Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2016

01-09-2016 | Epidemiology

Adjuvant systemic therapy in early breast cancer: impact of guideline changes and clinicopathological factors associated with nonadherence at a nation-wide level

Authors: A. M. F. Verschoor, A. Kuijer, J. Verloop, C. H. Van Gils, G. S. Sonke, A. Jager, T. van Dalen, S. G. Elias

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Over recent years, adjuvant systemic treatment guidelines (AST) for early-stage breast cancer have changed considerably. We aimed to assess the impact of these guideline changes on the administration of AST in early-stage breast cancer patients and to what extent these guidelines are adhered to at a nation-wide level. We used Netherlands Cancer Registry data to describe trends in AST prescription, adherence to AST guidelines, and to identify clinicopathological determinants of nonadherence. Between 1990 and 2012, 231,648 Dutch patients were diagnosed with early breast cancer, of whom 124,472 received AST. Adjuvant endocrine treatment (ET) use increased from 23 % of patients (1990) to 56 % (2012), and chemotherapy from 11 to 44 %. In 2009–2012, 8 % of patients received ET and 3 % received chemotherapy without guideline indication. Conversely, 10–29 % of patients did not receive ET and chemotherapy, respectively, despite a guideline indication. Unfavorable clinicopathological characteristics generally decreased the chance of undertreatment and increased the chance for overtreatment. Remarkable was the increased chance of ET undertreatment in younger women (RR < 35 vs 60–69 years 1.79; 95 % CI 1.30–2.47) and in women with HER2+ disease (RR 1.64; 95 % CI 1.46–1.85). Over the years, AST guidelines expanded resulting in much more Dutch early breast cancer patients receiving AST. In the majority of cases, AST administration was guideline concordant, but the high frequency of chemotherapy undertreatment in some subgroups suggests limited AST guideline support in these patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Mariotto A, Feuer EJ, Harlan LC, Wun LM, Johnson KA, Abrams J (2002) Trends in use of adjuvant multi-agent chemotherapy and tamoxifen for breast cancer in the United States: 1975–1999. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(21):1626–1634CrossRefPubMed Mariotto A, Feuer EJ, Harlan LC, Wun LM, Johnson KA, Abrams J (2002) Trends in use of adjuvant multi-agent chemotherapy and tamoxifen for breast cancer in the United States: 1975–1999. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(21):1626–1634CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel (1986) National institutes of health consensus development conference statement: adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 36:42–47CrossRef National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel (1986) National institutes of health consensus development conference statement: adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 36:42–47CrossRef
4.
go back to reference National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel (1991) NIH consensus conference. Treatment of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA 265:391–395CrossRef National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel (1991) NIH consensus conference. Treatment of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA 265:391–395CrossRef
5.
go back to reference National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel (2001) National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference statement: adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 30: 5–15. Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL). Cijfers over kanker. http://www.cijfersoverkanker.nl/ National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel (2001) National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference statement: adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 30: 5–15. Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL). Cijfers over kanker. http://​www.​cijfersoverkanke​r.​nl/​
6.
go back to reference Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de gezondheidszorg CBO VvIK (2002). Risicoprofilering. Richtlijn mammacarcinoom p49-58 Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de gezondheidszorg CBO VvIK (2002). Risicoprofilering. Richtlijn mammacarcinoom p49-58
7.
go back to reference Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de gezondheidszorg CBO VvIK (2008). Risicoprofilering. Richtlijn mammacarcinoom p100-112 Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de gezondheidszorg CBO VvIK (2008). Risicoprofilering. Richtlijn mammacarcinoom p100-112
8.
go back to reference Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de gezondheidszorg CBO VvIK (2012). Risicoprofilering. Richtlijn mammacarcinoom p81-83 Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de gezondheidszorg CBO VvIK (2012). Risicoprofilering. Richtlijn mammacarcinoom p81-83
9.
go back to reference De Gelder R, Heijnsdijk EA, Fracheboud J, Draisma G, de Koning HJ (2015) The effects of population-based mammography screening starting between age 40 and 50 in the presence of adjuvant systemic therapy. Int J Cancer 137:165–172. doi:10.1002/ijc.29364 CrossRefPubMed De Gelder R, Heijnsdijk EA, Fracheboud J, Draisma G, de Koning HJ (2015) The effects of population-based mammography screening starting between age 40 and 50 in the presence of adjuvant systemic therapy. Int J Cancer 137:165–172. doi:10.​1002/​ijc.​29364 CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365:1687–1717CrossRef Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365:1687–1717CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, Fryback DG, Clarke L, Zelen M, Mandelblatt JS, Yakovlev AY, Habbema JD, Feuer EJ, Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) Collaborators (2005) Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353:1784–1792CrossRefPubMed Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, Fryback DG, Clarke L, Zelen M, Mandelblatt JS, Yakovlev AY, Habbema JD, Feuer EJ, Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) Collaborators (2005) Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353:1784–1792CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference Bueno-de-Mesquita JM, van Harten WH, Retel VP, van ’t Veer LJ, van Dam FS, Karsenberg K, Douma KF, van V H, Wesseling J, Wu TS, Atsma D, Rutgers EJ, Brink G, Floore AN, Glas AM, Roumen RM, Bellot FE, van Krimpen C, Rodenhuis S, van de Vijver MJ, Linn SC (2007) Use of 70-gene signature to predict prognosis of patients with node-negative breast cancer: a prospective community-based feasibility study (RASTER). Lancet Oncol 8:1079–1087CrossRefPubMed Bueno-de-Mesquita JM, van Harten WH, Retel VP, van ’t Veer LJ, van Dam FS, Karsenberg K, Douma KF, van V H, Wesseling J, Wu TS, Atsma D, Rutgers EJ, Brink G, Floore AN, Glas AM, Roumen RM, Bellot FE, van Krimpen C, Rodenhuis S, van de Vijver MJ, Linn SC (2007) Use of 70-gene signature to predict prognosis of patients with node-negative breast cancer: a prospective community-based feasibility study (RASTER). Lancet Oncol 8:1079–1087CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kuijer A, Drukker CA, Elias S, Smorenburg CH, Rutgers EJT, Siesling S, van Dalen T (2016) Changes over time in the impact of gene-expression profiles on the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in estrogen receptor positive early stage breast cancer patients—a nationwide study. Int J Cancer 139:769–775. doi:10.1002/ijc.30132 CrossRefPubMed Kuijer A, Drukker CA, Elias S, Smorenburg CH, Rutgers EJT, Siesling S, van Dalen T (2016) Changes over time in the impact of gene-expression profiles on the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in estrogen receptor positive early stage breast cancer patients—a nationwide study. Int J Cancer 139:769–775. doi:10.​1002/​ijc.​30132 CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
go back to reference Sukel MP, van de Poll-Franse LV, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Vreugdenhil G, Herings RM, Coebergh JW, Voogd AC (2008) Substantial increase in the use of adjuvant systemic treatment for early stage breast cancer reflects changes in guidelines in the period 1990-2006 in the southeastern Netherlands. Eur J Cancer 44:1846–1854. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.06.001 CrossRefPubMed Sukel MP, van de Poll-Franse LV, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Vreugdenhil G, Herings RM, Coebergh JW, Voogd AC (2008) Substantial increase in the use of adjuvant systemic treatment for early stage breast cancer reflects changes in guidelines in the period 1990-2006 in the southeastern Netherlands. Eur J Cancer 44:1846–1854. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejca.​2008.​06.​001 CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Tataru D, Robinson D, Moller H, Davies E (2006) Trends in the treatment of breast cancer in Southeast England following the introduction of national guidelines. J Public Health 28:215–217. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdl011 CrossRef Tataru D, Robinson D, Moller H, Davies E (2006) Trends in the treatment of breast cancer in Southeast England following the introduction of national guidelines. J Public Health 28:215–217. doi:10.​1093/​pubmed/​fdl011 CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kemetli L, Rutqvist LE, Jonsson H, Nystrom L, Lenner P, Tornberg S (2009) Temporal trends in the use of adjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer – a population based study in Sweden 1976-2005. Acta Oncol 48:59–66. doi:10.1080/02841860802277471 CrossRefPubMed Kemetli L, Rutqvist LE, Jonsson H, Nystrom L, Lenner P, Tornberg S (2009) Temporal trends in the use of adjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer – a population based study in Sweden 1976-2005. Acta Oncol 48:59–66. doi:10.​1080/​0284186080227747​1 CrossRefPubMed
21.
Metadata
Title
Adjuvant systemic therapy in early breast cancer: impact of guideline changes and clinicopathological factors associated with nonadherence at a nation-wide level
Authors
A. M. F. Verschoor
A. Kuijer
J. Verloop
C. H. Van Gils
G. S. Sonke
A. Jager
T. van Dalen
S. G. Elias
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3940-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine