Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 4/2012

01-08-2012 | Original Article

A rare allergy to a polyether dental impression material

Authors: Pauline Mittermüller, Rolf-Markus Szeimies, Michael Landthaler, Gottfried Schmalz

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Polyether impression materials have been used in dentistry for more than 40 years. Allergic reactions to these materials such as reported in the 1970s ceased after replacement of a catalyst. Very recently, however, patients have started to report symptoms that suggest a new allergic reaction from polyether impression materials. Here, we report on the results of allergy testing with polyether impression materials as well as with its components. Eight patients with clinical symptoms of a contact allergy (swelling, redness or blisters) after exposure to a polyether impression material were subjected to patch tests, two of them additionally to a prick test. A further patient with atypical symptoms of an allergy (nausea and vomiting after contact with a polyether impression material in the oral cavity) but with a history of other allergic reaction was also patch tested. The prick tests showed no immediate reactions in the two patients tested. In the patch tests, all eight patients with typical clinical symptoms showed positive reactions to the mixed polyether impression materials, to the base paste or to a base paste component. The patient with the atypical clinical symptoms did not show any positive patch test reactions. Polyether impression materials may evoke type IV allergic reactions. The causative agent was a component of the base paste. In consideration of the widespread use of this impression material (millions of applications per year) and in comparison to the number of adverse reactions from other dental materials, the number of such allergic reactions is very low. In very scarce cases, positive allergic reactions to polyether impression materials are possible.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schmalz G, Arenholt-Bindslev D (2005) Biokompatibilität zahnärztlicher Werkstoffe. Elsevier, München Schmalz G, Arenholt-Bindslev D (2005) Biokompatibilität zahnärztlicher Werkstoffe. Elsevier, München
2.
go back to reference Gangemi S, Spagnolo EV, Cardia G, Minciullo PL (2009) Fatal anaphylactic shock due to a dental impression material. Int J Prosthodont 22:33–34PubMed Gangemi S, Spagnolo EV, Cardia G, Minciullo PL (2009) Fatal anaphylactic shock due to a dental impression material. Int J Prosthodont 22:33–34PubMed
5.
go back to reference Dahl BL, Hensten-Pettersen A, Lyberg T (1990) Assessment of adverse reactions to prosthodontic materials. J Oral Rehabil 17:279–286PubMedCrossRef Dahl BL, Hensten-Pettersen A, Lyberg T (1990) Assessment of adverse reactions to prosthodontic materials. J Oral Rehabil 17:279–286PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fisher AA (1985) Allergic stomatitis from dental impression compounds. Cutis 36:295–296PubMed Fisher AA (1985) Allergic stomatitis from dental impression compounds. Cutis 36:295–296PubMed
7.
go back to reference Van Groeningen G, Nater JP (1975) Reactions to dental impression materials. Contact Dermat 1:373–376CrossRef Van Groeningen G, Nater JP (1975) Reactions to dental impression materials. Contact Dermat 1:373–376CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Beltrani VS, Bernstein IL, Cohen DE, Fonacier L (2006) Contact dermatitis: a practice parameter. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 97(3, suppl 2):1–38CrossRef Beltrani VS, Bernstein IL, Cohen DE, Fonacier L (2006) Contact dermatitis: a practice parameter. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 97(3, suppl 2):1–38CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bourke J, Coulson I, English J (2001) Guidelines for care of contact dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 145:877–885PubMedCrossRef Bourke J, Coulson I, English J (2001) Guidelines for care of contact dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 145:877–885PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bruze M, Conde-Salzar L, Goossens A, Kanerva L, White IR (1999) Thoughts on sensitizers in a standard patch test series. Eur Soc Contact Dermat 41:241–250CrossRef Bruze M, Conde-Salzar L, Goossens A, Kanerva L, White IR (1999) Thoughts on sensitizers in a standard patch test series. Eur Soc Contact Dermat 41:241–250CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Korting HC, Sterry W (1997) Diagnostische Verfahren in der Dermatologie. Blackwell, Berlin Korting HC, Sterry W (1997) Diagnostische Verfahren in der Dermatologie. Blackwell, Berlin
12.
go back to reference Meth MJ, Maibach HI (2006) Current understanding of contrast media reactions and implications for clinical management. Drug Saf 29:133–141PubMedCrossRef Meth MJ, Maibach HI (2006) Current understanding of contrast media reactions and implications for clinical management. Drug Saf 29:133–141PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A rare allergy to a polyether dental impression material
Authors
Pauline Mittermüller
Rolf-Markus Szeimies
Michael Landthaler
Gottfried Schmalz
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0618-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Clinical Oral Investigations 4/2012 Go to the issue