Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2009

01-10-2009 | Epidemiology

Complementary and alternative therapy use before and after breast cancer diagnosis: the Pathways Study

Authors: Heather Greenlee, Marilyn L. Kwan, Isaac Joshua Ergas, Karen J. Sherman, Sarah E. Krathwohl, Christine Bonnell, Marion M. Lee, Lawrence H. Kushi

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Many women use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) to maintain or improve their health. We describe CAM use among the first 1,000 participants enrolled in the Pathways Study, an ongoing prospective cohort study of women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC). Participants, identified by rapid case ascertainment in Kaiser Permanente Northern California, are women ≥ 21 years diagnosed with first invasive BC. Comprehensive baseline data are collected on CAM use through in-person interviews. Study participants include 70.9% non-Hispanic whites, 10.2% Hispanics, 9.0% Asians, 6.5% African–Americans, and 3.4% others. Most women (82.2%) were diagnosed with AJCC stage I/II BC at average (±SD) age 59.5 (±12.0) years and reported prior use of at least one form of CAM (96.5% of participants). In the 5 years before diagnosis, CAM therapies used at least weekly by >20% of women included green tea, glucosamine, omega-3 fatty acids, prayer and religion. CAM use was high (86.1% of participants) in the period immediately following diagnosis; 47.5% used botanical supplements, 47.2% used other natural products, 28.8% used special diets, 64.2% used mind-body healing, and 26.5% used body/energy/other treatments. In multivariable analyses, frequent use of each CAM modality before and after diagnosis was associated with use of other CAM modalities and other health behaviors (i.e., high fruit/vegetable intake, lower BMI). CAM use before and after BC diagnosis is common in this diverse group of women. Our results emphasize the need for clinicians to discuss CAM use with all BC patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Cancer Society (2008) Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2007–2008. American Cancer Society Inc., Atlanta American Cancer Society (2008) Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2007–2008. American Cancer Society Inc., Atlanta
4.
7.
go back to reference Pierce JP, Faerber S, Wright FA et al (2002) A randomized trial of the effect of a plant-based dietary pattern on additional breast cancer events and survival: the Women’s Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) study. Control Clin Trials 23:728–756. doi:10.1016/S0197-2456(02)00241-6 PubMedCrossRef Pierce JP, Faerber S, Wright FA et al (2002) A randomized trial of the effect of a plant-based dietary pattern on additional breast cancer events and survival: the Women’s Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) study. Control Clin Trials 23:728–756. doi:10.​1016/​S0197-2456(02)00241-6 PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gammon MD, Neugut AI, Santella RM et al (2002) The Long Island Breast Cancer Study project: description of a multi-institutional collaboration to identify environmental risk factors for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 74:235–254. doi:10.1023/A:1016387020854 PubMedCrossRef Gammon MD, Neugut AI, Santella RM et al (2002) The Long Island Breast Cancer Study project: description of a multi-institutional collaboration to identify environmental risk factors for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 74:235–254. doi:10.​1023/​A:​1016387020854 PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Oehrli MD, Quesenberry CP, Leyden W (2006) Northern California Cancer Registry: 2006 Annual report on trends, incidence, and outcomes. Kaiser Permanente Northern California Cancer Registry Oehrli MD, Quesenberry CP, Leyden W (2006) Northern California Cancer Registry: 2006 Annual report on trends, incidence, and outcomes. Kaiser Permanente Northern California Cancer Registry
12.
go back to reference Barnes PM, Powell-Griner E, McFann K et al (2004) Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States, 2002. Adv Data:1–19 Barnes PM, Powell-Griner E, McFann K et al (2004) Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States, 2002. Adv Data:1–19
13.
go back to reference Gansler T, Kaw C, Crammer C et al (2008) A population-based study of prevalence of complementary methods use by cancer survivors: a report from the American Cancer Society’s studies of cancer survivors. Cancer 113:1048–1057. doi:10.1002/cncr.23659 PubMedCrossRef Gansler T, Kaw C, Crammer C et al (2008) A population-based study of prevalence of complementary methods use by cancer survivors: a report from the American Cancer Society’s studies of cancer survivors. Cancer 113:1048–1057. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​23659 PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Buettner C, Kroenke CH, Phillips RS et al (2006) Correlates of use of different types of complementary and alternative medicine by breast cancer survivors in the Nurses’ Health Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 100:219–227. doi:10.1007/s10549-006-9239-3 PubMedCrossRef Buettner C, Kroenke CH, Phillips RS et al (2006) Correlates of use of different types of complementary and alternative medicine by breast cancer survivors in the Nurses’ Health Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 100:219–227. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-006-9239-3 PubMedCrossRef
16.
17.
go back to reference Messina M, McCaskill-Stevens W, Lampe JW (2006) Addressing the soy and breast cancer relationship: review, commentary, and workshop proceedings. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1275–1284PubMedCrossRef Messina M, McCaskill-Stevens W, Lampe JW (2006) Addressing the soy and breast cancer relationship: review, commentary, and workshop proceedings. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1275–1284PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Complementary and alternative therapy use before and after breast cancer diagnosis: the Pathways Study
Authors
Heather Greenlee
Marilyn L. Kwan
Isaac Joshua Ergas
Karen J. Sherman
Sarah E. Krathwohl
Christine Bonnell
Marion M. Lee
Lawrence H. Kushi
Publication date
01-10-2009
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2009
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0315-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2009

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2009 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine