Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2008

01-07-2008 | Clinical Trial

A phase II study of pemetrexed and carboplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer

Authors: August Garin, Alexey Manikhas, Mikhail Biakhov, Mikhail Chezhin, Tatiana Ivanchenko, Kurt Krejcy, Vera Karaseva, Sergey Tjulandin

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Pemetrexed and carboplatin have demonstrated activity in breast cancer. Their potential synergism in experimental models and the proven efficacy of pemetrexed/platinum in other indications make pemetrexed/carboplatin an attractive combination in breast cancer. Thus, this two-stage, sequential, open-label, multicenter, phase II study assessed the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed plus carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) or metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Patients and methods

Patients ≥ 18 years with a histologic/cytologic diagnosis and no prior chemotherapy for LABC or MBC received pemetrexed 600 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 5.0 on day 1 every 21 days with folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation.

Results

From June 2003 to April 2005, 50 patients with stage IIIB (30.0%) and stage IV (70.0%) disease were enrolled at 3 study centers. Twenty-eight percent of patients previously received adjuvant chemotherapy, 46.0% had visceral metastases, and 36.0% had ≥3 organs involved. Partial responses (RECIST criteria) were achieved in 27 (54.0%) patients (ORR = 54.0%; 95% CI, 39.3–68.2%). The median response duration was 11.1 months (95% CI, 6.5–14.0 months) and the median time to disease progression was 10.3 months (95% CI, 8.3–14.6 months). CTC hematologic toxicities were grade 3/4 neutropenia (58.0%/28.0%) and grade 3 thrombocytopenia (10.0%) and anemia (18.0%). Two (4.0%) patients had febrile neutropenia, 1 of whom died. No grade 4 non-hematologic toxicities occurred. Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities were ALT (4.0%) and AST elevation, and edema, fatigue, pruritus, rash/desquamation, and renal toxicity (2.0% each).

Conclusions

Results of this study suggest that the combination of pemetrexed and carboplatin has promising efficacy and an acceptable safety profile. Further assessment of this combination in a randomized trial of various breast cancer patient populations is warranted.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Calvert H (1999) An overview of folate metabolism: features relevant to the action and toxicities of antifolate anticancer agents. Semin Oncol 26(2 Suppl 6):3–10PubMed Calvert H (1999) An overview of folate metabolism: features relevant to the action and toxicities of antifolate anticancer agents. Semin Oncol 26(2 Suppl 6):3–10PubMed
2.
go back to reference Mendelsohn LG, Shih C, Chen VJ et al (1999) Enzyme inhibition, polyglutamation, and the effect of LY231514 (MTA) on purine biosynthesis. Semin Oncol 26(2 Suppl 6):42–47PubMed Mendelsohn LG, Shih C, Chen VJ et al (1999) Enzyme inhibition, polyglutamation, and the effect of LY231514 (MTA) on purine biosynthesis. Semin Oncol 26(2 Suppl 6):42–47PubMed
3.
go back to reference Vogelzang NJ, Rusthoven JJ, Symanowski J et al (2003) Phase III study of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol 21:2636–2644 PubMedCrossRef Vogelzang NJ, Rusthoven JJ, Symanowski J et al (2003) Phase III study of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol 21:2636–2644 PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hanna N, Shepherd FA, Fossella FV et al (2004) Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 22(9):1589–1597PubMedCrossRef Hanna N, Shepherd FA, Fossella FV et al (2004) Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 22(9):1589–1597PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gomez HL, Hanauske A-R, Santillana S et al (2002) A phase II trial of pemetrexed in previously untreated breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 76(Suppl 1):S66 (abstr) Gomez HL, Hanauske A-R, Santillana S et al (2002) A phase II trial of pemetrexed in previously untreated breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 76(Suppl 1):S66 (abstr)
6.
go back to reference Llombart-Cussac A, Theodoulou M, Rowland K et al (2006) Pemetrexed in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had received previous antracycline and taxane treatment: phase II study. Clin Breast Cancer 7:380–385PubMed Llombart-Cussac A, Theodoulou M, Rowland K et al (2006) Pemetrexed in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had received previous antracycline and taxane treatment: phase II study. Clin Breast Cancer 7:380–385PubMed
7.
go back to reference Martin M, Spielmann M, Namer M et al (2003) Phase II study of pemetrexed in breast cancer patients pretreated with anthracyclines. Ann Oncol 14:1246–1252PubMedCrossRef Martin M, Spielmann M, Namer M et al (2003) Phase II study of pemetrexed in breast cancer patients pretreated with anthracyclines. Ann Oncol 14:1246–1252PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Miles DW, Smith IE, Coleman RE et al (2001) A phase II study of pemetrexed disodium (LY231514) in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 37:1366–1371PubMedCrossRef Miles DW, Smith IE, Coleman RE et al (2001) A phase II study of pemetrexed disodium (LY231514) in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 37:1366–1371PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference O’Shaughnessey J, Liepa AM, Nguyen B (2002) Symptom improvement with pemetrexed for heavily pre-treated patients with advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 76(Suppl 1):530 (abstr) O’Shaughnessey J, Liepa AM, Nguyen B (2002) Symptom improvement with pemetrexed for heavily pre-treated patients with advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 76(Suppl 1):530 (abstr)
10.
go back to reference Ma CX, Steen P, Rowland KM et al (2006) A phase II trial of a combination of pemetrexed and gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer: an NCCTG study. Annalas of Oncology 17(2):226–231 CrossRef Ma CX, Steen P, Rowland KM et al (2006) A phase II trial of a combination of pemetrexed and gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer: an NCCTG study. Annalas of Oncology 17(2):226–231 CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Dittrich C, Petruzelka L, Vodvarka P et al (2006) A phase I study of pemetrexed (Alimta) and cyclophosphamide in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 12(23):7071–7078PubMedCrossRef Dittrich C, Petruzelka L, Vodvarka P et al (2006) A phase I study of pemetrexed (Alimta) and cyclophosphamide in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 12(23):7071–7078PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Paridaens R, Dirix L, Mellaerts N et al (2003) Phase I study of pemetrexed (Alimta) and epirubicin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Proc Amer Soc Clin Oncol, 21:A290 (abstr) Paridaens R, Dirix L, Mellaerts N et al (2003) Phase I study of pemetrexed (Alimta) and epirubicin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Proc Amer Soc Clin Oncol, 21:A290 (abstr)
13.
go back to reference Crown J, Pegram M (2003) Platinum-taxane combinations in metastatic breast cancer: an evolving role in the era of molecularly targeted therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 79(Suppl 1):S11–18PubMedCrossRef Crown J, Pegram M (2003) Platinum-taxane combinations in metastatic breast cancer: an evolving role in the era of molecularly targeted therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 79(Suppl 1):S11–18PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Martin M (2001) Platinum compounds in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2:190–208PubMedCrossRef Martin M (2001) Platinum compounds in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2:190–208PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Perez EA, Hillman DW, Stell PJ et al (2000) A phase II study of paclitaxel plus carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast carcinoma. Cancer 88:124–131PubMedCrossRef Perez EA, Hillman DW, Stell PJ et al (2000) A phase II study of paclitaxel plus carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast carcinoma. Cancer 88:124–131PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Fountzilas G, Dimopoulos AM, Papadimitriou C et al (1998) First-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel by three-hour infusion and carboplatin in advanced breast cancer (final report): a phase II study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group. Ann Oncol 9:1031–1034PubMedCrossRef Fountzilas G, Dimopoulos AM, Papadimitriou C et al (1998) First-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel by three-hour infusion and carboplatin in advanced breast cancer (final report): a phase II study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group. Ann Oncol 9:1031–1034PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Simon R (1989) Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 10:1–10PubMedCrossRef Simon R (1989) Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 10:1–10PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRef Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference National Cancer Institute (1998) Common Toxicity Criteria (version 2.0). Cited March 23 National Cancer Institute (1998) Common Toxicity Criteria (version 2.0). Cited March 23
20.
go back to reference Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation of incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481CrossRef Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation of incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481CrossRef
21.
go back to reference O’Shaughnessy JA, Clark RS, Blum JL et al (2005) Phase II study of pemetrexed in patients pretreated with an anthracycline, a taxane, and capecitabine for advanced breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 6:143–149PubMed O’Shaughnessy JA, Clark RS, Blum JL et al (2005) Phase II study of pemetrexed in patients pretreated with an anthracycline, a taxane, and capecitabine for advanced breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 6:143–149PubMed
22.
go back to reference Llombart-Cussac A, Martin M, Harbeck N et al (2006) Randomized, phase II study of two doses of pemetrexed as first-line chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC): clinical results and exploratory pharmacogenomic analysis. J Clin Oncol 24(18S):3077 (abstr) Llombart-Cussac A, Martin M, Harbeck N et al (2006) Randomized, phase II study of two doses of pemetrexed as first-line chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC): clinical results and exploratory pharmacogenomic analysis. J Clin Oncol 24(18S):3077 (abstr)
23.
go back to reference Perez EA (2004) Carboplatin in combination therapy for metastatic breast cancer. Oncologist 9:518–527PubMedCrossRef Perez EA (2004) Carboplatin in combination therapy for metastatic breast cancer. Oncologist 9:518–527PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Valero V, Holmes FA, Walters RS et al (1995) Phase II trial of docetaxel: a new highly effective antineoplastic agent in the management of patients with anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 13:2886–2894PubMed Valero V, Holmes FA, Walters RS et al (1995) Phase II trial of docetaxel: a new highly effective antineoplastic agent in the management of patients with anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 13:2886–2894PubMed
Metadata
Title
A phase II study of pemetrexed and carboplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer
Authors
August Garin
Alexey Manikhas
Mikhail Biakhov
Mikhail Chezhin
Tatiana Ivanchenko
Kurt Krejcy
Vera Karaseva
Sergey Tjulandin
Publication date
01-07-2008
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2008
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9722-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2008

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2008 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine