Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2009

01-07-2009 | Preclinical Study

The prognostic significance of Ki67 before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

Authors: Robin L. Jones, Janine Salter, Roger A’Hern, Ash Nerurkar, Marina Parton, Jorge S. Reis-Filho, Ian E. Smith, Mitchell Dowsett

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose To compare the prognostic significance of proliferation, as assessed by Ki67 expression, in breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods A retrospective search of a prospectively maintained clinical database was performed to identify patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy at the Royal Marsden Hospital. The expression of Ki67 was assessed using immunohistochemistry in pre-therapy core-needle biopsy and post-therapy surgical excision specimens. The following factors were considered pre- and post-chemotherapy for their relationship with relapse-free and overall survival: age, menstrual status, T and N stage, pre-therapy operability, Ki67, ER, PgR, HER2, grade, histological subtype, vascular invasion, clinical response, chemotherapy regimen, type of surgery performed, adjuvant therapy, pathological tumour size and nodal involvement. Results In a matched cohort of 103 patients, on multivariate analysis of relapse-free survival, post-therapy Ki67 was the only significant independent prognostic factor. On multivariate analysis for overall survival, both pre- and excision Ki67 were significant independent predictors but the latter showed a stronger prognostic impact. The highest and lowest tertiles of excision Ki67 had different prognosis for both 5-year relapse-free (27% vs. 77%) and overall (39% and 93%) survival. In a cohort of 284 patients with only excision samples, post-therapy Ki67 was a significant independent prognostic factor on multivariate analysis. Conclusion Post-chemotherapy Ki67 is a strong predictor of outcome for patients not achieving a pathological complete response.
Literature
3.
4.
go back to reference Gerdes J, Lemke H, Baisch H, Wacker HH, Schwab U, Stein H (1984) Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation-associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-67. J Immunol 133:1710–1715PubMed Gerdes J, Lemke H, Baisch H, Wacker HH, Schwab U, Stein H (1984) Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation-associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-67. J Immunol 133:1710–1715PubMed
7.
8.
10.
go back to reference Lee J, Im YH, Lee SH et al (2008) Evaluation of ER and Ki-67 proliferation index as prognostic factors for survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin/docetaxel for locally advanced breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 61:569–577. doi:10.1007/s00280-007-0506-8 PubMedCrossRef Lee J, Im YH, Lee SH et al (2008) Evaluation of ER and Ki-67 proliferation index as prognostic factors for survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin/docetaxel for locally advanced breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 61:569–577. doi:10.​1007/​s00280-007-0506-8 PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Takada M, Kataoka A, Toi M et al (2004) A close association between alteration in growth kinetics by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcome in primary breast cancer. Int J Oncol 25:397–405PubMed Takada M, Kataoka A, Toi M et al (2004) A close association between alteration in growth kinetics by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcome in primary breast cancer. Int J Oncol 25:397–405PubMed
12.
go back to reference Billgren AM, Rutqvist LE, Tani E, Wilking N, Fornander T, Skoog L (1999) Proliferating fraction during neoadjuvant chemotherapy of primary breast cancer in relation to objective local response and relapse-free survival. Acta Oncol 38:597–601. doi:10.1080/028418699431186 PubMedCrossRef Billgren AM, Rutqvist LE, Tani E, Wilking N, Fornander T, Skoog L (1999) Proliferating fraction during neoadjuvant chemotherapy of primary breast cancer in relation to objective local response and relapse-free survival. Acta Oncol 38:597–601. doi:10.​1080/​028418699431186 PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Osborne CR KL, Xie X-J, Ashfaq R, Bian A, Tripathy D (2006) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for basal-like breast cancer cohort: clinical and pathological outcomes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 100(1):S53 Osborne CR KL, Xie X-J, Ashfaq R, Bian A, Tripathy D (2006) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for basal-like breast cancer cohort: clinical and pathological outcomes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 100(1):S53
15.
16.
go back to reference Penault-Llorca F, Cayre A, Bouchet Mishellany F et al (2003) Induction chemotherapy for breast carcinoma: predictive markers and relation with outcome. Int J Oncol 22:1319–1325PubMed Penault-Llorca F, Cayre A, Bouchet Mishellany F et al (2003) Induction chemotherapy for breast carcinoma: predictive markers and relation with outcome. Int J Oncol 22:1319–1325PubMed
17.
go back to reference Faneyte IF, Schrama JG, Peterse JL, Remijnse PL, Rodenhuis S, van de Vijver MJ (2003) Breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: predictive markers and relation with outcome. Br J Cancer 88:406–412. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600749 PubMedCrossRef Faneyte IF, Schrama JG, Peterse JL, Remijnse PL, Rodenhuis S, van de Vijver MJ (2003) Breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: predictive markers and relation with outcome. Br J Cancer 88:406–412. doi:10.​1038/​sj.​bjc.​6600749 PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Daidone MG, Veneroni S, Benini E et al (1999) Biological markers as indicators of response to primary and adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Int J Cancer 84:580–586. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19991222)84:6≤580::AID-IJC7≥3.0.CO;2-W Daidone MG, Veneroni S, Benini E et al (1999) Biological markers as indicators of response to primary and adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Int J Cancer 84:580–586. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19991222)84:6≤580::AID-IJC7≥3.0.CO;2-W
20.
go back to reference Bottini A, Berruti A, Bersiga A et al (1996) Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on Ki67 labelling index, c-erbB-2 expression and steroid hormone receptor status in human breast tumours. Anticancer Res 16:3105–3110PubMed Bottini A, Berruti A, Bersiga A et al (1996) Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on Ki67 labelling index, c-erbB-2 expression and steroid hormone receptor status in human breast tumours. Anticancer Res 16:3105–3110PubMed
21.
go back to reference Honkoop AH, van Diest PJ, de Jong JS et al (1998) Prognostic role of clinical, pathological and biological characteristics in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer 77:621–626PubMed Honkoop AH, van Diest PJ, de Jong JS et al (1998) Prognostic role of clinical, pathological and biological characteristics in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer 77:621–626PubMed
22.
go back to reference Vincent-Salomon A, Rousseau A, Jouve M et al (2004) Proliferation markers predictive of the pathological response and disease outcome of patients with breast carcinomas treated by anthracycline-based preoperative chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 40:1502–1508. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2004.03.014 PubMedCrossRef Vincent-Salomon A, Rousseau A, Jouve M et al (2004) Proliferation markers predictive of the pathological response and disease outcome of patients with breast carcinomas treated by anthracycline-based preoperative chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 40:1502–1508. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejca.​2004.​03.​014 PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The prognostic significance of Ki67 before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
Authors
Robin L. Jones
Janine Salter
Roger A’Hern
Ash Nerurkar
Marina Parton
Jorge S. Reis-Filho
Ian E. Smith
Mitchell Dowsett
Publication date
01-07-2009
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-0081-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2009 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine