Top

Published in:

01-08-2012 | Original Article

Adhesion of conventional and simplified resin-based luting cements to superficial and deep dentin

Authors: Mutlu Özcan, Ayse Mese

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 4/2012

Abstract

This study evaluated the bond strengths of conventional (chemically and dual-polymerized) and simplified resin-based luting cements with their corresponding adhesives to superficial dentin (SD) and deep dentin (DD). Recently extracted third molars (N = 70, n = 10 per group) were obtained and prepared for testing procedures. After using their corresponding etchants, primers, and/or adhesive systems, the conventional and simplified cements (Variolink II [group A, conventional], Bifix QM [group B, conventional], Panavia F2.0 [group C, conventional], Multilink Automix [group D, simplified], Superbond C&B [group E, conventional], Clearfil Esthetic Cement [group F, simplified], Ketac-Fil [group G, conventional]) were adhered incrementally onto the dentin surfaces using polyethylene molds (inner diameter 3.5 mm, height 5 mm) and polymerized accordingly. Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC) acted as the control material. Shear bond strengths (1 mm/min) were determined after 500 times of thermocycling. Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests were used to analyze the data (α = 0.05). Bond strength (MPa) results were significantly affected by the cement types and their corresponding adhesive systems (p ≤ 0.05). The shear bond strengths (MPa ± SD) for groups A–G were 14.6 ± 3.8, 18.9 ± 3.9, 5.5 ± 4.5, 3.1 ± 3.6, 1.1 ± 2.5, 15.5 ± 2.6, 7 ± 4.3 and 7.1 ± 5.8, 15.1 ± 7.8, 8.4 ± 7.3, 7.5 ± 7.3, 4.9 ± 5.1, 12.5 ± 2.1, 6 ± 2.6 for SD and DD, respectively. The level of dentin depth did not decrease the bond strength significantly (p > 0.05) for all cements, except for Variolink II (p < 0.05). On the SD, bond strength of resin cements with “etch-and-rinse” adhesive systems (Variolink II, Bifix QM, Super-Bond C&B) showed similar results being higher than those of the simplified ones. Simplified cements and RMGIC as control material showed inferior adhesion to superficial and deep dentin compared to conventional resin cements tested.

Edelhoff D, Özcan M (2007) To what extend does the longevity of fixed dental prostheses depend on the function of cement? Clin Oral Implants Res 18:193–204PubMedCrossRef

Smith DC (1968) A new dental cement. Br Dent J 124:381–384PubMed

Wilson AD, Kent BE (1971) The glass ionomer cement: a new translucent dental filling material. J Appl Chem Biotechnol 21:313–320CrossRef

Mitra SB (1991) Adhesion to dentin and physical properties of a light-cured glass-ionomer liner/base. J Dent Res 70:72–77PubMedCrossRef

Antonucci JM (1987) Formulation and evaluation of resin modified glass ionomer cements. Trans Soc Biomater 13:225

Fu BP, Sun XM, Qian WX, Shen YQ, Chen RR, Hannig M (2005) Evidence of chemical bonding to hydroxyapatite by phosphoric acid esters. Biomaterials 26:5104–5110PubMedCrossRef

Mathis Mathis RS, Ferracane JL (1989) Properties of a glass-ionomer/resin-composite hybrid material. Dent Mater 5:355–358CrossRef

Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ (1998) Dental luting agents: a review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 80:280–301PubMedCrossRef

Yang B, Ludwig K, Adelung R, Kern M (2006) Micro-tensile bond strength of three luting resins to human regional dentin. Dent Mater 22:45–56PubMedCrossRef

10.

Hill EE (2007) Dental cements for definitive luting: a review and practical clinical considerations. Dent Clin North Am 51:643–658PubMedCrossRef

11.

Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M (2008) Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review. J Adhes Dent 10:251–258PubMed

12.

Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJT (2010) Self-adhesive resin cements—chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil 38:295–314PubMedCrossRef

13.

Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2001) Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Oper Dent Suppl 6:119–144

14.

Van Meerbeek B, De Munk J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2003) Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28:215–235PubMed

15.

Tay FR, Pashley DH (2001) Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems 1: depth of penetration beyond smear layers. Dent Mater 17:296–308PubMedCrossRef

16.

Tay F, Pashley D, Yoshiyama M (2002) Two modes of nanoleakage expression in single-step adhesives. J Dent Res 81:47–476

17.

Armstrong SR, Vargas MA, Fang Q, Laffoon JE (2003) Microtensile bond strength of a total-etch 3-step, total-etch 2-step, self-etch 2-step, and a self-etch 1-step dentin bonding system through 15-month water storage. J Adhes Dent 5:47–56PubMed

18.

Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B (2004) Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 83:454–458PubMedCrossRef

19.

Sensi L, Lopes G, Monteiro S, Baratieri L, Vieira L (2005) Dentin bond strength of self-etching primers/adhesives. Oper Dent 30:63–68PubMed

20.

Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A (2002) Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 30:371–382PubMedCrossRef

21.

Cheong C, King NM, Pashley DH, Ferrari M, Toledano M, Tay FR (2003) Incompatibility of self-etch adhesives with chemical/dual-cured composites: two-step vs one-step systems. Oper Dent 28:747–755PubMed

22.

Bolhuis PB, de Gee AJ, Kleverlaan CJ, El Zohairy AA, Feilzer AJ (2006) Contraction stress and bond strength to dentin for compatible and incompatible combinations of bonding systems and chemical and light-cured core build-up resin composites. Dent Mater 22:223–233PubMedCrossRef

23.

