Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2019

01-08-2019

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection for small submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer in the gastric fundus

Authors: Bing Li, Tao Chen, Zhi-Peng Qi, Li-Qing Yao, Mei-Dong Xu, Qiang Shi, Shi-Lun Cai, Di Sun, Ping-Hong Zhou, Yun-Shi Zhong

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 8/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Gastric small submucosal tumors (SMTs) are becoming increasingly common. However, the fundus of stomach is regarded as a difficult area for endoscopic resection (ER). In this study, we investigated the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of ER for small SMTs of the gastric fundus in a large series of patients, research that was previously lacking.

Methods

537 consecutive patients with SMTs no more than 20 mm in diameter, occurring in the gastric fundus and originating from the muscularis propria layer, which were treated with endoscopic submucosal excavation or endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) were included in this retrospective study at Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University from January 2013 to September 2016. Clinicopathological, endoscopic, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed.

Results

En bloc resection was achieved in 100% of patients, and complete resection was achieved for 530 (98.7%) lesions. Although the total rate of complications was 9.3%, few serious adverse events occurred in only three (0.6%) patients, including major pneumoperitoneum, major hydrothorax, and bleeding. Unlike lager tumor sizes and longer procedure times, endoscopist experience had a positive impact on decreasing the likelihood of complications. Based on statistical analysis, tumors with greater size near the cardia, which were treated by EFTR, were the significant contributors to longer operative times. A median follow-up of 32 months was available, and all patients were free from local recurrence or distant metastasis during the study period.

Conclusions

Although the gastric fundus presents technical difficulties, ER is effective for the resection of small gastric SMTs with a high complete resection rate and rare serious adverse events.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Yu QX et al (2014) Clinical presentations of gastric small gastrointestinal stromal tumors mimics functional dyspepsia symptoms. World J Gastroenterol 20:11800–11807CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yu QX et al (2014) Clinical presentations of gastric small gastrointestinal stromal tumors mimics functional dyspepsia symptoms. World J Gastroenterol 20:11800–11807CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference von Mehren et al (2016) Soft tissue sarcoma, version 2.2016, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 14:758–786CrossRef von Mehren et al (2016) Soft tissue sarcoma, version 2.2016, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 14:758–786CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Zhou PH et al (2011) Endoscopic full-thickness resection without laparoscopic assistance for gastric submucosal tumors originated from the muscularis propria. Surg Endosc 25:2926–2931CrossRefPubMed Zhou PH et al (2011) Endoscopic full-thickness resection without laparoscopic assistance for gastric submucosal tumors originated from the muscularis propria. Surg Endosc 25:2926–2931CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Cai MY et al (2016) Endoscopic resection for gastric schwannoma with long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 30:3994–4000CrossRefPubMed Cai MY et al (2016) Endoscopic resection for gastric schwannoma with long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 30:3994–4000CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Shi Q et al (2013) Complete closure of large gastric defects after endoscopic full-thickness resection, using endoloop and metallic clip interrupted suture. Endoscopy 45:329–334CrossRefPubMed Shi Q et al (2013) Complete closure of large gastric defects after endoscopic full-thickness resection, using endoloop and metallic clip interrupted suture. Endoscopy 45:329–334CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Chen T et al (2017) Long-term outcomes of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Ann Surg 265:363–369CrossRefPubMed Chen T et al (2017) Long-term outcomes of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Ann Surg 265:363–369CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Joensuu H et al (2008) Risk stratification of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Hum Pathol 39:1411–1419CrossRefPubMed Joensuu H et al (2008) Risk stratification of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Hum Pathol 39:1411–1419CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lee SP et al (2017) A randomized controlled trial of prophylactic antibiotics in the prevention of electrocoagulation syndrome after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 86:349–357.e2CrossRefPubMed Lee SP et al (2017) A randomized controlled trial of prophylactic antibiotics in the prevention of electrocoagulation syndrome after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 86:349–357.e2CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Faulx AL et al (2017) The role of endoscopy in subepithelial lesions of the GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc 85:1117–1132CrossRefPubMed Faulx AL et al (2017) The role of endoscopy in subepithelial lesions of the GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc 85:1117–1132CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Chandrasekhara V et al (2011) Endoscopic management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 13:532–539CrossRefPubMed Chandrasekhara V et al (2011) Endoscopic management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 13:532–539CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lok KH et al (2009) Endosonographic surveillance of small gastrointestinal tumors originating from muscularis propria. J Gastrointest Liver Dis 18:177–180 Lok KH et al (2009) Endosonographic surveillance of small gastrointestinal tumors originating from muscularis propria. J Gastrointest Liver Dis 18:177–180
16.
go back to reference Zhou XX et al (2011) EUS for choosing best endoscopic treatment of mesenchymal tumors of upper gastrointestinal tract. World J Gastroenterol 17:1766–1771CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhou XX et al (2011) EUS for choosing best endoscopic treatment of mesenchymal tumors of upper gastrointestinal tract. World J Gastroenterol 17:1766–1771CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Hwang JH et al (2006) American Gastroenterological Association Institute technical review on the management of gastric subepithelial masses. Gastroenterology 130:2217–2228CrossRefPubMed Hwang JH et al (2006) American Gastroenterological Association Institute technical review on the management of gastric subepithelial masses. Gastroenterology 130:2217–2228CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Wiech T et al (2005) Histopathological classification of nonneoplastic and neoplastic gastrointestinal submucosal lesions. Endoscopy 37:630–634CrossRefPubMed Wiech T et al (2005) Histopathological classification of nonneoplastic and neoplastic gastrointestinal submucosal lesions. Endoscopy 37:630–634CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Akahoshi K et al (2007) Preoperative diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. World J Gastroenterol 13:2077–2082CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Akahoshi K et al (2007) Preoperative diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. World J Gastroenterol 13:2077–2082CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Eckardt AJ et al (2012) Endosonographic large-bore biopsy of gastric subepithelial tumors: a prospective multicenter study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24:1135–1144CrossRefPubMed Eckardt AJ et al (2012) Endosonographic large-bore biopsy of gastric subepithelial tumors: a prospective multicenter study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24:1135–1144CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Qiao WG et al (2015) Cap-aspiration lumpectomy for small submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria of the gastric fundus: a preliminary study (with videos). J Dig Dis 16:642–648CrossRefPubMed Qiao WG et al (2015) Cap-aspiration lumpectomy for small submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria of the gastric fundus: a preliminary study (with videos). J Dig Dis 16:642–648CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Li L et al (2013) Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric fundus subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria. Exp Ther Med 6:391–395CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li L et al (2013) Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric fundus subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria. Exp Ther Med 6:391–395CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Li QL et al (2012) Submucosal tumors of the esophagogastric junction originating from the muscularis propria layer: a large study of endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 75:1153–1158CrossRefPubMed Li QL et al (2012) Submucosal tumors of the esophagogastric junction originating from the muscularis propria layer: a large study of endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 75:1153–1158CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Joo MK et al (2016) Endoscopic versus surgical resection of GI stromal tumors in the upper GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc 83:318–326CrossRefPubMed Joo MK et al (2016) Endoscopic versus surgical resection of GI stromal tumors in the upper GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc 83:318–326CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Chun SY et al (2013) Endoscopic submucosal dissection as a treatment for gastric subepithelial tumors that originate from the muscularis propria layer: a preliminary analysis of appropriate indications. Surg Endosc 27:3271–3279CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chun SY et al (2013) Endoscopic submucosal dissection as a treatment for gastric subepithelial tumors that originate from the muscularis propria layer: a preliminary analysis of appropriate indications. Surg Endosc 27:3271–3279CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference An W et al (2017) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 31:4522–4531CrossRefPubMed An W et al (2017) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 31:4522–4531CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Lee H et al (2012) Clinical features and predictive factors of coagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasm. Gastric Cancer 15:83–90CrossRefPubMed Lee H et al (2012) Clinical features and predictive factors of coagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasm. Gastric Cancer 15:83–90CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Karaca C et al (2017) Endoscopic submucosal resection of gastric subepithelial lesions smaller than 20 mm: a comparison of saline solution-assisted snare and cap band mucosectomy techniques. Gastrointest Endosc 85:956–962CrossRefPubMed Karaca C et al (2017) Endoscopic submucosal resection of gastric subepithelial lesions smaller than 20 mm: a comparison of saline solution-assisted snare and cap band mucosectomy techniques. Gastrointest Endosc 85:956–962CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Godat S et al (2016) Efficiency and safety of endoscopic resection in the management of subepithelial lesions of the stomach. United Eur Gastroenterol J 4:250–256CrossRef Godat S et al (2016) Efficiency and safety of endoscopic resection in the management of subepithelial lesions of the stomach. United Eur Gastroenterol J 4:250–256CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Meng Y et al (2017) Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus laparoscopic resection for gastric stromal tumors less than 2 cm. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 32:1693–1697CrossRefPubMed Meng Y et al (2017) Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus laparoscopic resection for gastric stromal tumors less than 2 cm. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 32:1693–1697CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Meng FS et al (2016) Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for the treatment of gastric submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer: a single-center study (with video). Surg Endosc 30:5099–5107CrossRefPubMed Meng FS et al (2016) Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for the treatment of gastric submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer: a single-center study (with video). Surg Endosc 30:5099–5107CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection for small submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer in the gastric fundus
Authors
Bing Li
Tao Chen
Zhi-Peng Qi
Li-Qing Yao
Mei-Dong Xu
Qiang Shi
Shi-Lun Cai
Di Sun
Ping-Hong Zhou
Yun-Shi Zhong
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6549-6

Other articles of this Issue 8/2019

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2019 Go to the issue