Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2013

01-08-2013 | Review

The impact of the Oncotype Dx breast cancer assay in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Josh J. Carlson, Joshua A. Roth

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

The impact of the Oncotype Dx (ODX) breast cancer assay on adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) treatment decisions has been evaluated in many previous studies. However, it can be difficult to interpret the collective findings, which were conducted in diverse settings with limited sample sizes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize the results and provide insights about ODX utility. Studies, identified from PubMed, Embase, ASCO, and SABCS, were included if patients had ER+, node −, early-stage breast cancer, reported use of ODX to inform actual ACT decisions. Information was summarized and pooled according to: (1) distribution of ODX recurrence scores (RS), (2) impact of ODX on ACT recommendations, (3) impact of ODX on ACT use, and (4) proportion of patients following the treatment suggested by the ODX RS. A total of 23 studies met inclusion criteria. The distribution of RS categories was 48.8 % low, 39.0 % intermediate, and 12.2 % high (21 studies, 4,156 patients). ODX changed the clinical-pathological ACT recommendation in 33.4 % of patients (8 studies, 1,437 patients). In patients receiving ODX, receipt of ACT were: 28.2 % overall, 5.8 % low, 37.4 % intermediate, and 83.4 % high. High RS patients were significantly more likely to follow the treatment suggested by ODX versus low RS patients RR: 1.07 (1.01–1.14). The pooled results are consistent with most individual studies to date. The increased proportion of intermediate scores relative to original estimates may have implications for the clinical utility and cost impacts of testing. In addition, low versus high RS patients were significantly more likely to follow the ODX results, suggesting a tendency toward less aggressive treatment, despite a high ODX RS. Finally, there was a lack of studies on the impact of ODX on ACT use versus standard approaches, suggesting that additional studies are warranted.
Literature
1.
go back to reference National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2012) NCCN Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer V.1.2012 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2012) NCCN Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer V.1.2012
3.
go back to reference Peto R, Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R, Pan HC, Clarke M, Cutter D, Darby S, McGale P, Taylor C, Wang YC, Bergh J, Di Leo A, Albain K, Swain S, Piccart M, Pritchard K (2012) Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet 379(9814):432–444. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61625-5 PubMedCrossRef Peto R, Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R, Pan HC, Clarke M, Cutter D, Darby S, McGale P, Taylor C, Wang YC, Bergh J, Di Leo A, Albain K, Swain S, Piccart M, Pritchard K (2012) Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet 379(9814):432–444. doi:10.​1016/​s0140-6736(11)61625-5 PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365(9472):1687–1717. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0 CrossRef Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365(9472):1687–1717. doi:10.​1016/​s0140-6736(05)66544-0 CrossRef
5.
7.
go back to reference Arpino G, Generali D, Sapino A, Lucia DM, Frassoldati A, de Laurentis M, Paolo P, Mustacchi G, Cazzaniga M, De Placido S, Conte P, Cappelletti M, Zanoni V, Antonelli A, Martinotti M, Puglisi F, Berruti A, Bottini A, Dogliotti L (2013) Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: a clinical perspective. Breast. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2013.01.016 PubMed Arpino G, Generali D, Sapino A, Lucia DM, Frassoldati A, de Laurentis M, Paolo P, Mustacchi G, Cazzaniga M, De Placido S, Conte P, Cappelletti M, Zanoni V, Antonelli A, Martinotti M, Puglisi F, Berruti A, Bottini A, Dogliotti L (2013) Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: a clinical perspective. Breast. doi:10.​1016/​j.​breast.​2013.​01.​016 PubMed
8.
go back to reference Marchionni L, Wilson RF, Wolff AC, Marinopoulos S, Parmigiani G, Bass EB, Goodman SN (2008) Systematic review: gene expression profiling assays in early-stage breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 148(5):358–369PubMedCrossRef Marchionni L, Wilson RF, Wolff AC, Marinopoulos S, Parmigiani G, Bass EB, Goodman SN (2008) Systematic review: gene expression profiling assays in early-stage breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 148(5):358–369PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Paik S, Tang G, Shak S, Kim C, Baker J, Kim W, Cronin M, Baehner FL, Watson D, Bryant J, Costantino JP, Geyer CE Jr, Wickerham DL, Wolmark N (2006) Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24(23):3726–3734. doi:10.1200/jco.2005.04.7985 PubMedCrossRef Paik S, Tang G, Shak S, Kim C, Baker J, Kim W, Cronin M, Baehner FL, Watson D, Bryant J, Costantino JP, Geyer CE Jr, Wickerham DL, Wolmark N (2006) Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24(23):3726–3734. doi:10.​1200/​jco.​2005.​04.​7985 PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Buyse M, Loi S, van’t Veer L, Viale G, Delorenzi M, Glas AM, d’Assignies MS, Bergh J, Lidereau R, Ellis P, Harris A, Bogaerts J, Therasse P, Floore A, Amakrane M, Piette F, Rutgers E, Sotiriou C, Cardoso F, Piccart MJ (2006) Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 98(17):1183–1192. doi:10.1093/jnci/djj329 PubMedCrossRef Buyse M, Loi S, van’t Veer L, Viale G, Delorenzi M, Glas AM, d’Assignies MS, Bergh J, Lidereau R, Ellis P, Harris A, Bogaerts J, Therasse P, Floore A, Amakrane M, Piette F, Rutgers E, Sotiriou C, Cardoso F, Piccart MJ (2006) Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 98(17):1183–1192. doi:10.​1093/​jnci/​djj329 PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kok M, Linn SC, Van Laar RK, Jansen MP, van den Berg TM, Delahaye LJ, Glas AM, Peterse JL, Hauptmann M, Foekens JA, Klijn JG, Wessels LF, Van’t Veer LJ, Berns EM (2009) Comparison of gene expression profiles predicting progression in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen. Breast Cancer Res Treat 113(2):275–283. doi:10.1007/s10549-008-9939-y PubMedCrossRef Kok M, Linn SC, Van Laar RK, Jansen MP, van den Berg TM, Delahaye LJ, Glas AM, Peterse JL, Hauptmann M, Foekens JA, Klijn JG, Wessels LF, Van’t Veer LJ, Berns EM (2009) Comparison of gene expression profiles predicting progression in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen. Breast Cancer Res Treat 113(2):275–283. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-008-9939-y PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mamounas EP, Tang G, Fisher B, Paik S, Shak S, Costantino JP, Watson D, Geyer CE Jr, Wickerham DL, Wolmark N (2010) Association between the 21-gene recurrence score assay and risk of locoregional recurrence in node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20. J Clin Oncol 28(10):1677–1683. doi:10.1200/jco.2009.23.7610 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Mamounas EP, Tang G, Fisher B, Paik S, Shak S, Costantino JP, Watson D, Geyer CE Jr, Wickerham DL, Wolmark N (2010) Association between the 21-gene recurrence score assay and risk of locoregional recurrence in node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20. J Clin Oncol 28(10):1677–1683. doi:10.​1200/​jco.​2009.​23.​7610 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tang G, Shak S, Paik S, Anderson SJ, Costantino JP, Geyer CE Jr, Mamounas EP, Wickerham DL, Wolmark N (2011) Comparison of the prognostic and predictive utilities of the 21-gene recurrence score assay and adjuvant! for women with node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20. Breast Cancer Res Treat 127(1):133–142. doi:10.1007/s10549-010-1331-z PubMedCrossRef Tang G, Shak S, Paik S, Anderson SJ, Costantino JP, Geyer CE Jr, Mamounas EP, Wickerham DL, Wolmark N (2011) Comparison of the prognostic and predictive utilities of the 21-gene recurrence score assay and adjuvant! for women with node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20. Breast Cancer Res Treat 127(1):133–142. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-010-1331-z PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, Kim C, Baker J, Cronin M, Baehner FL, Walker MG, Watson D, Park T, Hiller W, Fisher ER, Wickerham DL, Bryant J, Wolmark N (2004) A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 351(27):2817–2826. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa041588 PubMedCrossRef Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, Kim C, Baker J, Cronin M, Baehner FL, Walker MG, Watson D, Park T, Hiller W, Fisher ER, Wickerham DL, Bryant J, Wolmark N (2004) A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 351(27):2817–2826. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa041588 PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Harris L, Fritsche H, Mennel R, Norton L, Ravdin P, Taube S, Somerfield MR, Hayes DF, Bast RC Jr (2007) American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25(33):5287–5312. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.14.2364 PubMedCrossRef Harris L, Fritsche H, Mennel R, Norton L, Ravdin P, Taube S, Somerfield MR, Hayes DF, Bast RC Jr (2007) American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25(33):5287–5312. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2007.​14.​2364 PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hornberger J, Cosler LE, Lyman GH (2005) Economic analysis of targeting chemotherapy using a 21-gene RT-PCR assay in lymph-node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer. Am J Manag Care 11(5):313–324PubMed Hornberger J, Cosler LE, Lyman GH (2005) Economic analysis of targeting chemotherapy using a 21-gene RT-PCR assay in lymph-node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer. Am J Manag Care 11(5):313–324PubMed
23.
go back to reference Ademuyiwa FO, Miller A, O’Connor T, Edge SB, Thorat MA, Sledge GW, Levine E, Badve S (2011) The effects of oncotype DX recurrence scores on chemotherapy utilization in a multi-institutional breast cancer cohort. Breast Cancer Res Treat 126(3):797–802. doi:10.1007/s10549-010-1329-6 PubMedCrossRef Ademuyiwa FO, Miller A, O’Connor T, Edge SB, Thorat MA, Sledge GW, Levine E, Badve S (2011) The effects of oncotype DX recurrence scores on chemotherapy utilization in a multi-institutional breast cancer cohort. Breast Cancer Res Treat 126(3):797–802. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-010-1329-6 PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Asad J, Jacobson AF, Estabrook A, Smith SR, Boolbol SK, Feldman SM, Osborne MP, Boachie-Adjei K, Twardzik W, Tartter PI (2008) Does oncotype DX recurrence score affect the management of patients with early-stage breast cancer? Am J Surg 196(4):527–529. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.06.021 PubMedCrossRef Asad J, Jacobson AF, Estabrook A, Smith SR, Boolbol SK, Feldman SM, Osborne MP, Boachie-Adjei K, Twardzik W, Tartter PI (2008) Does oncotype DX recurrence score affect the management of patients with early-stage breast cancer? Am J Surg 196(4):527–529. doi:10.​1016/​j.​amjsurg.​2008.​06.​021 PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Geffen DB, Abu-Ghanem S, Sion-Vardy N, Braunstein R, Tokar M, Ariad S, Delgado B, Bayme M, Koretz M (2011) The impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on decision making about adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer in an oncology practice with a unified treatment policy. Ann Oncol 22(11):2381–2386. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq769 PubMedCrossRef Geffen DB, Abu-Ghanem S, Sion-Vardy N, Braunstein R, Tokar M, Ariad S, Delgado B, Bayme M, Koretz M (2011) The impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on decision making about adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer in an oncology practice with a unified treatment policy. Ann Oncol 22(11):2381–2386. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdq769 PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Henry LR, Stojadinovic A, Swain SM, Prindiville S, Cordes R, Soballe PW (2009) The influence of a gene expression profile on breast cancer decisions. J Surg Oncol 99(6):319–323. doi:10.1002/jso.21244 PubMedCrossRef Henry LR, Stojadinovic A, Swain SM, Prindiville S, Cordes R, Soballe PW (2009) The influence of a gene expression profile on breast cancer decisions. J Surg Oncol 99(6):319–323. doi:10.​1002/​jso.​21244 PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hornberger J, Chien R, Krebs K, Hochheiser L (2011) US insurance program’s experience with a multigene assay for early-stage breast cancer. Am J Manag Care 17(5 Spec No):e194–202 Hornberger J, Chien R, Krebs K, Hochheiser L (2011) US insurance program’s experience with a multigene assay for early-stage breast cancer. Am J Manag Care 17(5 Spec No):e194–202
28.
go back to reference Joh JE, Esposito NN, Kiluk JV, Laronga C, Lee MC, Loftus L, Soliman H, Boughey JC, Reynolds C, Lawton TJ, Acs PI, Gordan L, Acs G (2011) The effect of Oncotype DX recurrence score on treatment recommendations for patients with estrogen receptor-positive early stage breast cancer and correlation with estimation of recurrence risk by breast cancer specialists. Oncologist 16(11):1520–1526. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0045 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Joh JE, Esposito NN, Kiluk JV, Laronga C, Lee MC, Loftus L, Soliman H, Boughey JC, Reynolds C, Lawton TJ, Acs PI, Gordan L, Acs G (2011) The effect of Oncotype DX recurrence score on treatment recommendations for patients with estrogen receptor-positive early stage breast cancer and correlation with estimation of recurrence risk by breast cancer specialists. Oncologist 16(11):1520–1526. doi:10.​1634/​theoncologist.​2011-0045 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kelly CM, Krishnamurthy S, Bianchini G, Litton JK, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Hortobagyi GN, Pusztai L (2010) Utility of oncotype DX risk estimates in clinically intermediate risk hormone receptor-positive, HER2-normal, grade II, lymph node-negative breast cancers. Cancer 116(22):5161–5167. doi:10.1002/cncr.25269 PubMedCrossRef Kelly CM, Krishnamurthy S, Bianchini G, Litton JK, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Hortobagyi GN, Pusztai L (2010) Utility of oncotype DX risk estimates in clinically intermediate risk hormone receptor-positive, HER2-normal, grade II, lymph node-negative breast cancers. Cancer 116(22):5161–5167. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​25269 PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Lo SS, Mumby PB, Norton J, Rychlik K, Smerage J, Kash J, Chew HK, Gaynor ER, Hayes DF, Epstein A, Albain KS (2010) Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on medical oncologist and patient adjuvant breast cancer treatment selection. J Clin Oncol 28(10):1671–1676. doi:10.1200/jco.2008.20.2119 PubMedCrossRef Lo SS, Mumby PB, Norton J, Rychlik K, Smerage J, Kash J, Chew HK, Gaynor ER, Hayes DF, Epstein A, Albain KS (2010) Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on medical oncologist and patient adjuvant breast cancer treatment selection. J Clin Oncol 28(10):1671–1676. doi:10.​1200/​jco.​2008.​20.​2119 PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Lund MJ, Mosunjac M, Davis KM, Gabram-Mendola S, Rizzo M, Bumpers HL, Hearn S, Zelnak A, Styblo T, O’Regan RM (2012) 21-Gene recurrence scores: racial differences in testing, scores, treatment, and outcome. Cancer 118(3):788–796. doi:10.1002/cncr.26180 PubMedCrossRef Lund MJ, Mosunjac M, Davis KM, Gabram-Mendola S, Rizzo M, Bumpers HL, Hearn S, Zelnak A, Styblo T, O’Regan RM (2012) 21-Gene recurrence scores: racial differences in testing, scores, treatment, and outcome. Cancer 118(3):788–796. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​26180 PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Partin JF, Mamounas EP (2011) Impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay compared with standard clinicopathologic guidelines in adjuvant therapy selection for node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 18(12):3399–3406. doi:10.1245/s10434-011-1698-z PubMedCrossRef Partin JF, Mamounas EP (2011) Impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay compared with standard clinicopathologic guidelines in adjuvant therapy selection for node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 18(12):3399–3406. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-011-1698-z PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Tatarian T, Damle S, McSwain AP, Ojong-Ntui M, Tabbara I, Teal CB (2011) Clinical utility and therapeutic implications of oncotype analysis in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 18:S182 Tatarian T, Damle S, McSwain AP, Ojong-Ntui M, Tabbara I, Teal CB (2011) Clinical utility and therapeutic implications of oncotype analysis in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 18:S182
36.
go back to reference Tzeng JP, Mayer D, Richman AR, Lipkus I, Han PK, Valle CG, Carey LA, Brewer NT (2010) Women’s experiences with genomic testing for breast cancer recurrence risk. Cancer 116(8):1992–2000. doi:10.1002/cncr.24990 PubMedCrossRef Tzeng JP, Mayer D, Richman AR, Lipkus I, Han PK, Valle CG, Carey LA, Brewer NT (2010) Women’s experiences with genomic testing for breast cancer recurrence risk. Cancer 116(8):1992–2000. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​24990 PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Wolf I, Ben-Baruch N, Shapira-Frommer R, Rizel S, Goldberg H, Yaal-Hahoshen N, Klein B, Geffen DB, Kaufman B (2008) Association between standard clinical and pathologic characteristics and the 21-gene recurrence score in breast cancer patients: a population-based study. Cancer 112(4):731–736. doi:10.1002/cncr.23225 PubMedCrossRef Wolf I, Ben-Baruch N, Shapira-Frommer R, Rizel S, Goldberg H, Yaal-Hahoshen N, Klein B, Geffen DB, Kaufman B (2008) Association between standard clinical and pathologic characteristics and the 21-gene recurrence score in breast cancer patients: a population-based study. Cancer 112(4):731–736. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​23225 PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Moinuddin I YS, Goodman J (2009) Effect of menopausal status and oncotype recurrence score on treatment choice for early-stage receptor-positive breast cancer. Paper presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Symposium Moinuddin I YS, Goodman J (2009) Effect of menopausal status and oncotype recurrence score on treatment choice for early-stage receptor-positive breast cancer. Paper presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Symposium
39.
go back to reference Guth AA FS, Fei K, Franco R, Bickell N (2011) Utilization of Oncotype DX to predict chemotherapy use in an innercity population. Paper presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting Guth AA FS, Fei K, Franco R, Bickell N (2011) Utilization of Oncotype DX to predict chemotherapy use in an innercity population. Paper presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting
40.
go back to reference Goodwin MC HJ, Diego M, Frazier TG (2009) Impact of Oncotype DXTM recurrence score and tumor size on making chemotherapy decisions in breast cancer patients. Paper presented at the Sand Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Goodwin MC HJ, Diego M, Frazier TG (2009) Impact of Oncotype DXTM recurrence score and tumor size on making chemotherapy decisions in breast cancer patients. Paper presented at the Sand Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium
41.
go back to reference Gregg X BT, Rowley B, Rees W (2009) Experience with use of the Oncotype DX gene assay test in a multicenter community-based healthcare system. Paper presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Gregg X BT, Rowley B, Rees W (2009) Experience with use of the Oncotype DX gene assay test in a multicenter community-based healthcare system. Paper presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium
42.
go back to reference de Boer RH BC, Speakman D, Mann B (2011) Australian decision impact study: the impact of Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) on adjuvant treatment decisions in hormone receptor positive (HR+), node negative (N0) and node positive (N+) early stage breast cancer (ESBC) in the multidisciplinary clinic (MDC). Paper presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium de Boer RH BC, Speakman D, Mann B (2011) Australian decision impact study: the impact of Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) on adjuvant treatment decisions in hormone receptor positive (HR+), node negative (N0) and node positive (N+) early stage breast cancer (ESBC) in the multidisciplinary clinic (MDC). Paper presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium
43.
go back to reference Holt S BG, Brinkworth E, Durrani S, Jones S, Khawaja S, Laggner U, Moe M, Pudney D, Pitcher S, Rolles M, Sharaiha Y, Whelan S (2011) Results from a prospective clinical study on the impact of Oncotype DX on adjuvant treatment decision making in a cohort of 142 UK patients. Paper presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Holt S BG, Brinkworth E, Durrani S, Jones S, Khawaja S, Laggner U, Moe M, Pudney D, Pitcher S, Rolles M, Sharaiha Y, Whelan S (2011) Results from a prospective clinical study on the impact of Oncotype DX on adjuvant treatment decision making in a cohort of 142 UK patients. Paper presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium
44.
go back to reference Rezai M EW, Kummel S, Kuhn T, Warm M, Friedrichs K, Schneeweiss A, Markmann S, Eggemann H, Hilfrich J, Jackisch C, Witzel I, Eidtmann H, Kaufmann M, Blohmer JU (2011) Impact of the recurrence score on adjuvant decision-making in ER-positive early breast cancer—results of a large prospective multicentre decision impact study in node negative and node positive disease. Paper presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Rezai M EW, Kummel S, Kuhn T, Warm M, Friedrichs K, Schneeweiss A, Markmann S, Eggemann H, Hilfrich J, Jackisch C, Witzel I, Eidtmann H, Kaufmann M, Blohmer JU (2011) Impact of the recurrence score on adjuvant decision-making in ER-positive early breast cancer—results of a large prospective multicentre decision impact study in node negative and node positive disease. Paper presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium
45.
go back to reference Patel H HK, Kaplan C, Davidson R, DeMichele A, Fox KR, Domcheck SM (2007) Utilization of Oncotype DX in node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer patients. Paper presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting Patel H HK, Kaplan C, Davidson R, DeMichele A, Fox KR, Domcheck SM (2007) Utilization of Oncotype DX in node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer patients. Paper presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting
46.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4):264–269, W264 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4):264–269, W264
47.
go back to reference Turaga K, Acs G, Laronga C (2010) Gene expression profiling in breast cancer. Cancer Control 17(3):177–182PubMed Turaga K, Acs G, Laronga C (2010) Gene expression profiling in breast cancer. Cancer Control 17(3):177–182PubMed
48.
go back to reference Duval S, Tweedie R (2000) Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 56(2):455–463PubMedCrossRef Duval S, Tweedie R (2000) Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 56(2):455–463PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Greenland S (1994) Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods. Am J Epidemiol 140(3):290–296PubMed Greenland S (1994) Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods. Am J Epidemiol 140(3):290–296PubMed
50.
go back to reference Juni P, Witschi A, Bloch R, Egger M (1999) The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. JAMA 282(11):1054–1060PubMedCrossRef Juni P, Witschi A, Bloch R, Egger M (1999) The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. JAMA 282(11):1054–1060PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) Working Group (2009) Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: can tumor gene expression profiling improve outcomes in patients with breast cancer? Genet Med 11(1):66–73. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181928f56 CrossRef Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) Working Group (2009) Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: can tumor gene expression profiling improve outcomes in patients with breast cancer? Genet Med 11(1):66–73. doi:10.​1097/​GIM.​0b013e3181928f56​ CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Marchionni L, Wilson RF, Marinopoulos SS, Wolff AC, Parmigiani G, Bass EB, Goodman SN (2007) Impact of gene expression profiling tests on breast cancer outcomes. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 160:1–105 Marchionni L, Wilson RF, Marinopoulos SS, Wolff AC, Parmigiani G, Bass EB, Goodman SN (2007) Impact of gene expression profiling tests on breast cancer outcomes. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 160:1–105
54.
go back to reference Kratz JR, He J, Van Den Eeden SK, Zhu Z-H, Gao W, Pham PT, Mulvihill MS, Ziaei F, Zhang H, Su B, Zhi X, Quesenberry CP, Habel LA, Deng Q, Wang Z, Zhou J, Li H, Huang M-C, Yeh C–C, Segal MR, Ray MR, Jones KD, Raz DJ, Xu Z, Jahan TM, Berryman D, He B, Mann MJ, Jablons DM (2012) A practical molecular assay to predict survival in resected non-squamous, non-small-cell lung cancer: development and international validation studies. Lancet 379(9818):823–832. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61941-7 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kratz JR, He J, Van Den Eeden SK, Zhu Z-H, Gao W, Pham PT, Mulvihill MS, Ziaei F, Zhang H, Su B, Zhi X, Quesenberry CP, Habel LA, Deng Q, Wang Z, Zhou J, Li H, Huang M-C, Yeh C–C, Segal MR, Ray MR, Jones KD, Raz DJ, Xu Z, Jahan TM, Berryman D, He B, Mann MJ, Jablons DM (2012) A practical molecular assay to predict survival in resected non-squamous, non-small-cell lung cancer: development and international validation studies. Lancet 379(9818):823–832. doi:10.​1016/​s0140-6736(11)61941-7 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Gray RG, Quirke P, Handley K, Lopatin M, Magill L, Baehner FL, Beaumont C, Clark-Langone KM, Yoshizawa CN, Lee M, Watson D, Shak S, Kerr DJ (2011) Validation study of a quantitative multigene reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay for assessment of recurrence risk in patients with stage II colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 29(35):4611–4619. doi:10.1200/jco.2010.32.8732 PubMedCrossRef Gray RG, Quirke P, Handley K, Lopatin M, Magill L, Baehner FL, Beaumont C, Clark-Langone KM, Yoshizawa CN, Lee M, Watson D, Shak S, Kerr DJ (2011) Validation study of a quantitative multigene reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay for assessment of recurrence risk in patients with stage II colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 29(35):4611–4619. doi:10.​1200/​jco.​2010.​32.​8732 PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The impact of the Oncotype Dx breast cancer assay in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Josh J. Carlson
Joshua A. Roth
Publication date
01-08-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2666-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2013 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine