Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2015

01-06-2015 | Clinical trial

Phase II neoadjuvant clinical trial of carboplatin and eribulin in women with triple negative early-stage breast cancer (NCT01372579)

Authors: Virginia G. Kaklamani, Jacqueline S. Jeruss, Elisha Hughes, Kalliopi Siziopikou, Kirsten M. Timms, Alexander Gutin, Victor Abkevich, Zaina Sangale, Cara Solimeno, Krystal L. Brown, Joshua Jones, Anne-Renee Hartman, Caitlin Meservey, Borko Jovanovic, Irene Helenowski, Seema A. Khan, Kevin Bethke, Nora Hansen, Regina Uthe, Sara Giordano, Steven Rosen, Kent Hoskins, Jamie Von Roenn, Sarika Jain, Vamsi Parini, William Gradishar

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant treatment with carboplatin and eribulin in patients with early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), and to explore biomarkers based on DNA and protein expression profiles as predictors of response. Patients with histologically confirmed early-stage TNBC received carboplatin AUC 6 iv every 21 days, and eribulin 1.4 mg/m2 day 1 and day 8 every 21 days for four cycles. The primary endpoint of the study was pathologic complete response (pCR), with secondary endpoints including clinical response and safety of the combination. Exploratory studies assessed DNA-based biomarkers [homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score, and HR deficiency status (HRD score + BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation status)], protein-based biomarkers (Ki67, TP53, androgen receptor, Cyclin E, CDK2, Cyclin D, CDK4, Pin1 and Smad3), and clinical pretreatment factors as predictors of pCR. 13/30 (43.3 %) patients enrolled in the study achieved pCR. 24 (80.0 %) had a clinical complete or partial response. The combination was safe with mostly grade 1 and 2 toxicities. HRD score (P = 0.0024) and HR deficiency status (P = 0.0012) significantly predicted pCR. Pretreatment cytoplasmic CDK2 was also associated with pCR (P = 0.021). Significant differences in pre- versus post-treatment expression levels of nuclear Cyclin D (P = 0.020), nuclear CDK4 (P = 0.0030), and nuclear Smad3 (P = 0.015) were detected. The combination of carboplatin and eribulin is safe and efficacious in the treatment of early-stage TNBC. HRD score, HR deficiency status, and cytoplasmic CDK2 predicted pCR in this patient population.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Reis-Filho JS, Tutt AN (2008) Triple negative tumours: a critical review. Histopathology 52:108–118CrossRefPubMed Reis-Filho JS, Tutt AN (2008) Triple negative tumours: a critical review. Histopathology 52:108–118CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Lips EH, Mulder L, Oonk A, van der Kolk LE, Hogervorst FB, Imholz AL et al (2013) Triple-negative breast cancer: BRCAness and concordance of clinical features with BRCA1-mutation carriers. Br J Cancer 108:2172–2177CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Lips EH, Mulder L, Oonk A, van der Kolk LE, Hogervorst FB, Imholz AL et al (2013) Triple-negative breast cancer: BRCAness and concordance of clinical features with BRCA1-mutation carriers. Br J Cancer 108:2172–2177CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
3.
