Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 1/2007

01-02-2007 | Original Paper

Which women aren’t getting mammograms and why? (United States)

Authors: Helen I. Meissner, Nancy Breen, Michele L. Taubman, Sally W. Vernon, Barry I. Graubard

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 1/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

This study investigates why women who reported no recent mammogram did not get the test.

Methods

Using data from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), we examine correlates of mammography use among women 40 years and older (n = 10,212), with particular focus on the 30% (n = 3,188) who reported no recent mammogram. Non-screening is examined in the context of two important correlates of mammography use—access to health care and a physician’s recommendation to get a mammogram.

Results

In total, 80% of non-screeners who reported having access to healthcare did not receive a recommendation for a mammogram. Women age 65 years and older were more likely than younger women to report not receiving a recommendation (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.25–2.50). For women who reported having access, non-screening was significantly more likely among younger women (40–49), those with less education, incomes less than $20,000, residence outside Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and no family history of breast cancer. Among women with access problems, those who had not visited a primary care provider in the past year were much more likely to be non-screeners (80%) compared with those who had seen a provider (46%). Among women with access, those who reported put it off as the main reason for non-screening were significantly more likely to be younger and to be born in the U.S. than women who said that they didn’t know they needed a mammogram.

Conclusions

Most non-screeners report not receiving a physician recommendation for mammography. Although a minority reported access problems, the effect of lacking access on utilization was strong and is accentuated when women without access do not see a doctor. These findings confirm the importance of a mammography recommendation and raise questions concerning whether this information is being conveyed by physicians or heard by patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2002) Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med 137:344–346 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2002) Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med 137:344–346
2.
go back to reference Swan J, Breen N, Coates RJ, Rimer BK, Lee NC (2003) Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer 97:1528–1540PubMedCrossRef Swan J, Breen N, Coates RJ, Rimer BK, Lee NC (2003) Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer 97:1528–1540PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Legler J, Meissner HI, Coyne C, Breen N, Chollette V, Rimer BK (2002) The effectiveness of interventions to promote mammography among women with historically lower rates of screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:59–71PubMed Legler J, Meissner HI, Coyne C, Breen N, Chollette V, Rimer BK (2002) The effectiveness of interventions to promote mammography among women with historically lower rates of screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:59–71PubMed
4.
go back to reference Rimer B, Meissner HI, Breen N, Legler J, Coyne C (2001) Social and behavioral interventions to increase breast cancer screening. In: Schneiderman N, Speers MA, Silva JM, Tomes H, Gentry JH, (eds). Integrating behavioral and social sciences with public health. Washington, D.C., American Psychological Association, pp 177–201CrossRef Rimer B, Meissner HI, Breen N, Legler J, Coyne C (2001) Social and behavioral interventions to increase breast cancer screening. In: Schneiderman N, Speers MA, Silva JM, Tomes H, Gentry JH, (eds). Integrating behavioral and social sciences with public health. Washington, D.C., American Psychological Association, pp 177–201CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Vernon SW, Laville EA, Jackson GL (1990) Participation in breast screening programs: a review. Soc Sci Med 30:1107–1118PubMedCrossRef Vernon SW, Laville EA, Jackson GL (1990) Participation in breast screening programs: a review. Soc Sci Med 30:1107–1118PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mandelblatt JS, Gold K, O’Malley AS, et al (1999) Breast and cervix cancer screening among multiethnic women: role of age, health, and source of care. Prev Med 28:418–425PubMedCrossRef Mandelblatt JS, Gold K, O’Malley AS, et al (1999) Breast and cervix cancer screening among multiethnic women: role of age, health, and source of care. Prev Med 28:418–425PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hiatt RA, Pasick RJ (1996) Unsolved problems in early breast cancer detection: focus on the underserved. Breast Cancer Res Treat 40:37–51PubMedCrossRef Hiatt RA, Pasick RJ (1996) Unsolved problems in early breast cancer detection: focus on the underserved. Breast Cancer Res Treat 40:37–51PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Breen N, Kessler L (1994) Changes in the use of screening mammography: evidence from the 1987 and 1990 National Health Interview Surveys. Am J Public Health 84:62–67PubMed Breen N, Kessler L (1994) Changes in the use of screening mammography: evidence from the 1987 and 1990 National Health Interview Surveys. Am J Public Health 84:62–67PubMed
9.
go back to reference Hiatt RA, Klabunde C, Breen N, Swan J, Ballard-Barbash R (2002) Cancer screening practices from national health interview surveys: past, present, and future. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1837–1846PubMed Hiatt RA, Klabunde C, Breen N, Swan J, Ballard-Barbash R (2002) Cancer screening practices from national health interview surveys: past, present, and future. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1837–1846PubMed
10.
go back to reference Kiefe CI, McKay SV, Halevy A, Brody BA (1994) Is cost a barrier to screening mammography for low-income women receiving medicare benefits? A randomized trial. Arch Intern Med 154:1217–1224PubMedCrossRef Kiefe CI, McKay SV, Halevy A, Brody BA (1994) Is cost a barrier to screening mammography for low-income women receiving medicare benefits? A randomized trial. Arch Intern Med 154:1217–1224PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Breen N, Wagener DK, Brown ML, Davis WW, Ballard-Barbash R (2001) Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 national health interview surveys. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1704–1713PubMedCrossRef Breen N, Wagener DK, Brown ML, Davis WW, Ballard-Barbash R (2001) Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 national health interview surveys. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1704–1713PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hsia J, Kemper E, Kiefe C, et al (2000) The importance of health insurance as a determinant of cancer screening: evidence from the women’s health initiative. Prev Med 31:261–270PubMedCrossRef Hsia J, Kemper E, Kiefe C, et al (2000) The importance of health insurance as a determinant of cancer screening: evidence from the women’s health initiative. Prev Med 31:261–270PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kirkman-Liff B, Kronenfeld JJ (1992) Access to cancer screening services for women. Am J Public Health 82:733–735PubMedCrossRef Kirkman-Liff B, Kronenfeld JJ (1992) Access to cancer screening services for women. Am J Public Health 82:733–735PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Fox SA, Klos DS, Tsou CV (1988) Underuse of screening mammography by family physicians. Radiology 166:431–433PubMed Fox SA, Klos DS, Tsou CV (1988) Underuse of screening mammography by family physicians. Radiology 166:431–433PubMed
15.
go back to reference Fox SA, Murata PJ, Stein JA (1991) The impact of physician compliance on screening mammography for older women. Arch Intern Med 151:50–56PubMedCrossRef Fox SA, Murata PJ, Stein JA (1991) The impact of physician compliance on screening mammography for older women. Arch Intern Med 151:50–56PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium (1990) Screening mammography: a missed clinical opportunity? Results of the NCI breast cancer screening consortium and national health interview survey studies. J Am Med Assoc 264:54–58 NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium (1990) Screening mammography: a missed clinical opportunity? Results of the NCI breast cancer screening consortium and national health interview survey studies. J Am Med Assoc 264:54–58
17.
go back to reference Vernon SW, Vogel VG, Halabi S, Jackson GL, Lundy RO, Peters GN (1992) Breast cancer screening behaviors and attitudes in three racial/ethnic groups. Cancer 69:165–174PubMedCrossRef Vernon SW, Vogel VG, Halabi S, Jackson GL, Lundy RO, Peters GN (1992) Breast cancer screening behaviors and attitudes in three racial/ethnic groups. Cancer 69:165–174PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Fox SA, Stein JA (1991) The effect of physician–patient communication on mammography utilization by different ethnic groups. Med Care 29:1065–1082PubMedCrossRef Fox SA, Stein JA (1991) The effect of physician–patient communication on mammography utilization by different ethnic groups. Med Care 29:1065–1082PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Roetzheim RG, Fox SA, Leake B (1995) Physician-reported determinants of screening mammography in older women: the impact of physician and practice characteristics. J Am Geriatr Soc 43:1398–1402PubMed Roetzheim RG, Fox SA, Leake B (1995) Physician-reported determinants of screening mammography in older women: the impact of physician and practice characteristics. J Am Geriatr Soc 43:1398–1402PubMed
20.
go back to reference Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH (2002) Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 137:347–360PubMed Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH (2002) Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 137:347–360PubMed
21.
go back to reference National Research Council (1992) Toward a national health care survey. A data system for 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, National Research Council (1992) Toward a national health care survey. A data system for 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press,
22.
go back to reference National Center for Health Statistics (2001) Data file documentation, National Health Interview Survey, 2000 [machine readable data file and documentation). Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics National Center for Health Statistics (2001) Data file documentation, National Health Interview Survey, 2000 [machine readable data file and documentation). Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics
23.
go back to reference Botman SL, Moore TF, Moriarity CL, Parsons VL (2000) Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 1995–2004. Vital Health Statistics 2 Botman SL, Moore TF, Moriarity CL, Parsons VL (2000) Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 1995–2004. Vital Health Statistics 2
24.
go back to reference Korn EL, Graubard BI (1999) Analysis of Health Surveys. New York: John Wiley and Sons Korn EL, Graubard BI (1999) Analysis of Health Surveys. New York: John Wiley and Sons
25.
go back to reference SAS Institute Inc. (1999) SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 8. SAS Institute Inc SAS Institute Inc. (1999) SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 8. SAS Institute Inc
26.
go back to reference SUDAAN (2002) SUDAAN user’s manual, release 8.0.1. Research Triangle Institute SUDAAN (2002) SUDAAN user’s manual, release 8.0.1. Research Triangle Institute
27.
go back to reference Zapka JG, Lemon SC (2004) Interventions for patients, providers and health care organizations. Cancer 101:1165–1187PubMedCrossRef Zapka JG, Lemon SC (2004) Interventions for patients, providers and health care organizations. Cancer 101:1165–1187PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Wagner TH (1998) The effectiveness of mailed patient reminders on mammography screening: a meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med 14:64–70PubMedCrossRef Wagner TH (1998) The effectiveness of mailed patient reminders on mammography screening: a meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med 14:64–70PubMedCrossRef
29.
30.
go back to reference Cohen D, DiCicco-Bloom B, Ohman Strickland P, et al (2004) Opportunistic approaches for delivering preventive care in illness visits. Prev Med 38:565–573PubMedCrossRef Cohen D, DiCicco-Bloom B, Ohman Strickland P, et al (2004) Opportunistic approaches for delivering preventive care in illness visits. Prev Med 38:565–573PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Walter LC, Lewis CL, Barton MB (2005) Screening for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer in the elderly: a review of the evidence. Am J Med 118:1078–1086PubMedCrossRef Walter LC, Lewis CL, Barton MB (2005) Screening for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer in the elderly: a review of the evidence. Am J Med 118:1078–1086PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Sabatino SA, Burns RB, Davis RB, Phillips RS, Chen YH, McCarthy EP (2004) Breast carcinoma screening and risk perception among women at increased risk for breast carcinoma. Cancer 100:2338–2346PubMedCrossRef Sabatino SA, Burns RB, Davis RB, Phillips RS, Chen YH, McCarthy EP (2004) Breast carcinoma screening and risk perception among women at increased risk for breast carcinoma. Cancer 100:2338–2346PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Which women aren’t getting mammograms and why? (United States)
Authors
Helen I. Meissner
Nancy Breen
Michele L. Taubman
Sally W. Vernon
Barry I. Graubard
Publication date
01-02-2007
Publisher
Kluwer Academic Publishers
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 1/2007
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-006-0078-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2007

Cancer Causes & Control 1/2007 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine