Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2012

01-06-2012 | Preclinical study

Rates of upgrade to malignancy for 271 cases of flat epithelial atypia (FEA) diagnosed by breast core biopsy

Authors: Alexandre Peres, Emmanuel Barranger, Véronique Becette, Alain Boudinet, Jean-Marc Guinebretiere, Pascal Cherel

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Flat epithelial atypia (FEA) is a borderline lesion that might represent an early stage in the development of certain low-grade carcinomas in situ and invasive cancers. There are no guidelines on its management. Our objectives were to determine the upgrade to malignancy rate and identify a subpopulation of patients that might undergo just mammographic surveillance. We retrospectively reviewed the data for 271 FEA cases among 5,555 breast core biopsies obtained over a 7-year period (January 2003–2010). We collated clinical data (age, history of cancer, menopausal status), radiological data (lesion type, size, Bi-Rads category), technical data (number of biopsies, needle gauge, excision quality) and histological data and sought correlations between these factors and upgrade rate. The 271 FEA comprised 128 cases of pure FEA, 135 cases of FEA + atypical ductal hyperplasia, and 8 cases of FEA + atypical lobular hyperplasia. Overall, 184 patients underwent surgery and 46 mammographic surveillance. Surgery detected 34 cases of malignancy (23 CIS, 7 invasive cancers, and 4 mixed cases) giving a 15% upgrade rate. Quality of excision was the only factor associated with under-diagnosis. The presence of FEA at biopsy warrants surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Collins LC, Baer HJ, Tamimi RM, Connolly JL, Colditz GA, Schnitt SJ (2007) Magnitude and laterality of breast cancer risk according to histologic type of atypical hyperplasia: results from the Nurses’ Health Study. Cancer 109:180–187PubMedCrossRef Collins LC, Baer HJ, Tamimi RM, Connolly JL, Colditz GA, Schnitt SJ (2007) Magnitude and laterality of breast cancer risk according to histologic type of atypical hyperplasia: results from the Nurses’ Health Study. Cancer 109:180–187PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference De Mascarel I, MacGrogan G, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Vincent-Salomon A, Soubeyran I, Picot V et al (2007) Epithelial atypia in biopsies performed for microcalcifications. Practical considerations about 2,833 serially sectioned surgical biopsies with a long follow-up. Virchows Arch 451:1–10PubMedCrossRef De Mascarel I, MacGrogan G, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Vincent-Salomon A, Soubeyran I, Picot V et al (2007) Epithelial atypia in biopsies performed for microcalcifications. Practical considerations about 2,833 serially sectioned surgical biopsies with a long follow-up. Virchows Arch 451:1–10PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Foote FW, Stewart FW (1945) Comparative studies of cancerous versus noncancerous breasts. Ann Surg 121:197–222PubMedCrossRef Foote FW, Stewart FW (1945) Comparative studies of cancerous versus noncancerous breasts. Ann Surg 121:197–222PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Schnitt SJ, Vincent-Salomon A (2003) Columnar cell lesions of the breast. Adv Anat Pathol 10:113–124PubMedCrossRef Schnitt SJ, Vincent-Salomon A (2003) Columnar cell lesions of the breast. Adv Anat Pathol 10:113–124PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Schnitt SJ (2004) Columnar cell lesions of the breast pathological features and clinical significance. Mini-symposium:breast pathology. Curr Diagn Pathol 10:193–203 Schnitt SJ (2004) Columnar cell lesions of the breast pathological features and clinical significance. Mini-symposium:breast pathology. Curr Diagn Pathol 10:193–203
6.
go back to reference Abdel-Fatah TM, Powe DG, Hodi Z, Lee AH, Reis-Filho JS, Ellis IO (2007) High frequency of coexistence of columnar cell lesions, lobular neoplasia, and low grade ductal carcinoma in situ with invasive tubular carcinoma and invasive lobular carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 31:417–426PubMedCrossRef Abdel-Fatah TM, Powe DG, Hodi Z, Lee AH, Reis-Filho JS, Ellis IO (2007) High frequency of coexistence of columnar cell lesions, lobular neoplasia, and low grade ductal carcinoma in situ with invasive tubular carcinoma and invasive lobular carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 31:417–426PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Oyama T, Maluf H, Koerner F (1999) Atypical cystic lobules: an early stage in the formation of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ. Virchows Arch 435:413–421PubMedCrossRef Oyama T, Maluf H, Koerner F (1999) Atypical cystic lobules: an early stage in the formation of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ. Virchows Arch 435:413–421PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Weidner N (1995) Malignant breast lesions that may mimic benign tumors. Semin Diagn Pathol 12:2–13PubMed Weidner N (1995) Malignant breast lesions that may mimic benign tumors. Semin Diagn Pathol 12:2–13PubMed
9.
go back to reference Eusebi V, Feudale E, Foschini MP, Micheli A, Conti A, Riva C et al (1994) Long-term follow-up of in situ carcinoma of the breast. Semin Diagn Pathol 11:223–235PubMed Eusebi V, Feudale E, Foschini MP, Micheli A, Conti A, Riva C et al (1994) Long-term follow-up of in situ carcinoma of the breast. Semin Diagn Pathol 11:223–235PubMed
10.
go back to reference Bijker N, Peterse JL, Duchateau L, Julien JP, Fentiman IS, Duval C et al (2001) Risk factors for recurrence and metastasis after breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma-in situ: analysis of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 10853. J Clin Oncol 19:2263–2271PubMed Bijker N, Peterse JL, Duchateau L, Julien JP, Fentiman IS, Duval C et al (2001) Risk factors for recurrence and metastasis after breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma-in situ: analysis of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 10853. J Clin Oncol 19:2263–2271PubMed
11.
go back to reference Jacobs TW, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ (2002) Nonmalignant lesions in breast core needle biopsies: to excise or not to excise? Am J Surg Pathol 26:1095–1110PubMedCrossRef Jacobs TW, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ (2002) Nonmalignant lesions in breast core needle biopsies: to excise or not to excise? Am J Surg Pathol 26:1095–1110PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nasser SM, Fan MJ (2003) Does atypical columnar cell hyperplasia on breast core biopsy warrant follow-up excision? Mod Pathol 16:42CrossRef Nasser SM, Fan MJ (2003) Does atypical columnar cell hyperplasia on breast core biopsy warrant follow-up excision? Mod Pathol 16:42CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Schnitt SJ (2003) The diagnosis and management of pre-invasive breast disease: flat epithelial atypia-classification, pathologic features and clinical significance. Breast Cancer Res 5:263–268PubMedCrossRef Schnitt SJ (2003) The diagnosis and management of pre-invasive breast disease: flat epithelial atypia-classification, pathologic features and clinical significance. Breast Cancer Res 5:263–268PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Martel M, Barron-Rodriguez P, Tolgay OI, Dotto J, Tavassoli FA, Flat DIN (2007) 1 (flat epithelial atypia) on core needle biopsy: 63 cases identified retrospectively among 1, 751 core biopsies performed over an 8-year period (1992–1999). Virchows Arch 451:883–891PubMedCrossRef Martel M, Barron-Rodriguez P, Tolgay OI, Dotto J, Tavassoli FA, Flat DIN (2007) 1 (flat epithelial atypia) on core needle biopsy: 63 cases identified retrospectively among 1, 751 core biopsies performed over an 8-year period (1992–1999). Virchows Arch 451:883–891PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Piubello Q, Parisi A, Eccher A, Barbazeni G, Franchini Z, Iannucci A (2009) Flat epithelial atypia on core needle biopsy: which is the right management? Am J Surg Pathol 33:1078–1084PubMedCrossRef Piubello Q, Parisi A, Eccher A, Barbazeni G, Franchini Z, Iannucci A (2009) Flat epithelial atypia on core needle biopsy: which is the right management? Am J Surg Pathol 33:1078–1084PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Brem RF, Behrndt VS, Sanow L, Gatewood OM (1999) Atypical ductal hyperplasia: histologic underestimation of carcinoma in tissue harvested from impalpable breast lesions using 11-gauge stereotactically guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:1405–1407PubMed Brem RF, Behrndt VS, Sanow L, Gatewood OM (1999) Atypical ductal hyperplasia: histologic underestimation of carcinoma in tissue harvested from impalpable breast lesions using 11-gauge stereotactically guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:1405–1407PubMed
17.
go back to reference Darling ML, Smith DN, Lester SC, Kaelin C, Selland DL, Denison CM et al (2000) Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:1341–1346PubMed Darling ML, Smith DN, Lester SC, Kaelin C, Selland DL, Denison CM et al (2000) Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:1341–1346PubMed
18.
go back to reference Liberman L, Smolkin JH, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Rosen PP (1998) Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Radiology 208:251–260PubMed Liberman L, Smolkin JH, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Rosen PP (1998) Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Radiology 208:251–260PubMed
19.
go back to reference Meyer JE, Smith DN, Lester SC, Kaelin C, DiPiro PJ, Denison CM et al (1999) Large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. JAMA 281:1638–1641PubMedCrossRef Meyer JE, Smith DN, Lester SC, Kaelin C, DiPiro PJ, Denison CM et al (1999) Large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. JAMA 281:1638–1641PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Philpotts LE, Shaheen NA, Carter D, Lange RC, Lee CH (1999) Comparison of rebiopsy rates after stereotactic core needle biopsy of the breast with 11-gauge vacuum suction probe versus 14-gauge needle and automatic gun. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:683–687PubMed Philpotts LE, Shaheen NA, Carter D, Lange RC, Lee CH (1999) Comparison of rebiopsy rates after stereotactic core needle biopsy of the breast with 11-gauge vacuum suction probe versus 14-gauge needle and automatic gun. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:683–687PubMed
21.
go back to reference Kunju LP, Kleer CG (2007) Significance of flat epithelial atypia on mammotome core needle biopsy: should it be excised? Hum Pathol 38:35–41PubMedCrossRef Kunju LP, Kleer CG (2007) Significance of flat epithelial atypia on mammotome core needle biopsy: should it be excised? Hum Pathol 38:35–41PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Burbank F, Parker SH, Fogarty TJ (1996) Stereotactic breast biopsy: improved tissue harvesting with the Mammotome. Am Surg 62:738–744PubMed Burbank F, Parker SH, Fogarty TJ (1996) Stereotactic breast biopsy: improved tissue harvesting with the Mammotome. Am Surg 62:738–744PubMed
23.
go back to reference Burbank F (1997) Stereotactic breast biopsy: comparison of 14- and 11-gauge Mammotome probe performance and complication rates. Am Surg 63:988–995PubMed Burbank F (1997) Stereotactic breast biopsy: comparison of 14- and 11-gauge Mammotome probe performance and complication rates. Am Surg 63:988–995PubMed
24.
go back to reference David N, Labbe-Devilliers C, Moreau D, Loussouarn D, Campion L (2006) Diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia (FEA) after stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) of the breast: what is the best management: systematic surgery for all or follow-up? J Radiol 87:1671–1677PubMedCrossRef David N, Labbe-Devilliers C, Moreau D, Loussouarn D, Campion L (2006) Diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia (FEA) after stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) of the breast: what is the best management: systematic surgery for all or follow-up? J Radiol 87:1671–1677PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Senetta R et al (2009) Columnar cell lesions associated with breast calcifications on vacuum-assisted core biopsies: clinical, radiographic, and histologic correlations. Mod Pathol 22:762–769PubMed Senetta R et al (2009) Columnar cell lesions associated with breast calcifications on vacuum-assisted core biopsies: clinical, radiographic, and histologic correlations. Mod Pathol 22:762–769PubMed
26.
go back to reference Brogi E, Tan LP (2002) Findings at excisional biopsy (EBX) performed after identification of columnar cell change (CCC) of ductal epithelium in breast epithelium in breast core biopsy (CBX). Mod Pathol 15:29A–30A Brogi E, Tan LP (2002) Findings at excisional biopsy (EBX) performed after identification of columnar cell change (CCC) of ductal epithelium in breast epithelium in breast core biopsy (CBX). Mod Pathol 15:29A–30A
27.
go back to reference Harigopal M, Yao DX, Hoda SA (2002) Columnar cell alteration diagnosed on mammotome core biopsy for indeterminate microcalcifications: results of subsequent mammogram and surgical excision. Mod Pathol 15:36 Harigopal M, Yao DX, Hoda SA (2002) Columnar cell alteration diagnosed on mammotome core biopsy for indeterminate microcalcifications: results of subsequent mammogram and surgical excision. Mod Pathol 15:36
28.
go back to reference Bonnett M, Wallis T, Rossmann M, Pernick NL, Bouwman D, Carolin KA et al (2003) Histopathologic analysis of atypical lesions in image-guided core breast biopsies. Mod Pathol 16:154–160PubMedCrossRef Bonnett M, Wallis T, Rossmann M, Pernick NL, Bouwman D, Carolin KA et al (2003) Histopathologic analysis of atypical lesions in image-guided core breast biopsies. Mod Pathol 16:154–160PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Guerra-Wallace MM, Christensen WN, White RL Jr (2004) A retrospective study of columnar alteration with prominent apical snouts and secretions and the association with cancer. Am J Surg 188:395–398PubMedCrossRef Guerra-Wallace MM, Christensen WN, White RL Jr (2004) A retrospective study of columnar alteration with prominent apical snouts and secretions and the association with cancer. Am J Surg 188:395–398PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Rates of upgrade to malignancy for 271 cases of flat epithelial atypia (FEA) diagnosed by breast core biopsy
Authors
Alexandre Peres
Emmanuel Barranger
Véronique Becette
Alain Boudinet
Jean-Marc Guinebretiere
Pascal Cherel
Publication date
01-06-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1839-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine