Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2012

01-08-2012 | Clinical Trial

Impact of real-time virtual sonography, a coordinated sonography and MRI system that uses an image fusion technique, on the sonographic evaluation of MRI-detected lesions of the breast in second-look sonography

Authors: Shogo Nakano, Junko Kousaka, Kimihito Fujii, Kyoko Yorozuya, Miwa Yoshida, Yukako Mouri, Miwa Akizuki, Rie Tetsuka, Takahito Ando, Takashi Fukutomi, Yukihiko Oshima, Junko Kimura, Tsuneo Ishiguchi, Osamu Arai

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to verify the utility of second-look sonography using real-time virtual sonography (RVS)—a coordinated sonography with an MRI system that uses an image fusion technique with magnetic navigation—on the sonographic evaluation of MRI-detected lesions of the breast. Of the 196 consecutive patients who were examined with breast MRI in our hospital from 2006 to 2009, those patients who underwent second-look sonography to identify MRI-detected lesions were enrolled in this study. MRI was performed using a 1.5-T imager with the patient in a supine position. To assess the efficacy benefits of RVS, the correlations between lesion detection rates, MRI features, distribution, and histopathological classification on second-look sonography using conventional B-mode or RVS were analyzed. Of the 196 patients, 55 (28 %) demonstrated 67 lesions initially detected by MRI, followed by second-look sonography. Of the 67 MRI-detected lesions, 18 (30 %) were identified with second-look sonography using conventional B-mode alone, whereas 60 (90 %) lesions were detected with second-look sonography using RVS (p < 0.001). The detection rates of 16 focal lesions, 46 mass lesions, 16 lesions sized <5 mm, 45 lesions sized 5–10 mm, 26 lesions situated within the mammary gland, 41 lesions situated around mammary fascia, 24 malignant lesions, and 43 benign lesions were, respectively, 25, 26, 25, 24, 42, 17, 33, and 23 % by conventional B-mode, and were significantly higher, respectively, at 94, 89, 94, 89, 88, 90, 92, and 88 % by RVS. Of the seven lesions with no sonographic correlates, five could be biopsied by marking MRI information onto the body surface using RVS. Overall, 65 of 67 (97 %) MRI-detected lesions were confirmed by histopathological results. Our results suggest that the additional use of RVS on second-look sonography significantly increases the sonographic detection rate of MRI-detected lesions without operator dependence.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Morris EA et al (2003) MRI of occult breast carcinoma in a high-risk population. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181(3):619–626PubMed Morris EA et al (2003) MRI of occult breast carcinoma in a high-risk population. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181(3):619–626PubMed
2.
go back to reference Kuhl CK et al (2005) Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23(33):8469–8476PubMedCrossRef Kuhl CK et al (2005) Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23(33):8469–8476PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Warner E et al (2004) Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 292(11):1317–1325PubMedCrossRef Warner E et al (2004) Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 292(11):1317–1325PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Saslow D et al (2007) American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 57(2):75–89PubMedCrossRef Saslow D et al (2007) American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 57(2):75–89PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Berg WA et al (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233(3):830–849PubMedCrossRef Berg WA et al (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233(3):830–849PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Liberman L et al (2003) MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180(2):333–341PubMed Liberman L et al (2003) MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180(2):333–341PubMed
7.
go back to reference Houssami N et al (2008) Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(19):3248–3258PubMedCrossRef Houssami N et al (2008) Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(19):3248–3258PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference LaTrenta LR et al (2003) Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US. Radiology 227(3):856–861PubMedCrossRef LaTrenta LR et al (2003) Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US. Radiology 227(3):856–861PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Teifke A et al (2003) Outcome analysis and rational management of enhancing lesions incidentally detected on contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181(3):655–662PubMed Teifke A et al (2003) Outcome analysis and rational management of enhancing lesions incidentally detected on contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181(3):655–662PubMed
10.
go back to reference Beran L et al (2005) Correlation of targeted ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities of the breast. Am J Surg 190(4):592–594PubMedCrossRef Beran L et al (2005) Correlation of targeted ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities of the breast. Am J Surg 190(4):592–594PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Linda A et al (2008) Outcome of initially only magnetic resonance mammography-detected findings with and without correlate at second-look sonography: distribution according to patient history of breast cancer and lesion size. Breast 17(1):51–57PubMedCrossRef Linda A et al (2008) Outcome of initially only magnetic resonance mammography-detected findings with and without correlate at second-look sonography: distribution according to patient history of breast cancer and lesion size. Breast 17(1):51–57PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Shin JH et al (2007) Targeted ultrasound for MR-detected lesions in breast cancer patients. Korean J Radiol 8(6):475–483PubMedCrossRef Shin JH et al (2007) Targeted ultrasound for MR-detected lesions in breast cancer patients. Korean J Radiol 8(6):475–483PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Demartini WB et al (2009) Utility of targeted sonography for breast lesions that were suspicious on MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(4):1128–1134PubMedCrossRef Demartini WB et al (2009) Utility of targeted sonography for breast lesions that were suspicious on MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(4):1128–1134PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Destounis S et al (2009) Community-based practice experience of unsuspected breast magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities evaluated with second-look sonography. J Ultrasound Med 28(10):1337–1346PubMed Destounis S et al (2009) Community-based practice experience of unsuspected breast magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities evaluated with second-look sonography. J Ultrasound Med 28(10):1337–1346PubMed
15.
go back to reference Meissnitzer M et al (2009) Targeted ultrasound of the breast in women with abnormal MRI findings for whom biopsy has been recommended. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(4):1025–1029PubMedCrossRef Meissnitzer M et al (2009) Targeted ultrasound of the breast in women with abnormal MRI findings for whom biopsy has been recommended. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(4):1025–1029PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Nakano S et al (2009) Fusion of MRI and sonography image for breast cancer evaluation using real-time virtual sonography with magnetic navigation: first experience. Jpn J Clin Oncol 39(9):552–559PubMedCrossRef Nakano S et al (2009) Fusion of MRI and sonography image for breast cancer evaluation using real-time virtual sonography with magnetic navigation: first experience. Jpn J Clin Oncol 39(9):552–559PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Abe H et al (2010) MR-directed (“Second-Look”) ultrasound examination for breast lesions detected initially on MRI: MR and sonographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(2):370–377PubMedCrossRef Abe H et al (2010) MR-directed (“Second-Look”) ultrasound examination for breast lesions detected initially on MRI: MR and sonographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(2):370–377PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Carbognin G et al (2010) Utility of second-look ultrasound in the management of incidental enhancing lesions detected by breast MR imaging. Radiol Med 115(8):1234–1245PubMedCrossRef Carbognin G et al (2010) Utility of second-look ultrasound in the management of incidental enhancing lesions detected by breast MR imaging. Radiol Med 115(8):1234–1245PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Candelaria R et al (2011) Second-look US examination of MR-detected breast lesions. J Clin Ultrasound 39(3):115–121PubMedCrossRef Candelaria R et al (2011) Second-look US examination of MR-detected breast lesions. J Clin Ultrasound 39(3):115–121PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Berg WA et al (2006) Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization. Radiology 241(2):355–365PubMedCrossRef Berg WA et al (2006) Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization. Radiology 241(2):355–365PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Nakano S et al (2007) Detection of enhancing lesions on contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast using real-time virtual sonography; fusion of MRI and sonography data. Breast Cancer Res Treat 106:S13 (abstr 43) Nakano S et al (2007) Detection of enhancing lesions on contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast using real-time virtual sonography; fusion of MRI and sonography data. Breast Cancer Res Treat 106:S13 (abstr 43)
22.
go back to reference Nakano S et al (2012) Real-time virtual sonography, a coordinated sonography and MRI system that uses magnetic navigation, improves the sonographic identification of enhancing lesions on breast MRI. Ultrasound Med Biol 38(1):42–49PubMedCrossRef Nakano S et al (2012) Real-time virtual sonography, a coordinated sonography and MRI system that uses magnetic navigation, improves the sonographic identification of enhancing lesions on breast MRI. Ultrasound Med Biol 38(1):42–49PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Yamamoto S et al (2010) Sentinel lymph node detection in breast cancer patients by real-time virtual sonography constructed with three-dimensional computed tomography–lymphography. Breast J 16(1):4–8PubMedCrossRef Yamamoto S et al (2010) Sentinel lymph node detection in breast cancer patients by real-time virtual sonography constructed with three-dimensional computed tomography–lymphography. Breast J 16(1):4–8PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Yamamoto S et al (2012) Prospective ultrasonographic prediction of sentinel lymph node metastasis by real-time virtual sonography constructed with three-dimensional computed tomography–lymphography in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer 19(1):77–82PubMedCrossRef Yamamoto S et al (2012) Prospective ultrasonographic prediction of sentinel lymph node metastasis by real-time virtual sonography constructed with three-dimensional computed tomography–lymphography in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer 19(1):77–82PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference D’Orsi C et al (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BIRADS—breast imaging atlas. American College of Radiology, Reston D’Orsi C et al (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BIRADS—breast imaging atlas. American College of Radiology, Reston
26.
go back to reference Peters NH et al (2008) Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology 246(1):116–124PubMedCrossRef Peters NH et al (2008) Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology 246(1):116–124PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Stacey-Clear A et al (1993) Mammographically detected breast cancer: location in women under 50 years old. Radiology 186(3):677–680PubMed Stacey-Clear A et al (1993) Mammographically detected breast cancer: location in women under 50 years old. Radiology 186(3):677–680PubMed
28.
go back to reference Stavros AT et al (1995) Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 196(1):123–134PubMed Stavros AT et al (1995) Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 196(1):123–134PubMed
29.
go back to reference Tozaki M et al (2006) Supine MR mammography using VIBE with parallel acquisition technique for the planning of breast-conserving surgery: clinical feasibility. Breast 15(1):137–140PubMedCrossRef Tozaki M et al (2006) Supine MR mammography using VIBE with parallel acquisition technique for the planning of breast-conserving surgery: clinical feasibility. Breast 15(1):137–140PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Sakakibara M et al (2008) Breast-conserving surgery using projection and reproduction techniques of surgical-position breast MRI in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Am Coll Surg 207(1):62–68PubMedCrossRef Sakakibara M et al (2008) Breast-conserving surgery using projection and reproduction techniques of surgical-position breast MRI in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Am Coll Surg 207(1):62–68PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Nakamura R et al (2008) Breast-conserving surgery using supine magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast 17(3):245–251PubMedCrossRef Nakamura R et al (2008) Breast-conserving surgery using supine magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast 17(3):245–251PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Rizzatto G et al (2009) Breast imaging and volume navigation: MR imaging and ultrasound coregistration. Ultrasound Clin 4:261–271CrossRef Rizzatto G et al (2009) Breast imaging and volume navigation: MR imaging and ultrasound coregistration. Ultrasound Clin 4:261–271CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Alderliesten T et al (2011) On the feasibility of MRI-guided navigation to demarcate breast cancer for breast-conserving surgery. Med Phys 37(6):2617–2626CrossRef Alderliesten T et al (2011) On the feasibility of MRI-guided navigation to demarcate breast cancer for breast-conserving surgery. Med Phys 37(6):2617–2626CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Fausto A et al (2012) A new method to combine contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging during live ultrasound of the breast using volume navigation technique: A study for evaluating feasibility, accuracy and reproducibility in healthy volunteers. Eur J Radiol 81(3):332–337 Fausto A et al (2012) A new method to combine contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging during live ultrasound of the breast using volume navigation technique: A study for evaluating feasibility, accuracy and reproducibility in healthy volunteers. Eur J Radiol 81(3):332–337
Metadata
Title
Impact of real-time virtual sonography, a coordinated sonography and MRI system that uses an image fusion technique, on the sonographic evaluation of MRI-detected lesions of the breast in second-look sonography
Authors
Shogo Nakano
Junko Kousaka
Kimihito Fujii
Kyoko Yorozuya
Miwa Yoshida
Yukako Mouri
Miwa Akizuki
Rie Tetsuka
Takahito Ando
Takashi Fukutomi
Yukihiko Oshima
Junko Kimura
Tsuneo Ishiguchi
Osamu Arai
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2163-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine