Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2015

01-07-2015 | Epidemiology

Race-associated biological differences among Luminal A breast tumors

Authors: Monica D’Arcy, Jodie Fleming, Whitney R. Robinson, Erin L. Kirk, Charles M. Perou, Melissa A. Troester

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

African-American (AA) women have higher breast cancer-specific mortality rates. A higher prevalence of the worse outcome Basal-like breast cancer subtype contributes to this, but AA women also have higher mortality even within the more favorable outcome Luminal A breast cancers. These differences may reflect treatment or health care access issues, inherent biological differences, or both. To identify potential biological differences by race among Luminal A breast cancers, gene expression data from 108 CAU and 57 AA breast tumors were analyzed. Race-associated genes were evaluated for associations with survival. Finally, expression of race- and survival-associated genes was evaluated in normal tissue of AA and CAU women. Six genes (ACOX2, MUC1, CRYBB2, PSPH, SQLE, TYMS) were differentially expressed by race among Luminal A breast cancers and were associated with survival (HR <0.8, HR >1.25). For all six genes, tumors in AA had higher expression of poor prognosis genes (CRYBB2, PSPH, SQLE, TYMS) and lower expression of good prognosis genes (ACOX2, MUC1). A score based on all six genes predicted survival in a large independent dataset (HR = 1.9 top vs. bottom quartile, 95 % CI: 1.4–2.5). For four genes, normal tissue of AA and CAU women showed similar expression (ACOX2, MUC1, SQLE, TYMS); however, the poor outcome-associated genes CRYBB2 and PSPH were more highly expressed in AA versus CAU women’s normal tissue. This analysis identified gene expression differences that may contribute to mortality disparities and suggests that among Luminal A breast tumors there are biological differences between AA and CAU patients. Some of these differences (CRYBB2 and PSPH) may exist from the earliest stages of tumor development, or may even precede malignancy.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Cancer Society (2013) Breast cancer facts and figures 2013–2014. ACS, Atlanta American Cancer Society (2013) Breast cancer facts and figures 2013–2014. ACS, Atlanta
6.
go back to reference Field LA, Love B, Deyarmin B et al (2012) Identification of differentially expressed genes in breast tumors from African American compared with Caucasian women. Cancer 118:1334–1344. doi:10.1002/cncr.26405 PubMedCrossRef Field LA, Love B, Deyarmin B et al (2012) Identification of differentially expressed genes in breast tumors from African American compared with Caucasian women. Cancer 118:1334–1344. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​26405 PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pirone JR, D’Arcy M, Stewart DA et al (2012) Age-associated gene expression in normal breast tissue mirrors qualitative age-at-incidence patterns for breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 21:1735–1744. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0451 CrossRef Pirone JR, D’Arcy M, Stewart DA et al (2012) Age-associated gene expression in normal breast tissue mirrors qualitative age-at-incidence patterns for breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 21:1735–1744. doi:10.​1158/​1055-9965.​EPI-12-0451 CrossRef
12.
16.
go back to reference Benito M, Parker J, Du Q et al (2004) Adjustment of systematic microarray data biases. Bioinformatics 20:105–114PubMedCrossRef Benito M, Parker J, Du Q et al (2004) Adjustment of systematic microarray data biases. Bioinformatics 20:105–114PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Smyth GK (2004) Linear models and empirical Bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 3:Article 3. doi:10.2202/1544-6115.1027 Smyth GK (2004) Linear models and empirical Bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 3:Article 3. doi:10.​2202/​1544-6115.​1027
25.
go back to reference Alers JC, Rochat J, Krijtenburg PJ et al (2000) Identification of genetic markers for prostatic cancer progression. Lab Invest 80:931–942PubMedCrossRef Alers JC, Rochat J, Krijtenburg PJ et al (2000) Identification of genetic markers for prostatic cancer progression. Lab Invest 80:931–942PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Zaretsky JZ, Barnea I, Aylon Y et al (2006) MUC1 gene overexpressed in breast cancer: structure and transcriptional activity of the MUC1 promoter and role of estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) in regulation of the MUC1 gene expression. Mol Cancer 5:57. doi:10.1186/1476-4598-5-57 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Zaretsky JZ, Barnea I, Aylon Y et al (2006) MUC1 gene overexpressed in breast cancer: structure and transcriptional activity of the MUC1 promoter and role of estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) in regulation of the MUC1 gene expression. Mol Cancer 5:57. doi:10.​1186/​1476-4598-5-57 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Li Y, Cozzi PJ (2007) MUC1 is a promising therapeutic target for prostate cancer therapy. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 7:259–271PubMedCrossRef Li Y, Cozzi PJ (2007) MUC1 is a promising therapeutic target for prostate cancer therapy. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 7:259–271PubMedCrossRef
35.
39.
go back to reference Yokomise H, Liu D, Chang S et al (2013) Biomarkers as prognostic factors for cN2 or 3 non-small cell lung cancer treated by induction chemoradiotherapy and surgery. Anticancer Res 33:1107–1115PubMed Yokomise H, Liu D, Chang S et al (2013) Biomarkers as prognostic factors for cN2 or 3 non-small cell lung cancer treated by induction chemoradiotherapy and surgery. Anticancer Res 33:1107–1115PubMed
41.
go back to reference Sturtz LA, Melley J, Mamula K et al (2014) Outcome disparities in African American women with triple negative breast cancer: a comparison of epidemiological and molecular factors between African American and Caucasian women with triple negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer 14:62. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-14-62 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Sturtz LA, Melley J, Mamula K et al (2014) Outcome disparities in African American women with triple negative breast cancer: a comparison of epidemiological and molecular factors between African American and Caucasian women with triple negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer 14:62. doi:10.​1186/​1471-2407-14-62 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Race-associated biological differences among Luminal A breast tumors
Authors
Monica D’Arcy
Jodie Fleming
Whitney R. Robinson
Erin L. Kirk
Charles M. Perou
Melissa A. Troester
Publication date
01-07-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3474-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine