Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 1/2019

01-01-2019 | Original Paper

Long term evaluation of electromechanical delay in patients with atrial septal defect after transcatheter closure

Authors: Ahmet Öz, Emre Aruğaslan, Tufan Çınar, Muhammed Keskin, Mert Ilker Hayıroğlu, Şahin Avşar, Mehmet Baran Karataş, Berat Arıkan Aydın, Koray Demir, Barış Güngör, Osman Bolca

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Some studies have been showed that electromechanical delay, which may pose an increased tendency to atrial fibrillation, may prolong in patients with various clinical conditions. In addition, the electromechanical delay in patients with secundum type atrial septal defect (ASD) compared to healthy people have been reported previously. Therefore, in the present study, we prospectively evaluated the mid-term and long-term effects of the transcatheter closure of secundum type ASD on the lateral atrial conduction time (PA), septal PA, tricuspid PA, left and right intra-atrial electromechanical delay (ILeft-EMD and IRight-EMD, respectively) and inter-atrial electromechanical delay (IA-EMD) measured by means of Doppler echocardiography. Our prospective study included a total of 45 secundum type ASD patients who undergone percutaneous transcatheter closure from December 2012 to April 2015. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) before the closure, at sixth and twelfth months after the closure. In comparison of the EMD sixth months after the device closure, there were statistically significant decrease in lateral PA, septal PA, tricuspid PA, ILeft-EMD, IRight-EMD and IA-EMD compared to pre-device closure values. Twelfth months after the device closure, we also observed statistically significant decrease in lateral PA, septal PA, tricuspid PA, ILeft-EMD, IRight-EMD and IA-EMD compared to 6-month post-device closure values. In the present study, we observed that the atrial EMD improves after device closure and continues to improve after twelfth month following post-device closure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Abd El Rahman MY, Hui W, Timme J, Ewert P, Berger F, Dsebissowa F, Hetzer R, Lange PE, Abdul-Khaliq H (2005) Analysis of atrial and ventricular performance by tissue Doppler imaging in patients with atrial septal defects before and after surgical and catheter closure. Echocardiography 22(7):579–585CrossRefPubMed Abd El Rahman MY, Hui W, Timme J, Ewert P, Berger F, Dsebissowa F, Hetzer R, Lange PE, Abdul-Khaliq H (2005) Analysis of atrial and ventricular performance by tissue Doppler imaging in patients with atrial septal defects before and after surgical and catheter closure. Echocardiography 22(7):579–585CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kharouf R, Luxenberg DM, Khalid O, Abdulla R (2008) Atrial septal defect: spectrum of care. Pediatr Cardiol 29(2):271–280CrossRefPubMed Kharouf R, Luxenberg DM, Khalid O, Abdulla R (2008) Atrial septal defect: spectrum of care. Pediatr Cardiol 29(2):271–280CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Eerola A, Pihkala JI, Boldt T, Mattila IP, Poutanen T, Jokinen E (2007) Hemodynamic improvement is faster after percutaneous ASD closure than after surgery. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 69(3):432–441CrossRefPubMed Eerola A, Pihkala JI, Boldt T, Mattila IP, Poutanen T, Jokinen E (2007) Hemodynamic improvement is faster after percutaneous ASD closure than after surgery. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 69(3):432–441CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Du ZD, Hijazi ZM, Kleinman CS, Silverman NH, Larntz K, Amplatzer Investigators (2002) Comparison between transcatheter and surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defect in children and adults: results of a multicenter nonrandomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 39(11):1836–1844CrossRefPubMed Du ZD, Hijazi ZM, Kleinman CS, Silverman NH, Larntz K, Amplatzer Investigators (2002) Comparison between transcatheter and surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defect in children and adults: results of a multicenter nonrandomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 39(11):1836–1844CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Daubert JC, Pavin D, Jauvert G, Mabo P (2004) Intra- and interatrial conduction delay: implications for cardiac pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 27(4):507–525CrossRefPubMed Daubert JC, Pavin D, Jauvert G, Mabo P (2004) Intra- and interatrial conduction delay: implications for cardiac pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 27(4):507–525CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Cagdas M, Velibey Y, Guvenc TS, Gungor B, Guzelburc O, Calik N, Ugur M, Tekkesin AI, Gurkan K, Eren M (2015) Evaluation of atrial electromechanical conduction delay in case of hemodynamically insignificant rheumatic heart disease: a tissue Doppler study. Cardiol J 22(6):683–690CrossRefPubMed Cagdas M, Velibey Y, Guvenc TS, Gungor B, Guzelburc O, Calik N, Ugur M, Tekkesin AI, Gurkan K, Eren M (2015) Evaluation of atrial electromechanical conduction delay in case of hemodynamically insignificant rheumatic heart disease: a tissue Doppler study. Cardiol J 22(6):683–690CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Guo C, Liu J, Zhao S, Teng Y, Shen L (2016) Decreased left atrial strain parameters are correlated with prolonged total atrial conduction time in lone atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 32(7):1053–1061CrossRefPubMed Guo C, Liu J, Zhao S, Teng Y, Shen L (2016) Decreased left atrial strain parameters are correlated with prolonged total atrial conduction time in lone atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 32(7):1053–1061CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Rosenheck S (1997) Signal-averaged P wave in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 20(10 Pt 2):2577–2586CrossRefPubMed Rosenheck S (1997) Signal-averaged P wave in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 20(10 Pt 2):2577–2586CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Darbar D, Jahangir A, Hammill SC, Gersh BJ (2002) P wave signal-averaged electrocardiography to identify risk for atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 25(10):1447–1453CrossRefPubMed Darbar D, Jahangir A, Hammill SC, Gersh BJ (2002) P wave signal-averaged electrocardiography to identify risk for atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 25(10):1447–1453CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Steinberg JS, Zelenkofske S, Wong SC, Gelernt M, Sciacca R, Menchavez E (1993) Value of the P-wave signal-averaged ECG for predicting atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Circulation 88(6):2618 – 2622CrossRefPubMed Steinberg JS, Zelenkofske S, Wong SC, Gelernt M, Sciacca R, Menchavez E (1993) Value of the P-wave signal-averaged ECG for predicting atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Circulation 88(6):2618 – 2622CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Platonov PG, Carlson J, Ingemansson MP, Roijer A, Hansson A, Chireikin LV, Olsson SB (2000) Detection of interatrial conduction defects with unfiltered signal-averaged P-wave ECG in patients with lone atrial fibrillation. Europace 2(1):32–41CrossRefPubMed Platonov PG, Carlson J, Ingemansson MP, Roijer A, Hansson A, Chireikin LV, Olsson SB (2000) Detection of interatrial conduction defects with unfiltered signal-averaged P-wave ECG in patients with lone atrial fibrillation. Europace 2(1):32–41CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Erturk M, Aslam M, Aksu H, Akturk IF, Gul M, Uzun F, Surgit O, Ari H, Uslu N, Erol MK (2013) Evaluation of atrial electromechanic delay and left atrial functions in the patients with secundum type atrial septal defect. Echocardiography 30(6):699–705CrossRefPubMed Erturk M, Aslam M, Aksu H, Akturk IF, Gul M, Uzun F, Surgit O, Ari H, Uslu N, Erol MK (2013) Evaluation of atrial electromechanic delay and left atrial functions in the patients with secundum type atrial septal defect. Echocardiography 30(6):699–705CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lang RM1, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, Picard MH, Roman MJ, Seward J, Shanewise JS, Solomon SD, Spencer KT, Sutton MS, Stewart WJ, Chamber Quantification Writing Group; American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee; European Association of Echocardiography (2005) Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18(12):1440–1463CrossRefPubMed Lang RM1, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, Picard MH, Roman MJ, Seward J, Shanewise JS, Solomon SD, Spencer KT, Sutton MS, Stewart WJ, Chamber Quantification Writing Group; American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee; European Association of Echocardiography (2005) Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18(12):1440–1463CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, Hua L, Handschumacher MD, Chandrasekaran K, Solomon SD, Louie EK, Schiller NB (2010) Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23(7):685–713CrossRef Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, Hua L, Handschumacher MD, Chandrasekaran K, Solomon SD, Louie EK, Schiller NB (2010) Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23(7):685–713CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Butera G, Carminati M, Chessa M, Youssef R, Drago M, Giamberti A, Pomè G, Bossone E, Frigiola A (2006) Percutaneous versus surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defect: comparison of early results and complications. Am Heart J 151(1):228–234CrossRefPubMed Butera G, Carminati M, Chessa M, Youssef R, Drago M, Giamberti A, Pomè G, Bossone E, Frigiola A (2006) Percutaneous versus surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defect: comparison of early results and complications. Am Heart J 151(1):228–234CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kutty S, Hazeem AA, Brown K, Danford CJ, Worley SE, Delaney JW, Danford DA, Latson LA (2012) Long term (5 to 20 years) outcomes after transcatheter or surgical treatment of hemodynamically significant isolated secundum atrial septal defect. Am J Cardiol 109(9):1348–1352CrossRefPubMed Kutty S, Hazeem AA, Brown K, Danford CJ, Worley SE, Delaney JW, Danford DA, Latson LA (2012) Long term (5 to 20 years) outcomes after transcatheter or surgical treatment of hemodynamically significant isolated secundum atrial septal defect. Am J Cardiol 109(9):1348–1352CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kaya Y, Yurtdaş M, Ceylan Y, Bulut MO, Söylemez N, Güvenç TS, Karakurt A, Akdemir R, Öztürk H, Güneş Y, Balcı B, Özkan M (2013) Erişkin ve çocuklardaki sekundum tip atriyal septal defektlerin perkütan yaklaşım ile kapatılması: Kısa – orta dönem izlem sonuçlarımız. Türk Kardiyol Dern Arş 41(8):705–713CrossRefPubMed Kaya Y, Yurtdaş M, Ceylan Y, Bulut MO, Söylemez N, Güvenç TS, Karakurt A, Akdemir R, Öztürk H, Güneş Y, Balcı B, Özkan M (2013) Erişkin ve çocuklardaki sekundum tip atriyal septal defektlerin perkütan yaklaşım ile kapatılması: Kısa – orta dönem izlem sonuçlarımız. Türk Kardiyol Dern Arş 41(8):705–713CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Sadiq M, Kazmi T, Rehman A, Latif F, Hyder N, Qureshi SA (2012) Device closure of atrial septal defect: medium-term outcome with special reference to complications. Cardiol Young 22(1):71–78CrossRefPubMed Sadiq M, Kazmi T, Rehman A, Latif F, Hyder N, Qureshi SA (2012) Device closure of atrial septal defect: medium-term outcome with special reference to complications. Cardiol Young 22(1):71–78CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Oto A, Aytemir K, Özkutlu S, Kaya BE, Kabakcı G, Ateş AH, Yorgun H, Canpolat U (2011) İnteratriyal septal defektlerin perkütan yolla kapatılması: Orta dönem izlem sonuçları. Türk Kardiyol Dern Arş 39(5):385–395CrossRefPubMed Oto A, Aytemir K, Özkutlu S, Kaya BE, Kabakcı G, Ateş AH, Yorgun H, Canpolat U (2011) İnteratriyal septal defektlerin perkütan yolla kapatılması: Orta dönem izlem sonuçları. Türk Kardiyol Dern Arş 39(5):385–395CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Chessa M, Carminati M, Butera G, Bini RM, Drago M, Rosti L, Giamberti A, Pome G, Bossone E, Frigiola A (2002) Early and late complications associated with transcatheter occlusion of secundum atrial septal defect. J Am Coll Cardiol 39(6):1061–1065CrossRefPubMed Chessa M, Carminati M, Butera G, Bini RM, Drago M, Rosti L, Giamberti A, Pome G, Bossone E, Frigiola A (2002) Early and late complications associated with transcatheter occlusion of secundum atrial septal defect. J Am Coll Cardiol 39(6):1061–1065CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Sawa T, Tanaka H, Motoji Y, Hiraishi M, Mochizuki Y, Ryo K, Matsumoto K, Otake H, Shinke T, Hirata K (2016) Utility of isovolumic contraction peak velocity for evaluation of adult patient status after transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect. Echocardiography 33(1):23–29CrossRefPubMed Sawa T, Tanaka H, Motoji Y, Hiraishi M, Mochizuki Y, Ryo K, Matsumoto K, Otake H, Shinke T, Hirata K (2016) Utility of isovolumic contraction peak velocity for evaluation of adult patient status after transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect. Echocardiography 33(1):23–29CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Ağaç MT, Akyüz AR, Acar Z, Akdemir R, Korkmaz L, Kırış A, Erkuş E, Erkan H, Celik S (2012) Evaluation of right ventricular function in early period following transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect. Echocardiography 29(3):358–362CrossRefPubMed Ağaç MT, Akyüz AR, Acar Z, Akdemir R, Korkmaz L, Kırış A, Erkuş E, Erkan H, Celik S (2012) Evaluation of right ventricular function in early period following transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect. Echocardiography 29(3):358–362CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Knepp M, Rocchini A, Llyod T, Aiyagari R (2010) Long term follow up of secundum atrial septal defect closure with the Amplatzer septal occluder. Congenit Heart Dis 5(1):32–37CrossRefPubMed Knepp M, Rocchini A, Llyod T, Aiyagari R (2010) Long term follow up of secundum atrial septal defect closure with the Amplatzer septal occluder. Congenit Heart Dis 5(1):32–37CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Santoro G, Pascotto M, Caputo S, Gaio G, Lacono C, Caso I, Sarubbi B, Carrozza M, Russo MG, Calabrò R (2008) Short term electrogeometric atrial remodeling after percutaneous atrial septal defect closure. J Cardiovasc Med 9(8):789–793CrossRef Santoro G, Pascotto M, Caputo S, Gaio G, Lacono C, Caso I, Sarubbi B, Carrozza M, Russo MG, Calabrò R (2008) Short term electrogeometric atrial remodeling after percutaneous atrial septal defect closure. J Cardiovasc Med 9(8):789–793CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Balcı KG, Balcı MM, Aksoy MM, Yılmaz S, Aytürk M, Doğan M, Yeter E, Akdemir R (2015) Remodeling process in right and left ventricle after percutaneous atrial septal defect closure in adult patients. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 43(3):250–258CrossRefPubMed Balcı KG, Balcı MM, Aksoy MM, Yılmaz S, Aytürk M, Doğan M, Yeter E, Akdemir R (2015) Remodeling process in right and left ventricle after percutaneous atrial septal defect closure in adult patients. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 43(3):250–258CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Ozer N, Yavuz B, Can I et al (2005) Doppler tissue evaluation of intraatrial and interatrial electromechanical delay and comparison with P-wave dispersion in patient with mitral stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18:945–948CrossRefPubMed Ozer N, Yavuz B, Can I et al (2005) Doppler tissue evaluation of intraatrial and interatrial electromechanical delay and comparison with P-wave dispersion in patient with mitral stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18:945–948CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Aslan M, Erturk M, Turen S, Uzun F, Surgit O, Ozbay Ozyilmaz S, Rifat Yildirim M, Faruk Baycan O, Uygur B, Yildirim A, Eksik A (2014) Effects of percutaneous closure of atrial septal defect on left atrial mechanical and conduction functions. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 15(10):1117–1124CrossRefPubMed Aslan M, Erturk M, Turen S, Uzun F, Surgit O, Ozbay Ozyilmaz S, Rifat Yildirim M, Faruk Baycan O, Uygur B, Yildirim A, Eksik A (2014) Effects of percutaneous closure of atrial septal defect on left atrial mechanical and conduction functions. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 15(10):1117–1124CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Hessling G, Hyca S, Brockmeier K, Ulmer HE (2003) Cardiac dysrhythmias in pediatric patients before and 1 year after transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects using the Amplatzer septal occluder. Pediatr Cardiol 24:259–262CrossRefPubMed Hessling G, Hyca S, Brockmeier K, Ulmer HE (2003) Cardiac dysrhythmias in pediatric patients before and 1 year after transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects using the Amplatzer septal occluder. Pediatr Cardiol 24:259–262CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Long term evaluation of electromechanical delay in patients with atrial septal defect after transcatheter closure
Authors
Ahmet Öz
Emre Aruğaslan
Tufan Çınar
Muhammed Keskin
Mert Ilker Hayıroğlu
Şahin Avşar
Mehmet Baran Karataş
Berat Arıkan Aydın
Koray Demir
Barış Güngör
Osman Bolca
Publication date
01-01-2019
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1426-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 1/2019 Go to the issue