Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2012

01-10-2012 | Brief Report

Preoperative breast MRI in early-stage breast cancer

Authors: Patricia Young, Benjamin Kim, Jennifer L. Malin

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Rapid uptake of new imaging technology is a major contributor to rising healthcare costs. Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for patients with early-stage breast cancer has dramatically increased in use without the evidence of improved outcomes compared to standard assessment and is associated with higher rates of mastectomy. A decision analytic model was developed to evaluate the impact of adding breast MRI to the preoperative evaluation of women with early-stage breast cancer who were candidates for breast-conserving therapy on patient outcomes measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Model inputs, including survival, recurrence rates, and health utilities, were obtained from a comprehensive literature review. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed to estimate threshold values for key parameters at which adding MRI would become the optimal imaging strategy over standard assessment. Preoperative MRI resulted in 17.77 QALYs compared to 17.86 QALYs with standard assessment, a decrease of 0.09 QALYs or 34 days. In sensitivity analyses, standard assessment was associated with better patient outcomes than preoperative breast MRI across all plausible probabilities for mastectomy, local recurrence, and health utilities. For routine preoperative breast MRI to become the optimal strategy, the conversion rate to mastectomy after preoperative MRI would need to be <1 % (versus the range of 3.6–33 % reported in the literature). Routine preoperative breast MRI appears to confer no advantage over the standard diagnostic evaluations for early-stage breast cancer and may lead to worse patient outcomes.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Baker LC, Atlas SW, Afendulis CC (2008) Expanded use of imaging technology and the challenge of measure value. Health Aff (Millwood) 27:1467–1478CrossRef Baker LC, Atlas SW, Afendulis CC (2008) Expanded use of imaging technology and the challenge of measure value. Health Aff (Millwood) 27:1467–1478CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Dinan MA, Curtis LH, Hammill BG et al (2010) Changes in the use and costs of diagnostic imaging among Medicare beneficiaries with cancer, 1996–2006. JAMA 303:1625–1631PubMedCrossRef Dinan MA, Curtis LH, Hammill BG et al (2010) Changes in the use and costs of diagnostic imaging among Medicare beneficiaries with cancer, 1996–2006. JAMA 303:1625–1631PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Houssami N, Hayes DF (2009) Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer? CA Cancer J Clin 59:290–302PubMedCrossRef Houssami N, Hayes DF (2009) Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer? CA Cancer J Clin 59:290–302PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bilimoria KY, Cambic A, Hansen NM et al (2007) Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers. Arch Surg 142:441–445PubMedCrossRef Bilimoria KY, Cambic A, Hansen NM et al (2007) Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers. Arch Surg 142:441–445PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Deurloo EE, Peterse JL, Rutgers EJ et al (2005) Additional breast lesions in patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy by MRI: impact on preoperative management and potential benefit of computerized analysis. Eur J Cancer 41:1393–1401PubMedCrossRef Deurloo EE, Peterse JL, Rutgers EJ et al (2005) Additional breast lesions in patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy by MRI: impact on preoperative management and potential benefit of computerized analysis. Eur J Cancer 41:1393–1401PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS et al (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233:830–849PubMedCrossRef Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS et al (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233:830–849PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bagley FH (2004) The role of magnetic resonance imaging mammography in the surgical management of the index breast cancer. Arch Surg 139:380–383PubMedCrossRef Bagley FH (2004) The role of magnetic resonance imaging mammography in the surgical management of the index breast cancer. Arch Surg 139:380–383PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Zhang Y, Fukatsu H, Naganawa S et al (2002) The role of contrast-enhanced MR mammography for determining candidates for breast conservation surgery. Breast Cancer 9:231–239PubMedCrossRef Zhang Y, Fukatsu H, Naganawa S et al (2002) The role of contrast-enhanced MR mammography for determining candidates for breast conservation surgery. Breast Cancer 9:231–239PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tan JE, Orel SG, Schnall MD et al (1999) Role of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging-guided surgery in the evaluation of patients with early-stage breast cancer for breast conservation. Am J Clin Oncol 22:414–418PubMedCrossRef Tan JE, Orel SG, Schnall MD et al (1999) Role of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging-guided surgery in the evaluation of patients with early-stage breast cancer for breast conservation. Am J Clin Oncol 22:414–418PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hollingsworth AB, Stough RG (2006) Preoperative breast MRI for locoregional staging. J Okla Stage Med Assoc 99:505–515 Hollingsworth AB, Stough RG (2006) Preoperative breast MRI for locoregional staging. J Okla Stage Med Assoc 99:505–515
12.
go back to reference Schelfout K, Van Goethem M, Kersschot E et al (2004) Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol 30:501–507PubMedCrossRef Schelfout K, Van Goethem M, Kersschot E et al (2004) Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol 30:501–507PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel SG et al (2003) Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 98:468–473PubMedCrossRef Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel SG et al (2003) Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 98:468–473PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hlawatsch A, Teifke A, Schmidt M et al (2002) Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: sonography versus MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1493–1501PubMed Hlawatsch A, Teifke A, Schmidt M et al (2002) Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: sonography versus MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1493–1501PubMed
15.
go back to reference Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E (1999) Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 213:881–888PubMed Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E (1999) Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 213:881–888PubMed
16.
go back to reference Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM et al (1995) Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect o MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology 196:115–122PubMed Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM et al (1995) Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect o MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology 196:115–122PubMed
17.
go back to reference Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T et al (2009) Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol 27:4082–4088PubMedCrossRef Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T et al (2009) Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol 27:4082–4088PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hede K (2009) Preoperative MRI in breast cancer grows contentious. J Natl Cancer Inst 10:1667–1669CrossRef Hede K (2009) Preoperative MRI in breast cancer grows contentious. J Natl Cancer Inst 10:1667–1669CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Center for Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (2010) The cost-effectiveness analysis registry. Institute for Clinical Research Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston. www.cearegistry.org. Accessed 8 June 2010 Center for Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (2010) The cost-effectiveness analysis registry. Institute for Clinical Research Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston. www.​cearegistry.​org. Accessed 8 June 2010
20.
go back to reference Turnbull LW, Brown SR, Olivier C et al (2010) Multicenter randomised controlled trial examining the cost-effectiveness of contrast-enhanced high field magnetic resonance imaging in women with primary breast cancer scheduled for wide local excision (COMICE). Health Technol Assess 14:1–182PubMed Turnbull LW, Brown SR, Olivier C et al (2010) Multicenter randomised controlled trial examining the cost-effectiveness of contrast-enhanced high field magnetic resonance imaging in women with primary breast cancer scheduled for wide local excision (COMICE). Health Technol Assess 14:1–182PubMed
21.
go back to reference Turnbull LW, Brown SR, Harvey I et al (2010) Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 375:563–571PubMedCrossRef Turnbull LW, Brown SR, Harvey I et al (2010) Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 375:563–571PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1227–1232PubMedCrossRef Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1227–1232PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomized trials. Lancet 366:2087–2106 Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomized trials. Lancet 366:2087–2106
24.
go back to reference Dowsett M, Cuzick J, Ingle J et al (2010) Meta-analysis of breast cancer outcomes in adjuvant trials of aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen. J Clin Oncol 28:509–518PubMedCrossRef Dowsett M, Cuzick J, Ingle J et al (2010) Meta-analysis of breast cancer outcomes in adjuvant trials of aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen. J Clin Oncol 28:509–518PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Norum J, Olsen JA, Wist EA (1997) Lumpectomy or mastectomy? Is breast conserving surgery too expensive? Breast Cancer Res Treat 45:7–14PubMedCrossRef Norum J, Olsen JA, Wist EA (1997) Lumpectomy or mastectomy? Is breast conserving surgery too expensive? Breast Cancer Res Treat 45:7–14PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hayman JA, Harris JR, Hillner BE et al (1998) Cost-effectiveness of routine radiation therapy following conservative surgery for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:1022–1029PubMed Hayman JA, Harris JR, Hillner BE et al (1998) Cost-effectiveness of routine radiation therapy following conservative surgery for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:1022–1029PubMed
27.
go back to reference de Koning HJ, Collette HJ, de Haes JC et al (1991) Breast cancer screening and cost-effectiveness; policy alternatives, quality of life considerations and the possible impact of uncertain factors. Int J Cancer 49:531–537PubMedCrossRef de Koning HJ, Collette HJ, de Haes JC et al (1991) Breast cancer screening and cost-effectiveness; policy alternatives, quality of life considerations and the possible impact of uncertain factors. Int J Cancer 49:531–537PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hayman JA, Hillner BE, Haris JR et al (2000) Cost-effectiveness of adding an electron-beam boost to tangential radiation therapy in patients with negative margins after conservative surgery for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:287–295PubMed Hayman JA, Hillner BE, Haris JR et al (2000) Cost-effectiveness of adding an electron-beam boost to tangential radiation therapy in patients with negative margins after conservative surgery for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:287–295PubMed
29.
go back to reference Suh WW, Hillner BE, Pierce LJ et al (2005) Cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy following conservative surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61:1054–1061PubMedCrossRef Suh WW, Hillner BE, Pierce LJ et al (2005) Cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy following conservative surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61:1054–1061PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Holland ML, Huston A, Noyes K (2009) Cost-effectiveness of testing for breast cancer susceptibility genes. Value Health 12:207–216PubMedCrossRef Holland ML, Huston A, Noyes K (2009) Cost-effectiveness of testing for breast cancer susceptibility genes. Value Health 12:207–216PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Lee JH, Glick HA, Hayman JA et al (2002) Decision-analytic model and cost-effectiveness of evaluation of postmastectomy radiation therapy in high-risk premenopausal breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 20:2713–2725PubMedCrossRef Lee JH, Glick HA, Hayman JA et al (2002) Decision-analytic model and cost-effectiveness of evaluation of postmastectomy radiation therapy in high-risk premenopausal breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 20:2713–2725PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Tengs TO (2000) The cost effectiveness of testing for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility genes. Dis Manag Clin Outcomes 1:15–24 Tengs TO (2000) The cost effectiveness of testing for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility genes. Dis Manag Clin Outcomes 1:15–24
33.
go back to reference Sher DJ, Wittenberg E, Suh WW et al (2009) Partial-breast irradiation versus whole-breast irradiation for early-stage breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74:440–446PubMedCrossRef Sher DJ, Wittenberg E, Suh WW et al (2009) Partial-breast irradiation versus whole-breast irradiation for early-stage breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74:440–446PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK et al (2007) MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356:1295–1303PubMedCrossRef Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK et al (2007) MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356:1295–1303PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL et al (2009) Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg 209:180–187PubMedCrossRef Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL et al (2009) Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg 209:180–187PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Lohrisch C, Paltiel C, Gelmon K et al (2006) Impact on survival of time from definitive surgery to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage. J Clin Oncol 24:4888–4894PubMedCrossRef Lohrisch C, Paltiel C, Gelmon K et al (2006) Impact on survival of time from definitive surgery to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage. J Clin Oncol 24:4888–4894PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference OM (Institute of Medicine) (2009) Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC OM (Institute of Medicine) (2009) Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
38.
go back to reference Bartelink H, Horiot JC, Poortmans P et al (2001) Recurrence rates after treatment of breast cancer with standard radiotherapy with or without additional radiation. N Engl J Med 345:1378–1387PubMedCrossRef Bartelink H, Horiot JC, Poortmans P et al (2001) Recurrence rates after treatment of breast cancer with standard radiotherapy with or without additional radiation. N Engl J Med 345:1378–1387PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Baer A, Bechar N, Coehn G et al (2010) Basic steps to building a research program. J Oncol Pract 6:45–47PubMedCrossRef Baer A, Bechar N, Coehn G et al (2010) Basic steps to building a research program. J Oncol Pract 6:45–47PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284PubMedCrossRef Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Bailey SR (2001) Past and present attempts to prevent radiocontrast nephropathy. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2(supp 1):S14–S18PubMed Bailey SR (2001) Past and present attempts to prevent radiocontrast nephropathy. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2(supp 1):S14–S18PubMed
42.
go back to reference Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1233–1241PubMedCrossRef Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1233–1241PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Preoperative breast MRI in early-stage breast cancer
Authors
Patricia Young
Benjamin Kim
Jennifer L. Malin
Publication date
01-10-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2207-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine