Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2012

01-04-2012 | Clinical trial

US follow-up protocol in concordant benign result after US-guided 14-gauge core needle breast biopsy

Authors: Ji Hyun Youk, Inkyung Jung, Eun-Kyung Kim, Min Jung Kim, Eun Ju Son, Hee Jung Moon, Jin Young Kwak

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

To determine the time when follow-up ultrasound (US) should begin for concordant benign lesions after US-guided 14-gauge core needle breast biopsy (CNB). This was an IRB–approved retrospective study, with a waiver of informed consent. Among 3,888 consecutive US-guided CNBs performed between August 2005 and March 2008, 1,492 breast masses in 1,309 women with concordant benign results and follow-up US after CNB were included. Their medical records were reviewed. Statistical comparisons for the result of first follow-up US and malignant rates among 6-month, 12-month, and long-term intervals were performed by using Fisher exact test. Results dichotomized for symptom, lesion size (10 mm), and CNB result (specific or not), were also analyzed. In 1,492 masses, seven malignancies (0.5%) were diagnosed by interval growth at first follow-up US performed at 6-month (n = 3), 12-month (n = 1), and long-term interval (n = 3). No significant difference in results of follow-up US and malignant rates was found among follow-up intervals. At 6-month interval, malignant rate in symptomatic group (1.9%, 3/162) was significantly higher than in asymptomatic group (0%, 0/819) (P = 0.004). The size of malignancy at long-term interval tended to be larger than at shorter interval, and metastasis was developed in one patient with malignancy at long-term interval. Concordant benign lesions after US-guided 14-gauge CNB should be recommended to begin US follow-up at least at 12 months to detect early-stage cancers. However, for concordant benign lesion associated with any clinical symptoms, follow-up US should begin earlier, at 6 months after CNB.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bassett LW, Mahoney MC, Apple SK (2007) Interventional breast imaging: current procedures and assessing for concordance with pathology. Radiol Clin North Am 45:881–894PubMedCrossRef Bassett LW, Mahoney MC, Apple SK (2007) Interventional breast imaging: current procedures and assessing for concordance with pathology. Radiol Clin North Am 45:881–894PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Lee JY, Oh KK (2007) Missed breast cancers at US-guided core needle biopsy: how to reduce them. Radiographics 27:79–94PubMedCrossRef Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Lee JY, Oh KK (2007) Missed breast cancers at US-guided core needle biopsy: how to reduce them. Radiographics 27:79–94PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Ko KH, Kwak JY, Son EJ, Choi J, Kang HY (2011) Concordant or discordant? Imaging-pathology correlation in a sonography-guided core needle biopsy of a breast lesion. Korean J Radiol 12:232–240PubMedCrossRef Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Ko KH, Kwak JY, Son EJ, Choi J, Kang HY (2011) Concordant or discordant? Imaging-pathology correlation in a sonography-guided core needle biopsy of a breast lesion. Korean J Radiol 12:232–240PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lee CH, Philpotts LE, Horvath LJ, Tocino I (1999) Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate. Radiology 212:189–194PubMed Lee CH, Philpotts LE, Horvath LJ, Tocino I (1999) Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate. Radiology 212:189–194PubMed
5.
go back to reference Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, Marzoni FA Jr, Finkelstein SI, Shepard MJ (1999) Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 210:799–805PubMed Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, Marzoni FA Jr, Finkelstein SI, Shepard MJ (1999) Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 210:799–805PubMed
6.
go back to reference Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Kwak JY, Son EJ (2010) Analysis of false-negative results after US-guided 14-gauge core needle breast biopsy. Eur Radiol 20:782–789PubMedCrossRef Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Kwak JY, Son EJ (2010) Analysis of false-negative results after US-guided 14-gauge core needle breast biopsy. Eur Radiol 20:782–789PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Acheson MB, Patton RG, Howisey RL, Lane RF, Morgan A, Rowbotham RK (2002) Three- to six-year followup for 379 benign image-guided large-core needle biopsies of nonpalpable breast abnormalities. J Am Coll Surg 195:462–466PubMedCrossRef Acheson MB, Patton RG, Howisey RL, Lane RF, Morgan A, Rowbotham RK (2002) Three- to six-year followup for 379 benign image-guided large-core needle biopsies of nonpalpable breast abnormalities. J Am Coll Surg 195:462–466PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Salkowski LR, Fowler AM, Burnside ES, Sisney GA (2011) Utility of 6-month follow-up imaging after a concordant benign breast biopsy result. Radiology 258:380–387PubMedCrossRef Salkowski LR, Fowler AM, Burnside ES, Sisney GA (2011) Utility of 6-month follow-up imaging after a concordant benign breast biopsy result. Radiology 258:380–387PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Liberman L, Drotman M, Morris EA, LaTrenta LR, Abramson AF, Zakowski MF, Dershaw DD (2000) Imaging-histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy. Cancer 89:2538–2546PubMedCrossRef Liberman L, Drotman M, Morris EA, LaTrenta LR, Abramson AF, Zakowski MF, Dershaw DD (2000) Imaging-histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy. Cancer 89:2538–2546PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Berg WA (2004) Image-guided breast biopsy and management of high-risk lesions. Radiol Clin N Am 42:935–946PubMedCrossRef Berg WA (2004) Image-guided breast biopsy and management of high-risk lesions. Radiol Clin N Am 42:935–946PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Schoonjans JM, Brem RF (2001) Fourteen-gauge ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy of breast masses. J Ultrasound Med 20:967–972PubMed Schoonjans JM, Brem RF (2001) Fourteen-gauge ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy of breast masses. J Ultrasound Med 20:967–972PubMed
12.
go back to reference Crystal P, Koretz M, Shcharynsky S, Makarov V, Strano S (2005) Accuracy of sonographically guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy: results of 715 consecutive breast biopsies with at least two-year follow-up of benign lesions. J Clin Ultrasound 33:47–52PubMedCrossRef Crystal P, Koretz M, Shcharynsky S, Makarov V, Strano S (2005) Accuracy of sonographically guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy: results of 715 consecutive breast biopsies with at least two-year follow-up of benign lesions. J Clin Ultrasound 33:47–52PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Li J, Dershaw DD, Lee CH, Kaplan J, Morris EA (2009) MRI follow-up after concordant, histologically benign diagnosis of breast lesions sampled by MRI-guided biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:850–855PubMedCrossRef Li J, Dershaw DD, Lee CH, Kaplan J, Morris EA (2009) MRI follow-up after concordant, histologically benign diagnosis of breast lesions sampled by MRI-guided biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:850–855PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Schueller G, Jaromi S, Ponhold L, Fuchsjaeger M, Memarsadeghi M, Rudas M, Weber M, Liberman L, Helbich TH (2008) US-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy: results of a validation study in 1352 cases. Radiology 248:406–413PubMedCrossRef Schueller G, Jaromi S, Ponhold L, Fuchsjaeger M, Memarsadeghi M, Rudas M, Weber M, Liberman L, Helbich TH (2008) US-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy: results of a validation study in 1352 cases. Radiology 248:406–413PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sickles EA (1995) Management of probably benign breast lesions. Radiol Clin North Am 33:1123–1130PubMed Sickles EA (1995) Management of probably benign breast lesions. Radiol Clin North Am 33:1123–1130PubMed
16.
go back to reference Vizcaino I, Gadea L, Andreo L, Salas D, Ruiz-Perales F, Cuevas D, Herranz C, Bueno F (2001) Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography. Radiology 219:475–483PubMed Vizcaino I, Gadea L, Andreo L, Salas D, Ruiz-Perales F, Cuevas D, Herranz C, Bueno F (2001) Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography. Radiology 219:475–483PubMed
17.
go back to reference Varas X, Leborgne JH, Leborgne F, Mezzera J, Jaumandreu S (2002) Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:691–695PubMed Varas X, Leborgne JH, Leborgne F, Mezzera J, Jaumandreu S (2002) Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:691–695PubMed
18.
go back to reference Raza S, Goldkamp AL, Chikarmane SA, Birdwell RL (2010) US of breast masses categorized as BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5: pictorial review of factors influencing clinical management. Radiographics 30:1199–1213PubMedCrossRef Raza S, Goldkamp AL, Chikarmane SA, Birdwell RL (2010) US of breast masses categorized as BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5: pictorial review of factors influencing clinical management. Radiographics 30:1199–1213PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Graf O, Helbich TH, Fuchsjaeger MH, Hopf G, Morgun M, Graf C, Mallek R, Sickles EA (2004) Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted? Radiology 233:850–856PubMedCrossRef Graf O, Helbich TH, Fuchsjaeger MH, Hopf G, Morgun M, Graf C, Mallek R, Sickles EA (2004) Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted? Radiology 233:850–856PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Tabar L, Duffy SW, Vitak B, Chen HH, Prevost TC (1999) The natural history of breast carcinoma: what have we learned from screening? Cancer 86:449–462PubMedCrossRef Tabar L, Duffy SW, Vitak B, Chen HH, Prevost TC (1999) The natural history of breast carcinoma: what have we learned from screening? Cancer 86:449–462PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Michaelson JS, Silverstein M, Wyatt J, Weber G, Moore R, Halpern E, Kopans DB, Hughes K (2002) Predicting the survival of patients with breast carcinoma using tumor size. Cancer 95:713–723PubMedCrossRef Michaelson JS, Silverstein M, Wyatt J, Weber G, Moore R, Halpern E, Kopans DB, Hughes K (2002) Predicting the survival of patients with breast carcinoma using tumor size. Cancer 95:713–723PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Feig SA (2005) Current status of screening US. In: Feig SA (ed) 2005 Syllabus: categorical course in diagnostic radiology-breast imaging. Radiological Society of North America, Oak Brook, pp 143–154 Feig SA (2005) Current status of screening US. In: Feig SA (ed) 2005 Syllabus: categorical course in diagnostic radiology-breast imaging. Radiological Society of North America, Oak Brook, pp 143–154
23.
go back to reference Starvros AT (2004) False-negative and false-positive examinations. In: McAllister L, Donnellan K, Martin SP, Rothschild R (eds) Breast ultrasound. Lippincott Willams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 947–978 Starvros AT (2004) False-negative and false-positive examinations. In: McAllister L, Donnellan K, Martin SP, Rothschild R (eds) Breast ultrasound. Lippincott Willams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 947–978
24.
go back to reference Goodman KA, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM (1998) Compliance with recommended follow-up after percutaneous breast core biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:89–92PubMed Goodman KA, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM (1998) Compliance with recommended follow-up after percutaneous breast core biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:89–92PubMed
25.
go back to reference Andrykowski MA, Carpenter JS, Studts JL, Cordova MJ, Cunningham LL, Mager W, Sloan D, Kenady D, McGrath P (2001) Adherence to recommendations for clinical follow-up after benign breast biopsy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 69:165–178PubMedCrossRef Andrykowski MA, Carpenter JS, Studts JL, Cordova MJ, Cunningham LL, Mager W, Sloan D, Kenady D, McGrath P (2001) Adherence to recommendations for clinical follow-up after benign breast biopsy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 69:165–178PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Chang SD, Abrahams Z, Gordon PB (2005) Patient compliance with recommended follow-up after fine-needle aspiration biopsy of solid breast masses. Can Assoc Radiol J 56:36–39PubMed Chang SD, Abrahams Z, Gordon PB (2005) Patient compliance with recommended follow-up after fine-needle aspiration biopsy of solid breast masses. Can Assoc Radiol J 56:36–39PubMed
27.
go back to reference Pal S, Ikeda DM, Birdwell RL (1996) Compliance with recommended follow-up after fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: a retrospective study. Radiology 201:71–74PubMed Pal S, Ikeda DM, Birdwell RL (1996) Compliance with recommended follow-up after fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: a retrospective study. Radiology 201:71–74PubMed
Metadata
Title
US follow-up protocol in concordant benign result after US-guided 14-gauge core needle breast biopsy
Authors
Ji Hyun Youk
Inkyung Jung
Eun-Kyung Kim
Min Jung Kim
Eun Ju Son
Hee Jung Moon
Jin Young Kwak
Publication date
01-04-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1951-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine