Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2010

01-04-2010 | Clinical trial

Increased estrogen sulfatase (STS) and 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1(17β-HSD1) following neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy in breast cancer patients

Authors: Niramol Chanplakorn, Pongsthorn Chanplakorn, Takashi Suzuki, Katsuhiko Ono, Monica S. M. Chan, Yasuhiro Miki, Shigetoyo Saji, Takayuki Ueno, Masakazu Toi, Hironobu Sasano

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are considered the gold standard for endocrine therapy of estrogen receptor (ER) positive postmenopausal breast cancer patients. The therapy may enhance therapeutic response and stabilize disease but resistance and disease progression inevitably occur in the patients. These are considered at least partly due to an emergence of alternative intratumoral estrogen production pathways. Therefore, in this study we evaluated effects of exemestane (EXE) upon the enzymes involved in intratumoral estrogen production including estrogen sulfatase (STS), 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (17β-HSD1), and estrogen sulfotransferase (EST) and correlated the findings with therapeutic responses including Ki67 labeling index (Ki67). 116 postmenopausal patients with invasive ductal carcinoma, stage II/IIIa, were enrolled in JFMC34-0601 clinical trials between March, 2006 and January, 2008. EXE of 25 mg/day was administered according to the protocol. Pre- and posttreatment specimens of 49 cases were available for this study. Status of STS, EST, 17β-HSD1, ER, progesterone receptor (PgR), human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (Her2), and Ki67 in pre- and post-specimens were evaluated. Specimens examined before the therapy demonstrated following features; ER+ (100%), PgR+ (85.7%), and Her2+ (77.6%). After treatment, the number of Ki67, PgR, and ER positive carcinoma cells demonstrated significant decrement in clinical response (CliR) and pathological response (PaR) groups. Significant increment of 17β-HSD1 and STS immunoreactivity was detected in all groups examined except for STS in PaR. EST showed significant increment in nonresponsive groups. Alterations of Ki67 of carcinoma cells before and after therapy were subclassified into three groups according to its degrees. Significant alterations of intratumoral enzymes, especially 17β-HSD1 and STS, were correlated with Ki67 reduction after neoadjuvant EXE therapy. This is the first study demonstrating significant increment of STS and 17β-HSD1 following AI neoadjuvant therapy of postmenopausal ER positive breast carcinoma patients. This increment may represent the compensatory response of breast carcinoma tissues to estrogen depletion.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Pasqualini JR, Chetrite GS (2005) Recent insight on the control of enzymes involved in estrogen formation and transformation in human breast cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 93:221–236CrossRefPubMed Pasqualini JR, Chetrite GS (2005) Recent insight on the control of enzymes involved in estrogen formation and transformation in human breast cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 93:221–236CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Sasano H, Nagasaki S, Miki Y, Suzuki T (2009) New developments in intracrinology of human breast cancer estrogen sulfatase and sulfotransferase. Ann NY Acad Sci 1155:76–79CrossRefPubMed Sasano H, Nagasaki S, Miki Y, Suzuki T (2009) New developments in intracrinology of human breast cancer estrogen sulfatase and sulfotransferase. Ann NY Acad Sci 1155:76–79CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference James VH, Reed MJ, Lai LC, Ghilchik MW, Tait GH, Newton CJ, Coldham NG (1990) Regulation of estrogen concentrations in human breast tissues. Ann NY Acad Sci 595:227–235CrossRefPubMed James VH, Reed MJ, Lai LC, Ghilchik MW, Tait GH, Newton CJ, Coldham NG (1990) Regulation of estrogen concentrations in human breast tissues. Ann NY Acad Sci 595:227–235CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Larionov AA, Berstein LM, Miller WR (2002) Local uptake and synthesis of oestrone in normal and malignant postmenopausal breast tissues. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 81:57–64CrossRefPubMed Larionov AA, Berstein LM, Miller WR (2002) Local uptake and synthesis of oestrone in normal and malignant postmenopausal breast tissues. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 81:57–64CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Miller WR, Hawkins RA, Forrest APM (1982) Significance of aromatase activity in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 42:S3365–S3368 Miller WR, Hawkins RA, Forrest APM (1982) Significance of aromatase activity in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 42:S3365–S3368
10.
go back to reference Miki Y, Suzuki T, Tazawa C, Yamaguchi Y, Kitada K, Honma S, Moriya T, Hirakawa H, Evans DB, Hayashi S, Ohuchi N, Sasano H (2007) Aromatase localization in human breast cancer tissues: possible interactions between intratumoral stromal and parenchymal cells. Cancer Res 67:3945–3954CrossRefPubMed Miki Y, Suzuki T, Tazawa C, Yamaguchi Y, Kitada K, Honma S, Moriya T, Hirakawa H, Evans DB, Hayashi S, Ohuchi N, Sasano H (2007) Aromatase localization in human breast cancer tissues: possible interactions between intratumoral stromal and parenchymal cells. Cancer Res 67:3945–3954CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Sasano H, Harada N (1998) Intratumoral aromatase in human breast, endometrial, and ovarian malignancies. Endocr Rev 19:593–607CrossRefPubMed Sasano H, Harada N (1998) Intratumoral aromatase in human breast, endometrial, and ovarian malignancies. Endocr Rev 19:593–607CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Santen RJ, Leszczynski D, Tilson-Mallet N, Feil PD, Wright C, Manni A, Santner S (1986) Enzymatic control of estrogen production in human breast cancer: relative significance of aromatase versus sulfatase pathways. Ann N Y Acad Sci 464:126–137CrossRefPubMed Santen RJ, Leszczynski D, Tilson-Mallet N, Feil PD, Wright C, Manni A, Santner S (1986) Enzymatic control of estrogen production in human breast cancer: relative significance of aromatase versus sulfatase pathways. Ann N Y Acad Sci 464:126–137CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Miller WR, Anderson TJ, Jack WJL (1990) Relationship between tumour aromatase activity, tumour characteristics and response to therapy. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 37:1055–1059CrossRefPubMed Miller WR, Anderson TJ, Jack WJL (1990) Relationship between tumour aromatase activity, tumour characteristics and response to therapy. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 37:1055–1059CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Suzuki T, Nakata T, Miki Y, Kaneko C, Moriya T, Ishida T, Akinaga S, Hirakawa H, Kimura M, Sasano H (2003) Estrogen sulfotransferase and steroid sulfatase in human breast carcinoma. Cancer Res 63:2762–2770PubMed Suzuki T, Nakata T, Miki Y, Kaneko C, Moriya T, Ishida T, Akinaga S, Hirakawa H, Kimura M, Sasano H (2003) Estrogen sulfotransferase and steroid sulfatase in human breast carcinoma. Cancer Res 63:2762–2770PubMed
15.
go back to reference Sasano H, Suzuki T, Nakata T, Moriya T (2006) New development in intracrinology of breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer 13:129–136CrossRefPubMed Sasano H, Suzuki T, Nakata T, Moriya T (2006) New development in intracrinology of breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer 13:129–136CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
go back to reference Miller WR, Anderson TJ, White S, Larionov A, Murray J, Evans D, Krause A, Dixon JM (2005) Aromatase inhibitors: cellular and molecular effects. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 95:83–89CrossRefPubMed Miller WR, Anderson TJ, White S, Larionov A, Murray J, Evans D, Krause A, Dixon JM (2005) Aromatase inhibitors: cellular and molecular effects. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 95:83–89CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
go back to reference Geisler J, Lønning PE (2005) Aromatase inhibition: translation into a successful therapeutic approach. Clin Cancer Res 11:2809–2821CrossRefPubMed Geisler J, Lønning PE (2005) Aromatase inhibition: translation into a successful therapeutic approach. Clin Cancer Res 11:2809–2821CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Masri S, Phung S, Wang X, Wu X, Yuan YC, Wagman L, Chen S (2008) Genome-wide analysis of aromatase inhibitor-resistant, tamoxifen-resistant, and long-term estrogen-deprived cells reveals a role for estrogen receptor. Cancer Res 68:4910–4918CrossRefPubMed Masri S, Phung S, Wang X, Wu X, Yuan YC, Wagman L, Chen S (2008) Genome-wide analysis of aromatase inhibitor-resistant, tamoxifen-resistant, and long-term estrogen-deprived cells reveals a role for estrogen receptor. Cancer Res 68:4910–4918CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Lønning PE (2009) Lack of complete cross-resistance between different aromatase inhibitors; a real finding in search for an explanation? Eur J Cancer 45:527–535CrossRefPubMed Lønning PE (2009) Lack of complete cross-resistance between different aromatase inhibitors; a real finding in search for an explanation? Eur J Cancer 45:527–535CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Santen RJ, Lobenhofer EK, Afshari CA, Bao Y, Song RX (2005) Adaptation of estrogen-regulated genes in long-term estradiol deprived MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat 94:213–223CrossRefPubMed Santen RJ, Lobenhofer EK, Afshari CA, Bao Y, Song RX (2005) Adaptation of estrogen-regulated genes in long-term estradiol deprived MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat 94:213–223CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Flågeng MH, Moi LL H, Dixon JM, Geisler J, Lien EA, Miller WR, LØnning PE, Mellgren G (2009) Nuclear receptor co-activators and HER-2/neu are upregulated in breast cancer patients during neo-adjuvant treatment with aromatase inhibitors. Br J Cancer 101:1253–1260CrossRefPubMed Flågeng MH, Moi LL H, Dixon JM, Geisler J, Lien EA, Miller WR, LØnning PE, Mellgren G (2009) Nuclear receptor co-activators and HER-2/neu are upregulated in breast cancer patients during neo-adjuvant treatment with aromatase inhibitors. Br J Cancer 101:1253–1260CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Sato N, Masuda N, Saji S, Takei H, Yamamoto Y, Sasano H, Toi M (2009) Neoadjuvant exemestane for 24 weeks in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive stage II or IIIa breast cancer (JFMC34-0601) [abstract 591]. J Clin Oncol 27:15SCrossRef Sato N, Masuda N, Saji S, Takei H, Yamamoto Y, Sasano H, Toi M (2009) Neoadjuvant exemestane for 24 weeks in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive stage II or IIIa breast cancer (JFMC34-0601) [abstract 591]. J Clin Oncol 27:15SCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Glabbeke MV, van Oosterom AT, Christian MC, Gwyther SG (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216CrossRefPubMed Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Glabbeke MV, van Oosterom AT, Christian MC, Gwyther SG (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Miller WR, White S, Dixon JM, Murray J, Renshaw L, Anderson TJ (2006) Proliferation, steroid receptors and clinical/pathological response in breast cancer treated with letrozole. Br J Cancer 94:1051–1056CrossRefPubMed Miller WR, White S, Dixon JM, Murray J, Renshaw L, Anderson TJ (2006) Proliferation, steroid receptors and clinical/pathological response in breast cancer treated with letrozole. Br J Cancer 94:1051–1056CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Bouzubar N, Walker KJ, Griffiths K, Ellis IO, Elston CW, Robertson JFR, Blamey RW, Nicholson RI (1989) Ki67 immunostaining in primary breast cancer: pathological and clinical associations. Br J Cancer 59:943–947PubMed Bouzubar N, Walker KJ, Griffiths K, Ellis IO, Elston CW, Robertson JFR, Blamey RW, Nicholson RI (1989) Ki67 immunostaining in primary breast cancer: pathological and clinical associations. Br J Cancer 59:943–947PubMed
29.
go back to reference Harvey JM, Clark GM, Osborne CK, Allred DC (1999) Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:1474–1481PubMed Harvey JM, Clark GM, Osborne CK, Allred DC (1999) Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:1474–1481PubMed
30.
go back to reference Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Schwartz JN et al (2007) American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:118–145CrossRefPubMed Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Schwartz JN et al (2007) American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:118–145CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Takei H, Suemasu K, Inoue K, Saito T, Okubo K, Koh J, Sato K, Tsuda H, Kurosumi M, Tabei T (2008) Multicenter phase II trial of neoadjuvant exemestane for postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, operable breast cancer: Saitama Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group (SBCCSG-03). Breast Cancer Res Treat 107:87–94CrossRefPubMed Takei H, Suemasu K, Inoue K, Saito T, Okubo K, Koh J, Sato K, Tsuda H, Kurosumi M, Tabei T (2008) Multicenter phase II trial of neoadjuvant exemestane for postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, operable breast cancer: Saitama Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group (SBCCSG-03). Breast Cancer Res Treat 107:87–94CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Mlineritsch B, Tausch C, Singer C, Luschin-Ebengreuth G, Jakesz R, Ploner F, Stierer M, Melbinger E, Menzel C, Urbania A, Fridrik M, Steger G, Wohlmuth P, Gnant M, Greil R (2008) Exemestane as primary systemic treatment for hormone receptor positive post-menopausal breast cancer patients: a phase II trial of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG-17). Breast Cancer Res Treat 112:203–213CrossRefPubMed Mlineritsch B, Tausch C, Singer C, Luschin-Ebengreuth G, Jakesz R, Ploner F, Stierer M, Melbinger E, Menzel C, Urbania A, Fridrik M, Steger G, Wohlmuth P, Gnant M, Greil R (2008) Exemestane as primary systemic treatment for hormone receptor positive post-menopausal breast cancer patients: a phase II trial of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG-17). Breast Cancer Res Treat 112:203–213CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Yamashita H, Takahashi S, Ito Y, Yamashita T, Ando Y, Toyama T, Sugiura H, Yoshimoto N, Kobayashi S, Fujii Y, Iwase H (2009) Predictors of response to exemestane as primary endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Cancer Sci 100:2028–2033CrossRefPubMed Yamashita H, Takahashi S, Ito Y, Yamashita T, Ando Y, Toyama T, Sugiura H, Yoshimoto N, Kobayashi S, Fujii Y, Iwase H (2009) Predictors of response to exemestane as primary endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Cancer Sci 100:2028–2033CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Barnadas A, Gil M, González S, Tusquets I, Munoz M, Arcusa A, Prieto L, Margeli-Vila M, Moreno A (2009) Exemestane as primary treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women: a phase II trial. Br J Cancer 100:442–449CrossRefPubMed Barnadas A, Gil M, González S, Tusquets I, Munoz M, Arcusa A, Prieto L, Margeli-Vila M, Moreno A (2009) Exemestane as primary treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women: a phase II trial. Br J Cancer 100:442–449CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Miller WR, Dixon JM, Macfarlane L, Cameron D, Anderson TJ (2003) Pathological features of breast cancer response following neoadjuvant treatment with either letrozole or tamoxifen. Eur J Cancer 39:462–468CrossRefPubMed Miller WR, Dixon JM, Macfarlane L, Cameron D, Anderson TJ (2003) Pathological features of breast cancer response following neoadjuvant treatment with either letrozole or tamoxifen. Eur J Cancer 39:462–468CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Dowsett M, Ebbs SR, Dixon JM, Skene A, Griffith C, Boeddinghaus I, Salter J, Detre S, Hills M, Ashley S, Francis S, Walsh G, Smith IE (2005) Biomarker changes during neoadjuvant anastrozole, tamoxifen, or the combination: influence of hormonal status and HER-2 in breast cancer-a study from the IMPACT trialists. J Clin Oncol 23:2477–2492CrossRefPubMed Dowsett M, Ebbs SR, Dixon JM, Skene A, Griffith C, Boeddinghaus I, Salter J, Detre S, Hills M, Ashley S, Francis S, Walsh G, Smith IE (2005) Biomarker changes during neoadjuvant anastrozole, tamoxifen, or the combination: influence of hormonal status and HER-2 in breast cancer-a study from the IMPACT trialists. J Clin Oncol 23:2477–2492CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Dowsett M, Smith IE, Ebbs SR, Dixon JM, Skene A, A’Hern R, Salter J, Detre S, Hills M, Walsh G (2007) Prognostic value of Ki67 expression after short-term presurgical endocrine therapy for primary breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:167–170CrossRefPubMed Dowsett M, Smith IE, Ebbs SR, Dixon JM, Skene A, A’Hern R, Salter J, Detre S, Hills M, Walsh G (2007) Prognostic value of Ki67 expression after short-term presurgical endocrine therapy for primary breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:167–170CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Anderson H, Bulun S, Ian Smith, Dowsett M (2007) Predictors of response to aromatase inhibitors. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 106:49–54CrossRefPubMed Anderson H, Bulun S, Ian Smith, Dowsett M (2007) Predictors of response to aromatase inhibitors. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 106:49–54CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Ellis MJ, Coop A, Singh B, Mauriac L, Llombert-Cussac A, Jänicke F, Miller WR, Evans DB, Dugan M, Brady C, Quebe-Fehling E, Borgs M (2001) Letrozole is more effective neoadjuvant endocrine therapy than tamoxifen for ErbB-1- and/or ErbB-2-positive, estrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer: evidence from a phase III randomized trial. J Cli Oncol 19:3808–3816 Ellis MJ, Coop A, Singh B, Mauriac L, Llombert-Cussac A, Jänicke F, Miller WR, Evans DB, Dugan M, Brady C, Quebe-Fehling E, Borgs M (2001) Letrozole is more effective neoadjuvant endocrine therapy than tamoxifen for ErbB-1- and/or ErbB-2-positive, estrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer: evidence from a phase III randomized trial. J Cli Oncol 19:3808–3816
40.
go back to reference Suzuki T, Moriya T, Ariga N, Kaneko C, Kanazawa M, Sasano H (2000) 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 and type 2 in human breast carcinoma: a correlation to clinicopathological parameters. Br J Cancer 82:518–523CrossRefPubMed Suzuki T, Moriya T, Ariga N, Kaneko C, Kanazawa M, Sasano H (2000) 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 and type 2 in human breast carcinoma: a correlation to clinicopathological parameters. Br J Cancer 82:518–523CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Aka JA, Mazumdar M, Lin SX (2009) Reductive 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases in the sulfatase pathway: Critical in the cell proliferation of breast cancer. Mol Cell Endocrinol 301:183–190CrossRefPubMed Aka JA, Mazumdar M, Lin SX (2009) Reductive 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases in the sulfatase pathway: Critical in the cell proliferation of breast cancer. Mol Cell Endocrinol 301:183–190CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Increased estrogen sulfatase (STS) and 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1(17β-HSD1) following neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy in breast cancer patients
Authors
Niramol Chanplakorn
Pongsthorn Chanplakorn
Takashi Suzuki
Katsuhiko Ono
Monica S. M. Chan
Yasuhiro Miki
Shigetoyo Saji
Takayuki Ueno
Masakazu Toi
Hironobu Sasano
Publication date
01-04-2010
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2010
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-0785-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2010

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2010 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine