Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 3/2019

01-03-2019 | Original Article

Physical property investigation of contemporary glass ionomer and resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials

Authors: Matthew Moberg, John Brewster, John Nicholson, Howard Roberts

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

The objective of this study was to investigate selected physical properties of nine contemporary and recently marketed glass ionomer cement (GIC) and four resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGI) dental restorative materials.

Materials and methods

Specimens (n = 12) were fabricated for fracture toughness and flexure strength using standardized, stainless steel molds. Testing was completed on a universal testing machine until failure. Knoop hardness was obtained using failed fracture toughness specimens on a microhardness tester, while both flexural modulus and flexural toughness was obtained by analysis of the flexure strength results data. Testing was completed at 1 h, 24 h, 1 week, and then at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Mean data was analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney (p = 0.05).

Results

Physical properties results were material dependent. Physical properties of the GIC and RMGI products were inferior at 1 h compared to that at 24 h. Some improvement in selected physical properties were noted over time, but development processes were basically concluded by 24 h. A few materials demonstrated improved physical properties over the course of the evaluation.

Conclusions

Under the conditions of this study:
1.
GIC and RMGI physical property performance over time was material dependent;
 
2.
Polyalkenoate maturation processes are essentially complete by 24 h;
 
3.
Although differences in GIC physical properties were noted, the small magnitude of the divergences may render such to be unlikely of clinical significance;
 
4.
Modest increases in some GIC physical properties were noted especially flexural modulus and hardness, which lends support to reports of a maturing hydrogel matrix;
 
5.
Overall, GIC product physical properties were more stable than RMGI;
 
6.
A similar modulus reduction at 6 months for both RMGI and GIC produced may suggest a polyalkenoate matrix change; and
 
7.
Globally, RMGI products demonstrated higher values of flexure strength, flexural toughness, and fracture toughness than GIC materials.
 

Clinical relevance

As compared to RMGI materials, conventional glass ionomer restorative materials demonstrate more stability in physical properties.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wilson AD, Kent BE (1971) The glass-ionomer cement, a new translucent dental filling material. J Appl Chem 21:313CrossRef Wilson AD, Kent BE (1971) The glass-ionomer cement, a new translucent dental filling material. J Appl Chem 21:313CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Wilson AD, Batchelor RF (1967) Dental silicate cements I. The chemistry of erosion. J Dent Res 46:1078–1085 Wilson AD, Batchelor RF (1967) Dental silicate cements I. The chemistry of erosion. J Dent Res 46:1078–1085
3.
go back to reference Wilson AD (1989) Developments in glass-ionomer cements. Int J Prosthodont 2:438–446PubMed Wilson AD (1989) Developments in glass-ionomer cements. Int J Prosthodont 2:438–446PubMed
4.
5.
go back to reference Hatton PV, Brook IM (1992) Characterization of the ultrastructure of glass-ionomer (poly-alkenoate) cement. Br Dent J 173:275–277CrossRefPubMed Hatton PV, Brook IM (1992) Characterization of the ultrastructure of glass-ionomer (poly-alkenoate) cement. Br Dent J 173:275–277CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Cattani-Lovente MA, Godin C, Meyer JM (1994) Mechanical behavior of glass ionomer cements affected by the long-term storage in water. Dent Mater 10:37–44CrossRef Cattani-Lovente MA, Godin C, Meyer JM (1994) Mechanical behavior of glass ionomer cements affected by the long-term storage in water. Dent Mater 10:37–44CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Matsuya S, Maeda T, Ohta M (1996) IR and NMR analyses of hardening and maturation of glass-ionomer cement. J Dent Res 75:1920–1927CrossRefPubMed Matsuya S, Maeda T, Ohta M (1996) IR and NMR analyses of hardening and maturation of glass-ionomer cement. J Dent Res 75:1920–1927CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Crisp S, Lewis BG, Wilson AD (1976) Characterization of glass-ionomer cements. 1. Long term hardness and compressive strength. J Dent 4:162–166CrossRefPubMed Crisp S, Lewis BG, Wilson AD (1976) Characterization of glass-ionomer cements. 1. Long term hardness and compressive strength. J Dent 4:162–166CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Mitra SB (1991) Adhesion to dentin and physical properties of a light-cured glass-ionomer liner/base. J Dent Res 70:72–74CrossRefPubMed Mitra SB (1991) Adhesion to dentin and physical properties of a light-cured glass-ionomer liner/base. J Dent Res 70:72–74CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Khoroushi M, Keshani F (2013) A review of glass-ionomers: from conventional glass-ionomer to bioactive glass-ionomer. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 10:411–420 Khoroushi M, Keshani F (2013) A review of glass-ionomers: from conventional glass-ionomer to bioactive glass-ionomer. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 10:411–420
15.
go back to reference Prosser HJ, Powis DR, Brant PJ, Wilson AD (1984) Characterization of glass-ionomer cements. The physical properties of current materials. J Dent 12:231–240CrossRefPubMed Prosser HJ, Powis DR, Brant PJ, Wilson AD (1984) Characterization of glass-ionomer cements. The physical properties of current materials. J Dent 12:231–240CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference McLean JW, Gasser O (1985) Glass cermet cements. Quintessence Int 16:333–343PubMed McLean JW, Gasser O (1985) Glass cermet cements. Quintessence Int 16:333–343PubMed
17.
go back to reference Simmons JJ (1983) The miracle mixture: glass-ionomer and alloy powder. Tex Dent J 100:6–12PubMed Simmons JJ (1983) The miracle mixture: glass-ionomer and alloy powder. Tex Dent J 100:6–12PubMed
18.
go back to reference Williams JA, Billington RW, Pearson GJ (1992) The comparative strengths of commercial glass-ionomer cements with and without metal additions. Br Dent J 172:279–282CrossRefPubMed Williams JA, Billington RW, Pearson GJ (1992) The comparative strengths of commercial glass-ionomer cements with and without metal additions. Br Dent J 172:279–282CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Guggenberger R, May R, Stefan KP (1998) New trends in glass-ionomer chemistry. Biomaterials 19:479–483CrossRefPubMed Guggenberger R, May R, Stefan KP (1998) New trends in glass-ionomer chemistry. Biomaterials 19:479–483CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Boyd D, Towler MR, Watts S, Hill RG, Wren AW, Clarkin OM (2008) The role of Sr2+ on the structure and reactivity of SrO-CaO-ZnO-SiO2 ionomer glasses. J Mater Sci Mater Med 19:953–957CrossRefPubMed Boyd D, Towler MR, Watts S, Hill RG, Wren AW, Clarkin OM (2008) The role of Sr2+ on the structure and reactivity of SrO-CaO-ZnO-SiO2 ionomer glasses. J Mater Sci Mater Med 19:953–957CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Sidhu SK, Watson TF (1995) Resin-modified glass ionomer materials. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 8:59–67PubMed Sidhu SK, Watson TF (1995) Resin-modified glass ionomer materials. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 8:59–67PubMed
26.
go back to reference Friedl KH, Powers JM, Hiller KA (1995) Influence of different factors on bond strength of hybrid ionomers. Oper Dent 20:74–80PubMed Friedl KH, Powers JM, Hiller KA (1995) Influence of different factors on bond strength of hybrid ionomers. Oper Dent 20:74–80PubMed
27.
go back to reference Kakaboura A, Eliades G, Palaghias G (1996) An FTIR study on the setting mechanism of resin-modified glass ionomer restoratives. Dent Mater 12:173–178CrossRefPubMed Kakaboura A, Eliades G, Palaghias G (1996) An FTIR study on the setting mechanism of resin-modified glass ionomer restoratives. Dent Mater 12:173–178CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Tay FR, Pashley EL, Huang C, Hashimoto M, Sano H, Smales RJ, Pashley DH (2001) The glass-ionomer phase in resin-based restorative materials. J Dent Res 80:1808–1812CrossRefPubMed Tay FR, Pashley EL, Huang C, Hashimoto M, Sano H, Smales RJ, Pashley DH (2001) The glass-ionomer phase in resin-based restorative materials. J Dent Res 80:1808–1812CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Fukuda R, Yoshida Y, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Inoue S, Sano H, Suzuki K, Shintani H, Meerbeek BV (2003) Bonding efficacy of polyalkenoic acids to hydroxyapatite, enamel, and dentin. Biomaterials 24:1861–1867CrossRefPubMed Fukuda R, Yoshida Y, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Inoue S, Sano H, Suzuki K, Shintani H, Meerbeek BV (2003) Bonding efficacy of polyalkenoic acids to hydroxyapatite, enamel, and dentin. Biomaterials 24:1861–1867CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Yiu CK, Tay FR, King NM, Pashley DH, Sidhu SK, Neo JC et al (2004) Interaction of glass ionomer cements with moist dentin. J Dent Res 83:283–289CrossRefPubMed Yiu CK, Tay FR, King NM, Pashley DH, Sidhu SK, Neo JC et al (2004) Interaction of glass ionomer cements with moist dentin. J Dent Res 83:283–289CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Yip HK, Tay FR, Ngo HC, Smales RJ, Pashley DH (2001) Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to dentin. Dent Mater 17:456–470CrossRefPubMed Yip HK, Tay FR, Ngo HC, Smales RJ, Pashley DH (2001) Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to dentin. Dent Mater 17:456–470CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Tay FR, Smales RJ, Ngo H, Wei SH, Pashley DH (2000) Effect of different conditioning protocols on adhesion of a GIC to dentin. J Adhes Dent 3:153–167 Tay FR, Smales RJ, Ngo H, Wei SH, Pashley DH (2000) Effect of different conditioning protocols on adhesion of a GIC to dentin. J Adhes Dent 3:153–167
34.
go back to reference Hammesfahr PD Developments in resionomer systems. In: Hunt P (ed) Glass ionomers: The next generation. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Glass Ionomers, June 1994, Philadelphia, PA. International Symposia in Dentistry, PC, Philadelphia, pp 47–55 Hammesfahr PD Developments in resionomer systems. In: Hunt P (ed) Glass ionomers: The next generation. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Glass Ionomers, June 1994, Philadelphia, PA. International Symposia in Dentistry, PC, Philadelphia, pp 47–55
38.
go back to reference Young AM (2002) FTIR investigation of polymerization [sic] and polyacid neutralization kinetics in resin-modified glass-ionomer dental cements. Biomaterials 23:3289–3295CrossRefPubMed Young AM (2002) FTIR investigation of polymerization [sic] and polyacid neutralization kinetics in resin-modified glass-ionomer dental cements. Biomaterials 23:3289–3295CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Young A, Sherpa G, Pearson B, Schottlander, Waters DN (2000) Use of Raman spectroscopy in the characterisation of the acid–base reaction in glass-ionomer cements. Biomaterials 21:1971–1979CrossRefPubMed Young A, Sherpa G, Pearson B, Schottlander, Waters DN (2000) Use of Raman spectroscopy in the characterisation of the acid–base reaction in glass-ionomer cements. Biomaterials 21:1971–1979CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Stamboulis A, Matsuya S, Hill RG, Law RV, Udoh K, Nakagawa M, Matsuya Y (2006) MAS-NMR spectroscopy studies in the setting reaction of glass ionomer cements. J Dent 34:574–581CrossRefPubMed Stamboulis A, Matsuya S, Hill RG, Law RV, Udoh K, Nakagawa M, Matsuya Y (2006) MAS-NMR spectroscopy studies in the setting reaction of glass ionomer cements. J Dent 34:574–581CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Wasson EA, Nicholson JW (1993) Change in pH during setting of polyelectrolyte dental cements. J Dent 21:122–126CrossRefPubMed Wasson EA, Nicholson JW (1993) Change in pH during setting of polyelectrolyte dental cements. J Dent 21:122–126CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Griffin SG, Hill RG (1999) Influence of glass composition on the properties of glass polyalkenoate cements. Part I: influence of aluminium to silicon ratio. Biomaterials 20:1579–1586CrossRefPubMed Griffin SG, Hill RG (1999) Influence of glass composition on the properties of glass polyalkenoate cements. Part I: influence of aluminium to silicon ratio. Biomaterials 20:1579–1586CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Algera TJ, Kleverlaan CJ, Prahl-Andersen B, Feilzer AJ (2006) The influence of environmental conditions on the material properties of setting glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 22:852–856CrossRefPubMed Algera TJ, Kleverlaan CJ, Prahl-Andersen B, Feilzer AJ (2006) The influence of environmental conditions on the material properties of setting glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 22:852–856CrossRefPubMed
44.
45.
go back to reference Watts C (1998) Analysis of reactions in glass-polyalkenoate/resin systems by dielectric impedance spectroscopy. Biomaterials 19:551–577CrossRefPubMed Watts C (1998) Analysis of reactions in glass-polyalkenoate/resin systems by dielectric impedance spectroscopy. Biomaterials 19:551–577CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference ŠSantić A, Čalogović AM, Pavić L, Gladić J, Vučić Z, Lovrić D, Prskalo K, Janković B, Tarle Z, Moguš-Milanković A (2015) New insights into the setting processes of glass ionomer cements from analysis of dielectric properties. J Am Ceram Soc 98:3869–3876. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.13830 CrossRef ŠSantić A, Čalogović AM, Pavić L, Gladić J, Vučić Z, Lovrić D, Prskalo K, Janković B, Tarle Z, Moguš-Milanković A (2015) New insights into the setting processes of glass ionomer cements from analysis of dielectric properties. J Am Ceram Soc 98:3869–3876. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​jace.​13830 CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Watts DC (1986) The development of surface hardness in visible light cured posterior composites. J Dent 14:169–174CrossRefPubMed Watts DC (1986) The development of surface hardness in visible light cured posterior composites. J Dent 14:169–174CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Azillah MA, Anstice HM, Pearson GJ (1998) Long-term flexural strength of three direct aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent 26:177–182CrossRefPubMed Azillah MA, Anstice HM, Pearson GJ (1998) Long-term flexural strength of three direct aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent 26:177–182CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Wasson EA, Nicholson JW (1993) New aspects of the setting chemistry of glass-ionomer cements. J Dent Res 72:481–483CrossRefPubMed Wasson EA, Nicholson JW (1993) New aspects of the setting chemistry of glass-ionomer cements. J Dent Res 72:481–483CrossRefPubMed
58.
go back to reference Cefaly DFG, Tapety CMC, Mondelli RFL, Lauris JRP, Phantumvanit P, Navarro MFL (2006) Three-year evaluation of the ART approach in class III and V restorations in permanent anterior teeth. Caries Res 40:389–392CrossRefPubMed Cefaly DFG, Tapety CMC, Mondelli RFL, Lauris JRP, Phantumvanit P, Navarro MFL (2006) Three-year evaluation of the ART approach in class III and V restorations in permanent anterior teeth. Caries Res 40:389–392CrossRefPubMed
60.
go back to reference Faccin ES, Ferreira SH, Kramer PF, Ardenghi TM, Feldens CA (2009) Clinical performance of ART restorations in primary teeth: a survival analysis. J Clin Pediatr Dent 33:295–298CrossRefPubMed Faccin ES, Ferreira SH, Kramer PF, Ardenghi TM, Feldens CA (2009) Clinical performance of ART restorations in primary teeth: a survival analysis. J Clin Pediatr Dent 33:295–298CrossRefPubMed
62.
go back to reference Frencken JE, van 't Hof MA, van Amerongen WE, Holmgren CJ (2004) Effectiveness of single-surface ART restorations in the permanent dentition: a meta-analysis. J Dent Res 83:120–123CrossRefPubMed Frencken JE, van 't Hof MA, van Amerongen WE, Holmgren CJ (2004) Effectiveness of single-surface ART restorations in the permanent dentition: a meta-analysis. J Dent Res 83:120–123CrossRefPubMed
63.
go back to reference Rutar J, Mcallan L, Tyas MJ (2002) Three-year clinical performance of glass ionomer cement in primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent 12:146–147CrossRefPubMed Rutar J, Mcallan L, Tyas MJ (2002) Three-year clinical performance of glass ionomer cement in primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent 12:146–147CrossRefPubMed
64.
go back to reference Burrow MF, Tyas MJ (2007) Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 32:11–15CrossRefPubMed Burrow MF, Tyas MJ (2007) Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 32:11–15CrossRefPubMed
65.
66.
go back to reference McComb D, Erickson RL, Maxymiw WG, Wood RE (2002) A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients. Oper Dent 27:430–437PubMed McComb D, Erickson RL, Maxymiw WG, Wood RE (2002) A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients. Oper Dent 27:430–437PubMed
67.
go back to reference Qvist V, Manscherb E, Teglers PT (2004) Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results. J Dent 32:285–294CrossRefPubMed Qvist V, Manscherb E, Teglers PT (2004) Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results. J Dent 32:285–294CrossRefPubMed
68.
go back to reference van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U (2008) Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 24:915–922CrossRefPubMed van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U (2008) Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 24:915–922CrossRefPubMed
70.
go back to reference Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V, Leal SC, Oliveria LB, Bezerra AC, Bonecker M (2009) Absence of carious lesions of glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations: a meta-analysis. Eur J Paediatr Dent 10:41–46PubMed Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V, Leal SC, Oliveria LB, Bezerra AC, Bonecker M (2009) Absence of carious lesions of glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations: a meta-analysis. Eur J Paediatr Dent 10:41–46PubMed
72.
go back to reference Billington R, Williams J, Pearson GJ (1990) Variation in powder/liquid ratio of a restorative glass-ionomer cement used in general dental practice. Br Dent J 168:164–167CrossRef Billington R, Williams J, Pearson GJ (1990) Variation in powder/liquid ratio of a restorative glass-ionomer cement used in general dental practice. Br Dent J 168:164–167CrossRef
75.
go back to reference ISO 9917-2:2010. Water based cements–Part 2: resin-modified cements. International Organization for Standardization, Geneve ISO 9917-2:2010. Water based cements–Part 2: resin-modified cements. International Organization for Standardization, Geneve
76.
go back to reference Prosser HJ, Powis DR, Brant P, Wilson AD (1984) Characterization of glass-ionomer cements. 7. The physical properties of current materials. J Dent 12:231–240CrossRefPubMed Prosser HJ, Powis DR, Brant P, Wilson AD (1984) Characterization of glass-ionomer cements. 7. The physical properties of current materials. J Dent 12:231–240CrossRefPubMed
80.
go back to reference Bonifácio CC, Kleverlaan CJ, Raggio DP, Werner A, de Carvalho RCR, van Amerongen (2009) Physical-mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment. Aust Dent J 54:233–237CrossRefPubMed Bonifácio CC, Kleverlaan CJ, Raggio DP, Werner A, de Carvalho RCR, van Amerongen (2009) Physical-mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment. Aust Dent J 54:233–237CrossRefPubMed
81.
go back to reference Yamazaki T, Schricker SR, Brantley WA, Culbertson BM, Johnston WJ (2005) Viscoelastic behavior and fracture toughness of six glass-ionomer cements. J Dent Res 96:266–272 Yamazaki T, Schricker SR, Brantley WA, Culbertson BM, Johnston WJ (2005) Viscoelastic behavior and fracture toughness of six glass-ionomer cements. J Dent Res 96:266–272
82.
go back to reference Xie D, Brantley WA, Culbertson BM, Wang G (2000) Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 16:129–138CrossRefPubMed Xie D, Brantley WA, Culbertson BM, Wang G (2000) Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 16:129–138CrossRefPubMed
83.
go back to reference Lucksanasombool P, Higgs WAJ, Higgs RJED, Swain MV (2002) Time dependence of the mechanical properties of GICs in simulated physiologic conditions. J Mater Sci Mater Med 13:745–750CrossRefPubMed Lucksanasombool P, Higgs WAJ, Higgs RJED, Swain MV (2002) Time dependence of the mechanical properties of GICs in simulated physiologic conditions. J Mater Sci Mater Med 13:745–750CrossRefPubMed
84.
go back to reference Xie D, Yang Y, Zhao J, Park JG, Zhang JT (2007) A novel comonomer-free light-cured glass-ionomer cement for reduced cytotoxicity and enhanced mechanical strength. Dent Mater 23:994–1003CrossRefPubMed Xie D, Yang Y, Zhao J, Park JG, Zhang JT (2007) A novel comonomer-free light-cured glass-ionomer cement for reduced cytotoxicity and enhanced mechanical strength. Dent Mater 23:994–1003CrossRefPubMed
86.
89.
go back to reference De Moor RJG, Verbeeck RMH (1998) Changes in surface hardness of conventional restorative glass ionomer cements. Biomaterials 19:2269–2275CrossRefPubMed De Moor RJG, Verbeeck RMH (1998) Changes in surface hardness of conventional restorative glass ionomer cements. Biomaterials 19:2269–2275CrossRefPubMed
90.
go back to reference Tyas MJ (1990) Correlation between fracture properties and clinical performance of composite resins in class IV cavities. Aust Dent J 35:46–49CrossRefPubMed Tyas MJ (1990) Correlation between fracture properties and clinical performance of composite resins in class IV cavities. Aust Dent J 35:46–49CrossRefPubMed
91.
go back to reference Ferracane JL, Condon JR (1999) In vitro evaluation of the marginal degradation of dental composites under simulated occlusal loading. Dent Mater 15:262–267CrossRefPubMed Ferracane JL, Condon JR (1999) In vitro evaluation of the marginal degradation of dental composites under simulated occlusal loading. Dent Mater 15:262–267CrossRefPubMed
94.
go back to reference Kanchanavasita W, Anstice HM, Pearson GJ (1997) Water sorption characteristics of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. Biomaterials 18:343–349CrossRefPubMed Kanchanavasita W, Anstice HM, Pearson GJ (1997) Water sorption characteristics of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. Biomaterials 18:343–349CrossRefPubMed
95.
go back to reference Small ICB, Watson TF, Chadwick AV, Sidhu SK (1998) Water sorption in resin-modified glass-ionomer cements: an in vitro comparison with other materials. Biomaterials 19:545–550CrossRefPubMed Small ICB, Watson TF, Chadwick AV, Sidhu SK (1998) Water sorption in resin-modified glass-ionomer cements: an in vitro comparison with other materials. Biomaterials 19:545–550CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Physical property investigation of contemporary glass ionomer and resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials
Authors
Matthew Moberg
John Brewster
John Nicholson
Howard Roberts
Publication date
01-03-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2554-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Clinical Oral Investigations 3/2019 Go to the issue