Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 6/2018

01-06-2018 | Original Article

Rectal E. coli above ciprofloxacin ECOFF associate with infectious complications following prostate biopsy

Authors: Inari Kalalahti, Kaisa Huotari, Kanerva Lahdensuo, Eveliina Tarkka, Henrikki Santti, Antti Rannikko, Anu Pätäri-Sampo

Published in: European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Transrectal prostate biopsies carry the risk of infection. By using non-selective culture plates, instead of commonly used ciprofloxacin (CIP)-containing plates, we analyzed the association between Escherichia coli CIP minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and post-biopsy infectious complications. A pre-biopsy rectal swab was taken from 207 consecutive men, scheduled for transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy with CIP 750 mg as the mostly used prophylaxis. CIP MIC of rectal Gram-negative bacilli was determined from a chromogenic agar. Rectal E. coli were categorized to resistant (R) and intermediate (I) isolates together (R + I, MIC > 0.25 mg/l) and to sensitive (S, MIC ≤ 0.25 mg/l) using EUCAST clinical breakpoints. In addition, epidemiological cutoff (ECOFF R, MIC > 0.064 mg/l) was used for categorization. Eighteen (8.7%) men showed CIP R + I E. coli by the EUCAST breakpoints and 41 (19.8%) using the ECOFF R criteria. During follow-up, 15 (7.2%) men had infectious symptoms, of which 9 (4.3%) were culture-confirmed infections. Only 4 (26.7%) of these 15 patients showed R + I E. coli in the rectal swab according to EUCAST, but 10 (66.7%) using the ECOFF cutoff. Rectal E. coli CIP R + I by the EUCAST clinical breakpoints associated with infectious complications with OR 5.7 (95% CI 1.5–21.8, P = 0.005) and ECOFF R E. coli by OR 10.7 (95% CI 3.0–37.6, P < 0.001). Men carrying rectal E. coli with moderately lowered CIP susceptibility (MIC > ECOFF 0.064 mg/l) were identified and, interestingly, they showed a high risk of developing infectious symptoms after the biopsy. This explains why some men develop infectious complications despite appropriate antibiotics before prostatic biopsies. Trial registration: NCT02140502
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dy GW, Gore JL, Forouzanfar MH, Naghavi M, Fitzmaurice C (2017) Global burden of urologic cancers, 1990–2013. Eur Urol 71:437–446CrossRefPubMed Dy GW, Gore JL, Forouzanfar MH, Naghavi M, Fitzmaurice C (2017) Global burden of urologic cancers, 1990–2013. Eur Urol 71:437–446CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Vasarainen H, Lokman U, Ruutu M, Taari K, Rannikko A (2012) Prostate cancer active surveillance and health-related quality of life: results of the Finnish arm of the prospective trial. BJU Int 109:1614–1619CrossRefPubMed Vasarainen H, Lokman U, Ruutu M, Taari K, Rannikko A (2012) Prostate cancer active surveillance and health-related quality of life: results of the Finnish arm of the prospective trial. BJU Int 109:1614–1619CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Holding P et al (2016) The ProtecT trial: 10-year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 375:1415–1424CrossRefPubMed Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Holding P et al (2016) The ProtecT trial: 10-year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 375:1415–1424CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ehdaie B, Vertosick E, Spaliviero M, Giallo-Uvino A, Taur Y, O'Sullivan M et al (2014) The impact of repeat biopsies on infectious complications in men with prostate cancer on active surveillance. J Urol 191:660–664CrossRefPubMed Ehdaie B, Vertosick E, Spaliviero M, Giallo-Uvino A, Taur Y, O'Sullivan M et al (2014) The impact of repeat biopsies on infectious complications in men with prostate cancer on active surveillance. J Urol 191:660–664CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Lindstedt S, Lindström U, Ljunggren E, Wullt B, Grabe M (2006) Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in core prostate biopsy: impact of timing and identification of risk factors. Eur Urol 50:832–837CrossRefPubMed Lindstedt S, Lindström U, Ljunggren E, Wullt B, Grabe M (2006) Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in core prostate biopsy: impact of timing and identification of risk factors. Eur Urol 50:832–837CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Nam RK, Saskin R, Lee Y, Liu Y, Law C, Klotz LH et al (2013) Increasing hospital admission rates for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 189:S12–S18CrossRefPubMed Nam RK, Saskin R, Lee Y, Liu Y, Law C, Klotz LH et al (2013) Increasing hospital admission rates for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 189:S12–S18CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Wagenlehner FM, Pilatz A, Waliszewski P, Weidner W, Johansen TE (2014) Reducing infection rates after prostate biopsy. Nat Rev Urol 11:80–86CrossRefPubMed Wagenlehner FM, Pilatz A, Waliszewski P, Weidner W, Johansen TE (2014) Reducing infection rates after prostate biopsy. Nat Rev Urol 11:80–86CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Zowawi HM, Harris PN, Roberts MJ, Tambyah PA, Schembri MA, Pezzani MD et al (2015) The emerging threat of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in urology. Nat Rev Urol 12:570–584CrossRefPubMed Zowawi HM, Harris PN, Roberts MJ, Tambyah PA, Schembri MA, Pezzani MD et al (2015) The emerging threat of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in urology. Nat Rev Urol 12:570–584CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Liss MA, Johnson JR, Porter SB, Johnston B, Clabots C, Gillis K et al (2015) Clinical and microbiological determinants of infection after transrectal prostate biopsy. Clin Infect Dis 60:979–987CrossRefPubMed Liss MA, Johnson JR, Porter SB, Johnston B, Clabots C, Gillis K et al (2015) Clinical and microbiological determinants of infection after transrectal prostate biopsy. Clin Infect Dis 60:979–987CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Liss MA, Kim W, Moskowitz D, Szabo RJ (2015) Comparative effectiveness of targeted vs empirical antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent sepsis from transrectal prostate biopsy: a retrospective analysis. J Urol 194:397–402CrossRefPubMed Liss MA, Kim W, Moskowitz D, Szabo RJ (2015) Comparative effectiveness of targeted vs empirical antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent sepsis from transrectal prostate biopsy: a retrospective analysis. J Urol 194:397–402CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Marino K, Parlee A, Orlando R, Lerner L, Strymish J, Gupta K (2015) Comparative effectiveness of single versus combination antibiotic prophylaxis for TRUS-biopsy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:7273–7275CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Marino K, Parlee A, Orlando R, Lerner L, Strymish J, Gupta K (2015) Comparative effectiveness of single versus combination antibiotic prophylaxis for TRUS-biopsy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:7273–7275CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Rudzinski JK, Kawakami J (2014) Incidence of infectious complications following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in Calgary, Alberta, Canada: a retrospective population-based analysis. Can Urol Assoc J 8:301–305CrossRef Rudzinski JK, Kawakami J (2014) Incidence of infectious complications following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in Calgary, Alberta, Canada: a retrospective population-based analysis. Can Urol Assoc J 8:301–305CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lahdensuo K, Rannikko A, Anttila VJ, Erickson A, Pätäri-Sampo A, Rautio M (2016) Increase of prostate biopsy-related bacteremic complications in southern Finland, 2005–2013: a population-based analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 19:417–422CrossRefPubMed Lahdensuo K, Rannikko A, Anttila VJ, Erickson A, Pätäri-Sampo A, Rautio M (2016) Increase of prostate biopsy-related bacteremic complications in southern Finland, 2005–2013: a population-based analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 19:417–422CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Farrell JJ, Hicks JL, Wallace SE, Seftel AD (2017) Impact of preoperative screening for rectal colonization with fluoroquinolone-resistant enteric bacteria on the incidence of sepsis following transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Res Rep Urol 24:37–41 Farrell JJ, Hicks JL, Wallace SE, Seftel AD (2017) Impact of preoperative screening for rectal colonization with fluoroquinolone-resistant enteric bacteria on the incidence of sepsis following transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Res Rep Urol 24:37–41
18.
go back to reference Fahmy A, Rhashad H, Mohi M, Elabbadie A, Kotb A (2016) Optimizing prophylactic antibiotic regimen in patients admitted for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies: a prospective randomized study. Prostate Int 4:113–117CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fahmy A, Rhashad H, Mohi M, Elabbadie A, Kotb A (2016) Optimizing prophylactic antibiotic regimen in patients admitted for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies: a prospective randomized study. Prostate Int 4:113–117CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Liss MA, Peeples AN, Peterson EM (2011) Detection of fluoroquinolone-resistant organisms from rectal swabs by use of selective media prior to a transrectal prostate biopsy. J Clin Microbiol 49:1116–1118CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liss MA, Peeples AN, Peterson EM (2011) Detection of fluoroquinolone-resistant organisms from rectal swabs by use of selective media prior to a transrectal prostate biopsy. J Clin Microbiol 49:1116–1118CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Taylor AK, Zembower TR, Nadler RB, Scheetz MH, Cashy JP, Bowen D et al (2012) Targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis using rectal swab cultures in men undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy is associated with reduced incidence of postoperative infectious complications and cost of care. J Urol 187:1275–1279CrossRefPubMed Taylor AK, Zembower TR, Nadler RB, Scheetz MH, Cashy JP, Bowen D et al (2012) Targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis using rectal swab cultures in men undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy is associated with reduced incidence of postoperative infectious complications and cost of care. J Urol 187:1275–1279CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Taylor S, Margolick J, Abughosh Z, Goldenberg SL, Lange D, Bowie WR et al (2013) Ciprofloxacin resistance in the faecal carriage of patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. BJU Int 111:946–953CrossRefPubMed Taylor S, Margolick J, Abughosh Z, Goldenberg SL, Lange D, Bowie WR et al (2013) Ciprofloxacin resistance in the faecal carriage of patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. BJU Int 111:946–953CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Batura D, Rao GG, Nielsen PB (2010) Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in intestinal flora of patients undergoing prostatic biopsy: implications for prophylaxis and treatment of infections after biopsy. BJU Int 106:1017–1020CrossRefPubMed Batura D, Rao GG, Nielsen PB (2010) Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in intestinal flora of patients undergoing prostatic biopsy: implications for prophylaxis and treatment of infections after biopsy. BJU Int 106:1017–1020CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Chan ES, Lo KL, Ng CF, Hou SM, Yip SK (2012) Randomized controlled trial of antibiotic prophylaxis regimens for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Chin Med J 125:2432–2435PubMed Chan ES, Lo KL, Ng CF, Hou SM, Yip SK (2012) Randomized controlled trial of antibiotic prophylaxis regimens for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Chin Med J 125:2432–2435PubMed
25.
go back to reference Cussans A, Somani BK, Basarab A, Dudderidge TJ et al (2016) The role of targeted prophylactic antimicrobial therapy before transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy in reducing infection rates: a systematic review. BJU Int 117:725–731CrossRefPubMed Cussans A, Somani BK, Basarab A, Dudderidge TJ et al (2016) The role of targeted prophylactic antimicrobial therapy before transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy in reducing infection rates: a systematic review. BJU Int 117:725–731CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Boeri L, Fontana M, Gallioli A, Zanetti SP, Catellani M, Longo F et al (2017) Rectal culture-guided targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis reduces the incidence of post-operative infectious complications in men at high risk for infections submitted to transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy—results of a cross-sectional study. PLoS One 12:e0170319CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Boeri L, Fontana M, Gallioli A, Zanetti SP, Catellani M, Longo F et al (2017) Rectal culture-guided targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis reduces the incidence of post-operative infectious complications in men at high risk for infections submitted to transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy—results of a cross-sectional study. PLoS One 12:e0170319CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Liss MA, Ehdaie B, Loeb S, Meng MV, Raman JD, Spears V et al (2017) An update of the American Urological Association white paper on the prevention and treatment of the more common complications related to prostate biopsy. J Urol 198:329–333CrossRefPubMed Liss MA, Ehdaie B, Loeb S, Meng MV, Raman JD, Spears V et al (2017) An update of the American Urological Association white paper on the prevention and treatment of the more common complications related to prostate biopsy. J Urol 198:329–333CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Tukenmez Tigen E, Tandogdu Z, Ergonul O, Altinkanat G, Gunaydin B, Ozgen M et al (2014) Outcomes of fecal carriage of extended-spectrum β-lactamase after transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate. Urology 84:1008–1015CrossRefPubMed Tukenmez Tigen E, Tandogdu Z, Ergonul O, Altinkanat G, Gunaydin B, Ozgen M et al (2014) Outcomes of fecal carriage of extended-spectrum β-lactamase after transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate. Urology 84:1008–1015CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Rectal E. coli above ciprofloxacin ECOFF associate with infectious complications following prostate biopsy
Authors
Inari Kalalahti
Kaisa Huotari
Kanerva Lahdensuo
Eveliina Tarkka
Henrikki Santti
Antti Rannikko
Anu Pätäri-Sampo
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0934-9723
Electronic ISSN: 1435-4373
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-018-3217-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 6/2018 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine