Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 8/2009

01-08-2009 | Original Article

Aprepitant as salvage antiemetic therapy in breast cancer patients receiving doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide

Authors: Paul J. Hesketh, Jerry Younger, Pedro Sanz-Altamira, Melissa Hayden, Julie Bushey, Brian Trainor, Michael Krentzin, Peter Nowd, Konstantinos Arnaoutakis, Ann M. Hesketh

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 8/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Goals of work

To assess the efficacy of adding aprepitant to a 5-HT3 antagonist and dexamethasone as salvage antiemetic therapy for breast cancer patients receiving their initial cycle of an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC) and failing to achieve complete control of emesis.

Materials and methods

Eligibility: breast cancer patients receiving their first cycle of AC. Treatment: standard dose of a 5-HT3 antagonist and dexamethasone 8–10 mg IV/PO on day 1 prior to cycle 1 of AC and dexamethasone 4 mg bid on days 2 and 3. Patients without complete control (no emesis, no nausea, or rescue antiemetics) during cycle 1 could proceed to cycle 2. During cycle 2, patients received AC and identical antiemetics (except dexamethasone 4 mg qd on days 2 and 3) plus aprepitant 125 mg PO day 1 and 80 mg PO days 2 and 3. Primary endpoint: complete control, 0–120 h after chemotherapy.

Results

Sixty-two patients received cycle 1 of AC. Complete control cycle 1: 13 patients (21%; 95%CI, 12–33%). Of the 49 patients eligible for cycle 2, four elected not to continue on study. Of the 45 patients receiving cycle 2, 44 were evaluable. Complete control and complete response (no emesis, no rescue) for the 5-day study period improved from 0% to 18% (p = 0.14) and 7% to 36% (p = 0.02) on cycles 1 and 2, respectively.