Gale MS, Darvell BW (1999) Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 27:89–99PubMedCrossRef

24.

Suh BI, Feng L, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2003) Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically cured or dual-cured composites. Part III. Effect of acidic resin monomers. J Adhes Dent 5:267–282PubMed

25.

Shono Y, Ogawa T, Terashita M, Carvalho RM, Pashley EL, Pashley DH (1999) Regional measurement of resin–dentin bonding as an array. J Dent Res 78:699–705PubMedCrossRef

26.

Akawa H, Nikaido T, Takada T, Burrow MF, Tagami J (2002) Shear bond strengths to coronal and pulp chamber floor dentin. Am J Dent 15:383–388

27.

Takahashi A, Sato Y, Uno S, Pereira PNR, Sano H (2002) Effects of mechanical properties of adhesive resins on bond strength to dentin. Dent Mater 18:263–268PubMedCrossRef

28.

Lopes GC, Perdigão J, Lopes Mde F, Vieira LC, Baratieri LN, Monteiro S Jr (2006) Dentin bond strengths of simplified adhesives: effect of dentin depth. Compend Contin Educ Dent 27:340–346PubMed

29.

De Munck J, Vargas M, Iracki J, Van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2005) One-day bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 30:39–49PubMed

30.

Reis A, Loguercio AD, Azevedo CLN, Carvalho RM, Singer JM, Grande RHM (2003) Moisture spectrum of demineralized dentin for different solvent-based adhesive system. J Adhes Dent 5:183–192PubMed

31.

Marques Melo R, Özcan M, Barbosa SH, Galhano G, Amaral R, Bottino MA, Valandro LF (2010) Bond strength of two resin cements on dentin using different cementation strategies. J Esthet Restor Dent 22:262–268CrossRef

32.

Carvalho RM, Pegoraro TA, Tay FR, Pegoraro LF, Silva NRFA, Pashley DH (2004) Adhesive permeability affects coupling of resin cements that utilize self-etching primers to dentine. J Dent 32:55–65PubMedCrossRef

33.

Paul SJ, Leach M, Rueggeberg FA, Pashley DH (1999) Effect of water content on the physical properties of model dentine primer and bonding resins. J Dent 27:209–214PubMedCrossRef

34.

de Gee AJ, ten Harkel HC, Davidson CL (1989) The influence of mixing ratio on the working time, strength and wear of composites. Aust Dent J 34:466–469PubMedCrossRef

35.

Kinomoto Y, Torii M, Takeshige F, Ebisu S (1999) Comparison of polymerization contraction stresses between self- and light-curing composites. J Dent 27:383–389PubMedCrossRef

36.

Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E (1982) The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 16:265–273PubMedCrossRef

37.

Takagaki T, Nikaido T, Tsuchiya S, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, Tagami J (2009) Effect of hybridization on bond strength and adhesive interface after acid-base challenge using 4-META/MMA-TBB resin. Dent Mater J 28:185–193PubMedCrossRef

38.

Moszner N, Salz U, Zimmermann J (2005) Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel-dentin adhesives; a systematic review. Dent Mater 21:895–910PubMedCrossRef

39.

Ma S, Nakajima KF, Nishiyama N (2009) Effects of storage temperature on the shelf life of one-step and two-step self-etch adhesives. Oper Dent 34:472–480PubMedCrossRef

40.

Caiado AC, de Goes MF, de Souza-Filho FJ, Rueggeberg FA (2010) The effect of acid etchant type and dentin location on tubular density and dimension. J Prosthet Dent 103:352–361PubMedCrossRef

41.

Sengun A, Ozturk B, Ozer F (2003) The effect of simulated intrapulpal pressure on bond strength to enamel and dentine. J Oral Rehabil 30:550–555PubMedCrossRef

42.

Pioch T, Staehle HJ, Schneider H, Duschner H, Dorfer CE (2001) Effect of intrapulpal pressure simulation in vitro on shear bond strengths and hybrid layer formation. Am J Dent 14:319–323PubMed

43.

El-Araby AM, Talic YF (2007) The effect of thermocycling on the adhesion of self-etching adhesives on dental enamel and dentin. J Contemp Dent Pract 8:17–24PubMed

44.

Valandro LF, Özcan M, Amaral R, Vanderlei A, Bottino MA (2008) Effect of testing methods on the bond strength of resin to zirconia-alumina ceramic: microtensile versus shear test. Dent Mater J 27:849–855PubMedCrossRef

45.

Tay FR, Carvalho R, Sano H, Pashley DH (2000) Effect of smear layers on the bonding of a self-etching primer to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2:99–116PubMed

Title: Adhesion of conventional and simplified resin-based luting cements to superficial and deep dentin
Authors: Mutlu Özcan
Ayse Mese
Publication date: 01-08-2012
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0594-z

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Adhesion of conventional and simplified resin-based luting cements to superficial and deep dentin

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Bisphosphonates modulate the expression of OPG and M-CSF in hMSC-derived osteoblasts

Bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the mandible: reliable soft tissue reconstruction using a local myofascial flap

A rare allergy to a polyether dental impression material

Predictors of poor dental arch relationship in young children with unilateral cleft lip and palate

Correlation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) findings in the maxillary sinus with dental diagnoses: a retrospective cross-sectional study

Long-term effectiveness of four pulpotomy techniques: 3-year randomised controlled trial