Cancer Centre (NBCC) (2005) The National Breast Cancer Centre Breast Health Survey Technical Report. NBCC, Camperdown
10.
go back to reference Williams T, Clarke VA, Savage S (2002) Women’s perceptions of the familial aspects of breast cancer. Health Education 102:50–59CrossRef Williams T, Clarke VA, Savage S (2002) Women’s perceptions of the familial aspects of breast cancer. Health Education 102:50–59CrossRef
11.
go back to reference van Dooren S, Seynaeve C, Rijnsburger AJ et al (2005) The impact of having relatives affected with breast cancer on psychological distress in women at increased risk for hereditary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 89:75–80CrossRefPubMed van Dooren S, Seynaeve C, Rijnsburger AJ et al (2005) The impact of having relatives affected with breast cancer on psychological distress in women at increased risk for hereditary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 89:75–80CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Andersen MR, Smith R, Meischke H et al (2003) Breast cancer worry and mammography use by women with and without a family history in a population-based sample. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:314–320PubMed Andersen MR, Smith R, Meischke H et al (2003) Breast cancer worry and mammography use by women with and without a family history in a population-based sample. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:314–320PubMed
13.
go back to reference Erblich J, Bovbjerg DH, Valdimarsdottir HB (2000) Looking forward and back: distress among women at familial risk for breast cancer. Ann Behav Med 22:53–59CrossRefPubMed Erblich J, Bovbjerg DH, Valdimarsdottir HB (2000) Looking forward and back: distress among women at familial risk for breast cancer. Ann Behav Med 22:53–59CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Molino A, Giovannini M, Pedersini R et al (2004) Correlations between family history and cancer characteristics in 2256 breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 91:96–98CrossRefPubMed Molino A, Giovannini M, Pedersini R et al (2004) Correlations between family history and cancer characteristics in 2256 breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 91:96–98CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Colditz GA, Willett WC, Hunter DJ et al (1993) Family history, age, and risk of breast cancer. Prospective data from the nurses health study. JAMA 270:338–343CrossRefPubMed Colditz GA, Willett WC, Hunter DJ et al (1993) Family history, age, and risk of breast cancer. Prospective data from the nurses health study. JAMA 270:338–343CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Russo A, Herd-Smith A, Gestri D et al (2002) Does family history influence survival in breast cancer cases? Int J Cancer 99:427–430CrossRefPubMed Russo A, Herd-Smith A, Gestri D et al (2002) Does family history influence survival in breast cancer cases? Int J Cancer 99:427–430CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Yip CH, Mohd Taib NA, Lau PC (2008) Does a positive family history influence the presentation of breast cancer? Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 9:63–65PubMed Yip CH, Mohd Taib NA, Lau PC (2008) Does a positive family history influence the presentation of breast cancer? Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 9:63–65PubMed
18.
go back to reference Petrisek A, Campbell S, Laliberte L (2000) Family history of breast cancer impact on the disease experience. Cancer Pract 8:135–142CrossRefPubMed Petrisek A, Campbell S, Laliberte L (2000) Family history of breast cancer impact on the disease experience. Cancer Pract 8:135–142CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lijovic M, Davis SR, Fradkin P et al (2008) Use of a cancer registry is preferable to a direct-to-community approach for recruitment to a cohort study of wellbeing in women newly diagnosed with invasive breast cancer. BMC Cancer 8:126CrossRefPubMed Lijovic M, Davis SR, Fradkin P et al (2008) Use of a cancer registry is preferable to a direct-to-community approach for recruitment to a cohort study of wellbeing in women newly diagnosed with invasive breast cancer. BMC Cancer 8:126CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Sobin LH, Wittekind C (eds) (2002) TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 6th edn. Wiley-Liss, Newyork Sobin LH, Wittekind C (eds) (2002) TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 6th edn. Wiley-Liss, Newyork
21.
go back to reference Cohen M (2006) Breast cancer early detection, health beliefs, and cancer worries in randomly selected women with and without a family history of breast cancer. Psychooncology 15:873–883CrossRefPubMed Cohen M (2006) Breast cancer early detection, health beliefs, and cancer worries in randomly selected women with and without a family history of breast cancer. Psychooncology 15:873–883CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Margolin S, Johansson H, Rutqvist LE et al (2006) Family history, and impact on clinical presentation and prognosis, in a population-based breast cancer cohort from the Stockholm County. Fam Cancer 5:309–321CrossRefPubMed Margolin S, Johansson H, Rutqvist LE et al (2006) Family history, and impact on clinical presentation and prognosis, in a population-based breast cancer cohort from the Stockholm County. Fam Cancer 5:309–321CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Hussain SK, Altieri A, Sundquist J et al (2008) Influence of education level on breast cancer risk and survival in Sweden between 1990 and 2004. Int J Cancer 122:165–169CrossRefPubMed Hussain SK, Altieri A, Sundquist J et al (2008) Influence of education level on breast cancer risk and survival in Sweden between 1990 and 2004. Int J Cancer 122:165–169CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Katapodi MC, Lee KA, Facione NC et al (2004) Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: a meta-analytic review. Prev Med 38:388–402CrossRefPubMed Katapodi MC, Lee KA, Facione NC et al (2004) Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: a meta-analytic review. Prev Med 38:388–402CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Murabito JM, Evans JC, Larson MG et al (2001) Family breast cancer history and mammography: Framingham Offspring Study. Am J Epidemiol 154:916–923CrossRefPubMed Murabito JM, Evans JC, Larson MG et al (2001) Family breast cancer history and mammography: Framingham Offspring Study. Am J Epidemiol 154:916–923CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Antill YC, Reynolds J, Young MA et al (2006) Screening behavior in women at increased familial risk for breast cancer. Fam Cancer 5:359–368CrossRefPubMed Antill YC, Reynolds J, Young MA et al (2006) Screening behavior in women at increased familial risk for breast cancer. Fam Cancer 5:359–368CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Figueiredo JC, Ennis M, Knight JA et al (2007) Influence of young age at diagnosis and family history of breast or ovarian cancer on breast cancer outcomes in a population-based cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 105:69–80CrossRefPubMed Figueiredo JC, Ennis M, Knight JA et al (2007) Influence of young age at diagnosis and family history of breast or ovarian cancer on breast cancer outcomes in a population-based cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 105:69–80CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Couto E, Banks E, Reeves G et al (2008) Family history and breast cancer tumour characteristics in screened women. Int J Cancer 123:2950–2954CrossRefPubMed Couto E, Banks E, Reeves G et al (2008) Family history and breast cancer tumour characteristics in screened women. Int J Cancer 123:2950–2954CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Verkooijen HM, Fioretta G, Chappuis PO et al (2004) Set-up of a population-based familial breast cancer registry in Geneva, Switzerland: validation of first results. Ann Oncol 15:350–353CrossRefPubMed Verkooijen HM, Fioretta G, Chappuis PO et al (2004) Set-up of a population-based familial breast cancer registry in Geneva, Switzerland: validation of first results. Ann Oncol 15:350–353CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Douglas FS, O’Dair LC, Robinson M et al (1999) The accuracy of diagnoses as reported in families with cancer: a retrospective study. J Med Genet 36:309–312PubMed Douglas FS, O’Dair LC, Robinson M et al (1999) The accuracy of diagnoses as reported in families with cancer: a retrospective study. J Med Genet 36:309–312PubMed
Metadata
Title
The relationship between knowledge of family history and cancer characteristics at diagnosis in women newly-diagnosed with invasive breast cancer
Authors
Marijana Lijovic
Susan R. Davis
Pam Fradkin
Jo Bradbury
Maria La China
Max Schwarz
Rory Wolfe
Helen Farrugia
Robin J. Bell
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Familial Cancer / Issue 4/2009
Print ISSN: 1389-9600
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7292
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-009-9236-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2009

Familial Cancer 4/2009 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine