Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 3/2017

01-04-2017 | Original Article • SHOULDER - FRACTURES

Shoulder arthroscopy combined to hardware removal in proximal humeral fractures: a series of 58 cases with a mean follow-up of 2 years

Authors: Ch. Maroun, D. Aliani, A. Hass, J. D. Werthel, Anne Vidil, Ph. Valenti

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Proximal humerus fractures are common injuries. Locking plates and anterograde medullary nails are the two most common fixation devices used when open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is indicated. Complications related to fracture and to hardware are numerous, especially shoulder stiffness. The goal of this study is to report the clinical outcomes of gleno-humeral arthroscopic arthrolysis combined with hardware removal.

Methods

A total of 58 patients (25 men, 33 women) with a mean age of 58 years (24–79) were reviewed retrospectively. Forty of them were active workers (5 heavy workers), and 18 were retired. A total of 24 fractures were reported after sport accident, 26 after domestic accident, and 8 after high energy trauma. Thirty-four patients with 3 or 4 part fractures (fracture through the anatomic neck and tuberosities), 20 patients with two part (displaced surgical neck) fracture and 4 cases of fracture of the tuberosities were operated. We combined a gleno-humeral arthrolysis by arthroscopy and a removal of the hardware using the previous incision for the plate or by arthroscopy for the nail.

Results

The average follow-up was 23 months (range 6–60). Pain in Constant Murley score (CS) increased from 7.3 ± 3.8 points preoperatively to 13 ± 2.76 points post-operatively (p < 0.05). CS increased from 36.8 ± 12.25 points to 68.45 ± 15.24 points. Subjective shoulder value (SSV) score increased from 45.8 ± 16.6 to 78.23 ± 14.74. A gain in all active range of motion was reported (forward flexion: 37.6°, abduction: 39.5°, external rotation: 24.3°, internal rotation: from L5-S1 to T12-L1).

Conclusions

Gleno-humeral arthrolysis by arthroscopy combined with hardware removal after proximal humerus ORIF in one step is safe and beneficial for post-traumatic stiffness of the shoulder. It provides significant pain relief and increase of range of motion and allows to treat associated articular pathology.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kirchoff C, Braunstein V, Kirchoff S, Sprecher CM, Ockert B, Fischer F, Leidel BA, Biberthaler P (2008) Outcome analysis following removal of locking plate fixation of the proximal humerus. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9:138. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-9-138 CrossRef Kirchoff C, Braunstein V, Kirchoff S, Sprecher CM, Ockert B, Fischer F, Leidel BA, Biberthaler P (2008) Outcome analysis following removal of locking plate fixation of the proximal humerus. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9:138. doi:10.​1186/​1471-2474-9-138 CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Owsley KC, Gorczyca JT (2008) Fracture displacement and screw cutout after open reduction and locked plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Jt Surg Br 90(2):233–240. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.01351 CrossRef Owsley KC, Gorczyca JT (2008) Fracture displacement and screw cutout after open reduction and locked plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Jt Surg Br 90(2):233–240. doi:10.​2106/​JBJS.​F.​01351 CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lin J (1998) Treatment of humeral shaft fractures with humeral locked nail and comparison with plate fixation. J Trauma 44(5):859–864CrossRefPubMed Lin J (1998) Treatment of humeral shaft fractures with humeral locked nail and comparison with plate fixation. J Trauma 44(5):859–864CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Katthagen JC, Jensen G, Hennecke D, Lill H, Voigt C (2012) Arthroscopic implant removal after fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus. Technique and initial results in comparison to open implant removal. Unfallchirurg 115(1):47–54. doi:10.1007/s00113-011-1953-6 CrossRefPubMed Katthagen JC, Jensen G, Hennecke D, Lill H, Voigt C (2012) Arthroscopic implant removal after fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus. Technique and initial results in comparison to open implant removal. Unfallchirurg 115(1):47–54. doi:10.​1007/​s00113-011-1953-6 CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
go back to reference Maqdes A, Levy B, Klouche S, Hardy P (2014) The feasibility of an arthroscopic removal of humeral locking plates and glenohumeral arthrolysis after proximal humeral fractures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(2):456–461. doi:10.1007/s00167-013-2437-8 CrossRefPubMed Maqdes A, Levy B, Klouche S, Hardy P (2014) The feasibility of an arthroscopic removal of humeral locking plates and glenohumeral arthrolysis after proximal humeral fractures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(2):456–461. doi:10.​1007/​s00167-013-2437-8 CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Schai PA, Hintermann B, Koris MJ (1999) Preoperative arthroscopic assessment of fractures about the shoulder. Arthroscopy 15(8):827–835CrossRefPubMed Schai PA, Hintermann B, Koris MJ (1999) Preoperative arthroscopic assessment of fractures about the shoulder. Arthroscopy 15(8):827–835CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Shoulder arthroscopy combined to hardware removal in proximal humeral fractures: a series of 58 cases with a mean follow-up of 2 years
Authors
Ch. Maroun
D. Aliani
A. Hass
J. D. Werthel
Anne Vidil
Ph. Valenti
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-017-1938-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 3/2017 Go to the issue