Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2012

01-07-2012 | Epidemiology

The influence of mammographic density on breast tumor characteristics

Authors: Louise Eriksson, Kamila Czene, Lena Rosenberg, Keith Humphreys, Per Hall

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Mammographic density (MD) is a well-established risk factor for breast cancer. Whether MD influences the tumor phenotype remains to be clarified. Previous studies are highly inconsistent and most lack important covariate information. This is a case-only study within a population-based case–control study. Cases were all postmenopausal women, aged 50–74 years, with incident breast cancer, diagnosed 1993–1995, and with no history of previous cancer (n = 2,720). 1,747 women with mammograms and information on tumor characteristics were included in analyses. MD was assessed using a computer-assisted thresholding technique. We used linear, logistic, and multinomial logistic regression, adjusting for possible confounders, to study density and tumor characteristics. PD was only statistically significantly associated with tumor size in our study (regression coefficient 0.031, p = 0.017). The effect of PD on tumor size was greater when mode of detection was excluded from the model (regression coefficient 0.043, p = 0.001). No other associations between PD and the tumor characteristics studied (lymph node metastasis, ER-status, PR-status, grade, and histopathological classification) were observed. In summary, PD was positively associated with tumor size in postmenopausal women. However, the relationship was at least partially confounded by mode of detection. Although there may be a true biological relationship between MD and more highly proliferative tumors, it also seems that part of this relationship is due to masking delaying diagnosis. In conclusion, PD does not seem to be differentially associated with tumor phenotype, except for tumor size, after taking mode of detection into consideration.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Ghosh K, Brandt KR, Sellers TA, Reynolds C, Scott CG, Maloney SD, Carston MJ, Pankratz VS, Vachon CM (2008) Association of mammographic density with the pathology of subsequent breast cancer among postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17(4):872–879. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0559 PubMedCrossRef Ghosh K, Brandt KR, Sellers TA, Reynolds C, Scott CG, Maloney SD, Carston MJ, Pankratz VS, Vachon CM (2008) Association of mammographic density with the pathology of subsequent breast cancer among postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17(4):872–879. doi:10.​1158/​1055-9965.​EPI-07-0559 PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ma H, Luo J, Press MF, Wang Y, Bernstein L, Ursin G (2009) Is there a difference in the association between percent mammographic density and subtypes of breast cancer? Luminal A and triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18(2):479–485. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0805 PubMedCrossRef Ma H, Luo J, Press MF, Wang Y, Bernstein L, Ursin G (2009) Is there a difference in the association between percent mammographic density and subtypes of breast cancer? Luminal A and triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18(2):479–485. doi:10.​1158/​1055-9965.​EPI-08-0805 PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Roubidoux MA, Bailey JE, Wray LA, Helvie MA (2004) Invasive cancers detected after breast cancer screening yielded a negative result: relationship of mammographic density to tumor prognostic factors. Radiology 230(1):42–48. doi:10.1148/radiol.2301020589 PubMedCrossRef Roubidoux MA, Bailey JE, Wray LA, Helvie MA (2004) Invasive cancers detected after breast cancer screening yielded a negative result: relationship of mammographic density to tumor prognostic factors. Radiology 230(1):42–48. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​2301020589 PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sala E, Solomon L, Warren R, McCann J, Duffy S, Luben R, Day N (2000) Size, node status and grade of breast tumours: association with mammographic parenchymal patterns. Eur Radiol 10(1):157–161PubMedCrossRef Sala E, Solomon L, Warren R, McCann J, Duffy S, Luben R, Day N (2000) Size, node status and grade of breast tumours: association with mammographic parenchymal patterns. Eur Radiol 10(1):157–161PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Yang WT, Dryden M, Broglio K, Gilcrease M, Dawood S, Dempsey PJ, Valero V, Hortobagyi G, Atchley D, Arun B (2008) Mammographic features of triple receptor-negative primary breast cancers in young premenopausal women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 111(3):405–410. doi:10.1007/s10549-007-9810-6 PubMedCrossRef Yang WT, Dryden M, Broglio K, Gilcrease M, Dawood S, Dempsey PJ, Valero V, Hortobagyi G, Atchley D, Arun B (2008) Mammographic features of triple receptor-negative primary breast cancers in young premenopausal women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 111(3):405–410. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-007-9810-6 PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ziv E, Tice J, Smith-Bindman R, Shepherd J, Cummings S, Kerlikowske K (2004) Mammographic density and estrogen receptor status of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13(12):2090–2095PubMed Ziv E, Tice J, Smith-Bindman R, Shepherd J, Cummings S, Kerlikowske K (2004) Mammographic density and estrogen receptor status of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13(12):2090–2095PubMed
10.
go back to reference Yaghjyan L, Colditz GA, Collins LC, Schnitt SJ, Rosner B, Vachon C, Tamimi RM (2011) Mammographic breast density and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women according to tumor characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(15):1179–1189. doi:10.1093/jnci/djr225 PubMedCrossRef Yaghjyan L, Colditz GA, Collins LC, Schnitt SJ, Rosner B, Vachon C, Tamimi RM (2011) Mammographic breast density and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women according to tumor characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(15):1179–1189. doi:10.​1093/​jnci/​djr225 PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chiu SY, Duffy S, Yen AM, Tabar L, Smith RA, Chen HH (2010) Effect of baseline breast density on breast cancer incidence, stage, mortality, and screening parameters: 25-year follow-up of a Swedish mammographic screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19(5):1219–1228. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-1028 PubMedCrossRef Chiu SY, Duffy S, Yen AM, Tabar L, Smith RA, Chen HH (2010) Effect of baseline breast density on breast cancer incidence, stage, mortality, and screening parameters: 25-year follow-up of a Swedish mammographic screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19(5):1219–1228. doi:10.​1158/​1055-9965.​EPI-09-1028 PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Heusinger K, Jud SM, Haberle L, Hack C, Adamietz BR, Meier-Meitinger M, Lux MP, Wagner F, Loehberg CR, Uder M, Hartmann A, Schulz-Wendtland R, Beckmann MW, Fasching PA (2012) Association of mammographic density with hormone receptors in invasive breast cancers—results from a case-only study. Int J Cancer. doi:10.1002/ijc.27515 PubMed Heusinger K, Jud SM, Haberle L, Hack C, Adamietz BR, Meier-Meitinger M, Lux MP, Wagner F, Loehberg CR, Uder M, Hartmann A, Schulz-Wendtland R, Beckmann MW, Fasching PA (2012) Association of mammographic density with hormone receptors in invasive breast cancers—results from a case-only study. Int J Cancer. doi:10.​1002/​ijc.​27515 PubMed
16.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, Sun L, Stone J, Fishell E, Jong RA, Hislop G, Chiarelli A, Minkin S, Yaffe MJ (2007) Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356(3):227–236. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa062790 PubMedCrossRef Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, Sun L, Stone J, Fishell E, Jong RA, Hislop G, Chiarelli A, Minkin S, Yaffe MJ (2007) Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356(3):227–236. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa062790 PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V (1996) Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA 276(1):33–38PubMedCrossRef Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V (1996) Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA 276(1):33–38PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, White D, Finder CA, Taplin SH, White E (2000) Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(13):1081–1087PubMedCrossRef Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, White D, Finder CA, Taplin SH, White E (2000) Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(13):1081–1087PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bentzon N, During M, Rasmussen BB, Mouridsen H, Kroman N (2008) Prognostic effect of estrogen receptor status across age in primary breast cancer. Int J Cancer 122(5):1089–1094. doi:10.1002/ijc.22892 PubMedCrossRef Bentzon N, During M, Rasmussen BB, Mouridsen H, Kroman N (2008) Prognostic effect of estrogen receptor status across age in primary breast cancer. Int J Cancer 122(5):1089–1094. doi:10.​1002/​ijc.​22892 PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Harrison DA, Duffy SW, Sala E, Warren RM, Couto E, Day NE (2002) Deterministic models for breast cancer progression: application to the association between mammographic parenchymal pattern and histologic grade of breast cancers. J Clin Epidemiol 55(11):1113–1118PubMedCrossRef Harrison DA, Duffy SW, Sala E, Warren RM, Couto E, Day NE (2002) Deterministic models for breast cancer progression: application to the association between mammographic parenchymal pattern and histologic grade of breast cancers. J Clin Epidemiol 55(11):1113–1118PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Vachon CM, van Gils CH, Sellers TA, Ghosh K, Pruthi S, Brandt KR, Pankratz VS (2007) Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction. Breast Cancer Res 9(6):217. doi:10.1186/bcr1829 PubMedCrossRef Vachon CM, van Gils CH, Sellers TA, Ghosh K, Pruthi S, Brandt KR, Pankratz VS (2007) Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction. Breast Cancer Res 9(6):217. doi:10.​1186/​bcr1829 PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Rosenberg LU, Granath F, Dickman PW, Einarsdottir K, Wedren S, Persson I, Hall P (2008) Menopausal hormone therapy in relation to breast cancer characteristics and prognosis: a cohort study. Breast Cancer Res 10(5):R78. doi:10.1186/bcr2145 PubMedCrossRef Rosenberg LU, Granath F, Dickman PW, Einarsdottir K, Wedren S, Persson I, Hall P (2008) Menopausal hormone therapy in relation to breast cancer characteristics and prognosis: a cohort study. Breast Cancer Res 10(5):R78. doi:10.​1186/​bcr2145 PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Rosenberg LU, Magnusson C, Lindstrom E, Wedren S, Hall P, Dickman PW (2006) Menopausal hormone therapy and other breast cancer risk factors in relation to the risk of different histological subtypes of breast cancer: a case-control study. Breast Cancer Res 8(1):R11. doi:10.1186/bcr1378 PubMedCrossRef Rosenberg LU, Magnusson C, Lindstrom E, Wedren S, Hall P, Dickman PW (2006) Menopausal hormone therapy and other breast cancer risk factors in relation to the risk of different histological subtypes of breast cancer: a case-control study. Breast Cancer Res 8(1):R11. doi:10.​1186/​bcr1378 PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Magnusson C, Baron J, Persson I, Wolk A, Bergstrom R, Trichopoulos D, Adami HO (1998) Body size in different periods of life and breast cancer risk in post-menopausal women. Int J Cancer 76(1):29–34PubMedCrossRef Magnusson C, Baron J, Persson I, Wolk A, Bergstrom R, Trichopoulos D, Adami HO (1998) Body size in different periods of life and breast cancer risk in post-menopausal women. Int J Cancer 76(1):29–34PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Guo YP, Martin LJ, Hanna W, Banerjee D, Miller N, Fishell E, Khokha R, Boyd NF (2001) Growth factors and stromal matrix proteins associated with mammographic densities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10(3):243–248PubMed Guo YP, Martin LJ, Hanna W, Banerjee D, Miller N, Fishell E, Khokha R, Boyd NF (2001) Growth factors and stromal matrix proteins associated with mammographic densities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10(3):243–248PubMed
28.
go back to reference Byrne C, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Speizer FE, Pollak M, Hankinson SE (2000) Plasma insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I, IGF-binding protein 3, and mammographic density. Cancer Res 60(14):3744–3748PubMed Byrne C, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Speizer FE, Pollak M, Hankinson SE (2000) Plasma insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I, IGF-binding protein 3, and mammographic density. Cancer Res 60(14):3744–3748PubMed
30.
go back to reference Livshits G, Malkin I, Williams FM, Hart DJ, Hakim A, Spector TD (2011) Longitudinal study of variation in body mass index in middle-aged UK females. Age (Dordr). doi:10.1007/s11357-011-9299-0 Livshits G, Malkin I, Williams FM, Hart DJ, Hakim A, Spector TD (2011) Longitudinal study of variation in body mass index in middle-aged UK females. Age (Dordr). doi:10.​1007/​s11357-011-9299-0
31.
go back to reference Byng JW, Boyd NF, Fishell E, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ (1994) The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol 39(10):1629–1638PubMedCrossRef Byng JW, Boyd NF, Fishell E, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ (1994) The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol 39(10):1629–1638PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Rutter CM, Mandelson MT, Laya MB, Seger DJ, Taplin S (2001) Changes in breast density associated with initiation, discontinuation, and continuing use of hormone replacement therapy. JAMA 285(2):171–176PubMedCrossRef Rutter CM, Mandelson MT, Laya MB, Seger DJ, Taplin S (2001) Changes in breast density associated with initiation, discontinuation, and continuing use of hormone replacement therapy. JAMA 285(2):171–176PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Magnusson C, Baron JA, Correia N, Bergstrom R, Adami HO, Persson I (1999) Breast-cancer risk following long-term oestrogen- and oestrogen–progestin-replacement therapy. Int J Cancer 81(3):339–344PubMedCrossRef Magnusson C, Baron JA, Correia N, Bergstrom R, Adami HO, Persson I (1999) Breast-cancer risk following long-term oestrogen- and oestrogen–progestin-replacement therapy. Int J Cancer 81(3):339–344PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Elston CW, Ellis IO (1991) Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19(5):403–410PubMedCrossRef Elston CW, Ellis IO (1991) Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19(5):403–410PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, Fishell EK, Little LE, Miller AB, Lockwood GA, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ (1995) Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 87(9):670–675PubMedCrossRef Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, Fishell EK, Little LE, Miller AB, Lockwood GA, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ (1995) Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 87(9):670–675PubMedCrossRef
36.
37.
go back to reference Akaike H (1974) New look at statistical-model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19(6):716–723CrossRef Akaike H (1974) New look at statistical-model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19(6):716–723CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Weinberg R (2006) The biology of cancer, 1st edn. Garland Science, New York Weinberg R (2006) The biology of cancer, 1st edn. Garland Science, New York
39.
go back to reference Byrne C, Schairer C, Brinton LA, Wolfe J, Parekh N, Salane M, Carter C, Hoover R (2001) Effects of mammographic density and benign breast disease on breast cancer risk (United States). Cancer Causes Control 12(2):103–110PubMedCrossRef Byrne C, Schairer C, Brinton LA, Wolfe J, Parekh N, Salane M, Carter C, Hoover R (2001) Effects of mammographic density and benign breast disease on breast cancer risk (United States). Cancer Causes Control 12(2):103–110PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Brekelmans CT, Peeters PH, Faber JA, Deurenberg JJ, Collette HJ (1994) The epidemiological profile of women with an interval cancer in the DOM screening programme. Breast Cancer Res Treat 30(3):223–232PubMedCrossRef Brekelmans CT, Peeters PH, Faber JA, Deurenberg JJ, Collette HJ (1994) The epidemiological profile of women with an interval cancer in the DOM screening programme. Breast Cancer Res Treat 30(3):223–232PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, Dressler LG, Cowan D, Conway K, Karaca G, Troester MA, Tse CK, Edmiston S, Deming SL, Geradts J, Cheang MC, Nielsen TO, Moorman PG, Earp HS, Millikan RC (2006) Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA 295(21):2492–2502. doi:10.1001/jama.295.21.2492 PubMedCrossRef Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, Dressler LG, Cowan D, Conway K, Karaca G, Troester MA, Tse CK, Edmiston S, Deming SL, Geradts J, Cheang MC, Nielsen TO, Moorman PG, Earp HS, Millikan RC (2006) Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA 295(21):2492–2502. doi:10.​1001/​jama.​295.​21.​2492 PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The influence of mammographic density on breast tumor characteristics
Authors
Louise Eriksson
Kamila Czene
Lena Rosenberg
Keith Humphreys
Per Hall
Publication date
01-07-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2127-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine