Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Gastric Cancer 3/2023

Open Access 21-03-2023 | Gastric Cancer | Original Article

Quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity analysis of nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for the management of previously untreated patients with advanced gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, or esophageal adenocarcinoma

Authors: Daniel Lin, Hiep Nguyen, Ruchit Shah, Yao Qiao, John Hartman, Ryan Sugarman

Published in: Gastric Cancer | Issue 3/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The phase 3 CheckMate 649 established superior overall survival of nivolumab in combination with chemotherapy (NIVO + chemo) compared with chemotherapy (chemo) alone as a first-line treatment for patients with Her2-negative advanced gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, and esophageal adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC/EAC). This post hoc trial analysis aimed to evaluate the benefit of NIVO + chemo using quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) to further account for quality of life (QoL) in different health states depending on disease progression and treatment toxicity.

Methods

Using data from CheckMate 649, we evaluated the quality-adjusted survival gain associated with NIVO + chemo compared with chemo alone among all randomized patients and repeated similar analyses among those with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 5. Relative Q-TWiST gains of ≥ 10% were predefined as clinically important.

Results

In all randomized patients, those receiving NIVO + chemo had a mean Q-TWiST gain of 1.8 (95% CI 0.9, 2.7) months compared with those receiving chemo alone. The relative Q-TWiST gain was estimated to be 12.8%. Patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 had greater quality-adjusted survival gain from NIVO + chemo with an estimated Q-TWiST gain of 2.8 (95% CI 1.5, 4.1) months, representing a relative gain of 20.6%. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses with various QoL utility values yielded consistent findings in favor of NIVO + chemo compared with chemo alone. Q-TWiST gain from NIVO + chemo increased with longer duration of follow-up.

Conclusions

NIVO + chemo was associated with a statistically significant and clinically important gain in quality-adjusted survival compared with chemo alone among previously untreated patients with advanced GC/GEJC/EAC.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.CrossRefPubMed Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Rawla P, Barsouk A. Epidemiology of gastric cancer: global trends, risk factors and prevention. Prz Gastroenterol. 2019;14(1):26–38.PubMed Rawla P, Barsouk A. Epidemiology of gastric cancer: global trends, risk factors and prevention. Prz Gastroenterol. 2019;14(1):26–38.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Cancer Genome Atlas Research N, Analysis Working Group: Asan U, Agency BCC, et al. Integrated genomic characterization of oesophageal carcinoma. Nature 2017;541(7636):169–175 Cancer Genome Atlas Research N, Analysis Working Group: Asan U, Agency BCC, et al. Integrated genomic characterization of oesophageal carcinoma. Nature 2017;541(7636):169–175
4.
go back to reference Salem ME, Puccini A, Xiu J, et al. Comparative molecular analyses of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, esophageal adenocarcinoma, and gastric adenocarcinoma. Oncologist. 2018;23(11):1319–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Salem ME, Puccini A, Xiu J, et al. Comparative molecular analyses of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, esophageal adenocarcinoma, and gastric adenocarcinoma. Oncologist. 2018;23(11):1319–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Chau I, Norman AR, Cunningham D, et al. The impact of primary tumour origins in patients with advanced oesophageal, oesophago-gastric junction and gastric adenocarcinoma–individual patient data from 1775 patients in four randomised controlled trials. Ann Oncol. 2009;20(5):885–91.CrossRefPubMed Chau I, Norman AR, Cunningham D, et al. The impact of primary tumour origins in patients with advanced oesophageal, oesophago-gastric junction and gastric adenocarcinoma–individual patient data from 1775 patients in four randomised controlled trials. Ann Oncol. 2009;20(5):885–91.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Pape M, Vissers PAJ, Bertwistle D, et al. A nationwide population-based study comparing survival in unresectable advanced or synchronous metastatic esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(4):308–308.CrossRef Pape M, Vissers PAJ, Bertwistle D, et al. A nationwide population-based study comparing survival in unresectable advanced or synchronous metastatic esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(4):308–308.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Song Z, Wu Y, Yang J, et al. Progress in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Tumour Biol. 2017;39(7):1010428317714626.CrossRefPubMed Song Z, Wu Y, Yang J, et al. Progress in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Tumour Biol. 2017;39(7):1010428317714626.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Le DT, Ott PA, Korytowsky B, et al. Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes across lines of therapy in patients with advanced/metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2020;19(1):32–8.CrossRefPubMed Le DT, Ott PA, Korytowsky B, et al. Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes across lines of therapy in patients with advanced/metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2020;19(1):32–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Janjigian YY, Shitara K, Moehler M, et al. First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (CheckMate 649): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;398(10294):27–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Janjigian YY, Shitara K, Moehler M, et al. First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (CheckMate 649): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;398(10294):27–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Revicki DA, Feeny D, Hunt TL, et al. Analyzing oncology clinical trial data using the Q-TWiST method: clinical importance and sources for health state preference data. Qual Life Res. 2006;15(3):411–23.CrossRefPubMed Revicki DA, Feeny D, Hunt TL, et al. Analyzing oncology clinical trial data using the Q-TWiST method: clinical importance and sources for health state preference data. Qual Life Res. 2006;15(3):411–23.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference European Medicines Agency. Revised framework for interaction between the European Medicines Agency and patients and consumers and their organisations. 2014 p. 8. European Medicines Agency. Revised framework for interaction between the European Medicines Agency and patients and consumers and their organisations. 2014 p. 8.
15.
go back to reference Schnipper LE, Davidson NE, Wollins DS, et al. American Society of clinical oncology statement: a conceptual framework to assess the value of cancer treatment options. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(23):2563–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schnipper LE, Davidson NE, Wollins DS, et al. American Society of clinical oncology statement: a conceptual framework to assess the value of cancer treatment options. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(23):2563–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Cherny NI, Sullivan R, Dafni U, et al. A standardised, generic, validated approach to stratify the magnitude of clinical benefit that can be anticipated from anti-cancer therapies: the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS). Ann Oncol. 2017;28(11):2901–5.CrossRefPubMed Cherny NI, Sullivan R, Dafni U, et al. A standardised, generic, validated approach to stratify the magnitude of clinical benefit that can be anticipated from anti-cancer therapies: the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS). Ann Oncol. 2017;28(11):2901–5.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Food and Drug Administration. Plan for issuance of patient-focused drug development guidance under 21st Century Cures Act Title III Section 3002. May 2017. Food and Drug Administration. Plan for issuance of patient-focused drug development guidance under 21st Century Cures Act Title III Section 3002. May 2017.
18.
go back to reference Postmus D, Mavris M, Hillege HL, et al. Incorporating patient preferences into drug development and regulatory decision making: Results from a quantitative pilot study with cancer patients, carers, and regulators. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016;99(5):548–54.CrossRefPubMed Postmus D, Mavris M, Hillege HL, et al. Incorporating patient preferences into drug development and regulatory decision making: Results from a quantitative pilot study with cancer patients, carers, and regulators. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016;99(5):548–54.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Postmus D, Richard S, Bere N, et al. Individual trade-offs between possible benefits and risks of cancer treatments: results from a stated preference study with patients with multiple myeloma. Oncologist. 2018;23(1):44–51.CrossRefPubMed Postmus D, Richard S, Bere N, et al. Individual trade-offs between possible benefits and risks of cancer treatments: results from a stated preference study with patients with multiple myeloma. Oncologist. 2018;23(1):44–51.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Solem CT, Kwon Y, Shah RM, et al. Systematic review and benchmarking of quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) in oncology. Exp Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018;18(3):245–53.CrossRef Solem CT, Kwon Y, Shah RM, et al. Systematic review and benchmarking of quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) in oncology. Exp Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018;18(3):245–53.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Chung HC, Bang Y, Cutsem EV, et al. (Q)-TWiST analysis of trastuzumab plus fluoropyrimidine/cisplatin (T-XP/FP) versus XP/FP alone as first-line therapy for advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(15):4048.CrossRef Chung HC, Bang Y, Cutsem EV, et al. (Q)-TWiST analysis of trastuzumab plus fluoropyrimidine/cisplatin (T-XP/FP) versus XP/FP alone as first-line therapy for advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(15):4048.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Cella D, Hackshaw MD, Vondeling GT, et al. Quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer from the DESTINY-Gastric01 trial. Wolters Kluwer Health; 2021. Cella D, Hackshaw MD, Vondeling GT, et al. Quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer from the DESTINY-Gastric01 trial. Wolters Kluwer Health; 2021.
Metadata
Title
Quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity analysis of nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for the management of previously untreated patients with advanced gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, or esophageal adenocarcinoma
Authors
Daniel Lin
Hiep Nguyen
Ruchit Shah
Yao Qiao
John Hartman
Ryan Sugarman
Publication date
21-03-2023
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Published in
Gastric Cancer / Issue 3/2023
Print ISSN: 1436-3291
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3305
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-023-01372-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2023

Gastric Cancer 3/2023 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.