go back to reference Sikov WM, Berry DA, Perou CM, Singh B, Cirrincione CT, Tolaney SM et al (2015) Impact of the addition of carboplatin and/or bevacizumab to neoadjuvant once-per-week paclitaxel followed by dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide on pathologic complete response rates in stage II to III triple-negative breast cancer: CALGB 40603 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol 33:13–21CrossRefPubMed Sikov WM, Berry DA, Perou CM, Singh B, Cirrincione CT, Tolaney SM et al (2015) Impact of the addition of carboplatin and/or bevacizumab to neoadjuvant once-per-week paclitaxel followed by dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide on pathologic complete response rates in stage II to III triple-negative breast cancer: CALGB 40603 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol 33:13–21CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference von Minckwitz G, Schneeweiss A, Loibl S, Salat C, Denkert C, Rezai M et al (2014) Neoadjuvant carboplatin in patients with triple-negative and HER2-positive early breast cancer (GeparSixto; GBG 66): a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:747–756CrossRef von Minckwitz G, Schneeweiss A, Loibl S, Salat C, Denkert C, Rezai M et al (2014) Neoadjuvant carboplatin in patients with triple-negative and HER2-positive early breast cancer (GeparSixto; GBG 66): a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:747–756CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Telli ML, Jensen KC, Vinayak S, Kurian AW, Lipson JA, Flaherty P, et al. (2015) A phase II study of gemcitabine, carboplatin and iniparib as neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative and BRCA1/2 mutation-associated breast cancer with assessment of a tumor-based measure of genomic instability (PrECOG 0105). J Clin Oncol. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.57.0085 Telli ML, Jensen KC, Vinayak S, Kurian AW, Lipson JA, Flaherty P, et al. (2015) A phase II study of gemcitabine, carboplatin and iniparib as neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative and BRCA1/2 mutation-associated breast cancer with assessment of a tumor-based measure of genomic instability (PrECOG 0105). J Clin Oncol. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2014.​57.​0085
6.
go back to reference Smith JA, Wilson L, Azarenko O, Zhu X, Lewis BM, Littlefield BA et al (2010) Eribulin binds at microtubule ends to a single site on tubulin to suppress dynamic instability. Biochemistry 49:1331–1337CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Smith JA, Wilson L, Azarenko O, Zhu X, Lewis BM, Littlefield BA et al (2010) Eribulin binds at microtubule ends to a single site on tubulin to suppress dynamic instability. Biochemistry 49:1331–1337CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cortes J, O’Shaughnessy J, Loesch D, Blum JL, Vahdat LT, Petrakova K et al (2011) Eribulin monotherapy versus treatment of physician’s choice in patients with metastatic breast cancer (EMBRACE): a phase 3 open-label randomised study. Lancet 377:914–923CrossRefPubMed Cortes J, O’Shaughnessy J, Loesch D, Blum JL, Vahdat LT, Petrakova K et al (2011) Eribulin monotherapy versus treatment of physician’s choice in patients with metastatic breast cancer (EMBRACE): a phase 3 open-label randomised study. Lancet 377:914–923CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Twelves C, Cortes J, Vahdat L, Olivo M, He Y, Kaufman PA et al (2014) Efficacy of eribulin in women with metastatic breast cancer: a pooled analysis of two phase 3 studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 148:553–561CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Twelves C, Cortes J, Vahdat L, Olivo M, He Y, Kaufman PA et al (2014) Efficacy of eribulin in women with metastatic breast cancer: a pooled analysis of two phase 3 studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 148:553–561CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
9.
go back to reference Isakoff SJ, Mayer EL, He L, Traina TA, Carey LA, Krag K, et al. (2015) TBCRC009: A multi-center Phase II clinical trial of platinum monotherapy with biomarker assessment in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.57.6660 Isakoff SJ, Mayer EL, He L, Traina TA, Carey LA, Krag K, et al. (2015) TBCRC009: A multi-center Phase II clinical trial of platinum monotherapy with biomarker assessment in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2014.​57.​6660
10.
go back to reference Telli ML, Jensen KC, Abkevich V, Hartman A-R, Vinayak S, Lanchbury JS et al (2012) Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score predicts pathologic response following neoadjuvant platinum-based therapy in triple-negative and BRCA1/2 mutation-associated breast cancer (BC)(PD09-04). Cancer Res 72(24 suppl):141s Telli ML, Jensen KC, Abkevich V, Hartman A-R, Vinayak S, Lanchbury JS et al (2012) Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score predicts pathologic response following neoadjuvant platinum-based therapy in triple-negative and BRCA1/2 mutation-associated breast cancer (BC)(PD09-04). Cancer Res 72(24 suppl):141s
11.
go back to reference Birkbak NJ, Wang ZC, Kim JY, Eklund AC, Li Q, Tian R et al (2012) Telomeric allelic imbalance indicates defective DNA repair and sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. Cancer Discov 2:366–375CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Birkbak NJ, Wang ZC, Kim JY, Eklund AC, Li Q, Tian R et al (2012) Telomeric allelic imbalance indicates defective DNA repair and sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. Cancer Discov 2:366–375CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
12.
go back to reference Popova T, Manie E, Rieunier G, Caux-Moncoutier V, Tirapo C, Dubois T et al (2012) Ploidy and large-scale genomic instability consistently identify basal-like breast carcinomas with BRCA1/2 inactivation. Cancer Res 72:5454–5462CrossRefPubMed Popova T, Manie E, Rieunier G, Caux-Moncoutier V, Tirapo C, Dubois T et al (2012) Ploidy and large-scale genomic instability consistently identify basal-like breast carcinomas with BRCA1/2 inactivation. Cancer Res 72:5454–5462CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Abkevich V, Timms KM, Hennessy BT, Potter J, Carey MS, Meyer LA et al (2012) Patterns of genomic loss of heterozygosity predict homologous recombination repair defects in epithelial ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer 107:1776–1782CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Abkevich V, Timms KM, Hennessy BT, Potter J, Carey MS, Meyer LA et al (2012) Patterns of genomic loss of heterozygosity predict homologous recombination repair defects in epithelial ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer 107:1776–1782CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
14.
go back to reference Graeser M, McCarthy A, Lord CJ, Savage K, Hills M, Salter J et al (2010) A marker of homologous recombination predicts pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 16:6159–6168CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Graeser M, McCarthy A, Lord CJ, Savage K, Hills M, Salter J et al (2010) A marker of homologous recombination predicts pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 16:6159–6168CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
15.
go back to reference Timms KM, Abkevich V, Hughes E, Neff C, Reid J, Morris B et al (2014) Association of BRCA1/2 defects with genomic scores predictive of DNA damage repair deficiency among breast cancer subtypes. Breast Cancer Res 16:475CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Timms KM, Abkevich V, Hughes E, Neff C, Reid J, Morris B et al (2014) Association of BRCA1/2 defects with genomic scores predictive of DNA damage repair deficiency among breast cancer subtypes. Breast Cancer Res 16:475CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
16.
go back to reference Nakagawa M, Bando Y, Nagao T, Morimoto M, Takai C, Ohnishi T et al (2011) Expression of p53, Ki-67, E-cadherin, N-cadherin and TOP2A in triple-negative breast cancer. Anticancer Res 31:2389–2393PubMed Nakagawa M, Bando Y, Nagao T, Morimoto M, Takai C, Ohnishi T et al (2011) Expression of p53, Ki-67, E-cadherin, N-cadherin and TOP2A in triple-negative breast cancer. Anticancer Res 31:2389–2393PubMed
17.
go back to reference Keam B, Im SA, Lee KH, Han SW, Oh DY, Kim JH et al (2011) Ki-67 can be used for further classification of triple negative breast cancer into two subtypes with different response and prognosis. Breast Cancer Res 13:R22CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Keam B, Im SA, Lee KH, Han SW, Oh DY, Kim JH et al (2011) Ki-67 can be used for further classification of triple negative breast cancer into two subtypes with different response and prognosis. Breast Cancer Res 13:R22CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
18.
go back to reference Tsutsumi Y (2012) Apocrine carcinoma as triple-negative breast cancer: novel definition of apocrine-type carcinoma as estrogen/progesterone receptor-negative and androgen receptor-positive invasive ductal carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol 42:375–386CrossRefPubMed Tsutsumi Y (2012) Apocrine carcinoma as triple-negative breast cancer: novel definition of apocrine-type carcinoma as estrogen/progesterone receptor-negative and androgen receptor-positive invasive ductal carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol 42:375–386CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Tarasewicz E, Rivas L, Hamdan R, Dokic D, Parimi V, Bernabe BP et al (2014) Inhibition of CDK-mediated phosphorylation of Smad3 results in decreased oncogenesis in triple negative breast cancer cells. Cell Cycle 13:3191–3201CrossRefPubMed Tarasewicz E, Rivas L, Hamdan R, Dokic D, Parimi V, Bernabe BP et al (2014) Inhibition of CDK-mediated phosphorylation of Smad3 results in decreased oncogenesis in triple negative breast cancer cells. Cell Cycle 13:3191–3201CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Shi Y, Massague J (2003) Mechanisms of TGF-beta signaling from cell membrane to the nucleus. Cell 113:685–700CrossRefPubMed Shi Y, Massague J (2003) Mechanisms of TGF-beta signaling from cell membrane to the nucleus. Cell 113:685–700CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Tarasewicz E, Hamdan R, Straehla J, Hardy A, Nunez LO, Zelivianski S et al (2014) CDK4 inhibition and doxorubicin mediate breast cancer cell apoptosis through Smad3 and survivin. Cancer Biol Ther 15:1301–1311CrossRefPubMed Tarasewicz E, Hamdan R, Straehla J, Hardy A, Nunez LO, Zelivianski S et al (2014) CDK4 inhibition and doxorubicin mediate breast cancer cell apoptosis through Smad3 and survivin. Cancer Biol Ther 15:1301–1311CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0. 2014 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0. 2014
24.
go back to reference Symmans WF, Peintinger F, Hatzis C, Rajan R, Kuerer H, Valero V et al (2007) Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 25:4414–4422CrossRefPubMed Symmans WF, Peintinger F, Hatzis C, Rajan R, Kuerer H, Valero V et al (2007) Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 25:4414–4422CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N, Mamounas E, Brown A, Fisher ER et al (1998) Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:2672–2685PubMed Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N, Mamounas E, Brown A, Fisher ER et al (1998) Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:2672–2685PubMed
26.
go back to reference Silver DP, Richardson AL, Eklund AC, Wang ZC, Szallasi Z, Li Q et al (2010) Efficacy of neoadjuvant Cisplatin in triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:1145–1153CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Silver DP, Richardson AL, Eklund AC, Wang ZC, Szallasi Z, Li Q et al (2010) Efficacy of neoadjuvant Cisplatin in triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:1145–1153CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
27.
28.
go back to reference Kaufman PA, Awada A, Twelves C, Yelle L, Perez EA, Wanders J et al (2014) A phase III, open-label, randomized, multicenter study of eribulin mesylate versus capecitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes (S6–7). Cancer Res 72(24 suppl):109s Kaufman PA, Awada A, Twelves C, Yelle L, Perez EA, Wanders J et al (2014) A phase III, open-label, randomized, multicenter study of eribulin mesylate versus capecitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes (S6–7). Cancer Res 72(24 suppl):109s
29.
go back to reference Twelves C, Akerele C, Wanders J, Cortes J (2010) Eribulin mesylate (E7389) vs treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in patients (PTS) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC): subgroup analyses from the EMBRACE study. Ann Oncol 21(8 suppl):viii96–viii121 Twelves C, Akerele C, Wanders J, Cortes J (2010) Eribulin mesylate (E7389) vs treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in patients (PTS) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC): subgroup analyses from the EMBRACE study. Ann Oncol 21(8 suppl):viii96–viii121
30.
