Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2016

Open Access 01-04-2016 | Clinical trial

Sentinel lymph node biopsy can be omitted in DCIS patients treated with breast conserving therapy

Authors: L. M. van Roozendaal, B. Goorts, M. Klinkert, K. B. M. I. Keymeulen, B. De Vries, L. J. A. Strobbe, C. A. P. Wauters, Y. E. van Riet, E. Degreef, E. J. T. Rutgers, J. Wesseling, M. L. Smidt

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Breast cancer guidelines advise sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on core biopsy at high risk of invasive cancer or in case of mastectomy. This study investigates the incidence of SLNB and SLN metastases and the relevance of indications in guidelines and literature to perform SLNB in order to validate whether SLNB is justified in patients with DCIS on core biopsy in current era. Clinically node negative patients diagnosed from 2004 to 2013 with only DCIS on core needle biopsy were selected from a national database. Incidence of SLN biopsy and metastases was calculated. With Fisher exact tests correlation between SLNB indications and actual presence of SLN metastases was studied. Further, underestimation rate for invasive cancer and correlation with SLN metastases was analysed. 910 patients were included. SLNB was performed in 471 patients (51.8 %): 94.5 % had pN0, 3.0 % pN1mi and 2.5 % pN1. Patients undergoing mastectomy had 7 % SLN metastases versus 3.5 % for breast conserving surgery (BCS) (p = 0.107). The only factors correlating to SLN metastases were smaller core needle size (p = 0.01) and invasive cancer (p < 0.001). Invasive cancer was detected in 16.7 % by histopathology with 15.6 % SLN metastases versus only 2 % in pure DCIS. SLNB showed metastases in 5.5 % of patients; 3.5 % in case of BCS (any histopathology) and 2 % when pure DCIS was found at definitive histopathology (BCS and mastectomy). Consequently, SLNB should no longer be performed in patients diagnosed with DCIS on core biopsy undergoing BCS. If definitive histopathology shows invasive cancer, SLNB can still be considered after initial surgery.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Silverstein MJ, Rosser RJ, Gierson ED, Waisman JR, Gamagami P, Hoffman RS, Fingerhut AG, Lewinsky BS, Colburn W, Handel N (1987) Axillary lymph node dissection for intraductal breast carcinoma–is it indicated? Cancer 59(10):1819–1824CrossRefPubMed Silverstein MJ, Rosser RJ, Gierson ED, Waisman JR, Gamagami P, Hoffman RS, Fingerhut AG, Lewinsky BS, Colburn W, Handel N (1987) Axillary lymph node dissection for intraductal breast carcinoma–is it indicated? Cancer 59(10):1819–1824CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Intra M, Veronesi P, Mazzarol G, Galimberti V, Luini A, Sacchini V, Trifiro G, Gentilini O, Pruneri G, Naninato P, Torres F, Paganelli G, Viale G, Veronesi U (2003) Axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Arch Surg 138(3):309–313CrossRefPubMed Intra M, Veronesi P, Mazzarol G, Galimberti V, Luini A, Sacchini V, Trifiro G, Gentilini O, Pruneri G, Naninato P, Torres F, Paganelli G, Viale G, Veronesi U (2003) Axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Arch Surg 138(3):309–313CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Klauber-DeMore N, Tan LK, Liberman L, Kaptain S, Fey J, Borgen P, Heerdt A, Montgomery L, Paglia M, Petrek JA, Cody HS, Van Zee KJ (2000) Sentinel lymph node biopsy: is it indicated in patients with high-risk ductal carcinoma-in situ and ductal carcinoma-in situ with microinvasion? Ann Surg Oncol 7(9):636–642CrossRefPubMed Klauber-DeMore N, Tan LK, Liberman L, Kaptain S, Fey J, Borgen P, Heerdt A, Montgomery L, Paglia M, Petrek JA, Cody HS, Van Zee KJ (2000) Sentinel lymph node biopsy: is it indicated in patients with high-risk ductal carcinoma-in situ and ductal carcinoma-in situ with microinvasion? Ann Surg Oncol 7(9):636–642CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Cox CE, Nguyen K, Gray RJ, Salud C, Ku NN, Dupont E, Hutson L, Peltz E, Whitehead G, Reintgen D, Cantor A (2001) Importance of lymphatic mapping in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): why map DCIS? Am Surg 67(6):513–519; discussion 519–521 Cox CE, Nguyen K, Gray RJ, Salud C, Ku NN, Dupont E, Hutson L, Peltz E, Whitehead G, Reintgen D, Cantor A (2001) Importance of lymphatic mapping in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): why map DCIS? Am Surg 67(6):513–519; discussion 519–521
7.
go back to reference Kelly TA, Kim JA, Patrick R, Grundfest S, Crowe JP (2003) Axillary lymph node metastases in patients with a final diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ. Am J Surg 186(4):368–370CrossRefPubMed Kelly TA, Kim JA, Patrick R, Grundfest S, Crowe JP (2003) Axillary lymph node metastases in patients with a final diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ. Am J Surg 186(4):368–370CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lara JF, Young SM, Velilla RE, Santoro EJ, Templeton SF (2003) The relevance of occult axillary micrometastasis in ductal carcinoma in situ: a clinicopathologic study with long-term follow-up. Cancer 98(10):2105–2113. doi:10.1002/cncr.11761 CrossRefPubMed Lara JF, Young SM, Velilla RE, Santoro EJ, Templeton SF (2003) The relevance of occult axillary micrometastasis in ductal carcinoma in situ: a clinicopathologic study with long-term follow-up. Cancer 98(10):2105–2113. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​11761 CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Pendas S, Dauway E, Giuliano R, Ku N, Cox CE, Reintgen DS (2000) Sentinel node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ patients. Ann Surg Oncol 7(1):15–20CrossRefPubMed Pendas S, Dauway E, Giuliano R, Ku N, Cox CE, Reintgen DS (2000) Sentinel node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ patients. Ann Surg Oncol 7(1):15–20CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Zavotsky J, Hansen N, Brennan MB, Turner RR, Giuliano AE (1999) Lymph node metastasis from ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion. Cancer 85(11):2439–2443CrossRefPubMed Zavotsky J, Hansen N, Brennan MB, Turner RR, Giuliano AE (1999) Lymph node metastasis from ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion. Cancer 85(11):2439–2443CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Cserni G (2002) Sentinel lymph node biopsy as a tool for the staging of ductal carcinoma in situ in patients with breast carcinoma. Surg Today 32(2):99–103CrossRefPubMed Cserni G (2002) Sentinel lymph node biopsy as a tool for the staging of ductal carcinoma in situ in patients with breast carcinoma. Surg Today 32(2):99–103CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Farkas EA, Stolier AJ, Teng SC, Bolton JS, Fuhrman GM (2004) An argument against routine sentinel node mapping for DCIS. Am Surg 70(1):13–17; discussion 17-18 Farkas EA, Stolier AJ, Teng SC, Bolton JS, Fuhrman GM (2004) An argument against routine sentinel node mapping for DCIS. Am Surg 70(1):13–17; discussion 17-18
15.
go back to reference Rahusen FD, Meijer S, Taets van Amerongen AH, Pijpers R, van Diest PJ (2003) Sentinel node biopsy for nonpalpable breast tumors requires a preoperative diagnosis of invasive breast cancer. Breast J 9(5):380–384CrossRefPubMed Rahusen FD, Meijer S, Taets van Amerongen AH, Pijpers R, van Diest PJ (2003) Sentinel node biopsy for nonpalpable breast tumors requires a preoperative diagnosis of invasive breast cancer. Breast J 9(5):380–384CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Francis AM, Haugen CE, Grimes LM, Crow JR, Yi M, Mittendorf EA, Bedrosian I, Caudle AS, Babiera GV, Krishnamurthy S, Kuerer HM, Hunt KK (2015) Is sentinel lymph node dissection warranted for patients with a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ? Ann Surg Oncol. doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4547-7 Francis AM, Haugen CE, Grimes LM, Crow JR, Yi M, Mittendorf EA, Bedrosian I, Caudle AS, Babiera GV, Krishnamurthy S, Kuerer HM, Hunt KK (2015) Is sentinel lymph node dissection warranted for patients with a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ? Ann Surg Oncol. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-015-4547-7
18.
go back to reference Brennan ME, Turner RM, Ciatto S, Marinovich ML, French JR, Macaskill P, Houssami N (2011) Ductal carcinoma in situ at core-needle biopsy: meta-analysis of underestimation and predictors of invasive breast cancer. Radiology 260(1):119–128. doi:10.1148/radiol.11102368 CrossRefPubMed Brennan ME, Turner RM, Ciatto S, Marinovich ML, French JR, Macaskill P, Houssami N (2011) Ductal carcinoma in situ at core-needle biopsy: meta-analysis of underestimation and predictors of invasive breast cancer. Radiology 260(1):119–128. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​11102368 CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Prendeville S, Ryan C, Feeley L, O’Connell F, Browne TJ, O’Sullivan MJ, Bennett MW (2015) Sentinel lymph node biopsy is not warranted following a core needle biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. Breast 24(3):197–200. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2015.01.004 CrossRefPubMed Prendeville S, Ryan C, Feeley L, O’Connell F, Browne TJ, O’Sullivan MJ, Bennett MW (2015) Sentinel lymph node biopsy is not warranted following a core needle biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. Breast 24(3):197–200. doi:10.​1016/​j.​breast.​2015.​01.​004 CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Fahrbach K, Sledge I, Cella C, Linz H, Ross SD (2006) A comparison of the accuracy of two minimally invasive breast biopsy methods: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 274(2):63–73. doi:10.1007/s00404-005-0106-y CrossRefPubMed Fahrbach K, Sledge I, Cella C, Linz H, Ross SD (2006) A comparison of the accuracy of two minimally invasive breast biopsy methods: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 274(2):63–73. doi:10.​1007/​s00404-005-0106-y CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Meijnen P, Oldenburg HS, Loo CE, Nieweg OE, Peterse JL, Rutgers EJ (2007) Risk of invasion and axillary lymph node metastasis in ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed by core-needle biopsy. Br J Surg 94(8):952–956. doi:10.1002/bjs.5735 CrossRefPubMed Meijnen P, Oldenburg HS, Loo CE, Nieweg OE, Peterse JL, Rutgers EJ (2007) Risk of invasion and axillary lymph node metastasis in ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed by core-needle biopsy. Br J Surg 94(8):952–956. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​5735 CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kaufman SA, Harris EE, Bailey L, Chadha M, Dutton SC, Freedman GM, Goyal S, Halyard MY, Horst KC, Novick KL, Park CC, Suh WW, Toppmeyer D, Zook J, Haffty BG (2015) ACR appropriateness criteria(R) ductal carcinoma in situ. Oncology 29(6):446–458, 441–460 Kaufman SA, Harris EE, Bailey L, Chadha M, Dutton SC, Freedman GM, Goyal S, Halyard MY, Horst KC, Novick KL, Park CC, Suh WW, Toppmeyer D, Zook J, Haffty BG (2015) ACR appropriateness criteria(R) ductal carcinoma in situ. Oncology 29(6):446–458, 441–460
23.
go back to reference NABON (2012) Richtlijn Mammacarcinoom (Dutch breast cancer guideline) NABON (2012) Richtlijn Mammacarcinoom (Dutch breast cancer guideline)
25.
go back to reference Giuliano AE, McCall L, Beitsch P, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz P, Leitch AM, Saha S, Hunt KK, Morrow M, Ballman K (2010) Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial. Ann Surg 252(3):426–432, discussion 432–423. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f08f32 Giuliano AE, McCall L, Beitsch P, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz P, Leitch AM, Saha S, Hunt KK, Morrow M, Ballman K (2010) Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial. Ann Surg 252(3):426–432, discussion 432–423. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e3181f08f32​
26.
go back to reference Galimberti V, Cole BF, Zurrida S, Viale G, Luini A, Veronesi P, Baratella P, Chifu C, Sargenti M, Intra M, Gentilini O, Mastropasqua MG, Mazzarol G, Massarut S, Garbay JR, Zgajnar J, Galatius H, Recalcati A, Littlejohn D, Bamert M, Colleoni M, Price KN, Regan MM, Goldhirsch A, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Veronesi U, International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial i (2013) Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 14 (4):297–305. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70035-4 Galimberti V, Cole BF, Zurrida S, Viale G, Luini A, Veronesi P, Baratella P, Chifu C, Sargenti M, Intra M, Gentilini O, Mastropasqua MG, Mazzarol G, Massarut S, Garbay JR, Zgajnar J, Galatius H, Recalcati A, Littlejohn D, Bamert M, Colleoni M, Price KN, Regan MM, Goldhirsch A, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Veronesi U, International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial i (2013) Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 14 (4):297–305. doi:10.​1016/​S1470-2045(13)70035-4
27.
go back to reference Gentilini O, Veronesi U (2012) Abandoning sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer? A new trial in progress at the European Institute of Oncology of Milan (SOUND: sentinel node vs Observation after axillary UltraSouND). Breast 21(5):678–681. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2012.06.013 CrossRefPubMed Gentilini O, Veronesi U (2012) Abandoning sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer? A new trial in progress at the European Institute of Oncology of Milan (SOUND: sentinel node vs Observation after axillary UltraSouND). Breast 21(5):678–681. doi:10.​1016/​j.​breast.​2012.​06.​013 CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Roozendaal L (2014) Omitting sentinel node procedure in breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving therapy Roozendaal L (2014) Omitting sentinel node procedure in breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving therapy
29.
go back to reference Casparie ea (2007) PALGA: Dutch pathology registry Casparie ea (2007) PALGA: Dutch pathology registry
30.
go back to reference Ellis IO, Humphreys S, Michell M, Pinder SE, Wells CA, Zakhour HD, Pathology UKNCCfBS, European Commission Working Group on Breast Screening P (2004) Best practice no 179. Guidelines for breast needle core biopsy handling and reporting in breast screening assessment. J Clin Pathol 57(9):897–902. doi:10.1136/jcp.2003.010983 Ellis IO, Humphreys S, Michell M, Pinder SE, Wells CA, Zakhour HD, Pathology UKNCCfBS, European Commission Working Group on Breast Screening P (2004) Best practice no 179. Guidelines for breast needle core biopsy handling and reporting in breast screening assessment. J Clin Pathol 57(9):897–902. doi:10.​1136/​jcp.​2003.​010983
31.
go back to reference Fisher B, Montague E, Redmond C, Deutsch M, Brown GR, Zauber A, Hanson WF, Wong A (1980) Findings from NSABP protocol no. B-04-comparison of radical mastectomy with alternative treatments for primary breast cancer. I. Radiation compliance and its relation to treatment outcome. Cancer 46(1):1–13CrossRefPubMed Fisher B, Montague E, Redmond C, Deutsch M, Brown GR, Zauber A, Hanson WF, Wong A (1980) Findings from NSABP protocol no. B-04-comparison of radical mastectomy with alternative treatments for primary breast cancer. I. Radiation compliance and its relation to treatment outcome. Cancer 46(1):1–13CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Elshof LE, Tryfonidis K, Slaets L, van Leeuwen-Stok AE, Skinner VP, Dif N, Pijnappel RM, Bijker N, Rutgers EJ, Wesseling J (2015) Feasibility of a prospective, randomised, open-label, international multicentre, phase III, non-inferiority trial to assess the safety of active surveillance for low risk ductal carcinoma in situ—the LORD study. Eur J Cancer 51(12):1497–1510. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2015.05.008 CrossRefPubMed Elshof LE, Tryfonidis K, Slaets L, van Leeuwen-Stok AE, Skinner VP, Dif N, Pijnappel RM, Bijker N, Rutgers EJ, Wesseling J (2015) Feasibility of a prospective, randomised, open-label, international multicentre, phase III, non-inferiority trial to assess the safety of active surveillance for low risk ductal carcinoma in situ—the LORD study. Eur J Cancer 51(12):1497–1510. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejca.​2015.​05.​008 CrossRefPubMed
33.
Metadata
Title
Sentinel lymph node biopsy can be omitted in DCIS patients treated with breast conserving therapy
Authors
L. M. van Roozendaal
B. Goorts
M. Klinkert
K. B. M. I. Keymeulen
B. De Vries
L. J. A. Strobbe
C. A. P. Wauters
Y. E. van Riet
E. Degreef
E. J. T. Rutgers
J. Wesseling
M. L. Smidt
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3783-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine