Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2018

01-07-2018 | Epidemiology

Validation of a personalized risk prediction model for contralateral breast cancer

Authors: Marzana Chowdhury, David Euhus, Banu Arun, Chris Umbricht, Swati Biswas, Pankaj Choudhary

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Women diagnosed with unilateral breast cancer are increasingly choosing to remove their other unaffected breast through contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) to reduce the risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC). Yet a large proportion of CPMs are believed to be medically unnecessary. Thus, there is a pressing need to educate patients effectively on their CBC risk. We had earlier developed a CBC risk prediction model called CBCRisk based on eight personal risk factors.

Methods

In this study, we validate CBCRisk on independent clinical data from the Johns Hopkins University (JH) and MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDA). Women whose first breast cancer diagnosis was either invasive and/or ductal carcinoma in situ and whose age at first diagnosis was between 18 and 88 years were included in the cohorts because CBCRisk was developed specifically for these women. A woman who develops CBC is called a case whereas a woman who does not is called a control. The cohort sizes are 6035 (with 117 CBC cases) for JH and 5185 (with 111 CBC cases) for MDA. We computed the relevant calibration and validation measures for 3- and 5-year risk predictions.

Results

We found that the model performs reasonably well for both cohorts. In particular, area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for the two cohorts range from 0.61 to 0.65.

Conclusions

With this independent validation, CBCRisk can be used confidently in clinical settings for counseling BC patients by providing their individualized CBC risk. In turn, this may potentially help alleviate the rate of medically unnecessary CPMs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, Morris TJ, Virnig BA (2007) Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol 25(33):5203–5209CrossRefPubMed Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, Morris TJ, Virnig BA (2007) Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol 25(33):5203–5209CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Tuttle TM, Jarosek S, Habermann EB, Arrington A, Abraham A, Morris TJ, Virnig BA (2009) Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol 27(9):1362–1367CrossRefPubMed Tuttle TM, Jarosek S, Habermann EB, Arrington A, Abraham A, Morris TJ, Virnig BA (2009) Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol 27(9):1362–1367CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference King TA, Sakr R, Patil S, Gurevich I, Stempel M, Sampson M, Morrow M (2011) Clinical management factors contribute to the decision for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. J Clin Oncol 29(16):2158–2164CrossRefPubMed King TA, Sakr R, Patil S, Gurevich I, Stempel M, Sampson M, Morrow M (2011) Clinical management factors contribute to the decision for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. J Clin Oncol 29(16):2158–2164CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Wong SM, Freedman RA, Sagara Y, Aydogan F, Barry WT, Golshan M (2017) Growing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy despite no improvement in long-term survival for invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg 265(3):581–589CrossRefPubMed Wong SM, Freedman RA, Sagara Y, Aydogan F, Barry WT, Golshan M (2017) Growing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy despite no improvement in long-term survival for invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg 265(3):581–589CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Nichols HB, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Lacey JV, Rosenberg PS, Anderson WF (2011) Declining incidence of contralateral breast cancer in the United States from 1975 to 2006. J Clin Oncol 29(12):1564–1569CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nichols HB, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Lacey JV, Rosenberg PS, Anderson WF (2011) Declining incidence of contralateral breast cancer in the United States from 1975 to 2006. J Clin Oncol 29(12):1564–1569CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Murphy JA, Milner TD, O’Donoghue JM (2013) Contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy in sporadic breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 14(7):e262–269CrossRefPubMed Murphy JA, Milner TD, O’Donoghue JM (2013) Contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy in sporadic breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 14(7):e262–269CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Abbott A, Rueth N, Pappas-Varco S, Kuntz K, Kerr E, Tuttle T (2011) Perceptions of contralateral breast cancer: an overestimation of risk. Ann Surg Oncol 18(11):3129–3136CrossRefPubMed Abbott A, Rueth N, Pappas-Varco S, Kuntz K, Kerr E, Tuttle T (2011) Perceptions of contralateral breast cancer: an overestimation of risk. Ann Surg Oncol 18(11):3129–3136CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Metcalfe KA, Narod SA (2002) Breast cancer risk perception among women who have undergone prophylactic bilateral mastectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(20):1564–1569CrossRefPubMed Metcalfe KA, Narod SA (2002) Breast cancer risk perception among women who have undergone prophylactic bilateral mastectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(20):1564–1569CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Khan SA (2011) Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: what do we know and what do our patients know? J Clin Oncol 29(16):2132–2135CrossRefPubMed Khan SA (2011) Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: what do we know and what do our patients know? J Clin Oncol 29(16):2132–2135CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Spiegelman D, Colditz GA, Hunter D, Hertzmark E (1994) Validation of the Gail et al. model for predicting individual breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 86(8):600–607CrossRefPubMed Spiegelman D, Colditz GA, Hunter D, Hertzmark E (1994) Validation of the Gail et al. model for predicting individual breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 86(8):600–607CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Delong ER, Delong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44(3):837–845CrossRefPubMed Delong ER, Delong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44(3):837–845CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Carpenter J, Bithell J (2000) Bootstrap confidence intervals: when, which, what? A practical guide for medical statisticians. Stat Med 19(9):1141–1164CrossRefPubMed Carpenter J, Bithell J (2000) Bootstrap confidence intervals: when, which, what? A practical guide for medical statisticians. Stat Med 19(9):1141–1164CrossRefPubMed
17.
18.
go back to reference Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez JC, Mller M (2011) pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare roc curves. BMC Bioinform 12:77CrossRef Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez JC, Mller M (2011) pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare roc curves. BMC Bioinform 12:77CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bondy ML, Lustbader ED, Halabi S, Ross E, Vogel VG (1994) Validation of a breast cancer risk assessment model in women with a positive family history. J Natl Cancer Inst 86(8):620–625CrossRefPubMed Bondy ML, Lustbader ED, Halabi S, Ross E, Vogel VG (1994) Validation of a breast cancer risk assessment model in women with a positive family history. J Natl Cancer Inst 86(8):620–625CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Costantino JP, Gail MH, Pee D, Anderson S, Redmond CK, Benichou J, Wieand HS (1999) Validation studies for models projecting the risk of invasive and total breast cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 91(18):1541–1548CrossRefPubMed Costantino JP, Gail MH, Pee D, Anderson S, Redmond CK, Benichou J, Wieand HS (1999) Validation studies for models projecting the risk of invasive and total breast cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 91(18):1541–1548CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Rockhill B, Spiegelman D, Byrne C, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA (2001) Model of breast cancer risk prediction and implications for chemoprevention. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(5):358–366CrossRefPubMed Rockhill B, Spiegelman D, Byrne C, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA (2001) Model of breast cancer risk prediction and implications for chemoprevention. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(5):358–366CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Chay WY, Ong WS, Tan PH, Leo NQJ, Ho GH, Wong CS, Chia KS et al (2012) Validation of the Gail model for predicting individual breast cancer risk in a prospective nationwide study of 28,104 Singapore women. Breast Cancer Res 14(1):R19CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chay WY, Ong WS, Tan PH, Leo NQJ, Ho GH, Wong CS, Chia KS et al (2012) Validation of the Gail model for predicting individual breast cancer risk in a prospective nationwide study of 28,104 Singapore women. Breast Cancer Res 14(1):R19CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Min JW, Chang MC, Lee HK, Hur MH, Noh DY, Yoon JH, Jung Y, Yang JH (2014) Validation of risk assessment models for predicting the incidence of breast cancer in Korean women. J Breast Cancer 17(3):226–235CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Min JW, Chang MC, Lee HK, Hur MH, Noh DY, Yoon JH, Jung Y, Yang JH (2014) Validation of risk assessment models for predicting the incidence of breast cancer in Korean women. J Breast Cancer 17(3):226–235CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Anothaisintawee T, Teerawattananon Y, Wiratkapun C, Srinakarin J, Woodtichartpreecha P, Hirunpat S, Wongwaisayawan S, Lertsithichai P, Kasamesup V, Thakkinstian A (2014) Development and validation of a breast cancer risk prediction model for Thai women: a cross-sectional study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 15(16):6811–6817CrossRefPubMed Anothaisintawee T, Teerawattananon Y, Wiratkapun C, Srinakarin J, Woodtichartpreecha P, Hirunpat S, Wongwaisayawan S, Lertsithichai P, Kasamesup V, Thakkinstian A (2014) Development and validation of a breast cancer risk prediction model for Thai women: a cross-sectional study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 15(16):6811–6817CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Pankratz VS, Degnim AC, Frank RD, Frost MH, Visscher DW, Vierkant RA, Hieken TJ, Ghosh K, Tarabishy Y, Vachon CM et al (2015) Model for individualized prediction of breast cancer risk after a benign breast biopsy. J Clin Oncol 33(8):923–929CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pankratz VS, Degnim AC, Frank RD, Frost MH, Visscher DW, Vierkant RA, Hieken TJ, Ghosh K, Tarabishy Y, Vachon CM et al (2015) Model for individualized prediction of breast cancer risk after a benign breast biopsy. J Clin Oncol 33(8):923–929CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Validation of a personalized risk prediction model for contralateral breast cancer
Authors
Marzana Chowdhury
David Euhus
Banu Arun
Chris Umbricht
Swati Biswas
Pankaj Choudhary
Publication date
01-07-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4763-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine