Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2014

01-11-2014 | Epidemiology

Mammography interval and breast cancer mortality in women over the age of 75

Authors: Michael S. Simon, Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller, Cynthia A. Thomson, Roberta M. Ray, F. Allan Hubbell, Lawrence Lessin, Dorothy S. Lane, Lew H. Kuller

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between mammography interval and breast cancer mortality among older women with breast cancer. The study population included 1,914 women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer at age 75 or later during their participation in the Women’s health initiative, with an average follow-up of 4.4 years (3.1 SD). Cause of death was based on medical record review. Mammography interval was defined as the time between the last self-reported mammogram 7 or more months prior to diagnosis, and the date of diagnosis. Multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for breast cancer mortality and all-cause mortality were computed from Cox proportional hazards analyses. Prior mammograms were reported by 73.0 % of women from 7 months to ≤2 year of diagnosis (referent group), 19.4 % (>2 to <5 years), and 7.5 % (≥5 years or no prior mammogram). Women with the longest versus shortest intervals had more poorly differentiated (28.5 % vs. 22.7 %), advanced stage (25.7 % vs. 22.9 %), and estrogen receptor negative tumors (20.9 % vs. 13.1 %). Compared to the referent group, women with intervals of >2 to <5 years or ≥5 years had an increased risk of breast cancer mortality (HR 1.62, 95 % CI 1.03–2.54) and (HR 2.80, 95 % CI 1.57–5.00), respectively, p trend = 0.0002. There was no significant relationship between mammography interval and other causes of death. These results suggest a continued role for screening mammography among women 75 years of age and older.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Cancer Society (2013) Cancer Facts and Figures 2013 , Atlanta: American Cancer Society American Cancer Society (2013) Cancer Facts and Figures 2013 , Atlanta:  American Cancer Society
4.
go back to reference Miller AB, Wall C, Baines CJ, Sun P, To T, Narod SA (2014) Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial. BMJ 348:g366PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Miller AB, Wall C, Baines CJ, Sun P, To T, Narod SA (2014) Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial. BMJ 348:g366PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Andersson I, Aspegren K, Janzon L, Landberg T, Lindholm K, Linell F, Ljungberg O, Ranstam J, Sigfusson B (1988) Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmo mammographic screening trial. BMJ 297:943–948PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Andersson I, Aspegren K, Janzon L, Landberg T, Lindholm K, Linell F, Ljungberg O, Ranstam J, Sigfusson B (1988) Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmo mammographic screening trial. BMJ 297:943–948PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Tabar L, Fagerberg CJ, Gad A, Baldetorp L, Holmberg LH, Grontoft O, Ljungquist U, Lundstrom B, Manson JC, Eklund G (1985) Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet 1:829–832PubMedCrossRef Tabar L, Fagerberg CJ, Gad A, Baldetorp L, Holmberg LH, Grontoft O, Ljungquist U, Lundstrom B, Manson JC, Eklund G (1985) Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet 1:829–832PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference McCarthy EP, Burns RB, Coughlin SS, Freund KM, Rice J, Marwill SL, Ash A, Shwartz M, Moskowitz MA (1998) Mammography use helps to explain differences in breast cancer stage at diagnosis between older black and white women. Ann Intern Med 128:729–736PubMedCrossRef McCarthy EP, Burns RB, Coughlin SS, Freund KM, Rice J, Marwill SL, Ash A, Shwartz M, Moskowitz MA (1998) Mammography use helps to explain differences in breast cancer stage at diagnosis between older black and white women. Ann Intern Med 128:729–736PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kirsh VA, Chiarelli AM, Edwards SA, O’Malley FP, Shumak RS, Yaffe MJ, Boyd NF (2011) Tumor characteristics associated with mammographic detection of breast cancer in the Ontario breast screening program. J Natl Cancer Inst 103:942–950. doi:10.1093/jnci/djr138 PubMedCrossRef Kirsh VA, Chiarelli AM, Edwards SA, O’Malley FP, Shumak RS, Yaffe MJ, Boyd NF (2011) Tumor characteristics associated with mammographic detection of breast cancer in the Ontario breast screening program. J Natl Cancer Inst 103:942–950. doi:10.​1093/​jnci/​djr138 PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Randolph WM, Goodwin JS, Mahnken JD, Freeman JL (2002) Regular mammography use is associated with elimination of age-related disparities in size and stage of breast cancer at diagnosis. Ann Intern Med 137:783–790PubMedCrossRef Randolph WM, Goodwin JS, Mahnken JD, Freeman JL (2002) Regular mammography use is associated with elimination of age-related disparities in size and stage of breast cancer at diagnosis. Ann Intern Med 137:783–790PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference McCarthy EP, Burns RB, Freund KM, Ash AS, Shwartz M, Marwill SL, Moskowitz MA (2000) Mammography use, breast cancer stage at diagnosis, and survival among older women. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:1226–1233PubMed McCarthy EP, Burns RB, Freund KM, Ash AS, Shwartz M, Marwill SL, Moskowitz MA (2000) Mammography use, breast cancer stage at diagnosis, and survival among older women. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:1226–1233PubMed
16.
go back to reference McPherson CP, Swenson KK, Lee MW (2002) The effects of mammographic detection and comorbidity on the survival of older women with breast cancer. J Am Geriatr Soc 50:1061–1068PubMedCrossRef McPherson CP, Swenson KK, Lee MW (2002) The effects of mammographic detection and comorbidity on the survival of older women with breast cancer. J Am Geriatr Soc 50:1061–1068PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Webb ML, Cady B, Michaelson JS, Bush DM, Calvillo KZ, Kopans DB, Smith BL (2013) A failure analysis of invasive breast cancer: most deaths from disease occur in women not regularly screened. Cancer. doi:10.1002/cncr.28199 PubMedCentral Webb ML, Cady B, Michaelson JS, Bush DM, Calvillo KZ, Kopans DB, Smith BL (2013) A failure analysis of invasive breast cancer: most deaths from disease occur in women not regularly screened. Cancer. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​28199 PubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Parvinen I, Helenius H, Pylkkanen L, Anttila A, Immonen-Raiha P, Kauhava L, Rasanen O, Klemi PJ (2006) Service screening mammography reduces breast cancer mortality among elderly women in Turku. J Med Screen 13:34–40. doi:10.1258/096914106776179845 PubMedCrossRef Parvinen I, Helenius H, Pylkkanen L, Anttila A, Immonen-Raiha P, Kauhava L, Rasanen O, Klemi PJ (2006) Service screening mammography reduces breast cancer mortality among elderly women in Turku. J Med Screen 13:34–40. doi:10.​1258/​0969141067761798​45 PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gorini G, Zappa M, Miccinesi G, Paci E, Costantini AS (2004) Breast cancer mortality trends in two areas of the province of Florence, Italy, where screening programmes started in the 1970s and 1990s. Br J Cancer 90:1780–1783. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6601744 PubMedPubMedCentral Gorini G, Zappa M, Miccinesi G, Paci E, Costantini AS (2004) Breast cancer mortality trends in two areas of the province of Florence, Italy, where screening programmes started in the 1970s and 1990s. Br J Cancer 90:1780–1783. doi:10.​1038/​sj.​bjc.​6601744 PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
22.
24.
go back to reference Jonsson H, Nystrom L, Tornberg S, Lundgren B, Lenner P (2003) Service screening with mammography. Long-term effects on breast cancer mortality in the county of Gavleborg, Sweden. Breast 12:183–193PubMedCrossRef Jonsson H, Nystrom L, Tornberg S, Lundgren B, Lenner P (2003) Service screening with mammography. Long-term effects on breast cancer mortality in the county of Gavleborg, Sweden. Breast 12:183–193PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Jonsson H, Nystrom L, Tornberg S, Lenner P (2001) Service screening with mammography of women aged 50–69 years in Sweden: effects on mortality from breast cancer. J Med Screen 8:152–160PubMedCrossRef Jonsson H, Nystrom L, Tornberg S, Lenner P (2001) Service screening with mammography of women aged 50–69 years in Sweden: effects on mortality from breast cancer. J Med Screen 8:152–160PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Tornberg S, Kemetli L, Lynge E, Helene OA, Hofvind S, Wang H, Anttila A, Hakama M, Nystrom L (2006) Breast cancer incidence and mortality in the Nordic capitals, 1970–1998. Trends related to mammography screening programmes. Acta Oncol 45:528–535. doi:10.1080/02841860500501610 PubMedCrossRef Tornberg S, Kemetli L, Lynge E, Helene OA, Hofvind S, Wang H, Anttila A, Hakama M, Nystrom L (2006) Breast cancer incidence and mortality in the Nordic capitals, 1970–1998. Trends related to mammography screening programmes. Acta Oncol 45:528–535. doi:10.​1080/​0284186050050161​0 PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Anderson G, Cummings S, Freedman LS, Furberg C, Henderson M, Johnson SR, Kuller L, Manson J, Oberman A, Prentice RL (chair) and Rossouw JE (1998) Design of the Women’s health initiative clinical trial and observational study. The Women’s health initiative study group. Control Clin Trials 19: 61–109 Anderson G, Cummings S, Freedman LS, Furberg C, Henderson M, Johnson SR, Kuller L, Manson J, Oberman A, Prentice RL (chair) and Rossouw JE (1998) Design of the Women’s health initiative clinical trial and observational study. The Women’s health initiative study group. Control Clin Trials 19: 61–109
28.
go back to reference Anderson GL, Manson J, Wallace R, Lund B, Hall D, Davis S, Shumaker S, Wang CY, Stein E, Prentice RL (2003) Implementation of the Women’s health initiative study design. Ann Epidemiol 13:S5–S17PubMedCrossRef Anderson GL, Manson J, Wallace R, Lund B, Hall D, Davis S, Shumaker S, Wang CY, Stein E, Prentice RL (2003) Implementation of the Women’s health initiative study design. Ann Epidemiol 13:S5–S17PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Langer RD, White E, Lewis CE, Kotchen JM, Hendrix SL, Trevisan M (2003) The Women’s health initiative observational study: baseline characteristics of participants and reliability of baseline measures. Ann Epidemiol 13:S107–S121PubMedCrossRef Langer RD, White E, Lewis CE, Kotchen JM, Hendrix SL, Trevisan M (2003) The Women’s health initiative observational study: baseline characteristics of participants and reliability of baseline measures. Ann Epidemiol 13:S107–S121PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Curb JD, McTiernan A, Heckbert SR, Kooperberg C, Stanford J, Nevitt M, Johnson KC, Proulx-Burns L, Pastore L, Criqui M, Daugherty S (2003) Outcomes ascertainment and adjudication methods in the Women’s health initiative. Ann Epidemiol 13:S122–S128PubMedCrossRef Curb JD, McTiernan A, Heckbert SR, Kooperberg C, Stanford J, Nevitt M, Johnson KC, Proulx-Burns L, Pastore L, Criqui M, Daugherty S (2003) Outcomes ascertainment and adjudication methods in the Women’s health initiative. Ann Epidemiol 13:S122–S128PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis 40:373–383PubMedCrossRef Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis 40:373–383PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Fine JP, Gray RJ (1999) A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 446:496–509CrossRef Fine JP, Gray RJ (1999) A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 446:496–509CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (2002) Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225:165–175PubMedCrossRef Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (2002) Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225:165–175PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Jerant AF, Franks P, Jackson JE, Doescher MP (2004) Age-related disparities in cancer screening: analysis of 2001 behavioral risk factor surveillance system data. Ann Fam Med 2:481–487PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Jerant AF, Franks P, Jackson JE, Doescher MP (2004) Age-related disparities in cancer screening: analysis of 2001 behavioral risk factor surveillance system data. Ann Fam Med 2:481–487PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
40.
go back to reference Eisner EJ, Zook EG, Goodman N, Macario E (2002) Knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of women ages 65 and older on mammography screening and medicare: results of a national survey. Women Health 36:1–18. doi:10.1300/J013v36n04_01 PubMedCrossRef Eisner EJ, Zook EG, Goodman N, Macario E (2002) Knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of women ages 65 and older on mammography screening and medicare: results of a national survey. Women Health 36:1–18. doi:10.​1300/​J013v36n04_​01 PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Blustein J, Weiss LJ (1998) The use of mammography by women aged 75 and older: factors related to health, functioning, and age. J Am Geriatr Soc 46:941–946PubMed Blustein J, Weiss LJ (1998) The use of mammography by women aged 75 and older: factors related to health, functioning, and age. J Am Geriatr Soc 46:941–946PubMed
Metadata
Title
Mammography interval and breast cancer mortality in women over the age of 75
Authors
Michael S. Simon
Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller
Cynthia A. Thomson
Roberta M. Ray
F. Allan Hubbell
Lawrence Lessin
Dorothy S. Lane
Lew H. Kuller
Publication date
01-11-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-3114-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine