Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 1/2012

01-05-2012 | Original Article

Posterior lumbar fusion by peek rods in degenerative spine: preliminary report on 30 cases

Authors: F. De Iure, G. Bosco, M. Cappuccio, S. Paderni, L. Amendola

Published in: European Spine Journal | Special Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Pre-curved peek rods to support posterior lumbar fusion have been available in the market since 4 years. Potential advantages using this new technology are increased load sharing on the anterior column promoting interbody fusion, reduced stress on bone–screw interface decreasing the rate of screw mobilization and, in the long term, reduced incidence of adjacent level disc degeneration.

Methods

The authors retrospectively reviewed 30 cases in which posterior fusion was supported by peek rods, analyzing early complications, rate of fusion and clinical outcome.

Results

At an average follow-up of 18 months, both clinical and radiographic results were satisfactory with only one case requiring surgical revision for a mechanical complication.

Conclusions

The semi-rigid systems can now be considered a viable option in the lumbar degenerative disease, although clinical evaluations are necessary in the longer term.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schwab FJ, Nazarian DG, Mahmud F et al (1995) Effects of spinal instrumentation on fusion of the lumbosacral spine. Spine 20:2023–2028PubMedCrossRef Schwab FJ, Nazarian DG, Mahmud F et al (1995) Effects of spinal instrumentation on fusion of the lumbosacral spine. Spine 20:2023–2028PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Narayan P, Haid RW, Subach BR et al (2002) Effect of spinal disease on successful arthrodesis in lumbar pedicle screw fixation. J Neurosurg 97(3 Suppl):277–280PubMed Narayan P, Haid RW, Subach BR et al (2002) Effect of spinal disease on successful arthrodesis in lumbar pedicle screw fixation. J Neurosurg 97(3 Suppl):277–280PubMed
3.
go back to reference Asher MA, Carson WL, Hardacker JW et al (2007) The effect of arthrodesis, implant stiffness, and time on the canine lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:549–559PubMedCrossRef Asher MA, Carson WL, Hardacker JW et al (2007) The effect of arthrodesis, implant stiffness, and time on the canine lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:549–559PubMedCrossRef
4.
5.
go back to reference Thomsen K, Christensen FB, Eiskjaer SP et al (1997) 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. The effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on functional outcome and fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective, randomized clinical study. Spine 22:2813–2822PubMedCrossRef Thomsen K, Christensen FB, Eiskjaer SP et al (1997) 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. The effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on functional outcome and fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective, randomized clinical study. Spine 22:2813–2822PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wedemeyer M, Parent S, Mahar A et al (2007) Titanium versus stainless steel for anterior spinal fusions: an analysis of rod stress as a predictor of rod breakage during physiologic loading in a bovine model. Spine 32:42–48PubMedCrossRef Wedemeyer M, Parent S, Mahar A et al (2007) Titanium versus stainless steel for anterior spinal fusions: an analysis of rod stress as a predictor of rod breakage during physiologic loading in a bovine model. Spine 32:42–48PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Toth JM, Wang M, Estes BT et al (2006) Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications. Biomaterials 27:324–334PubMedCrossRef Toth JM, Wang M, Estes BT et al (2006) Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications. Biomaterials 27:324–334PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kurtz SM, Devine JN (2007) PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials 28:4845–4869PubMedCrossRef Kurtz SM, Devine JN (2007) PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials 28:4845–4869PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ponnappan RK, Serhan H, Zarda B, Patel R, Albert T, Vaccaro AR (2009) Biomechanical evaluation and comparison of polyetheretherketone rod system to traditional titanium rod fixation. Spine J 9(3):263–267PubMedCrossRef Ponnappan RK, Serhan H, Zarda B, Patel R, Albert T, Vaccaro AR (2009) Biomechanical evaluation and comparison of polyetheretherketone rod system to traditional titanium rod fixation. Spine J 9(3):263–267PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Galbusera F, Bellini CM, Anasetti F, Ciavarro C, Lovi A, Brayda-Bruno M (2011) Rigid and flexible spinal stabilization devices: a biomechanical comparison. Med Eng Phys 33(4):490–496PubMedCrossRef Galbusera F, Bellini CM, Anasetti F, Ciavarro C, Lovi A, Brayda-Bruno M (2011) Rigid and flexible spinal stabilization devices: a biomechanical comparison. Med Eng Phys 33(4):490–496PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wenz LM, Merritt K, Brown SA, Moet A, Steffee AD (1990) In vitro biocompatibility of polyetheretherketone and polysulfone composites. J Biomed Mater Res 24:207–215PubMedCrossRef Wenz LM, Merritt K, Brown SA, Moet A, Steffee AD (1990) In vitro biocompatibility of polyetheretherketone and polysulfone composites. J Biomed Mater Res 24:207–215PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Posterior lumbar fusion by peek rods in degenerative spine: preliminary report on 30 cases
Authors
F. De Iure
G. Bosco
M. Cappuccio
S. Paderni
L. Amendola
Publication date
01-05-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue Special Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2219-x

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2012

European Spine Journal 1/2012 Go to the issue