Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Rheumatology 2/2010

01-02-2010 | Original Article

The Safe Functional Motion test is reliable for assessment of functional movements in individuals at risk for osteoporotic fracture

Authors: Norma J. MacIntyre, Carrie L. Stavness, Jonathan D. Adachi

Published in: Clinical Rheumatology | Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

The Safe Functional Motion (SFM) test is a performance-based tool developed to assess functional movements in individuals at risk for osteoporotic fracture. The purpose of this study was to determine the test–retest and inter-rater reliability of the scores on the short form of the SFM test (SFM-SF). A secondary objective was to evaluate the construct convergent validity of the balance domain. Community-dwelling adults with low bone mass (n = 36) completed the SFM-SF on two occasions. During one visit, SFM-SF performance was scored by two testers and additional tests of balance (Timed Up and Go (TUG), Berg Balance Scale (BERG), and Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CBMS)) were completed. Test–retest and inter-rater reliability of the SFM-SF score is excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.90), and the balance domain score demonstrates acceptable associations with established clinical measures of balance (Spearman’s rho = −0.69, 0.76, and 0.83 for TUG, BERG, and CBMS, respectively). SFM-SF provides reliable measures of functional movements in community-dwelling individuals at risk for osteoporotic fracture.
Footnotes
1
Chris Recknor, M.D., or Stephanie Grant M.S. OT/L, IONmed Systems, United Osteoporosis Clinics, 2350 Limestone Parkway, Gainsville, GA 30501, USA (sgrant@ionmed.us).
 
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Lentle B, Brown J, Khan A et al (2007) Recognizing and reporting vertebral fractures: reducing the risk of future osteoporotic fractures. Can Assoc Radiol J 58:27–36PubMed Lentle B, Brown J, Khan A et al (2007) Recognizing and reporting vertebral fractures: reducing the risk of future osteoporotic fractures. Can Assoc Radiol J 58:27–36PubMed
3.
go back to reference Bonner FJ Jr, Sinaki M, Grabois M et al (2003) Health professional's guide to rehabilitation of the patient with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 14:S1–S22CrossRefPubMed Bonner FJ Jr, Sinaki M, Grabois M et al (2003) Health professional's guide to rehabilitation of the patient with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 14:S1–S22CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Briggs AM, van Dieen JH, Wrigley TV et al (2007) Thoracic kyphosis affects spinal loads and trunk muscle force. Phys Ther 87:595–607PubMed Briggs AM, van Dieen JH, Wrigley TV et al (2007) Thoracic kyphosis affects spinal loads and trunk muscle force. Phys Ther 87:595–607PubMed
5.
go back to reference Schultz AB, Andersson GB, Haderspeck K et al (1982) Analysis and measurement of lumbar trunk loads in tasks involving bends and twists. J Biomech 15:669–675CrossRefPubMed Schultz AB, Andersson GB, Haderspeck K et al (1982) Analysis and measurement of lumbar trunk loads in tasks involving bends and twists. J Biomech 15:669–675CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Edmondston SJ, Singer KP, Day RE et al (1997) Ex vivo estimation of thoracolumbar vertebral body compressive strength: the relative contributions of bone densitometry and vertebral morphometry. Osteoporos Int 7:142–148CrossRefPubMed Edmondston SJ, Singer KP, Day RE et al (1997) Ex vivo estimation of thoracolumbar vertebral body compressive strength: the relative contributions of bone densitometry and vertebral morphometry. Osteoporos Int 7:142–148CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cress ME, Buchner DM, Questad KA et al (1996) Continuous-scale physical functional performance in healthy older adults: a validation study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77:1243–1250CrossRefPubMed Cress ME, Buchner DM, Questad KA et al (1996) Continuous-scale physical functional performance in healthy older adults: a validation study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77:1243–1250CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cress ME, Meyer M (2003) Maximal voluntary and functional performance levels needed for independence in adults aged 65 to 97 years. Phys Ther 83:37–48PubMed Cress ME, Meyer M (2003) Maximal voluntary and functional performance levels needed for independence in adults aged 65 to 97 years. Phys Ther 83:37–48PubMed
9.
go back to reference Reuben DB, Siu AL (1990) An objective measure of physical function of elderly outpatients. J Am Geriatr Soc 38:1105–1112PubMed Reuben DB, Siu AL (1990) An objective measure of physical function of elderly outpatients. J Am Geriatr Soc 38:1105–1112PubMed
10.
go back to reference Delbaere K, Van den Noortgate N, Bourgois J et al (2006) The Physical Performance Test as a predictor of frequent fallers: a prospective community-based cohort study. Clin Rehabil 20:83–90CrossRefPubMed Delbaere K, Van den Noortgate N, Bourgois J et al (2006) The Physical Performance Test as a predictor of frequent fallers: a prospective community-based cohort study. Clin Rehabil 20:83–90CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Recknor C, Grant S, Catanzarite J et al (2005) Bone safety evaluation and functional risk for fracture. Osteoporos Int 16:S44–S45CrossRef Recknor C, Grant S, Catanzarite J et al (2005) Bone safety evaluation and functional risk for fracture. Osteoporos Int 16:S44–S45CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Recknor C, Grant S, MacIntyre NJ (2009) A novel performance-based measure of functional risk for osteoporotic fracture has excellent reliability and good convergent construct validity. Osteoporos Int 20:S226–S227 Recknor C, Grant S, MacIntyre NJ (2009) A novel performance-based measure of functional risk for osteoporotic fracture has excellent reliability and good convergent construct validity. Osteoporos Int 20:S226–S227
14.
go back to reference Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M (2000) Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test. Phys Ther 80:896–903PubMed Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M (2000) Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test. Phys Ther 80:896–903PubMed
15.
go back to reference Berg K, WoodDauphinee S, Williams JI, Gayton D (1989) Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiother Can 41:304–311CrossRef Berg K, WoodDauphinee S, Williams JI, Gayton D (1989) Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiother Can 41:304–311CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Whitney S, Wrisley D, Furman J (2003) Concurrent validity of the Berg Balance Scale and the Dynamic Gait Index in people with vestibular dysfunction. Physiother Res Int 8:178–186CrossRefPubMed Whitney S, Wrisley D, Furman J (2003) Concurrent validity of the Berg Balance Scale and the Dynamic Gait Index in people with vestibular dysfunction. Physiother Res Int 8:178–186CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Steffen TM, Hacker TA, Mollinger L (2002) Age- and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: Six-Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up & Go Test, and gait speeds. Phys Ther 82:128–137PubMed Steffen TM, Hacker TA, Mollinger L (2002) Age- and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: Six-Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up & Go Test, and gait speeds. Phys Ther 82:128–137PubMed
18.
go back to reference Howe JA, Inness EL, Venturini A et al (2006) The community balance and mobility scale: a balance measure for individuals with traumatic brain injury. Clin Rehabil 20:885–895PubMed Howe JA, Inness EL, Venturini A et al (2006) The community balance and mobility scale: a balance measure for individuals with traumatic brain injury. Clin Rehabil 20:885–895PubMed
19.
go back to reference Rocque R, Bartlett D, Brown J, Garland SJ (2005) Influence of age and gender of healthy adults on scoring patterns on the Community Balance and Mobility Scale. Physiother Can 57:285–292CrossRef Rocque R, Bartlett D, Brown J, Garland SJ (2005) Influence of age and gender of healthy adults on scoring patterns on the Community Balance and Mobility Scale. Physiother Can 57:285–292CrossRef
20.
go back to reference LiuAmbrose T, Khan KM, Eng JJ et al (2004) Resistance and agility training reduce fall risk in women aged 75 to 85 with low bone mass: a 6-month randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 52:657–665CrossRef LiuAmbrose T, Khan KM, Eng JJ et al (2004) Resistance and agility training reduce fall risk in women aged 75 to 85 with low bone mass: a 6-month randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 52:657–665CrossRef
21.
go back to reference LiuAmbrose T, Khan KM, Donaldson MG et al (2006) Falls-related self-efficacy is independently associated with balance and mobility in older women with low bone mass. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 61A:832–838 LiuAmbrose T, Khan KM, Donaldson MG et al (2006) Falls-related self-efficacy is independently associated with balance and mobility in older women with low bone mass. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 61A:832–838
22.
go back to reference Shumway-Cook A, Baldwin M, Polissar NL, Gruber W (1997) Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults. Phys Ther 77:812–819PubMed Shumway-Cook A, Baldwin M, Polissar NL, Gruber W (1997) Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults. Phys Ther 77:812–819PubMed
23.
go back to reference Strout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428CrossRef Strout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Stratford PW (2004) Getting more from the literature: estimating the standard error of measurement for reliability studies. Physiother Can 56:27–30CrossRef Stratford PW (2004) Getting more from the literature: estimating the standard error of measurement for reliability studies. Physiother Can 56:27–30CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMed
26.
go back to reference Stratford PW, Spadoni GF (2003) Sample size estimation for the comparison of competing measures' reliability coefficients. Physiother Can 55:225–229CrossRef Stratford PW, Spadoni GF (2003) Sample size estimation for the comparison of competing measures' reliability coefficients. Physiother Can 55:225–229CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Cress ME, Petrella JK, Moore TL, Schenkman ML (2005) Continuous-scale physical functional performance test: validity, reliability, and sensitivity of data for the short version. Phys Ther 85:323–335PubMed Cress ME, Petrella JK, Moore TL, Schenkman ML (2005) Continuous-scale physical functional performance test: validity, reliability, and sensitivity of data for the short version. Phys Ther 85:323–335PubMed
28.
go back to reference King MB, Judge JO, Whipple R, Wolfson L (2000) Reliability and responsiveness of two physical performance measures examined in the context of a functional training intervention. Phys Ther 80:8–16PubMed King MB, Judge JO, Whipple R, Wolfson L (2000) Reliability and responsiveness of two physical performance measures examined in the context of a functional training intervention. Phys Ther 80:8–16PubMed
29.
go back to reference Madureira MM, Takayama L, Gallinaro AL et al (2007) Balance training program is highly effective in improving functional status and reducing the risk of falls in elderly women with osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 18:419–425CrossRefPubMed Madureira MM, Takayama L, Gallinaro AL et al (2007) Balance training program is highly effective in improving functional status and reducing the risk of falls in elderly women with osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 18:419–425CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Safe Functional Motion test is reliable for assessment of functional movements in individuals at risk for osteoporotic fracture
Authors
Norma J. MacIntyre
Carrie L. Stavness
Jonathan D. Adachi
Publication date
01-02-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology / Issue 2/2010
Print ISSN: 0770-3198
Electronic ISSN: 1434-9949
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-009-1297-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2010

Clinical Rheumatology 2/2010 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.