Top

Hernia

Published in:

01-04-2013 | Review

Mesh size in Lichtenstein repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the importance of mesh size

Authors: D. Seker, D. Oztuna, H. Kulacoglu, Y. Genc, M. Akcil

Published in: Hernia | Issue 2/2013

Abstract

Purpose

Small mesh size has been recognized as one of the factors responsible for recurrence after Lichtenstein hernia repair due to insufficient coverage or mesh shrinkage. The Lichtenstein Hernia Institute recommends a 7 × 15 cm mesh that can be trimmed up to 2 cm from the lateral side. We performed a systematic review to determine surgeons’ mesh size preference for the Lichtenstein hernia repair and made a meta-analysis to determine the effect of mesh size, mesh type, and length of follow-up time on recurrence.

Methods

Two medical databases, PubMed and ISI Web of Science, were systematically searched using the key word “Lichtenstein repair.” All full text papers were selected. Publications mentioning mesh size were brought for further analysis. A mesh surface area of 90 cm² was accepted as the threshold for defining the mesh as small or large. Also, a subgroup analysis for recurrence pooled proportion according to the mesh size, mesh type, and follow-up period was done.

Results

In total, 514 papers were obtained. There were no prospective or retrospective clinical studies comparing mesh size and clinical outcome. A total of 141 papers were duplicated in both databases. As a result, 373 papers were obtained. The full text was available in over 95 % of papers. Only 41 (11.2 %) papers discussed mesh size. In 29 studies, a mesh larger than 90 cm² was used. The most frequently preferred commercial mesh size was 7.5 × 15 cm. No papers mentioned the size of the mesh after trimming. There was no information about the relationship between mesh size and patient BMI. The pooled proportion in recurrence for small meshes was 0.0019 (95 % confidence interval: 0.007–0.0036), favoring large meshes to decrease the chance of recurrence. Recurrence becomes more marked when follow-up period is longer than 1 year (p < 0.001). Heavy meshes also decreased recurrence (p = 0.015).

Conclusion

This systematic review demonstrates that the size of the mesh used in Lichtenstein hernia repair is rarely discussed in clinical studies. Papers that discuss mesh size appear to reflect a trend to comply with the latest recommendations to use larger mesh. Standard heavy meshes decrease the recurrence in hernia repair. Even though there is no evidence, it seems that large meshes decrease recurrence rates.

Stock FE (1954) Repair of large hernia with nylon mesh. Lancet 266:395–396PubMedCrossRef

Kurzer M, Kark AE, Belsham PA (2003) The Lichtenstein repair of groin hernias. Surg Clin N Am 83:1099–1117PubMedCrossRef

Amid K (2004) Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty: its inception, evolution, and principles. Hernia 8:1–7PubMedCrossRef

Lichtenstien IL (1970) Hernia repair without disability, 1st edn. CV Mosby, St. Louis

Amid PK (2003) The Lichtenstein in 2002: an overview of causes of recurrence after Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty. Hernia 7(1):13–16PubMed

Amid PK (1997) Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia 1:12–19

Earle DB, Mark LA (2008) Prosthetic material in inguinal hernia repair: how do I choose? Surg Clin North Am 88(1):179–201PubMedCrossRef

StatsDirect Ltd (2005) StatsDirectstatistical software, England

Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560PubMedCrossRef

10.

Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 19:188–199PubMedCrossRef

11.

Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM (1989) The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg 157(2):188–193PubMedCrossRef

12.

Klinge U, Klosterehalfen B, Muller M et al (1998) Shrinking of polypropylene mesh in vivo: an experimental study in dogs. Eur J Surg 64:965–969

13.

Cheek CM, Black NA, Devlin HB et al (1998) Groin hernia surgery: a systematic review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80(Suppl 1):S1–S80PubMed

14.

Gao M, Han J, Tian J, Yang K (2010) Vypro II mesh for inguinal hernia repair: a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 251:838–842PubMedCrossRef

15.

Bittner R, Sauerland S, Schmedt CG (2005) Comparison of endoscopic techniques vs Shouldice and other open nonmesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19:605–615PubMedCrossRef

16.

Memon MA, Cooper NJ, Memon B et al (2003) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 90:1479–1492PubMedCrossRef

17.

Karthikesalingam A, Markar SR, Holt PJ, Praseedom RK (2010) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 97:4–11PubMedCrossRef

18.

Grant AM, EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2002) Open mesh versus non-mesh repair of groin hernia: meta-analysis of randomised trials based on individual patient data. Hernia 6:130–136

19.

Brown CN, Finch JG (2010) Which mesh for hernia repair? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 92:272–278PubMedCrossRef

20.

Zhao G, Gao P, Ma B et al (2009) Open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 250:35–42PubMedCrossRef

21.

Sanabria A, Dominguez LC, Valdivieso E, Gomez G (2007) Prophylactic antibiotics for mesh hernioplasty: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 245:392–396PubMedCrossRef

22.

Gravante G, Venditti D, Filingeri V (2008) The role of single-shot antibiotic prophylaxis in inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis approach of 4336 patients. Ann Surg 248:496–497PubMedCrossRef

23.

Eklund A Laparoscopic or open inguinal hernia repair—which is best for the patient? Acta Universitatis Uppsaliensis. Digital comprehensive summaries of Uppsala dissertations from Faculty of Medicine 476.63 pp. Uppsala. ISBN 978-91-554-7592-5

24.

Flum DR, Horvath K, Koepsell T (2003) Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair improved with time? A population-based analysis. Ann Surg 237(1):129–135PubMedCrossRef

25.

Klinge U, Binnebosel M, Mertens PR (2006) Are collagens the culprits in the development of incisional and inguinal hernia disease? Hernia 10(6):472–477PubMedCrossRef

26.

Holzheimer RG (2004) First results of Lichtenstein hernia repair with Ultrapro-mesh as cost saving procedure—quality control combined with a modified quality of life questionnaire (SF-36) in a series of ambulatory operated patients. Eur J Med Res 9(6):323–327PubMed

27.

Cobb WS, Kercher KW, Heniford BT (2005) The argument for lightweight polypropylene mesh in hernia repair. Surg Innov 12(1):63–69PubMedCrossRef

28.

Smietański M, Bigda J, Zaborowski K et al (2009) Three-year follow up modified Lichtenstein hernioplasty using lightweight poliglecaprone/polypropylene mesh. Hernia 13(3):239–242 (Epub 2009 Jan 20)

29.

Bringman S, Wollert S, Osterberg J et al (2005) One year results of a randomised controlled multi-centre study comparing Prolene and Vypro II-mesh in Lichtenstein hernioplasty. Hernia 9(3):223–227 (Epub 2005 Oct 22)

30.

Weyhe D, Schmitz I, Belyaev O et al (2006) Experimental comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes: less weight does not mean less biological response. World J Surg 30(8):1586–1591PubMedCrossRef

31.

Gao M, Han J, Tian J, Yang K (2010) Vypro II mesh for inguinal hernia repair: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 251(5):838–842PubMedCrossRef

32.

Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Alam F et al (2010) Partially or completely absorbable versus nonabsorbable mesh repair for inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20(4):213–219PubMedCrossRef

33.

Bendavid R (1994) Expectations of hernia surgery (inguinal and femoral). In: Paterson-Brown S, Garden J (eds) Principles and practice of surgical laparoscopy. WB Saunders, Philedelphia, pp 378–414

34.

Liem MS, van Duyn EB, van der Graaf Y (2003) Coala Trial Group. Recurrences after conventional anterior and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison. Ann Surg 237:136–141PubMedCrossRef

35.

Malangoni MA, Roen MJ (2008) Hernias. In: Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL (eds) Sabiston textbook of surgery: the biological basis of modern surgical practice, 18th edn. Saunders & Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 1155–1179

36.

Langeveld HR, Riet M, Weidema WF et al (2010) Total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein (the LEVEL-Trial). A randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 251:819–824PubMedCrossRef

37.

Nikkolo C, Lepner U, Murruste M et al (2010) Randomised clinical trial comparing lightweight mesh with heavyweight mesh for inguinal hernioplasty. Hernia 14(3):253–258

38.

Caliskan K, Nursal TZ, Caliskan E et al (2010) A method for the reduction of chronic pain after tension-free repair of inguinal hernia: iliohypogastric neurectomy and subcutaneous transposition of spermatic cord. Hernia 14:51–55PubMedCrossRef

39.

Berrevoet F, Maes L, Reyntjens K et al (2010) Transinguinal preperitoneal memory ring patch versus Lichtenstein repair for unilateral inguinal hernias. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:557–562PubMedCrossRef

40.

Jain SK, Vindal A (2009) Gelatin-resorcin-formalin (GFR) tissue glue as a novel technique for fixing prosthetic mesh in open hernia repair. Hernia 13:299–304PubMedCrossRef

41.

Malik AM, Khan A, Jawaid A et al (2009) A comparative analysis between non-mesh (Bassini’s) and mesh (Lichtenstein) repair of primary inguinal hernia. J Ayub Coll Abbottabad 21:17–20

42.

Eklund AS, Montgomery AK, Rasmussen C et al (2009) Low recurrence rate after laparoscopic (TEP) and open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg 249:33–38PubMedCrossRef

43.

Ansaloni L, Catena F, Coccolini F et al (2009) Inguinal hernia repair with porcine small intestine submucosa: 3-year follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial of Lichtenstein’s repair with polypropylene mesh versus surgisis inguinal hernia matrix. Am J Surg 198:303–312PubMedCrossRef

44.

Smietanski M, Bigda J, Zaborowski K et al (2009) Three-year follow-up of modified Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty using light weight poliglecaprone/polypropylene mesh. Hernia 13:239–242PubMedCrossRef

45.

Jaiswal SS, Chaudhry BR, Agrawal MA (2009) Chronic groin pain following Lichtenstein hernioplasty for inguinal hernia. Is it a myth? Indian J Surg 71:84–88PubMedCrossRef

46.

Dalenback J, Andersson C, Anesten B et al (2009) Prolene hernia system, Lichtenstein mesh and plug-and-patch for primary inguinal hernia repair: 3-year outcome of a prospective randomised controlled trial. Hernia 13:121–129PubMedCrossRef

47.

Smietanski M, Polish Hernia Study Group (2008) Randomised clinical trial comparing a polypropylene with a poliglecaprone and polypropylene composite mesh for inguinal hernioplasty. Br J Surg 95:1462–1468PubMedCrossRef

48.

Lauscher JC, Yafaei K, Buhr HJ, Ritz JP (2008) Laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair with alloplastic material. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18:457–463PubMedCrossRef

49.

Koch A, Bringman S, Myrelid P et al (2008) Randomized clinical trial of groin hernia repair with titanium-coated lightweight mesh compared with standard polypropylene mesh. Bri J Surg 95:1226–1231CrossRef

50.

Zeybek N, Tas H, Peker Y et al (2008) Comparison of modified darn repair and Lichtenstein repair of primary inguinal hernias. J Surg Res 146:225–229PubMedCrossRef

51.

Campanelli G, Champault G, Pascaul MH et al (2008) Randomized controlled, blind trial of Tissucol/Tisseel for mesh fixation in patients undergoing Lichtenstein technique for primary inguinal hernia repair: a rationale and study design of TIMELI trial. Hernia 12:159–165PubMedCrossRef

52.

Nienhuijs S, Staal E, Gels MK et al (2007) Pain after open preperitoneal repair versus Lichtenstein repair: a randomized trial. World J Surg 31:1751–1757PubMedCrossRef

53.

Canonico S, Benevento R, Corte AD et al (2007) Sutureless tension free hernia repair with human fibrin glue (Tissucol) in soccer players with chronic inguinal pain: initial experience. Int J Sports Med 28:873–876PubMedCrossRef

54.

Paajanen H (2007) A single-surgeon randomized trial comparing three composite meshes on chronic pain after Lichtenstein hernia repair in local anesthesia. Hernia 11:335–339PubMedCrossRef

55.

Veen RN, Wijsmuller AR, Vrijland WW et al (2007) Long-therm follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of non-mesh versus mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia. Bri J Surg 94:506–510CrossRef

56.

Lohsiriwat V, Sridermma W, Akaraviputh T et al (2007) Surgical outcomes of Lichtenstein tension-free herinoplasty for acutely incarcerated inguinal hernia. Surg Today 37:212–214PubMedCrossRef

57.

Eklund A, Rudberg C, Leijonmarck CE et al (2007) Recurrent inguinal hernia: randomized multicenter trial comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein repair. Surg Endosc 21:634–640PubMedCrossRef

58.

Frey DM, Wildisen A, Hamel CT et al (2007) Randomized clinical trial of Lichtenstein’s operation versus mesh plug for inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 94:36–41PubMedCrossRef

59.

Bringman S, Wollert S, Osterberg J et al (2006) Three-year results of a randomized clinical trial of lightweight or standard polypropylene mesh in Lichtenstein repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 93:1056–1059PubMedCrossRef

60.

Eklund A, Rudberg C, Smedberg S et al (2006) Short term results of a randomized clinical trial comparing Lichtenstein open repair with totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 93:1060–1068PubMedCrossRef

61.

Dogru O, Girgin M, Bulbuller N et al (2006) Comparison of Kugel and Lichtenstein operations for inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized study. World J Surg 30:346–350PubMedCrossRef

62.

Lau H, Patil NG, Yuen WK (2006) Day-case endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty versus open Lichtenstein hernioplasty for unilateral primary inguinal hernia in males. Surg Endosc 20:76–81PubMedCrossRef

63.

Canonico S, Santoriello A, Campitiello F et al (2005) Mesh fixation with human fibrin glue (Tissucol) in open tension-free inguinal hernia repair: a preliminary report. Hernia 9:330–333PubMedCrossRef

64.

Nienhuijs SW, Oort I, Gels MEK et al (2005) Randomized clinical trial comparing the Prolene Hernia System, mesh plug repair and Lichtenstein method for open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 92:33–38PubMedCrossRef

65.

Kark AE, Belsham PA, Kurzer MN (2005) Simultaneous repair of bilateral groin hernias using local anaesthesia: a review of 199 cases with a five-year follow-up. Hernia 9:131–133PubMedCrossRef

66.

Aytac B, Cakar KS, Kamercan A (2004) Comparison of Shouldice and Lichtenstein repair for treatment of primary inguinal hernia. Acta Chir Belg 104:418–421PubMed

67.

Post S, Weiss B, Willer M et al (2004) Randomized clinical trial of lightweight composite mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 91:44–48PubMedCrossRef

68.

Gokalp A, Inal M, Maralcan G, Baskonus I (2003) A prospective randomized study of Lichtenstein open tension-free versus laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Acta Chir Belg 103:502–506PubMed

69.

Muldoon RL, Marchant K, Johnson DD et al (2004) Lichtenstein vs anterior preperitoneal prosthetic mesh placement in open inguinal hernia repair: a prospective, randomized trial. Hernia 8:98–103PubMedCrossRef

70.

Barrat C, Seriser F, Arnoud R et al (2004) Inguinal hernia repair with beta glucan-coated mesh: prospective multicenter study (115 cases)—preliminary results. Hernia 8:33–38PubMedCrossRef

71.

Helbling C, Schlumpf R (2003) Sutureless Lichtenstein: first results of a prospective randomised clinical trial. Hernia 7:80–84PubMedCrossRef

72.

Andersson B, Hallen M, Leveau P et al (2003) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair versus open mesh repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surgery 133:464–472PubMedCrossRef

73.

Bringman S, Ramel S, Heikkinen TM et al (2003) Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein. Ann Surg 237:142–147PubMedCrossRef

74.

Vrijland WW, Tol MP, Luijendijk RW et al (2002) Randomized clinical trial of non-mesh versus mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 89:293–297PubMedCrossRef

75.

Sakorafas GH, Halikias I, Nissotakis C et al (2001) Open tension free repair of inguinal hernias; the Lichtenstein technique. BMC Surg 1:3PubMedCrossRef

76.

Bringman S, Wollert S, Osterberg J et al (2006) One year results of a randomized clinical trial of lightweight or standard polypropylene mesh in Lichtenstein repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 93(9):1056–1059PubMedCrossRef

Title: Mesh size in Lichtenstein repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the importance of mesh size
Authors: D. Seker
D. Oztuna
H. Kulacoglu
Y. Genc
M. Akcil
Publication date: 01-04-2013
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Hernia / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-1018-y

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Mesh size in Lichtenstein repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the importance of mesh size

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Erratum to: True-FISP MRI in diagnosis of postoperative hernia recurrence: a brief report

Laparoscopic repair of incarcerated inguinal hernia. A safe and effective procedure to adopt in children

Single-port endo-laparoscopic surgery (SPES) for totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia: a critical appraisal of the chopstick repair

Familial female femoral herniation

Long-term follow-up after incisional hernia repair: are there only benefits for symptomatic patients?

The effects of different prosthetic materials on the formation of collagen types in incisional hernia