go back to reference Byrski T, Gronwald J, Huzarski T, Grzybowska E, Budryk M, Stawicka M et al (2010) Pathologic complete response rates in young women with BRCA1-positive breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 28:375–379CrossRefPubMed Byrski T, Gronwald J, Huzarski T, Grzybowska E, Budryk M, Stawicka M et al (2010) Pathologic complete response rates in young women with BRCA1-positive breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 28:375–379CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Turner N, Tutt A, Ashworth A (2004) Hallmarks of ‘BRCAness’ in sporadic cancers. Nat Rev Cancer 4:814–819CrossRefPubMed Turner N, Tutt A, Ashworth A (2004) Hallmarks of ‘BRCAness’ in sporadic cancers. Nat Rev Cancer 4:814–819CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Venkitaraman AR (2002) Cancer susceptibility and the functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cell 108:171–182CrossRefPubMed Venkitaraman AR (2002) Cancer susceptibility and the functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cell 108:171–182CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Lambie H, Miremadi A, Pinder SE, Bell JA, Wencyk P, Paish EC et al (2003) Prognostic significance of BRCA1 expression in sporadic breast carcinomas. J Pathol 200:207–213CrossRefPubMed Lambie H, Miremadi A, Pinder SE, Bell JA, Wencyk P, Paish EC et al (2003) Prognostic significance of BRCA1 expression in sporadic breast carcinomas. J Pathol 200:207–213CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Turner NC, Reis-Filho JS, Russell AM, Springall RJ, Ryder K, Steele D et al (2007) BRCA1 dysfunction in sporadic basal-like breast cancer. Oncogene 26:2126–2132CrossRefPubMed Turner NC, Reis-Filho JS, Russell AM, Springall RJ, Ryder K, Steele D et al (2007) BRCA1 dysfunction in sporadic basal-like breast cancer. Oncogene 26:2126–2132CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Keyomarsi K, Tucker SL, Buchholz TA, Callister M, Ding Y, Hortobagyi GN et al (2002) Cyclin E and survival in patients with breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1566–1575CrossRefPubMed Keyomarsi K, Tucker SL, Buchholz TA, Callister M, Ding Y, Hortobagyi GN et al (2002) Cyclin E and survival in patients with breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1566–1575CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Velasco-Velazquez MA, Li Z, Casimiro M, Loro E, Homsi N, Pestell RG (2011) Examining the role of cyclin D1 in breast cancer. Future Oncol 7:753–765CrossRefPubMed Velasco-Velazquez MA, Li Z, Casimiro M, Loro E, Homsi N, Pestell RG (2011) Examining the role of cyclin D1 in breast cancer. Future Oncol 7:753–765CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Blagosklonny MV (2013) MTOR-driven quasi-programmed aging as a disposable soma theory: blind watchmaker vs. intelligent designer. Cell Cycle 12:1842–1847CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Blagosklonny MV (2013) MTOR-driven quasi-programmed aging as a disposable soma theory: blind watchmaker vs. intelligent designer. Cell Cycle 12:1842–1847CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
40.
go back to reference Matsuura I, Chiang KN, Lai CY, He D, Wang G, Ramkumar R et al (2010) Pin1 promotes transforming growth factor-beta-induced migration and invasion. J Biol Chem 285:1754–1764CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Matsuura I, Chiang KN, Lai CY, He D, Wang G, Ramkumar R et al (2010) Pin1 promotes transforming growth factor-beta-induced migration and invasion. J Biol Chem 285:1754–1764CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
41.
go back to reference Nakano A, Koinuma D, Miyazawa K, Uchida T, Saitoh M, Kawabata M et al (2009) Pin1 down-regulates transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) signaling by inducing degradation of Smad proteins. J Biol Chem 284:6109–6115CrossRefPubMed Nakano A, Koinuma D, Miyazawa K, Uchida T, Saitoh M, Kawabata M et al (2009) Pin1 down-regulates transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) signaling by inducing degradation of Smad proteins. J Biol Chem 284:6109–6115CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Jeruss JS, Sturgis CD, Rademaker AW, Woodruff TK (2003) Down-regulation of activin, activin receptors, and Smads in high-grade breast cancer. Cancer Res 63:3783–3790PubMed Jeruss JS, Sturgis CD, Rademaker AW, Woodruff TK (2003) Down-regulation of activin, activin receptors, and Smads in high-grade breast cancer. Cancer Res 63:3783–3790PubMed
Metadata
Title
Phase II neoadjuvant clinical trial of carboplatin and eribulin in women with triple negative early-stage breast cancer (NCT01372579)
Authors
Virginia G. Kaklamani
Jacqueline S. Jeruss
Elisha Hughes
Kalliopi Siziopikou
Kirsten M. Timms
Alexander Gutin
Victor Abkevich
Zaina Sangale
Cara Solimeno
Krystal L. Brown
Joshua Jones
Anne-Renee Hartman
Caitlin Meservey
Borko Jovanovic
Irene Helenowski
Seema A. Khan
Kevin Bethke
Nora Hansen
Regina Uthe
Sara Giordano
Steven Rosen
Kent Hoskins
Jamie Von Roenn
Sarika Jain
Vamsi Parini
William Gradishar
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3435-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine