Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 6/2010

01-06-2010 | Original Article

Ascertainment of Colonoscopy Indication Using Administrative Data

Authors: Deborah A. Fisher, Janet M. Grubber, John M. Castor, Cynthia J. Coffman

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 6/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Administrative procedure code data can estimate colonoscopy utilization; however, determining colonoscopy indication is more difficult as procedure codes do not inherently reflect the purpose (screening, surveillance, diagnosis) of the colonoscopy.

Aim

To improve the reported sensitivity (70%) and specificity (72%) of a published algorithm for identifying screening colonoscopies using Veterans Health Administration (VHA) administrative data.

Methods

We validated three algorithms for determining colonoscopy indication using medical records as the gold standard in a national sample of 650 patients. Algorithms used International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Medical records were manually abstracted using standardized protocols.

Results

The best algorithm had 83% sensitivity and 76% specificity for screening indication. Over 99% of colonoscopy CPT codes corresponded to a colonoscopy in the medical record.

Conclusions

VHA procedure codes are very accurate for colonoscopy utilization; however, algorithms to ascertain indication have only moderate accuracy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Seeff LC, Richards TB, Shapiro JA, et al. How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC’s survey of endoscopic capacity. Gastroenterology. 2004;127(6):1670–1677.CrossRefPubMed Seeff LC, Richards TB, Shapiro JA, et al. How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC’s survey of endoscopic capacity. Gastroenterology. 2004;127(6):1670–1677.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Use of colorectal cancer tests—United States, 2002, 2004, and 2006. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, CDC, Atlanta, GA. 2008 March 14; 57(10):253–258. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Use of colorectal cancer tests—United States, 2002, 2004, and 2006. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, CDC, Atlanta, GA. 2008 March 14; 57(10):253–258.
3.
go back to reference Mysliwiec PA, Brown ML, Klabunde CN. Ransohoff DF: are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:264–271.PubMed Mysliwiec PA, Brown ML, Klabunde CN. Ransohoff DF: are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:264–271.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Boolchand V, Olds G, Singh J, Singh P, Chak A. Cooper GS: colorectal screening after polypectomy: a national survey study of primary care physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:654–659.PubMed Boolchand V, Olds G, Singh J, Singh P, Chak A. Cooper GS: colorectal screening after polypectomy: a national survey study of primary care physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:654–659.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Walter LC, Lindquist K, Nugent S, et al. Impact of age and comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening among older veterans. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:465–473.PubMed Walter LC, Lindquist K, Nugent S, et al. Impact of age and comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening among older veterans. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:465–473.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Haque R, Chiu V, Mehta KR, Geiger AMl. An automated data algorithm to distinguish screening and diagnostic colorectal cancer endoscopy exams. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005;35:116–118.CrossRefPubMed Haque R, Chiu V, Mehta KR, Geiger AMl. An automated data algorithm to distinguish screening and diagnostic colorectal cancer endoscopy exams. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005;35:116–118.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference El-Serag HB, Petersen L, Hampel H, Richardson P, Cooper G. The use of screening colonoscopy for patients cared for by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(20):2202–2208.CrossRefPubMed El-Serag HB, Petersen L, Hampel H, Richardson P, Cooper G. The use of screening colonoscopy for patients cared for by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(20):2202–2208.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Schneeweiss S, Wang PS, Avorn J, Glynn RJ. Improved comorbidity adjustment for predicting mortality in medicare populations. Health Serv Res. 2003;38(4):1103–1120.CrossRefPubMed Schneeweiss S, Wang PS, Avorn J, Glynn RJ. Improved comorbidity adjustment for predicting mortality in medicare populations. Health Serv Res. 2003;38(4):1103–1120.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43(11):1130–1139.CrossRefPubMed Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43(11):1130–1139.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Ascertainment of Colonoscopy Indication Using Administrative Data
Authors
Deborah A. Fisher
Janet M. Grubber
John M. Castor
Cynthia J. Coffman
Publication date
01-06-2010
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 6/2010
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-010-1200-y

Other articles of this Issue 6/2010

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 6/2010 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.