Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastroenterology 7/2017

01-07-2017 | Original Article—Alimentary Tract

Risk factors of nonadherence to colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy and its impact on clinical outcomes: a KASID multicenter study

Authors: Chung Hyun Tae, Chang Mo Moon, Seong-Eun Kim, Sung-Ae Jung, Chang Soo Eun, Jae Jun Park, Geom Seog Seo, Jae Myung Cha, Sung Chul Park, Jaeyoung Chun, Hyun Jung Lee, Yunho Jung, Jin Oh Kim, Young-Eun Joo, Dong Il Park

Published in: Journal of Gastroenterology | Issue 7/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

An optimal surveillance program is important to prevent advanced colorectal neoplasm. In this context, we have evaluated the cumulative risk of high-risk adenoma (HRA) or colorectal cancer (CRC) according to surveillance interval time after polypectomy. In addition, we assessed risk factors for late surveillance to determine whether late surveillance can impact the risk of subsequent advanced colorectal neoplasm.

Methods

This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study involving 3562 subjects who had undergone removal of at least one adenoma at the index colonoscopy and who subsequently underwent a surveillance colonoscopy. The subjects were classified into an early, appropriate or late group depending on the timing of the surveillance colonoscopy, performed using modified U.S. guidelines.

Results

With 3% of the study population with LRA and HRA at the index colonoscopy going on to develop HRA or CRC, the estimated surveillance intervals calculated would be 6.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.42–7.10] years and 3.1 (95% CI 2.61–4.45) years, respectively. The predictors of late surveillance were female gender [odd ratio (OR) 1.21; 95% CI 1.04–1.40], having undergone the procedure in small-to-medium-sized cities (OR 1.92; 95% CI 1.36–2.72) and HRA at index colonoscopy (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.19–1.59). The risk factors for subsequent HRA or CRC were late surveillance (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.03–1.74), male gender (OR 2.13; 95% CI 1.54–2.95), having undergone the procedure in small-to-medium-sized cities (OR 1.63; 95% CI 1.11–2.40) and HRA at index colonoscopy (OR 2.60; 95% CI 2.04–3.33).

Conclusions

Women, having undergone the procedure in small-to-medium-sized cities and the presence of an HRA at the index colonoscopy were found to be independent risk factors for late surveillance colonoscopy. Late surveillance is significantly predictive of subsequent HRA or CRC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1977–81.CrossRefPubMed Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1977–81.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Fletcher SW, Dauphinee WD. Should colorectal carcinoma be sought in periodic health examinations?—an approach to the evidence. Clin Invest Med. 1981;4:23–31.PubMed Fletcher SW, Dauphinee WD. Should colorectal carcinoma be sought in periodic health examinations?—an approach to the evidence. Clin Invest Med. 1981;4:23–31.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Lin OS, Kozarek RA, Cha JM. Impact of sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: an evidence-based review of published prospective and retrospective studies. Intest Res. 2014;12:268–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lin OS, Kozarek RA, Cha JM. Impact of sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: an evidence-based review of published prospective and retrospective studies. Intest Res. 2014;12:268–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ, et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:901–6.CrossRefPubMed Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ, et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:901–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Jorgensen OD, Kronborg O, Fenger C. A randomized surveillance study of patients with pedunculated and small sessile tubular and tubulovillous adenomas. The Funen Adenoma Follow-up Study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1995;30:686–92. Jorgensen OD, Kronborg O, Fenger C. A randomized surveillance study of patients with pedunculated and small sessile tubular and tubulovillous adenomas. The Funen Adenoma Follow-up Study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1995;30:686–92.
6.
go back to reference Bertario L, Russo A, Sala P, et al. Predictors of metachronous colorectal neoplasms in sporadic adenoma patients. Int J Cancer. 2003;105:82–7.CrossRefPubMed Bertario L, Russo A, Sala P, et al. Predictors of metachronous colorectal neoplasms in sporadic adenoma patients. Int J Cancer. 2003;105:82–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Martinez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA, et al. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:832–41.CrossRefPubMed Martinez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA, et al. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:832–41.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Bonithon-Kopp C, Piard F, Fenger C, et al. Colorectal adenoma characteristics as predictors of recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:323–33.CrossRefPubMed Bonithon-Kopp C, Piard F, Fenger C, et al. Colorectal adenoma characteristics as predictors of recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:323–33.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Cairns SR, Scholefield JH, Steele RJ, et al. Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002). Gut. 2010;59:666–89.CrossRefPubMed Cairns SR, Scholefield JH, Steele RJ, et al. Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002). Gut. 2010;59:666–89.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844–57.CrossRefPubMed Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844–57.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hassan C, Quintero E, Dumonceau JM, et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2013;45:842–51.CrossRefPubMed Hassan C, Quintero E, Dumonceau JM, et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2013;45:842–51.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hong SN, Yang DH, Kim YH, et al. Korean guidelines for post-polypectomy colonoscopic surveillance. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2012;59:99–117.CrossRefPubMed Hong SN, Yang DH, Kim YH, et al. Korean guidelines for post-polypectomy colonoscopic surveillance. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2012;59:99–117.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lee HH, Kim SK, Choi HH, et al. Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers in average-risk Korean subjects with a normal initial colonoscopy. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2016;27:17–22.CrossRefPubMed Lee HH, Kim SK, Choi HH, et al. Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers in average-risk Korean subjects with a normal initial colonoscopy. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2016;27:17–22.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Leung WK, Lau JY, Suen BY, et al. Repeat-screening colonoscopy 5 years after normal baseline-screening colonoscopy in average-risk Chinese: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2028–34.CrossRefPubMed Leung WK, Lau JY, Suen BY, et al. Repeat-screening colonoscopy 5 years after normal baseline-screening colonoscopy in average-risk Chinese: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2028–34.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Harford WV, et al. Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:1077–85.CrossRefPubMed Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Harford WV, et al. Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:1077–85.CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
go back to reference Ryu SY, Crespi CM, Maxwell AE. Colorectal cancer among Koreans living in South Korea versus California: incidence, mortality, and screening rates. Ethn Health. 2014;19:406–23.CrossRefPubMed Ryu SY, Crespi CM, Maxwell AE. Colorectal cancer among Koreans living in South Korea versus California: incidence, mortality, and screening rates. Ethn Health. 2014;19:406–23.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Iskandar H, Yan Y, Elwing J, et al. Predictors of poor adherence of US gastroenterologists with colonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:971–8.CrossRefPubMed Iskandar H, Yan Y, Elwing J, et al. Predictors of poor adherence of US gastroenterologists with colonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:971–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Radaelli F, Paggi S, Bortoli A, et al. Overutilization of post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopy in clinical practice: a prospective, multicentre study. Dig Liver Dis. 2012;44:748–53.CrossRefPubMed Radaelli F, Paggi S, Bortoli A, et al. Overutilization of post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopy in clinical practice: a prospective, multicentre study. Dig Liver Dis. 2012;44:748–53.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Johnson MR, Grubber J, Grambow SC, et al. Physician nonadherence to colonoscopy interval guidelines in the veterans affairs healthcare system. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:938–51.CrossRef Johnson MR, Grubber J, Grambow SC, et al. Physician nonadherence to colonoscopy interval guidelines in the veterans affairs healthcare system. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:938–51.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Stock C, Holleczek B, Hoffmeister M, et al. Adherence to physician recommendations for surveillance in opportunistic colorectal cancer screening: the necessity of organized surveillance. PLoS One. 2013;8:e82676.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stock C, Holleczek B, Hoffmeister M, et al. Adherence to physician recommendations for surveillance in opportunistic colorectal cancer screening: the necessity of organized surveillance. PLoS One. 2013;8:e82676.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference van Heijningen EM, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Steyerberg EW, et al. Adherence to surveillance guidelines after removal of colorectal adenomas: a large, community-based study. Gut. 2015;64:1584–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Heijningen EM, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Steyerberg EW, et al. Adherence to surveillance guidelines after removal of colorectal adenomas: a large, community-based study. Gut. 2015;64:1584–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Jonkers D, Ernst J, Pladdet I, et al. Endoscopic follow-up of 383 patients with colorectal adenoma: an observational study in daily practice. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2006;15:202–10.CrossRefPubMed Jonkers D, Ernst J, Pladdet I, et al. Endoscopic follow-up of 383 patients with colorectal adenoma: an observational study in daily practice. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2006;15:202–10.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Murphy CC, Lewis CL, Golin CE, et al. Underuse of surveillance colonoscopy in patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:633–41.CrossRefPubMed Murphy CC, Lewis CL, Golin CE, et al. Underuse of surveillance colonoscopy in patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:633–41.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Huang Y, Gong W, Su B, et al. Recurrence and surveillance of colorectal adenoma after polypectomy in a southern Chinese population. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:838–45.CrossRefPubMed Huang Y, Gong W, Su B, et al. Recurrence and surveillance of colorectal adenoma after polypectomy in a southern Chinese population. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:838–45.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Greenspan M, Chehl N, Shawron K, et al. Patient non-adherence and cancellations are higher for screening colonoscopy compared with surveillance colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:2930–6.CrossRefPubMed Greenspan M, Chehl N, Shawron K, et al. Patient non-adherence and cancellations are higher for screening colonoscopy compared with surveillance colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:2930–6.CrossRefPubMed
30.
31.
go back to reference Singh A, Kuo YF, Goodwin JS. Many patients who undergo surgery for colorectal cancer receive surveillance colonoscopies earlier than recommended by guidelines. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(65–72):e1. Singh A, Kuo YF, Goodwin JS. Many patients who undergo surgery for colorectal cancer receive surveillance colonoscopies earlier than recommended by guidelines. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(65–72):e1.
33.
go back to reference Chun H, Khang YH, Kim IH, et al. Explaining gender differences in ill-health in South Korea: the roles of socio-structural, psychosocial, and behavioral factors. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:988–1001.CrossRefPubMed Chun H, Khang YH, Kim IH, et al. Explaining gender differences in ill-health in South Korea: the roles of socio-structural, psychosocial, and behavioral factors. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:988–1001.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Watkines Kevin. Team for the preparation of Human development report. 1st ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2006. Watkines Kevin. Team for the preparation of Human development report. 1st ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2006.
35.
go back to reference Shapiro JA, Klabunde CN, Thompson TD, et al. Patterns of colorectal cancer test use, including CT colonography, in the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21:895–904.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shapiro JA, Klabunde CN, Thompson TD, et al. Patterns of colorectal cancer test use, including CT colonography, in the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21:895–904.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Goodwin JS, Singh A, Reddy N, et al. Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:1335–43.CrossRefPubMed Goodwin JS, Singh A, Reddy N, et al. Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:1335–43.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Sheffield KM, Han Y, Kuo YF, et al. Potentially inappropriate screening colonoscopy in Medicare patients: variation by physician and geographic region. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:542–50.CrossRefPubMed Sheffield KM, Han Y, Kuo YF, et al. Potentially inappropriate screening colonoscopy in Medicare patients: variation by physician and geographic region. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:542–50.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Laiyemo AO, Pinsky PF, Marcus PM, et al. Utilization and yield of surveillance colonoscopy in the continued follow-up study of the polyp prevention trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:562–7 (quiz 497). Laiyemo AO, Pinsky PF, Marcus PM, et al. Utilization and yield of surveillance colonoscopy in the continued follow-up study of the polyp prevention trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:562–7 (quiz 497).
39.
go back to reference Sint Nicolaas J, de Jonge V, Cahen DL, et al. Awareness of surveillance recommendations among patients with colorectal adenomas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:405–11.CrossRefPubMed Sint Nicolaas J, de Jonge V, Cahen DL, et al. Awareness of surveillance recommendations among patients with colorectal adenomas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:405–11.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Saini SD, Nayak RS, Kuhn L, et al. Why don’t gastroenterologists follow colon polyp surveillance guidelines?: results of a national survey. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;43:554–8.CrossRefPubMed Saini SD, Nayak RS, Kuhn L, et al. Why don’t gastroenterologists follow colon polyp surveillance guidelines?: results of a national survey. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;43:554–8.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Jansen L, et al. Role of colonoscopy and polyp characteristics in colorectal cancer after colonoscopic polyp detection: a population-based case-control study. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:225–32.CrossRefPubMed Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Jansen L, et al. Role of colonoscopy and polyp characteristics in colorectal cancer after colonoscopic polyp detection: a population-based case-control study. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:225–32.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Sint Nicolaas J, de Jonge V, van Baalen O, et al. Optimal resource allocation in colonoscopy: timing of follow-up colonoscopies in relation to adenoma detection rates. Endoscopy. 2013;45:545–52.CrossRefPubMed Sint Nicolaas J, de Jonge V, van Baalen O, et al. Optimal resource allocation in colonoscopy: timing of follow-up colonoscopies in relation to adenoma detection rates. Endoscopy. 2013;45:545–52.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Seo JY, Chun J, Lee C, et al. Novel risk stratification for recurrence after endoscopic resection of advanced colorectal adenoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:655–64.CrossRefPubMed Seo JY, Chun J, Lee C, et al. Novel risk stratification for recurrence after endoscopic resection of advanced colorectal adenoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:655–64.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference van Enckevort CC, de Graaf AP, Hollema H, et al. Predictors of colorectal neoplasia after polypectomy: based on initial and consecutive findings. Neth J Med. 2014;72:139–45.PubMed van Enckevort CC, de Graaf AP, Hollema H, et al. Predictors of colorectal neoplasia after polypectomy: based on initial and consecutive findings. Neth J Med. 2014;72:139–45.PubMed
45.
go back to reference Vemulapalli KC, Rex DK. Risk of advanced lesions at first follow-up colonoscopy in high-risk groups as defined by the United Kingdom post-polypectomy surveillance guideline: data from a single U.S. center. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:299–306.CrossRefPubMed Vemulapalli KC, Rex DK. Risk of advanced lesions at first follow-up colonoscopy in high-risk groups as defined by the United Kingdom post-polypectomy surveillance guideline: data from a single U.S. center. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:299–306.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Risk factors of nonadherence to colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy and its impact on clinical outcomes: a KASID multicenter study
Authors
Chung Hyun Tae
Chang Mo Moon
Seong-Eun Kim
Sung-Ae Jung
Chang Soo Eun
Jae Jun Park
Geom Seog Seo
Jae Myung Cha
Sung Chul Park
Jaeyoung Chun
Hyun Jung Lee
Yunho Jung
Jin Oh Kim
Young-Eun Joo
Dong Il Park
Publication date
01-07-2017
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Gastroenterology / Issue 7/2017
Print ISSN: 0944-1174
Electronic ISSN: 1435-5922
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-016-1280-3

Other articles of this Issue 7/2017

Journal of Gastroenterology 7/2017 Go to the issue

Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract

Quantitative diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis using EUS elastography

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.