Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2009

01-02-2009

Picture, Archiving and Communication System in the Italian NHS: A Primer on Diffusion and Evaluation Analysis

Authors: Luca Buccoliero, Stefano Calciolari, Marta Marsilio, Elisa Mattavelli

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

This contribution focuses on picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) in the Italian National Healthcare System (NHS). It finally aims to test the Chiefs Radiology Department’s perceptions about PACS along the main evaluation dimensions emerging from the literature. First, a brief review of the main literature concerning PACS evaluation leads the authors to classify the different approaches undertaken and highlight the main variables of investigation. Second, the evidence emerging from a survey is presented and discussed in the light of the literature review. The survey aims to: (a) map out the degree of PACSs diffusion and their main features in the Italian NHS; (b) verify whether and how PACS impact the dimensions analyzed in many evaluation studies carried out to date; (c) test the relationship between some measured impacts and specific PACS features.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Siegel EL, Reiner BI: Filmless radiology at the Baltimore VA Medical Center: a 9 year retrospective. Comput Med Imaging Graph 27:101–109, 2003PubMedCrossRef Siegel EL, Reiner BI: Filmless radiology at the Baltimore VA Medical Center: a 9 year retrospective. Comput Med Imaging Graph 27:101–109, 2003PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Inamura K, et al: Status of PACS and technology assessment in Japan. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 66:5–15, 2001PubMedCrossRef Inamura K, et al: Status of PACS and technology assessment in Japan. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 66:5–15, 2001PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fu H, et al: Picture archiving and communication system in China: the development, problem, and integrating strategy with IHE. Int Congr Ser 1256:915–923, 2003CrossRef Fu H, et al: Picture archiving and communication system in China: the development, problem, and integrating strategy with IHE. Int Congr Ser 1256:915–923, 2003CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Keen J, Bryan S, Muris N, Weatherburn G, Buxton M: Evaluation of diffuse technologies: the case of digital imaging networks. Health Policy 34:153–166, 1995PubMedCrossRef Keen J, Bryan S, Muris N, Weatherburn G, Buxton M: Evaluation of diffuse technologies: the case of digital imaging networks. Health Policy 34:153–166, 1995PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference van de Wetering R, Batenburg R, Versendaal J, Lederman RLF: A balanced evaluation perspective: Picture archiving and communication system impacts on hospital workflow. J Digit Imaging 19:10–17, 2006PubMedCrossRef van de Wetering R, Batenburg R, Versendaal J, Lederman RLF: A balanced evaluation perspective: Picture archiving and communication system impacts on hospital workflow. J Digit Imaging 19:10–17, 2006PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bryan S, Keen J, Buxton M: Evaluation of picture archiving ad communications systems (PACS). Issues of methodology, Prague: Omnipress, 1992 Bryan S, Keen J, Buxton M: Evaluation of picture archiving ad communications systems (PACS). Issues of methodology, Prague: Omnipress, 1992
9.
go back to reference Parè G, Lepanto L, Aubry D, Sicotte C: Toward a multidimensional assessment of picture archiving and communication system success. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 21:471–479, 2005PubMedCrossRef Parè G, Lepanto L, Aubry D, Sicotte C: Toward a multidimensional assessment of picture archiving and communication system success. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 21:471–479, 2005PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Giribona P: Principles for PACS evaluation. Proc. European Community workshop on PACS: City Giribona P: Principles for PACS evaluation. Proc. European Community workshop on PACS: City
11.
go back to reference Siegel EL, Reiner BI: The costs and benefits of PACS in the VA: Past experience, present reality, and future potential. Appl Radiol 27, 1998 Siegel EL, Reiner BI: The costs and benefits of PACS in the VA: Past experience, present reality, and future potential. Appl Radiol 27, 1998
12.
go back to reference Cox B, Dawe N: Evaluation of the impact of a PACS system on an intensive care unit. J Manag Med 16:199–205, 2002PubMedCrossRef Cox B, Dawe N: Evaluation of the impact of a PACS system on an intensive care unit. J Manag Med 16:199–205, 2002PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fang Y-C, Yang M-C, Hsueh Y-S: Financial assessment of a picture archiving and communication system implemented all at once. J Digit Imaging 19:44–51, 2006PubMedCrossRef Fang Y-C, Yang M-C, Hsueh Y-S: Financial assessment of a picture archiving and communication system implemented all at once. J Digit Imaging 19:44–51, 2006PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Andriessen JH, Barnevald BM, Binkuysen FH, et al: Savings and costs of a picture archiving and communication system in the University Hospital Utrecht.. SPIE 1093::578–584,, 1989 Andriessen JH, Barnevald BM, Binkuysen FH, et al: Savings and costs of a picture archiving and communication system in the University Hospital Utrecht.. SPIE 1093::578–584,, 1989
15.
go back to reference Bakker AR, Stut WJJ, De Valk JPJ, et al: PACS costs: modelling and simulation. Med Inform (Lond.) 13:307–313, 1988 Bakker AR, Stut WJJ, De Valk JPJ, et al: PACS costs: modelling and simulation. Med Inform (Lond.) 13:307–313, 1988
16.
go back to reference Beard D, Parrish D, Stevenson D: A cost analysis of film image management and four PACS systems. SPIE 1234:10–17, 1990CrossRef Beard D, Parrish D, Stevenson D: A cost analysis of film image management and four PACS systems. SPIE 1234:10–17, 1990CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bryan S, Keen J, Muris N, Weatherburn G, Buxton M: Issues in the evaluation of picture archiving and communication systems. Health Policy 33:31–42, 1995PubMedCrossRef Bryan S, Keen J, Muris N, Weatherburn G, Buxton M: Issues in the evaluation of picture archiving and communication systems. Health Policy 33:31–42, 1995PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Fiedler V, Haufe G: Clinical and technical aspects of PACS in radiology and throughout the hospital. RBM 18:122–125, 1996CrossRef Fiedler V, Haufe G: Clinical and technical aspects of PACS in radiology and throughout the hospital. RBM 18:122–125, 1996CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Glass HI: Economic model of a whole hospital picture archiving and communication system installation. J Digit Imaging 4:71–74, 1991PubMed Glass HI: Economic model of a whole hospital picture archiving and communication system installation. J Digit Imaging 4:71–74, 1991PubMed
20.
go back to reference Haar Romeny BM, van der Wielen JMM, Achterberg FH, et al: PACS efficiency: a detailed quantitative study of the distribution process of films in a clinical environment. In: Samuel J. Dwyer; R. Gilbert Jost; Roger H. Schneider; Eds. Medical Imaging III: PACS System Design and Evaluation Proc. SPIE, vol. 1093, 1989, p. 259 Haar Romeny BM, van der Wielen JMM, Achterberg FH, et al: PACS efficiency: a detailed quantitative study of the distribution process of films in a clinical environment. In: Samuel J. Dwyer; R. Gilbert Jost; Roger H. Schneider; Eds. Medical Imaging III: PACS System Design and Evaluation Proc. SPIE, vol. 1093, 1989, p. 259
21.
go back to reference Hindel R, Preger W: Cost-effectiveness prospects of picture archiving and communications systems. Health Policy 9:91–101, 1988PubMedCrossRef Hindel R, Preger W: Cost-effectiveness prospects of picture archiving and communications systems. Health Policy 9:91–101, 1988PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hirscorn D, Omar R, DaSilva R, et al: Speech recognition, the academic perspective, Virginia: Great Falls, 2003 Hirscorn D, Omar R, DaSilva R, et al: Speech recognition, the academic perspective, Virginia: Great Falls, 2003
23.
go back to reference Ukovich W, Dalla Palma L, Stacul F, Cuttin Zernich R, Giribona P: Justifying PACS: general considerations based on Trieste experience. International Conference on HU-PACS: Sapporo, Japan, 1989 Ukovich W, Dalla Palma L, Stacul F, Cuttin Zernich R, Giribona P: Justifying PACS: general considerations based on Trieste experience. International Conference on HU-PACS: Sapporo, Japan, 1989
24.
go back to reference van Gennip EM, Bakker AR: Challenges and opportunities for technology assessment in medical informatics. Case study: PACS. Med Inform (Lond.) 18(3):209–218, 1993 van Gennip EM, Bakker AR: Challenges and opportunities for technology assessment in medical informatics. Case study: PACS. Med Inform (Lond.) 18(3):209–218, 1993
25.
go back to reference Warburton RN, Nosil J, et al: Digital diagnostic imaging with a comprehensive PACS: hypothetical economic evaluation at a large community hospital. J Digit Imaging 3:101–107, 1990PubMed Warburton RN, Nosil J, et al: Digital diagnostic imaging with a comprehensive PACS: hypothetical economic evaluation at a large community hospital. J Digit Imaging 3:101–107, 1990PubMed
26.
go back to reference Buccoliero L, Calciolari S, Marsilio M: A methodological and operative framework for the evaluation of an e-health project. International Journal of Health Planning and Management 23(1) In press. Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) May 4, 2007 Buccoliero L, Calciolari S, Marsilio M: A methodological and operative framework for the evaluation of an e-health project. International Journal of Health Planning and Management 23(1) In press. Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.​interscience.​wiley.​com) May 4, 2007
27.
go back to reference Hilsenrath PE, Smith WL, Berbaum KS, Franken EA, Owen DA: Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of PACS. AJR 156:177–180, 1991PubMed Hilsenrath PE, Smith WL, Berbaum KS, Franken EA, Owen DA: Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of PACS. AJR 156:177–180, 1991PubMed
28.
go back to reference Maass M, Kosonen M, Kormano M: Cost analysis of Turku University Central Hospital PACS in 1998. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 66:41–45, 2001PubMedCrossRef Maass M, Kosonen M, Kormano M: Cost analysis of Turku University Central Hospital PACS in 1998. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 66:41–45, 2001PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Siegel EL, Protopapas Z, Reiner B, Pomerantz S, Cameron EW, Pickar, E: A prospective evaluation of the impact of filmless operation on the Baltimore VA Medical Center. RBM 18:149–152, 1996CrossRef Siegel EL, Protopapas Z, Reiner B, Pomerantz S, Cameron EW, Pickar, E: A prospective evaluation of the impact of filmless operation on the Baltimore VA Medical Center. RBM 18:149–152, 1996CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Bryan SWG, Watkins J, Buxton MJ: An assessment of the health service costs of PACS at Hammersmith Hospital. Proceedings of the 15th EuroPACS Annual Meeting, Pisa, Septemper 25–27, 1997, 1997 Bryan SWG, Watkins J, Buxton MJ: An assessment of the health service costs of PACS at Hammersmith Hospital. Proceedings of the 15th EuroPACS Annual Meeting, Pisa, Septemper 25–27, 1997, 1997
31.
go back to reference Pratt EA: Incremental cost of department-side implementation of a picture archiving and communication system and computer radiography. Radiology 206:245–252, 1998PubMed Pratt EA: Incremental cost of department-side implementation of a picture archiving and communication system and computer radiography. Radiology 206:245–252, 1998PubMed
32.
go back to reference Mariani C, Tronchi A, Oncini L, Pirani O, M , urri R: Analysis of the X-ray work flow in two diagnostic imaging departments with and without a RIS/PACS System. J Digit Imaging 19:18–28, 2006PubMedCrossRef Mariani C, Tronchi A, Oncini L, Pirani O, M , urri R: Analysis of the X-ray work flow in two diagnostic imaging departments with and without a RIS/PACS System. J Digit Imaging 19:18–28, 2006PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Andriole KP: Applied imaging: Current trends in PACS. Computed and Digital Radiography 1:1–2, 2002 Andriole KP: Applied imaging: Current trends in PACS. Computed and Digital Radiography 1:1–2, 2002
34.
go back to reference Andriole KP: Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations. J Digit Imaging 15:161–169, 2002PubMedCrossRef Andriole KP: Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations. J Digit Imaging 15:161–169, 2002PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Andriole KP, Luth DM, Gould RG: Workflow assessment of digital versus computed radiography and screen-film in the outpatient environment. J Digit Imaging 15:124–126, 2002PubMedCrossRef Andriole KP, Luth DM, Gould RG: Workflow assessment of digital versus computed radiography and screen-film in the outpatient environment. J Digit Imaging 15:124–126, 2002PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Beird LC: Bringing all modalities online: A PACS success story. Appl Radiol 28:10–12, 1999CrossRef Beird LC: Bringing all modalities online: A PACS success story. Appl Radiol 28:10–12, 1999CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Dackiewicz D, Bergsneider C, Piraino D: Impact of digital radiography on clinical workflow and patient satisfaction. J Digit Imaging 13:200–201, 2000PubMed Dackiewicz D, Bergsneider C, Piraino D: Impact of digital radiography on clinical workflow and patient satisfaction. J Digit Imaging 13:200–201, 2000PubMed
38.
go back to reference Gale B, Safriel Y, Lukban A, et al: Radiology report production times, voice recognition vs transcription. Radiol Mange 23:18–22, 2001 Gale B, Safriel Y, Lukban A, et al: Radiology report production times, voice recognition vs transcription. Radiol Mange 23:18–22, 2001
39.
go back to reference Hayt DB, Alexander S: The pros and cons of implementing PACS and speech recognition systems. J Digit Imaging 14:149–157, 2002CrossRef Hayt DB, Alexander S: The pros and cons of implementing PACS and speech recognition systems. J Digit Imaging 14:149–157, 2002CrossRef
41.
42.
go back to reference Lemme PJ, Morin RL: The implementation of speech recognition in an electronic radiology practice. J Digit Imaging 13:153–154, 2000PubMedCrossRef Lemme PJ, Morin RL: The implementation of speech recognition in an electronic radiology practice. J Digit Imaging 13:153–154, 2000PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference May GA, Deer DD, Dackiewicz D: Impact of digital radiography on clinical workflow. J Digit Imaging 13:76–78, 2000PubMed May GA, Deer DD, Dackiewicz D: Impact of digital radiography on clinical workflow. J Digit Imaging 13:76–78, 2000PubMed
44.
go back to reference Mattern C, King B, Hangiandreou N, et al: Electronic imaging impact on image and report turnaround times. J Digit Imaging 12:155–159, 1999PubMed Mattern C, King B, Hangiandreou N, et al: Electronic imaging impact on image and report turnaround times. J Digit Imaging 12:155–159, 1999PubMed
45.
go back to reference Ramaswamy MR, Chaljiub G, Esch O, et al: Continuous speech recognition in MR imaging reporting, advantages, disadvantages, and impact. Am J Roentgenol 174:617–622, 2000 Ramaswamy MR, Chaljiub G, Esch O, et al: Continuous speech recognition in MR imaging reporting, advantages, disadvantages, and impact. Am J Roentgenol 174:617–622, 2000
46.
go back to reference Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper FJ, Pomerantz S, Dahlke A, Rallis D: Radiologists’ productivity in the interpretation of CT Scans: A comparison of PACS with conventional film. Am J Roentgenol 176:861–864, 2001 Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper FJ, Pomerantz S, Dahlke A, Rallis D: Radiologists’ productivity in the interpretation of CT Scans: A comparison of PACS with conventional film. Am J Roentgenol 176:861–864, 2001
47.
go back to reference Reiner BI, Siegel EL: Technologists’ productivity when using PACS: Comparison of film-based versus filmless radiography. Am J Roentgenol 179:33–37, 2002 Reiner BI, Siegel EL: Technologists’ productivity when using PACS: Comparison of film-based versus filmless radiography. Am J Roentgenol 179:33–37, 2002
48.
go back to reference Bryan NR: The digital revolution: The millennial change in medical imaging1. Radiology 229:299–304, 2003PubMedCrossRef Bryan NR: The digital revolution: The millennial change in medical imaging1. Radiology 229:299–304, 2003PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Hirota H, et al: Clinical evaluation of newly developed CRT viewing station: CT reading and observer's performance. Comput Med Imaging Graph 19:281–285, 1995PubMedCrossRef Hirota H, et al: Clinical evaluation of newly developed CRT viewing station: CT reading and observer's performance. Comput Med Imaging Graph 19:281–285, 1995PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Hruby W, Partan G, Mosser H, Krampla W, Malcher J: The digital hospital information technology in radiology. RBM 18:153–158, 1996CrossRef Hruby W, Partan G, Mosser H, Krampla W, Malcher J: The digital hospital information technology in radiology. RBM 18:153–158, 1996CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Inamura K, et al: HIS:RIS contribution to image diagnosis and maximization of efficacy of PACS when coupled with HIS:RIS. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 57:41–49, 1998PubMedCrossRef Inamura K, et al: HIS:RIS contribution to image diagnosis and maximization of efficacy of PACS when coupled with HIS:RIS. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 57:41–49, 1998PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Lau S-L, Mak AS-H, Lam W-T, Chau C-K, Lau K-Y: Reject analysis, a comparison of conventional film-screen radiography and computed radiography with PACS. Radiography 10:183–187, 2004CrossRef Lau S-L, Mak AS-H, Lam W-T, Chau C-K, Lau K-Y: Reject analysis, a comparison of conventional film-screen radiography and computed radiography with PACS. Radiography 10:183–187, 2004CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Siegel EL, Reiner BI: Work flow redesign: The key to success when using PACS. Am J Roentgenol 178:563–566, 2002 Siegel EL, Reiner BI: Work flow redesign: The key to success when using PACS. Am J Roentgenol 178:563–566, 2002
54.
go back to reference Siegel EL, Diaconis JN, Pomerantz S, Allman R, Briscoe B: Making filmless radiology work. J Digit Imaging 8(4):151–155, 1995PubMed Siegel EL, Diaconis JN, Pomerantz S, Allman R, Briscoe B: Making filmless radiology work. J Digit Imaging 8(4):151–155, 1995PubMed
55.
go back to reference Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Flagle C, Hooper FJ, Cox RE, Scanlon M: Effect of filmless imaging on the utilization of radiologic services. Radiology 215:163–167, 2000PubMed Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Flagle C, Hooper FJ, Cox RE, Scanlon M: Effect of filmless imaging on the utilization of radiologic services. Radiology 215:163–167, 2000PubMed
56.
go back to reference Vaden Brick JA: Medical Image Processing, Archiving and Communication (PACS). Tracking study, Des Plaines, Illinois: Technology Marketing Group, 1986 Vaden Brick JA: Medical Image Processing, Archiving and Communication (PACS). Tracking study, Des Plaines, Illinois: Technology Marketing Group, 1986
57.
go back to reference Vaden Brick JA: Medical Image Processing, Archiving and Communication (PACS). Tracking study, Des Plaines, Illinois: Technology Marketing Group, 1987 Vaden Brick JA: Medical Image Processing, Archiving and Communication (PACS). Tracking study, Des Plaines, Illinois: Technology Marketing Group, 1987
58.
go back to reference Watkins J: A hospital-wide picture archiving and communication system (PACS): the views of users and providers of the radiology service at Hammersmith Hospital. Eur J Radiol 32:106–112, 1999PubMedCrossRef Watkins J: A hospital-wide picture archiving and communication system (PACS): the views of users and providers of the radiology service at Hammersmith Hospital. Eur J Radiol 32:106–112, 1999PubMedCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Mullins ME, Mehta A, Patel H, McLoud TC, Novelline RA: Impact of PACS on the Education of radiology residents: The residents’ perspective. Acad Radiol 8:67–73, 2001PubMedCrossRef Mullins ME, Mehta A, Patel H, McLoud TC, Novelline RA: Impact of PACS on the Education of radiology residents: The residents’ perspective. Acad Radiol 8:67–73, 2001PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Kaplan B, Lundsgaarde HP: Toward an evaluation of an integrated clinical imaging system: identifying clinical benefits. Methods Inf Med 35:221–229, 1996PubMed Kaplan B, Lundsgaarde HP: Toward an evaluation of an integrated clinical imaging system: identifying clinical benefits. Methods Inf Med 35:221–229, 1996PubMed
61.
go back to reference Williams SC, Contreras M, McBiles M, Cawthon MA, Shah RB: The impact of a picture archiving and communication system on nuclear medicine examination interpretation. J Digit Imaging 10:51–56, 1997PubMedCrossRef Williams SC, Contreras M, McBiles M, Cawthon MA, Shah RB: The impact of a picture archiving and communication system on nuclear medicine examination interpretation. J Digit Imaging 10:51–56, 1997PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Brink JA, Neklesa VP, Mutalik P, Forman HP: PACS innovations leading to improved patient care. Appl Radiol 27:29–30, 1998CrossRef Brink JA, Neklesa VP, Mutalik P, Forman HP: PACS innovations leading to improved patient care. Appl Radiol 27:29–30, 1998CrossRef
63.
go back to reference Desimone DN, Kundel HL, Arenson RL: Effect of a digital imaging network on physician behaviour in an intensive care unit. Radiology 169:41–44, 1988 Desimone DN, Kundel HL, Arenson RL: Effect of a digital imaging network on physician behaviour in an intensive care unit. Radiology 169:41–44, 1988
64.
go back to reference Fillicelli T: Benefits of diagnosing from soft copy display. Appl Radiol 29:47–48, 2000CrossRef Fillicelli T: Benefits of diagnosing from soft copy display. Appl Radiol 29:47–48, 2000CrossRef
65.
go back to reference Gur D, Straub WH, Lieberman RH, Gennari RC: Clinicians’ access to diagnostic imaging information at an academic center: Perceived impact on patient management. AJR 158:893–896, 1992PubMed Gur D, Straub WH, Lieberman RH, Gennari RC: Clinicians’ access to diagnostic imaging information at an academic center: Perceived impact on patient management. AJR 158:893–896, 1992PubMed
66.
go back to reference Jorulf H, Finnbogason T, Jonsson V, Ringertz H: Pediatric PACS, Astrid Lindgren Children’s Hospital at Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, technical and practical aspects. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 66:25–30, 2001PubMedCrossRef Jorulf H, Finnbogason T, Jonsson V, Ringertz H: Pediatric PACS, Astrid Lindgren Children’s Hospital at Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, technical and practical aspects. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 66:25–30, 2001PubMedCrossRef
67.
go back to reference Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper FJ: Accuracy of interpretation of CT Scans: Comparing PACS monitor displays and hard-copy images. Am J Roentgenol 179:1407–1410, 2002 Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper FJ: Accuracy of interpretation of CT Scans: Comparing PACS monitor displays and hard-copy images. Am J Roentgenol 179:1407–1410, 2002
68.
go back to reference Pea S: Assessing the impact of PACS on patient care in a medical intensive care unit. SPIE 1899:423–431, 1993CrossRef Pea S: Assessing the impact of PACS on patient care in a medical intensive care unit. SPIE 1899:423–431, 1993CrossRef
69.
go back to reference Hruby W, Mosser H, Urban M, Ruger W: The Vienna SMZO-PACS project: the totally digital hospital. Proc Proceeding of CAR ‘91: City Hruby W, Mosser H, Urban M, Ruger W: The Vienna SMZO-PACS project: the totally digital hospital. Proc Proceeding of CAR ‘91: City
70.
go back to reference Feron M, et al: Practical aspects of HIS/PACS integration with emphasis on radiological workflow. International Congress Series 1230:805–811, 2001CrossRef Feron M, et al: Practical aspects of HIS/PACS integration with emphasis on radiological workflow. International Congress Series 1230:805–811, 2001CrossRef
71.
go back to reference Inamura K, et al: Time and flow study results before and after of a hospital information system and radiology information system and before clinical use of a picture archiving and communication system. J Digit Imaging 10(1):1–9, 1997PubMed Inamura K, et al: Time and flow study results before and after of a hospital information system and radiology information system and before clinical use of a picture archiving and communication system. J Digit Imaging 10(1):1–9, 1997PubMed
72.
go back to reference Bandon D, Trolliard P, Garcia A, Lovis C, Geissbühler A, Vallée J-P: Building an enterprise-wide PACS for all diagnostic images. International Congress Series 1268:279–284, 2004CrossRef Bandon D, Trolliard P, Garcia A, Lovis C, Geissbühler A, Vallée J-P: Building an enterprise-wide PACS for all diagnostic images. International Congress Series 1268:279–284, 2004CrossRef
73.
go back to reference Andersson T: Pax Vobiscum-a Swedish large PACS project. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 57:35–39, 1998PubMedCrossRef Andersson T: Pax Vobiscum-a Swedish large PACS project. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 57:35–39, 1998PubMedCrossRef
74.
go back to reference Leodolter W, Kocever K: PACS as a driver for integrating healthcare systems. International Congress Series 1256:910–914, 2003CrossRef Leodolter W, Kocever K: PACS as a driver for integrating healthcare systems. International Congress Series 1256:910–914, 2003CrossRef
75.
go back to reference Marsilio M, Mattavelli E: Analisi critica della bibliografia esistente sul tema della valutazione dei sistemi RIS-PACS-L’implementazione di sistemi RIS-PACS per la gestione delle immagini cliniche nelle aziende sanitarie: una metodologia per la valutazione degli impatti (organizzativi, gestionali ed economici) e del contributo all’integrazione informativa dell’azienda sanitaria (PAPER 2): SDA BOCCONI-Divisione ricerche, 2006 Marsilio M, Mattavelli E: Analisi critica della bibliografia esistente sul tema della valutazione dei sistemi RIS-PACS-L’implementazione di sistemi RIS-PACS per la gestione delle immagini cliniche nelle aziende sanitarie: una metodologia per la valutazione degli impatti (organizzativi, gestionali ed economici) e del contributo all’integrazione informativa dell’azienda sanitaria (PAPER 2): SDA BOCCONI-Divisione ricerche, 2006
76.
go back to reference Ratib O, Swiernik M, McCoy JM: From PACS to integrated EMR. Comput Med Imaging Graph 27:207–215, 2003PubMedCrossRef Ratib O, Swiernik M, McCoy JM: From PACS to integrated EMR. Comput Med Imaging Graph 27:207–215, 2003PubMedCrossRef
77.
go back to reference Munch H, Engelmann U, Schroeter A, Meinzer HP: The integration of medical images with the electronic patient record and their web-based distribution. Acad Radiol 11:661–668, 2004PubMedCrossRef Munch H, Engelmann U, Schroeter A, Meinzer HP: The integration of medical images with the electronic patient record and their web-based distribution. Acad Radiol 11:661–668, 2004PubMedCrossRef
78.
go back to reference Kondoh H, Shimomura T, Kuwata S: Infrastructure of PACS linked to EPR. International Congress Series 1268:285–288, 2004CrossRef Kondoh H, Shimomura T, Kuwata S: Infrastructure of PACS linked to EPR. International Congress Series 1268:285–288, 2004CrossRef
79.
go back to reference Schilling RB, Staab EV: Impact of PACS on the radiology team. Appl Radiol 28:10–13, 1999 Schilling RB, Staab EV: Impact of PACS on the radiology team. Appl Radiol 28:10–13, 1999
80.
go back to reference Schilling RB, Staab EV: Transition strategies for the radiology team. Appl Radiol 29:12–14, 2000CrossRef Schilling RB, Staab EV: Transition strategies for the radiology team. Appl Radiol 29:12–14, 2000CrossRef
81.
go back to reference Hanseth O, Lundberg N: Designing work oriented infrastructures. Comput Support Coop Work 10:347–372, 2001CrossRef Hanseth O, Lundberg N: Designing work oriented infrastructures. Comput Support Coop Work 10:347–372, 2001CrossRef
82.
go back to reference Bryan S, Keen J, Buxton M, Weatherburn G: Evaluation of a hospital-wide PACS: costs and benefits of the Hammersmith PACS installation. SPIE 1654:573–576, 1992CrossRef Bryan S, Keen J, Buxton M, Weatherburn G: Evaluation of a hospital-wide PACS: costs and benefits of the Hammersmith PACS installation. SPIE 1654:573–576, 1992CrossRef
83.
go back to reference DeMaster DR: Digital radiography offers major productivity gains over computed radiography: Results of a time-motion study. Appl Radiol 30:28–31, 2001CrossRef DeMaster DR: Digital radiography offers major productivity gains over computed radiography: Results of a time-motion study. Appl Radiol 30:28–31, 2001CrossRef
84.
go back to reference Li M, Wilson D, Wong M, Xthona A: The evolution of display technologies in PACS applications. Comput Med Imaging Graph 27:175–184, 2003PubMedCrossRef Li M, Wilson D, Wong M, Xthona A: The evolution of display technologies in PACS applications. Comput Med Imaging Graph 27:175–184, 2003PubMedCrossRef
85.
go back to reference Herman SJ: Speech recognition and the creation of radiology reports. Appl Radiol 33:23–28, 2004 Herman SJ: Speech recognition and the creation of radiology reports. Appl Radiol 33:23–28, 2004
86.
go back to reference Lepanto L: Impact of electronic signature on radiology report turnaround time. J Digit Imaging 16:306–309, 2003PubMedCrossRef Lepanto L: Impact of electronic signature on radiology report turnaround time. J Digit Imaging 16:306–309, 2003PubMedCrossRef
87.
88.
go back to reference DeJarnette WT: Web technology and its relevance to PACS and teleradiology. Appl Radiol 29:9–12, 2000CrossRef DeJarnette WT: Web technology and its relevance to PACS and teleradiology. Appl Radiol 29:9–12, 2000CrossRef
89.
go back to reference Margolin K: Web technology and its relevance to PACS and teleradiology—Take II. Appl Radiol 30:28–32, 2001CrossRef Margolin K: Web technology and its relevance to PACS and teleradiology—Take II. Appl Radiol 30:28–32, 2001CrossRef
90.
91.
go back to reference Bonomo L: Appropriatezza diagnostica nell'imaging radiologico. Proc. VII Convegno Nazionale AIIC - Appropriatezza, integrazione, sicurezza ed innovazione tecnologica nell’imaging diagnostico: City, 26–27 Maggio 2006 Year Bonomo L: Appropriatezza diagnostica nell'imaging radiologico. Proc. VII Convegno Nazionale AIIC - Appropriatezza, integrazione, sicurezza ed innovazione tecnologica nell’imaging diagnostico: City, 26–27 Maggio 2006 Year
92.
go back to reference Cecchini C: Le tecnologie di imaging diagnostico quale strumento di marketing sanitario. VII Convegno Nazionale AIIC-Appropriatezza, integrazione, sicurezza ed innovazione tecnologica nell’imaging diagnostico: Bologna, Italy, 2006 Cecchini C: Le tecnologie di imaging diagnostico quale strumento di marketing sanitario. VII Convegno Nazionale AIIC-Appropriatezza, integrazione, sicurezza ed innovazione tecnologica nell’imaging diagnostico: Bologna, Italy, 2006
93.
go back to reference Buccoliero L, Mattavelli E: Principali trend evolutivi dei sistemi per la gestione dei dati clinici e dei sistemi RIS PACS per la gestione delle immagini-L’implementazione di sistemi RIS-PACS per la gestione delle immagini cliniche nelle aziende sanitarie: una metodologia per la valutazione degli impatti (organizzativi, gestionali ed economici) e del contributo all'integrazione informativa dell'azienda sanitaria (PAPER 1): SDA BOCCONI-Divisione ricerche, 2006 Buccoliero L, Mattavelli E: Principali trend evolutivi dei sistemi per la gestione dei dati clinici e dei sistemi RIS PACS per la gestione delle immagini-L’implementazione di sistemi RIS-PACS per la gestione delle immagini cliniche nelle aziende sanitarie: una metodologia per la valutazione degli impatti (organizzativi, gestionali ed economici) e del contributo all'integrazione informativa dell'azienda sanitaria (PAPER 1): SDA BOCCONI-Divisione ricerche, 2006
94.
go back to reference Borgonovi E, Buccoliero L: L’impatto delle tecnologie dell’informazione e della comunicazione sulle amministrazioni pubbliche, Milano: EGEA, 2000 Borgonovi E, Buccoliero L: L’impatto delle tecnologie dell’informazione e della comunicazione sulle amministrazioni pubbliche, Milano: EGEA, 2000
Metadata
Title
Picture, Archiving and Communication System in the Italian NHS: A Primer on Diffusion and Evaluation Analysis
Authors
Luca Buccoliero
Stefano Calciolari
Marta Marsilio
Elisa Mattavelli
Publication date
01-02-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-007-9101-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2009 Go to the issue