Conclusions

In breast cancer patients receiving AC, the addition of aprepitant to a 5-HT3 antagonist and dexamethasone during cycle 2 of treatment improved antiemetic outcome. Although the improvement in the primary endpoint of complete control during cycle 2 was not significant, all secondary endpoints such as complete response and no emesis rates were significantly better during cycle 2. The extent of antiemetic control during cycle 2 was numerically inferior to the results achieved in a phase III trial employing aprepitant with cycle 1 of AC chemotherapy, suggesting that the preferred approach is to include aprepitant with the initial cycle of AC chemotherapy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference de Boer-Dennert M, de Wit R, Schmitz PI et al (1997) Patient perceptions of the side-effects of chemotherapy: the influence of 5HT3 antagonists. Br J Cancer 76:1055–1061PubMed de Boer-Dennert M, de Wit R, Schmitz PI et al (1997) Patient perceptions of the side-effects of chemotherapy: the influence of 5HT3 antagonists. Br J Cancer 76:1055–1061PubMed
2.
go back to reference Hickok JT, Roscoe JA, Morrow GR et al (2003) Nausea and emesis remain significant problems of chemotherapy despite prophylaxis with 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 antiemetics: a University of Rochester James P. Wilmot Cancer Center Community Clinical Oncology Program Study of 360 cancer patients treated in the community. Cancer 97:2880–2886 doi:10.1002/cncr.11408 PubMedCrossRef Hickok JT, Roscoe JA, Morrow GR et al (2003) Nausea and emesis remain significant problems of chemotherapy despite prophylaxis with 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 antiemetics: a University of Rochester James P. Wilmot Cancer Center Community Clinical Oncology Program Study of 360 cancer patients treated in the community. Cancer 97:2880–2886 doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​11408 PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hesketh P, Navari R, Grote T et al (1996) Double-blind, randomized comparison of the antiemetic efficacy of intravenous dolasetron mesylate and intravenous ondansetron in the prevention of acute cisplatin-induced emesis in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 14:2242–2249PubMed Hesketh P, Navari R, Grote T et al (1996) Double-blind, randomized comparison of the antiemetic efficacy of intravenous dolasetron mesylate and intravenous ondansetron in the prevention of acute cisplatin-induced emesis in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 14:2242–2249PubMed
6.
go back to reference Hesketh PJ, Kris MG, Grunberg SM et al (1997) Proposal for classifying the acute emetogenicity of cancer chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 15:103–109PubMed Hesketh PJ, Kris MG, Grunberg SM et al (1997) Proposal for classifying the acute emetogenicity of cancer chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 15:103–109PubMed
8.
go back to reference Gralla RJ, Osoba D, Kris MG et al (1999) Recommendations for the use of antiemetics: evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines. American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 17:2971–2994PubMed Gralla RJ, Osoba D, Kris MG et al (1999) Recommendations for the use of antiemetics: evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines. American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 17:2971–2994PubMed
9.
go back to reference Hesketh PJ, Grunberg SM, Gralla RJ et al (2003) The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin—the Aprepitant Protocol 052 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 21:4112–4119 doi:10.1200/JCO.2003.01.095 PubMedCrossRef Hesketh PJ, Grunberg SM, Gralla RJ et al (2003) The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin—the Aprepitant Protocol 052 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 21:4112–4119 doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2003.​01.​095 PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Poli-Bigelli S, Rodrigues-Pereira J, Carides AD et al (2003) Addition of the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist aprepitant to standard antiemetic therapy improves control of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Latin America. Cancer 97:3090–3098 doi:10.1002/cncr.11433 PubMedCrossRef Poli-Bigelli S, Rodrigues-Pereira J, Carides AD et al (2003) Addition of the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist aprepitant to standard antiemetic therapy improves control of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Latin America. Cancer 97:3090–3098 doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​11433 PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Warr DG, Hesketh PJ, Gralla RJ et al (2005) Efficacy and tolerability of aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with breast cancer after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 23:2822–2830, (Erratum, J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:5851) doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.09.050 PubMedCrossRef Warr DG, Hesketh PJ, Gralla RJ et al (2005) Efficacy and tolerability of aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with breast cancer after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 23:2822–2830, (Erratum, J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:5851) doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2005.​09.​050 PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Beck TM, Ciociola AA, Jones SE et al (1993) Efficacy of oral ondansetron in the prevention of emesis in outpatients receiving cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. The Ondansetron Study Group. Ann Intern Med 118:407–413PubMed Beck TM, Ciociola AA, Jones SE et al (1993) Efficacy of oral ondansetron in the prevention of emesis in outpatients receiving cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. The Ondansetron Study Group. Ann Intern Med 118:407–413PubMed
17.
go back to reference Roila F, Hesketh PJ, Herrstedt J et al (2006) Prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced emesis: results of the 2004 Perugia International Antiemetic Consensus Conference. Ann Oncol 17:20–28 doi:10.1093/annonc/mdj936 PubMedCrossRef Roila F, Hesketh PJ, Herrstedt J et al (2006) Prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced emesis: results of the 2004 Perugia International Antiemetic Consensus Conference. Ann Oncol 17:20–28 doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdj936 PubMedCrossRef
18.
19.
go back to reference Ettinger DS, Bierman PJ, Bradbury B et al (2007) Antiemesis. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 5:12–33PubMed Ettinger DS, Bierman PJ, Bradbury B et al (2007) Antiemesis. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 5:12–33PubMed
22.
go back to reference Fabi A, Barduagni M, Lauro S et al (2003) Is delayed chemotherapy-induced emesis well managed in oncological clinical practice? An observational study. Support Care Cancer 11:156–161PubMed Fabi A, Barduagni M, Lauro S et al (2003) Is delayed chemotherapy-induced emesis well managed in oncological clinical practice? An observational study. Support Care Cancer 11:156–161PubMed
23.
go back to reference Drug Utilization Review Team in Oncology (DURTO) (2003) Antiemetic prescription in Italian breast cancer patients submitted to adjuvant chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 11:785–789 doi:10.1007/s00520-003-0478-0 CrossRef Drug Utilization Review Team in Oncology (DURTO) (2003) Antiemetic prescription in Italian breast cancer patients submitted to adjuvant chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 11:785–789 doi:10.​1007/​s00520-003-0478-0 CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Oechsle K, Muller M, Hartmann J et al (2006) Aprepitant as salvage therapy in patients with chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis refractory to prophylaxis with 5-HT3 antagonists and dexamethasone. Onkologie 29:557–561 doi:10.1159/000096689 PubMedCrossRef Oechsle K, Muller M, Hartmann J et al (2006) Aprepitant as salvage therapy in patients with chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis refractory to prophylaxis with 5-HT3 antagonists and dexamethasone. Onkologie 29:557–561 doi:10.​1159/​000096689 PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Aprepitant as salvage antiemetic therapy in breast cancer patients receiving doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide
Authors
Paul J. Hesketh
Jerry Younger
Pedro Sanz-Altamira
Melissa Hayden
Julie Bushey
Brian Trainor
Michael Krentzin
Peter Nowd
Konstantinos Arnaoutakis
Ann M. Hesketh
Publication date
01-08-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 8/2009
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0545-7

Other articles of this Issue 8/2009

Supportive Care in Cancer 8/2009 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine